Last close As at 06/08/2026
—
— 0.00 (0.00%)
Market capitalisation
—
Research: Financials
Tungsten Corporation’s FY17 results confirm it is making good progress in implementing its more focused strategy and reengineering its internal processes to create greater operational leverage as demand for its e-invoicing and related services grows. The sale of Tungsten Bank last year and the start made on internal repair measures were key steps in improving the business and management can now focus on delivering profit and exploiting the attractive growth opportunities it is addressing.
Written by
Tungsten Corporation |
Focus on delivery and growth |
FY17 results |
Financial services |
24 July 2017 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analysts
Tungsten Corporation is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tungsten Corporation’s FY17 results confirm it is making good progress in implementing its more focused strategy and reengineering its internal processes to create greater operational leverage as demand for its e-invoicing and related services grows. The sale of Tungsten Bank last year and the start made on internal repair measures were key steps in improving the business and management can now focus on delivering profit and exploiting the attractive growth opportunities it is addressing.
Year end |
Revenue |
EBITDA |
EPS |
Net cash |
Buyer |
Supplier |
04/15 |
22.5 |
(25.2) |
(26.9) |
32.6 |
173 |
181 |
04/16 |
25.9 |
(16.2) |
(22.0) |
27.0 |
175 |
203 |
04/17 |
31.3 |
(11.8) |
(9.9) |
17.5 |
183 |
251 |
04/18e |
36.7 |
(6.0) |
(9.3) |
10.3 |
196 |
277 |
Note: FY15 includes Tungsten Bank. Tungsten does not currently pay a dividend.
Full year 2017 results demonstrate progress
The group’s FY17 results showed revenue growth of 21% or 12% on a constant currency basis. Buyer revenue growth was particularly strong at 35%, partly reflecting successful contract renewal negotiations. The EBITDA loss reduced from £16.2m (restated to exclude Tungsten Bank) to £11.8m (-27%) or by 31% on a constant currency basis. Net cash at the year end stood at £17.5m or £21.7m including invoice financing carried out on balance sheet on a transitional basis. The cash position reflects the benefit of the December sale of Tungsten Bank effectively refinancing the group as it makes progress towards profitability and operating cash generation.
Outlook
The substantial potential savings available to companies adopting e-invoicing in place of paper- or email-based processes remains a key underlying driver of growth for Tungsten. The large price increases achieved in contract renewals in FY17 (49% on a weighted basis) are a tangible measure of the value the Tungsten Network delivers and an important contributor to its path to profitability and cash generation. Tungsten has reiterated that it targets run-rate EBITDA profit in calendar 2017. The invoice financing offering has only recently been relaunched, but this and other adjacent service offerings to network customers may also make contributions to profitable growth.
Valuation
Tungsten is moving towards profitability, which makes valuation particularly sensitive to assumptions on the timing and pace of an expected move into profit and cash generation. Nevertheless, currently trading at an enterprise value of below 2x FY17 revenues, Tungsten appears modestly valued compared with two quoted peers and is in a sector that has already seen consolidation as larger players look to add scale or expertise.
Key points from FY17 results
In its May trading update Tungsten signalled that FY17 revenues and cash would be higher than previously guided with a lower EBITDA loss. The full year result confirmed this outcome and set out guidance for FY18 for the first time including an indication that the group remains on track to reach monthly EBITDA breakeven by the end of the calendar year. Key financial points from the statement were as follows with Exhibit 2 below providing a summary comparison of the income statement.
■
Revenue for the year was £31.3m which represented growth of 21% from FY16 or 12% on a constant currency basis. Within revenues buyer revenue increased by 35% reflecting a combination of successful negotiation of price increases on buyer contract renewals together with a modest increase in buyer numbers.
■
The group now splits out the cost of sales figure (all relates to Tungsten Network) of £2.3m allowing us to monitor changes in gross margin. The level of gross margin for FY17 was little changed at 92.6%.
■
The EBITDA loss (excludes the discontinued Tungsten Bank) was £11.8m. Reflecting the mix of revenue and costs, exchange rate moves only had a modest beneficial impact on this number and, on a constant currency basis, EBITDA would have been £11.2m (a reduction in loss of 31%).
■
The discontinued line, with a loss of £0.2m, reflects a net loss of £2.1m at Tungsten Bank prior to disposal partly offset by a gain on disposal of £1.9m.
■
Cash at the year end stood at £17.5m or £21.7m including self-funded invoice financing of £4.2m held on a transitional basis prior to financing by Tungsten’s financing partners (see next section).
Exhibit 2: FY17 income statement summary comparison
£m |
2016 |
2017 |
% change |
Supplier revenue |
15.8 |
17.4 |
10.6 |
Buyer revenue |
10.1 |
13.7 |
35.2 |
Tungsten Network |
25.9 |
31.1 |
20.7 |
Tungsten Network Finance |
0.0 |
0.2 |
N/A |
Revenue |
25.9 |
31.3 |
20.7 |
Cost of sales |
-1.9 |
-2.3 |
16.1 |
Gross profit |
24.0 |
29.0 |
21.2 |
Operating expenses |
-40.1 |
-40.8 |
1.7 |
EBITDA |
-16.2 |
-11.8 |
-27.1 |
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment |
-2.5 |
-2.8 |
11.2 |
Share-based payment |
-0.5 |
-0.4 |
-15.3 |
Net finance income |
0.4 |
2.3 |
525.6 |
Other income |
0.3 |
0.0 |
-100.0 |
Loss before tax |
-18.5 |
-12.7 |
-31.4 |
Taxation |
0.7 |
0.4 |
-38.6 |
Loss from continuing operations |
-17.8 |
-12.3 |
-31.1 |
Discontinued operations |
-9.4 |
-0.2 |
-97.6 |
Loss for year |
-27.2 |
-12.5 |
-54.1 |
Gross margin % |
92.7 |
92.6 |
-0.1pp |
Source: Tungsten Corporation, Edison Investment Research.
Our next exhibit shows a selection of performance indicators starting with the number of buyers and suppliers (up 5% and 24% respectively). During the year 10 new buyers were added for a net addition of 8 to 183 while 48,000 new suppliers were also connected to the system taking the total to 251,000. Although there is some erosion of buyers and suppliers it should be noted that those that drop out tend not to be large users of the network and therefore have a limited impact on revenues.
The company reported that 17.1m invoices were processed in FY17, an increase of 6% on the prior year. Tungsten notes that while this growth rate is somewhat below the level they would have hoped for it tends to be a lagging indicator reflecting the time it takes to sign up suppliers and generate flows through the network as they add new buyers. Prospectively, the launch of IDC may help to accelerate uptake and invoice processing levels.
Revenue per invoice increased 12% to 182p in part reflecting the price increases negotiated with buyers as noted above. The weighted average price increase on the 41 contracts renegotiated during the year was 49% and this contributed £0.6m to FY17 revenue with a further £0.4m to come in the current year, plus the benefit of any further increases on contract renewals. We see this as an encouraging indication of the value customers place on the service and the favourable balance of cost and benefit.
Exhibit 3: Selected key performance indicators
Year to April |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
% change |
Total buyers |
173 |
175 |
183 |
4.6 |
Suppliers |
181,000 |
203,000 |
251,000 |
23.6 |
Total invoice volume (m) |
14.8 |
16.1 |
17.1 |
6.2 |
Revenue per invoice (p) |
146 |
162 |
182 |
12.3 |
Adjusted operating expenses (£m)* |
45.3 |
40.1 |
40.8 |
1.5 |
Tungsten Network Finance average invoice outstandings (£m) |
2.9 |
11.1 |
13.7 |
23.4 |
Source: Tungsten Corporation, Edison Investment Research. * Adjusted operating expense for FY15 includes Tungsten Bank which is excluded from FY16 and FY17 figures.
A reduction of £2.5m in operating expenses was secured through the disposal of Tungsten Bank while, excluding the bank, adjusted operating expense was broadly stable at just over £40m (Exhibit 3). The underlying cost containment reflects the benefits of investment in processes and systems to ensure the operating base is lower, more stable and controllable, providing the opportunity to realise operational gearing as revenues grow.
Finally, the level of average invoice outstandings has continued to increase substantially but is still at an early stage and, as we show in the next section, we expect further strong expansion here supported by Tungsten’s funding partners.
Outlook: Looking to move into profit in calendar 2017
In its results statement Tungsten set out guidance for FY18 as follows:
■
Constant currency revenue growth of more than 15% (we estimate 17%)
■
Gross margin of at least 90% (compares with last year’s 92.6%)
■
Adjusted operating expenses of less than £40m (excluding one-off costs of c £2m and compared with £40.8m for FY17)
■
The group remains on track to achieve monthly EBITDA breakeven before the end of the calendar year
The group comments that a key focus during the year will be the move to new IT infrastructure providers allowing greater flexibility, improving customer experience and containing costs for the future. This will involve costs of £1.5m while further measures to ensure effective deployment of resources will mean redundancy costs of £0.5m resulting in total one-off costs of c £2m that will be excluded from reported EBITDA. The payback period for this investment is expected to be less than 18 months and the costs are expected to be incurred in the first half of FY18, so will not impact the achievement of monthly profitability by the end of calendar 2017.
Examples of measures already undertaken that are having a beneficial effect on the cost base are cost reductions within the finance and human resources teams that are saving £1m per annum and work undertaken by the procurement team that resulted in a saving of £1m during FY17. With costs now under better control the group is in a stronger position to allocate costs to achieve the best return and as noted above is expecting to maintain operating costs at around £40m with savings enabling increased marketing spend, for example.
The current year has started well in terms of customer acquisition with four new buyers added since the end of April (above the level at the same point last year) and the pipeline of potential customers is reported to be strong. Tungsten expects that more new buyers will be added than in FY17.
Our current year estimates are set in line with group guidance and an overview of our forecasts is shown in Exhibit 9.
On a longer view the potential for strong growth in e-invoicing remains in place, with rising market penetration reflecting the substantial cost/efficiency savings available compared with paper- or email-based invoice handling processes. For Tungsten growth should generate significant operational leverage, although in the nearer term this will be tempered by investment in upgrading its own internal IT and processes. In addition to operational leverage in the network business, there will be contributions from adjacent product offerings including invoice financing and other services.
Exhibit 4 sets out our key expectations for Tungsten Network. We assume overall growth in revenue of 15% for FY18. Contributors to this are growth in the number of suppliers and buyers, the benefit of buyer price increases (including the significant increases agreed in FY17 and those in prospect as further renewals are negotiated). Moves in foreign exchange rates could influence the revenue outcome but any changes are likely to be more limited at the EBITDA level reflecting balancing cost exposures.
One-off costs aside, underlying cost reduction should contribute to a swing into profitability in FY18e. While there are downside risks to our assumptions, Tungsten notes that it will be better placed to pursue new business opportunities as it completes the main parts of its internal changes, so there could be positive surprises in buyer recruitment and in upgrading Workflow customers (which are software users rather than full network subscribers), for example.
Exhibit 4: Tungsten Network – key points from estimates
Year to end April (£m except where stated) |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018e |
Supplier revenue |
13.8 |
15.8 |
17.4 |
19.0 |
Buyer revenue |
8.6 |
10.1 |
13.7 |
17.0 |
Total revenue |
22.4 |
25.9 |
31.1 |
35.9 |
Administrative expenses |
(28.2) |
(31.7) |
(35.4) |
(34.3) |
EBITDA |
(5.7) |
(5.8) |
(4.3) |
1.6 |
Operating metrics |
||||
Suppliers -end period |
181,000 |
203,000 |
251,000 |
277,000 |
% change in average suppliers |
13% |
10% |
15% |
20% |
Revenue per supplier (£) |
79 |
82 |
79 |
72 |
Buyers - end period |
173 |
175 |
183 |
196 |
% change in average buyers |
27% |
13% |
1% |
6% |
Revenue per buyer (£) |
55,246 |
57,224 |
76,751 |
89,410 |
Total number of invoices (m) |
15.4 |
16.1 |
17.1 |
18.6 |
% change in no. Invoices |
18% |
5% |
6% |
9% |
Revenue per average invoice (p) |
146 |
161 |
182 |
193 |
Source: Tungsten Corporation, Edison Investment Research
Following the sale of Tungsten Bank, our revenue assumptions for Tungsten Network Finance (shown in Exhibit 3) primarily represent Tungsten’s share of interest income on invoice financing funded by Insight Investment and other financing partners. The terms of the arrangement with Insight were revised, increasing the expected share of gross yield (9.5% gross yield and net yield to Tungsten 1.8% FY17) from invoice financing. Starting from a very low base, we assume a rapid build-up in the flow of invoice financing helped in part by the broadening of the offering through the additional partnerships with BlueVine and Orbian. Tungsten will generate additional revenues to the extent that it continues to provide temporary financing of invoices pending partner finance, but for the moment we have assumed that this will not be a significant feature following repayment of existing loans by the end of July. We would provisionally expect a continuation of the trends shown to allow the business to move to profitability in FY20e.
Exhibit 5: Tungsten Network Finance
Year to end April (£m except where stated) |
2016 |
2017 |
2018e |
|
Total revenue |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
|
Administrative expenses |
(3.8) |
(1.8) |
(2.2) |
|
EBITDA |
(3.8) |
(1.7) |
(1.4) |
|
Average lending balance |
11.1 |
13.7 |
32.4 |
|
Average gross yield reported/estimate (%) |
6.3 |
6.7 |
6.3 |
|
Source: Tungsten Corporation, Edison Investment Research. Note rounding means totals may not sum.
At the group level Tungsten has indicated that it is on track to reach EBITDA run-rate profitability in calendar 2017 and we believe this is a challenging target likely to be met at the end of the year. We estimate an EBITDA loss of £6m for the full year, close to half the level reported for FY17. While we do not publish a forecast for FY19 at this point we would look for a clear swing into EBITDA profitability followed by pre-tax profitability. In the next section we set out changes in our estimate for FY18, providing further detail on cash flow assumptions.
Financials: Bank sale releases cash
Changes in our estimates since our last note (October 2016) are shown in Exhibit 4, reflecting the treatment of Tungsten Bank as a discontinued activity and changes in assumptions following the intervening interim and final results. For FY18 our new assumptions mean little change in the revenue estimate but more realistic cost base estimates.
Exhibit 6: Estimate revisions
Revenue (£m) |
EBITDA (£m) |
EPS (p) |
Net cash (£m) |
|||||||||
New |
Old |
% chg. |
New |
Old |
% chg. |
New |
Old |
% chg. |
New |
Old |
% chg. |
|
04/17 |
31.3 |
30.1 |
3.7 |
(11.8) |
(13.9) |
-14.8 |
(9.9) |
(14.0) |
-29.3 |
17.5 |
20.2 |
-13.3 |
04/18e |
36.7 |
37.1 |
-1.2 |
(6.0) |
2.4 |
-350.0 |
(9.3) |
(1.2) |
677.5 |
10.3 |
20.9 |
-50.4 |
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: for FY17 old = estimate, new = actual reported.
At the end of FY17 Tungsten had net cash of £17.5m or £21.7m including £4.2m of self-funded invoice funding held on a transitional basis. The comparative cash figure for the end of FY16, excluding Tungsten bank was £9.3m. Exhibit 5 sets out a simplified cash flow analysis including our estimate for FY18. For FY17 the effect of the bank sale is a prominent feature, with an additional positive item of approaching £8m on top of the release of cash held within the bank (which is already included in the opening cash shown). On our estimates, Tungsten would see a substantial reduction in operating cash outflow in FY18, potentially moving close to neutral cash flow in FY19 and an inflow in FY20 on our provisional forecasts for those years (not shown).
Exhibit 7: Simplified cash flow analysis
Year end April (£m) |
2016 |
2017 |
2018e |
|
Net operating cash flow |
(21.7) |
(18.5) |
(4.2) |
|
Tungsten Bank disposal (£29.7m less the bank’s cash and other items) |
0.0 |
7.8 |
0.0 |
|
Equity issue |
16.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Other cash flows/fx movement |
(0.7) |
1.2 |
(3.0) |
|
Change in net cash |
(5.6) |
(9.5) |
(7.2) |
|
Opening net cash |
32.6 |
27.0 |
17.5 |
|
Closing net cash |
27.0 |
17.5 |
10.3 |
|
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: FY16 cash figure includes Tungsten Bank cash.
Valuation
As in previous notes, we use a DCF valuation model to give an indication of the discount rate implied by the current market price, given our cash flow assumptions. The next table shows the output from our DCF model, based on a range of long-term growth rate assumptions and discount rates. The central value, which is in line with a share price of 65p, implies a discount rate of 14.3%, assuming a long-term growth rate of 4%. This appears cautious, although the wide range of possible outcomes as Tungsten makes its expected move from cash consumption to cash generation must be remembered. Positively, factoring in faster growth (to allow for a more rapid medium-term acceleration in revenue) at 6% and a 10% discount rate would give a value of over 160p per share or £200m.
Exhibit 8: DCF output variations (value per share, p)
Long-term growth rate |
||||||
2.0% |
3.0% |
4.0% |
5.0% |
6.5% |
||
Discount rate |
10.5% |
80 |
88 |
98 |
111 |
142 |
13.0% |
65 |
69 |
75 |
82 |
97 |
|
14.3% |
58 |
61 |
65 |
71 |
81 |
|
15.0% |
54 |
57 |
61 |
66 |
74 |
|
16.0% |
50 |
53 |
56 |
59 |
66 |
|
Source: Edison Investment Research
At £200m Tungsten would be valued at an EV/revenue multiple of 5.0x compared with peers Coupa (COUP) and Basware (BAS1V), which currently trade on 10.7x and 4.0x respectively. At the current share price Tungsten trades on an EV of 1.8x revenue using FY17 year-end cash and FY18e revenues.
Exhibit 9: Financial summary
30 April (IFRS) £m |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018e |
|
PROFIT & LOSS |
||||||
Supplier revenue |
13.8 |
15.8 |
17.4 |
19.0 |
||
Buyer revenue |
8.6 |
10.1 |
13.7 |
17.0 |
||
Tungsten Network |
22.4 |
25.9 |
31.1 |
35.9 |
||
Tungsten Network Finance |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.8 |
||
Tungsten Bank |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Revenue |
|
10.8 |
22.5 |
25.9 |
31.3 |
36.7 |
Tungsten Network (e invoicing) |
(28.2) |
(31.7) |
(35.4) |
(34.3) |
||
Tungsten Network Finance |
(10.6) |
(3.8) |
(1.8) |
(2.2) |
||
Tungsten Bank |
(2.2) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Corporate centre |
(6.8) |
(6.6) |
(5.9) |
(6.2) |
||
Group expenses |
|
(20.9) |
(47.8) |
(42.1) |
(43.1) |
(42.7) |
Tungsten Network |
(5.7) |
(5.8) |
(4.3) |
1.6 |
||
Tungsten Network Finance |
(10.6) |
(3.8) |
(1.7) |
(1.4) |
||
Tungsten Bank |
(2.1) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Corporate centre |
(6.8) |
(6.6) |
(5.9) |
(6.2) |
||
EBITDA |
|
(10.2) |
(25.2) |
(16.2) |
(11.8) |
(6.0) |
Depreciation & amortisation |
(0.8) |
(2.3) |
(2.5) |
(2.8) |
(3.0) |
|
Share based payment |
0.0 |
(0.2) |
(0.5) |
(0.4) |
(0.5) |
|
Other income |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
One-off costs (FY18e) |
(2.0) |
|||||
Intangible impairment |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Operating Profit (before amort. and except.) |
(10.9) |
(27.7) |
(28.3) |
(15.0) |
(11.5) |
|
Net finance cost |
(0.2) |
(0.2) |
0.4 |
2.3 |
(0.2) |
|
Profit Before Tax (IFRS 3) |
|
(11.1) |
(27.9) |
(18.5) |
(12.7) |
(11.7) |
Tax |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
Profit from continuing operations |
(11.0) |
(27.6) |
(17.8) |
(12.3) |
(11.7) |
|
Discontinued operations |
(9.4) |
(0.2) |
0.0 |
|||
Profit After Tax (IFRS 3) |
(11.0) |
(27.6) |
(27.2) |
(12.5) |
(11.7) |
|
Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m) |
59.2 |
102.6 |
123.7 |
126.1 |
126.1 |
|
EPS - continuing operations(p) |
|
|
|
(14.4) |
(9.7) |
|
EPS - reported (p) |
|
(18.6) |
(26.9) |
(22.0) |
(9.9) |
(9.3) |
Dividend per share (p) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
EBITDA Margin (%) |
-94.5 |
-111.9 |
-62.4 |
-37.8 |
-16.3 |
|
BALANCE SHEET |
||||||
Fixed Assets |
|
115.9 |
131.0 |
119.2 |
120.8 |
120.8 |
Intangible Assets |
114.2 |
128.1 |
116.8 |
118.5 |
118.5 |
|
Other |
1.7 |
2.8 |
2.5 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
|
Current Assets |
|
72.7 |
46.8 |
46.7 |
30.6 |
21.3 |
Trade and other receivables |
6.0 |
14.2 |
8.7 |
13.1 |
11.0 |
|
Cash |
62.6 |
32.6 |
9.3 |
17.5 |
10.3 |
|
Other |
4.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Assets held for sale |
0.0 |
0.0 |
28.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Current Liabilities |
|
14.6 |
17.3 |
16.8 |
17.4 |
17.4 |
Trade and other payables |
6.8 |
8.6 |
7.5 |
9.5 |
9.5 |
|
Borrowing |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Deferred income |
7.8 |
8.6 |
8.3 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
|
Liabilities held for sale |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Long Term Liabilities |
|
2.9 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
Long term borrowings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Other long term liabilities |
2.9 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
|
Net Assets |
|
171.1 |
156.5 |
146.1 |
131.3 |
122.1 |
CASH FLOW |
||||||
Operating Cash Flow |
|
(8.1) |
(31.6) |
(21.7) |
(15.2) |
(4.2) |
Capex |
(2.3) |
(1.1) |
(1.2) |
(4.3) |
(3.0) |
|
Acquisitions/disposals |
(74.7) |
(9.6) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Financing |
149.2 |
11.8 |
16.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Other |
(4.8) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Exchange adjustment |
0.0 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
(0.5) |
0.0 |
|
Discontinued operations |
9.1 |
|||||
Change in net cash |
59.2 |
(30.0) |
(5.6) |
(9.5) |
(7.2) |
|
Opening net (debt)/cash |
|
3.4 |
62.6 |
32.6 |
27.0 |
17.5 |
Closing net (debt)/cash |
|
62.6 |
32.6 |
27.0 |
17.5 |
10.3 |
Source: Tungsten Corporation, Edison Investment Research. Note: FY16 net cash in the cash flow table includes cash at Tungsten Bank that was classified as an asset held for sale in the balance sheet. FY17 cash flow includes a net positive item of £11.2m relating to cash released from the sale of Tungsten Bank after deducting £20.6m cash held in the disposal group. Total cash released was nearly £30m. FY16 figures restated to treat Tungsten Bank as a discontinued operation.
|
|
We refresh our view on Cairn Energy, focusing on key areas of interest for investors already familiar with the company. We examine a number of valuation approaches for SNE in Senegal, the potential for reserve upgrades and exploration value. We believe SNE is an outsized asset and assume Cairn seeks to farm-down. This will naturally affect long-term value upside, but would in our view drive a better balance of asset and financial risk. We also examine features of Catcher, Cairn’s cost of capital and look at the Indian tax dispute. After a long period of value stagnation (as cash was invested to develop Catcher/Kraken), coming years could be a time when investors see a path to this investment steadily bearing fruit. Our core contingent NAV is 225p/share and our RENAV is 255p/share.