Last close As at 05/08/2026
EUR13.04
▲ −0.07 (−0.53%)
Market capitalisation
EUR3,986m
Research: Energy & Resources
A recovery in benchmark margins in February and March 2018 will offer relief to investors after a crude oil rally compressed margins in Q417. In this note, we adjust our forecasts to mark to market for Q118, while reflecting the anticipated positive margin impact of shipping regulatory changes in late 2019 and 2020. Longer term, European refining overcapacity remains a concern with capacity growth exceeding product demand growth – OPEC expects Europe to account for c 51% of projected global refinery closures in the period 2018–2020. ELPE remains well placed to weather the storm, given recent investments enhancing complexity and middle-distillate yield; however, competition from marginal refineries is likely to remain a drag on benchmarks. Our updated blended P/E, EV/EBITDA and DCF valuation stands at €9.0/share, down from €9.3/share. We expect a projected 4.3% dividend yield to provide share price support, with the potential for an increased one-off shareholder return in the event of receipt of DESFA sale proceeds in 2018.
Written by
Hellenic Petroleum |
Refining estimates and valuation |
Post-results update |
Oil & gas |
17 April 2018 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analyst
Hellenic Petroleum is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A recovery in benchmark margins in February and March 2018 will offer relief to investors after a crude oil rally compressed margins in Q417. In this note, we adjust our forecasts to mark to market for Q118, while reflecting the anticipated positive margin impact of shipping regulatory changes in late 2019 and 2020. Longer term, European refining overcapacity remains a concern with capacity growth exceeding product demand growth – OPEC expects Europe to account for c 51% of projected global refinery closures in the period 2018–2020. ELPE remains well placed to weather the storm, given recent investments enhancing complexity and middle-distillate yield; however, competition from marginal refineries is likely to remain a drag on benchmarks. Our updated blended P/E, EV/EBITDA and DCF valuation stands at €9.0/share, down from €9.3/share. We expect a projected 4.3% dividend yield to provide share price support, with the potential for an increased one-off shareholder return in the event of receipt of DESFA sale proceeds in 2018.
Year end |
Revenues |
Adjusted EBITDA |
Adjusted EBIT |
Net debt |
Dividend yield (%) |
12/16 |
6,680 |
731 |
522 |
1,761 |
N/A |
12/17 |
7,995 |
833 |
644 |
1,802 |
4.2 |
12/18e |
7,947 |
789 |
607 |
1,301 |
4.3** |
12/19e |
7,944 |
748 |
566 |
1,043 |
4.9 |
Note: *Adjusted numbers account for inventory movements and other specials. **Dividend forecasts exclude potential shareholder returns from DESFA sale.
2020 shipping sulphur controls likely to boost margins
Tighter emission controls in the shipping sector effective from January 2020 are likely to provide a boost to complex, distillate-weighted refineries such as ELPE’s Aspropyrgos and Elefsina. Quantifying the margin impact of increased global distillate demand on European benchmarks remains challenging, with analysts forecasting a c $0.5–1.5/bbl improvement. We assume a $0.75/bbl increase in 2020 versus 2018 FCC/hydrocracking benchmarks.
European refining overcapacity a headwind
Longer-term headwinds remain, given projected refining overcapacity within Europe. Our DCF-based valuation incorporates a longer-term structural decline in ELPE-realised refining margins as a result.
Valuation and forecast updates
Our valuation methodology is discussed in our recent initiation note and uses a blended approach using P/E, EV/EBITDA and DCF metrics. Changes to our 2018 and 2019 forecasts, and adjusting for lower peer-group multiples, reduce our valuation from €9.3/share to €9.0/share (-3.2%). Forecast adjustments leave our 2018 adjusted EBITDA increased by 4% to €789m and 2019 falling 1% to €748m on lower margins. Our adjusted EBITDA forecast for FY18 is 13% above Bloomberg consensus and 10% above for FY19.
Refining market outlook
Monthly movements in underlying benchmark refining margins are complex to forecast; however, it is apparent that the $10/bbl increase in Brent crude over the course of Q417 had a material negative impact on benchmark margins. Hydroskimming margins moved into negative territory in December 2017 through to January 2018 as a result. Stabilisation in crude prices drove a margin recovery in February 2018 and March 2018, and, in line with our underlying Brent crude price assumption for FY18 of $62.1/bbl, we expect margins to improve from March 2018 levels, driven by a fall in oil price from Q118 levels and annual seasonality. Our FY18 volume weighted average benchmark margin of $4.38/bbl is lower than c $5/bbl in FY17, but this is partly offset by higher utilisation in the absence of a major planned turnaround. We forecast refining adjusted EBITDA of €574m in FY18 versus €631m in FY17 for Hellenic.
|
Exhibit 1: Hellenic benchmark Med refining margins |
|
|
Source: ELPE |
Short- to mid-term focus on shipping regulation changes
Stronger controls on the sulphur levels in vessel exhaust gases come into effect from January 2020 as environmental legislation for shipping catches up with existing policy in other heavy industry. On 1 January 2020, a reduction in sulphur emissions from the current level of 3.5% to 0.5% will come into effect for all international shipping outside certain emission control areas – coastal areas where stricter limits are already applicable. As of today, c 80% of fuel within the global shipping fleet is heavy, high sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) rather than low sulphur marine fuels, or distillate-based light fuel oils. Other fuel options available to shippers include LNG – but this currently remains restrictive as a retrofit option, given the upfront capital cost of and limited refuelling infrastructure.
It is widely expected that the shipping industry will shift from HSFO to marine gas oil, a distillate-based blend, and marine heavy fuel oils with less than 0.5% sulphur. Ultimately, major refineries that have invested in upgrading equipment, including desulphurisation plants, are well placed to meet increased demand for distillate-based fuels and to manage the anticipated reduction in demand for HSFO.
ELPE’s Q417 refinery yield at 50% middle distillates, 20% MoGas, 16% fuel oil, 9% naphtha and 4% LPG demonstrates its bias towards the production of light low sulphur products. Significant investment in Aspropyrgos and Elefsina (Nelson complexity of 9.7 and 11.3, respectively) provides for the capability to convert heavy, high sulphur crudes into middle-distillate product.
ELPE appears to be well placed relatively to older, less complex refineries to take advantage of the 2020 shipping regulation change; however, quantifying the precise impact that marine sulphur controls are likely to have on individual refinery margins is complex. We assume that ELPE benefits from an increase in realised margin in the period beyond Q419 as a result of increased middle-distillate demand, with margins on average $0.75/bbl higher in 2020 than in 2018. This positive impact is likely to be partly offset by overcapacity within European refining during the period 2018–2022, as discussed below.
Long-term focus on European demand and Asian competition
Longer term, the outlook for European refining remains challenging. Overcapacity, a structural decline in European product demand and relatively high operational costs leave low-complexity refineries facing competitive pressures and lower margins.
OPEC forecasts 7.6mmbd of new refining capacity to come on stream between 2017 and 2022, with the majority of this new capacity located in developing economies, predominantly Asia and the Middle East. Underlying product demand growth is the key driver of this relocation of refining capacity away from industrialised regions towards emerging economies. Global refining additions are forecast to match incremental product demand growth in 2018 based on OPEC projections; beyond this, planned capacity additions exceed demand through to 2022, with a capacity surplus in developed regions including Europe.
|
Exhibit 2: Crude distillation capacity additions 2017–40 |
|
|
Source: OPEC, Edison Investment Research |
Complex, low-cost, middle-distillate-orientated refineries are likely to survive, but increasing competition is likely to have a negative effect on refinery utilisation and margins in the long term – a risk for Hellenic margins unless competitors scale down. OPEC projects that the majority of global refinery closures are likely to occur in Europe, which accounts for c 51% of projected global refinery closures in the period 2018–20.
|
Exhibit 3: European refinery closures (historical and projected) |
|
|
Source: OPEC, Edison Investment Research |
Our refining margin and utilisation assumptions attempt to project the impact of shipping regulations and structural oversupply in Europe on Hellenic’s refining margins and utilisation. We forecast margins to remain slightly lower in 2018 vs 2017, but with profitability partially protected by higher utilisation in the absence of major plant turnarounds. Beyond 2018, we forecast a margin recovery in late 2019 through to 2021, reflecting shipping regulation changes followed by a structural decline as overcapacity heightens competitive pressures.
Our benchmark margin forecasts
|
Exhibit 4: Our benchmark margin forecast (volume-weighted) |
|
|
Source: ELPE, Edison Investment Research |
Old vs new forecasts
Key changes to our forecasts include marking to market for FY17 financial actuals and H118 benchmark margins, revising our forecast margin assumptions as described in the previous section of this note, updating current peer-group comparable multiples and rolling forward our DCF-based valuation. We also include a lower interest charge for short-term debt liabilities.
An overview of key changes to our forecasts is provided below:
Exhibit 5: Changes to our forecasts
€m |
Actual |
Edison new |
Edison old |
Difference |
|||
|
FY17 |
FY18 |
FY19 |
FY18 |
FY19 |
FY18 |
FY19 |
Adjusted EBITDA, refining |
631 |
574 |
548 |
563 |
565 |
2% |
(3%) |
Adjusted EBITDA, petrochemicals |
96 |
121 |
108 |
100 |
97 |
21% |
11% |
Adjusted EBITDA, marketing |
107 |
102 |
100 |
101 |
99 |
1% |
1% |
Other |
(2) |
(2) |
(8) |
||||
Total adjusted EBITDA |
833 |
789 |
748 |
756 |
753 |
4% |
(1%) |
Associates |
31 |
34 |
16 |
||||
Adjusted EBIT |
644 |
607 |
566 |
574 |
571 |
6% |
(1%) |
Finance costs |
(165) |
(145) |
(122) |
||||
Adjusted net income |
368 |
372 |
345 |
344 |
338 |
8% |
2% |
Source: Edison Investment Research
Edison remains ahead of consensus for FY18 and FY19 adjusted EBITDA at 13% and 10%, respectively. While Bloomberg does not provide divisional EBITDA splits, we believe that this is predominantly due to a higher estimated refining and petrochemical margin for the forecast period. Material differences in analyst estimates can be expected in light of recent margin volatility.
Exhibit 6: Our forecasts versus Bloomberg consensus
€m |
Actual |
Edison |
Consensus |
Difference |
|||
|
FY17 |
FY18 |
FY19 |
FY18 |
FY19 |
FY18 |
FY19 |
Adjusted EBITDA, refining |
631 |
574 |
548 |
||||
Adjusted EBITDA, petrochemicals |
96 |
121 |
108 |
||||
Adjusted EBITDA, marketing |
107 |
102 |
100 |
||||
Other |
(2) |
(2) |
(8) |
||||
Total adjusted EBITDA |
833 |
789 |
748 |
701 |
682 |
8% |
10% |
Associates |
31 |
36 |
16 |
||||
Adjusted EBIT |
644 |
607 |
566 |
522 |
498 |
9% |
14% |
Finance costs |
(165) |
(145) |
(122) |
||||
Adjusted net income |
368 |
372 |
345 |
292 |
273 |
15% |
26% |
Source: Edison Investment Research, Bloomberg
Valuation
We adjust our valuation to reflect our updated forecasts, roll-forward of DCF and current peer-group multiples. Retaining our approach of using a blended valuation using peer-group PE/ EV/EBITDA and DCF valuations, our valuation moves from €9.3/share to €9.0/share (-3.2%).
|
Exhibit 7: Hellenic Petroleum valuation |
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research. Bars represent valuation range and dots represent average valuation. |
Risks
Refining margins – along with all refineries, the major risk to earnings is volatility of refining margins. As a price taker, it can do little to mitigate in the short term. Longer-term improvements of the refineries are capital-intensive and take many years. However, it will also benefit from increases in refinery margins. As discussed in this report, we think margins in Europe will compress in the long term.
Concentration risk – the bulk of Hellenic’s earnings are generated at the three refineries. Any incident that stops the refineries from operating (such as an unplanned outage) could have a material effect on cash flows. This is mitigated to some extent by the three separate sites and the other material businesses (not least marketing) and is particularly advantaged vs single refineries (such as Saras and Motor Oil).
Oil price – an increase in the oil price could have a material effect on refinery earnings and the balance sheet. Increasing oil prices would produce positive inventory effect earnings for the refineries and marketing businesses, while requiring more cash to be locked up in working capital.
Greek risk – Hellenic has significant export businesses and its production is entirely fungible for international markets. However, a fall in Greek demand or market sentiment towards the country may mean reduced sales and a greater risk premium applied to companies in Greece. These could have a detrimental effect on earnings and rating for Hellenic. The Greek economy is growing again but there is disagreement between the IMF and eurozone on what actions are required to continue on a path to greater stability. The incoming head of the eurozone (Mario Centeno) has stated that Greece needs to complete the current programme before any restructuring can occur, yet on 10 December 2017 Christine Lagarde said the debt needs to be restructured soon and hoped that it could be done early in 2018. This is clearly a fluid situation and Greece is not out of the danger zone yet. We also note the state ownership of 35% may be sold down over time as part of Greek economic restructuring.
Equally, we note that the Greek economy has a lot of potential to grow, and Hellenic Petroleum would be well placed to benefit from increased economic activity through the marketing, power and chemicals divisions. Increased tourism would help the refining and trading segment.
FX rates – as we mention in the financials section, a move in the euro versus the US dollar could have a material impact on earnings. Refining is a US dollar business (margins are quoted in US$) and so lower costs in US terms (as costs are in euros) have benefited earnings (and cushioned the poor refining environment in 2011–14). We calculate the average impact (2015–17) to have been around $85m on a pre-tax basis.
Exhibit 8: Financial summary
Accounts: IFRS, Year-end: December, €m |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018e |
2019e |
|
INCOME STATEMENT |
|
|||||||
Total revenues |
|
9,674 |
9,478 |
7,303 |
6,680 |
7,995 |
7,947 |
7,944 |
Cost of sales |
|
(9,369) |
(9,334) |
(6,608) |
(5,673) |
(6,907) |
(6,914) |
(6,952) |
Gross profit |
|
305 |
145 |
695 |
1,007 |
1,087 |
1,033 |
992 |
SG&A (expenses) |
|
(448) |
(440) |
(458) |
(409) |
(410) |
(412) |
(413) |
Other income/(expense) |
|
(53) |
7 |
9 |
28 |
(16) |
(14) |
(13) |
Exceptionals and adjustments |
|
(70) |
(484) |
(301) |
110 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
Reported EBIT |
|
(195) |
(289) |
245 |
626 |
662 |
607 |
566 |
Finance income/(expense) |
|
(209) |
(215) |
(201) |
(201) |
(165) |
(145) |
(122) |
Profit (loss) from JVs/associates (post tax) |
|
57 |
28 |
22 |
19 |
31 |
34 |
16 |
Other income (includes exceptionals) |
|
9 |
(9) |
(27) |
21 |
(8) |
0 |
0 |
Reported PBT |
|
(338) |
(485) |
39 |
466 |
520 |
496 |
459 |
Income tax expense (includes exceptionals) |
|
66 |
116 |
6 |
(137) |
(136) |
(124) |
(115) |
Reported net income |
|
(272) |
(369) |
45 |
329 |
384 |
372 |
345 |
Basic average number of shares, m |
|
306 |
306 |
306 |
306 |
306 |
306 |
306 |
Basic EPS |
|
(0.9) |
(1.2) |
0.1 |
1.1 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
178 |
416 |
758 |
731 |
833 |
789 |
748 |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
(46) |
211 |
559 |
522 |
644 |
607 |
566 |
Adjusted PBT |
|
(189) |
15 |
353 |
361 |
502 |
496 |
459 |
Adjusted net income |
(216) |
(1) |
395 |
252 |
368 |
372 |
345 |
|
Adjusted EPS |
|
(0.71) |
(0.00) |
1.29 |
0.82 |
1.20 |
1.22 |
1.13 |
DPS |
|
0.00 |
0.21 |
0.21 |
0.00 |
0.34 |
0.35 |
0.40 |
BALANCE SHEET |
||||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
|
3,463 |
3,398 |
3,385 |
3,303 |
3,312 |
3,302 |
3,260 |
Intangible assets |
|
144 |
132 |
117 |
108 |
106 |
106 |
106 |
Other non-current assets |
|
863 |
995 |
1,004 |
883 |
864 |
696 |
709 |
Total non-current assets |
|
4,470 |
4,526 |
4,506 |
4,295 |
4,282 |
4,104 |
4,075 |
Cash and equivalents* |
|
960 |
1,848 |
2,108 |
1,082 |
1,019 |
1,220 |
1,277 |
Inventories |
|
1,005 |
638 |
662 |
929 |
1,056 |
1,026 |
1,017 |
Trade and other receivables |
|
737 |
708 |
752 |
868 |
791 |
773 |
769 |
Other current assets |
|
5 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
Total current assets |
|
2,707 |
3,194 |
3,523 |
2,894 |
2,878 |
3,031 |
3,075 |
Non-current loans and borrowings |
|
1,312 |
1,812 |
1,598 |
1,456 |
920 |
620 |
420 |
Other non-current liabilities |
|
164 |
162 |
170 |
423 |
300 |
300 |
300 |
Total non-current liabilities |
|
1,475 |
1,974 |
1,768 |
1,879 |
1,220 |
920 |
720 |
Trade and other payables |
|
2,125 |
2,679 |
2,795 |
1,778 |
1,661 |
1,671 |
1,664 |
Current loans and borrowings |
|
1,338 |
1,178 |
1,633 |
1,386 |
1,900 |
1,900 |
1,900 |
Other current liabilities |
|
24 |
160 |
42 |
4 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
Total current liabilities |
|
3,488 |
4,017 |
4,471 |
3,168 |
3,568 |
3,577 |
3,571 |
Equity attributable to company |
|
2,099 |
1,618 |
1,684 |
2,040 |
2,309 |
2,573 |
2,796 |
Non-controlling interest |
|
116 |
110 |
106 |
102 |
63 |
63 |
63 |
CASH FLOW STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before tax |
|
(338) |
(485) |
39 |
466 |
520 |
496 |
459 |
Depreciation and amortisation |
|
224 |
205 |
199 |
209 |
189 |
182 |
182 |
Other adjustments |
|
172 |
227 |
275 |
236 |
207 |
111 |
107 |
Movements in working capital |
|
444 |
929 |
(18) |
(1,228) |
(463) |
58 |
6 |
Income taxes paid |
|
(9) |
(23) |
(35) |
(16) |
(10) |
(124) |
(115) |
Cash from operations (CFO) |
|
493 |
853 |
460 |
(334) |
443 |
723 |
640 |
Capex |
|
(105) |
(136) |
(165) |
(126) |
(209) |
(172) |
(140) |
Acquisitions & disposals net |
|
(7) |
0 |
0 |
(0) |
0 |
200 |
0 |
Other investing activities |
|
22 |
53 |
29 |
10 |
24 |
11 |
11 |
Cash used in investing activities (CFIA) |
|
(89) |
(83) |
(136) |
(116) |
(185) |
39 |
(129) |
Net proceeds from issue of shares |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dividends paid in period |
|
(46) |
(2) |
(67) |
(3) |
(107) |
(107) |
(122) |
Movements in debt |
|
(108) |
284 |
194 |
(393) |
(35) |
(300) |
(200) |
Other financing activities |
|
(184) |
(197) |
(156) |
(192) |
(149) |
(154) |
(131) |
Cash from financing activities (CFF) |
|
(339) |
85 |
(29) |
(589) |
(300) |
(561) |
(453) |
Increase/(decrease) in cash and equivalents |
|
64 |
855 |
295 |
(1,039) |
(42) |
201 |
58 |
Currency translation differences and other |
|
(6) |
34 |
10 |
10 |
(9) |
0 |
0 |
Cash and equivalents at end of period |
|
960 |
1,848 |
1,953 |
924 |
873 |
1,220 |
1,277 |
Net (debt)/cash |
|
(1,691) |
(1,142) |
(1,123) |
(1,761) |
(1,802) |
(1,301) |
(1,043) |
Source: Company accounts, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Balance sheet includes restricted cash, which amounted to €146m at end FY17 and €158m at end FY16.
|
|
A new senior management team is in place with a clear agenda to improve operational and financial performance. FY18 is going to be a transition year but investors will still want to see evidence of progress from the two strongest business units and in addressing specific issues in the other two. We have not changed estimates at this stage, but note the increased H2 bias flagged by management. The attraction of the current valuation will depend on the level of investor confidence in underlying prospects.