Market: Significant underlying drivers
Strong market dynamics for the adoption of cloud workers
After the 2008 financial crisis, companies sought a leaner and more efficient workforce.
Until recently, technology lacked the capability for management teams to effectively
leverage cloud-based contractors worldwide. With advancements like GenAI enabling
real-time translation, accessing cost-effective, specialised talent has never been
easier.
From SMEs to large multinationals, utilising cloud-based freelancers offers a host
of benefits, which drives the adoption of marketplaces like Freelancer.com. These
include:
- Flexibility and cost management: tapping into a cloud-based platform allows firms
to scale their workforces up and down depending on work requirements, enabling them
to keep a tighter control of their cost bases, particularly if freelancers are available
at more competitive rates versus traditional on-site workers.
- Future proofing: investments in high-speed internet connections and advancements in
communication technologies are making it easier for firms to work with contractors
globally, who may have unique skill sets that can help the company to keep abreast
of current technology trends at a potentially lower cost than hiring talent internally.
- COVID-19 and changing workforce preferences: more companies are adopting a flexible
work environment and may turn to cloud-based freelancers to fill in talent gaps and
maintain productivity. More staff are also looking to work remotely, driving the liquidity
of the freelancer market.
Marketplaces like Loadshift are benefiting from similar market dynamics. Moving heavy
freight can be complex and requires significant coordination. Using a cloud-based
platform can streamline the process of finding available carriers from a potentially
larger and more diverse pool of specialists, resulting in cost savings and time efficiencies.
Platforms can also extend reach by allowing shippers to connect with operators across
different regions and countries. Marketplaces, like Loadshift, are also equipped with
services that ensure regulatory compliance, reducing the risk of incurring penalties
or non-delivery.
Market landscape
In the public market there are a limited number of companies that compete directly
with Freelancer’s marketplace, including Fiverr and Upwork, which are both listed
in the US.
Management believes Freelancer differentiates itself from its listed peers by providing
both customised services and access to freelancers globally, including from developing
nations. In place of customisation, Fiverr’s strategy focuses on efficiency optimisation
and ease of use; freelancers on its platform post the specifics of their service under
a fixed pricing structure (‘service-as-a-product’).
Upwork’s platform is similar to Freelancer in that its clients can leave open jobs
for freelancers to bid on or can get in touch with them directly based on the freelancer’s
skill set. However, Upwork is more US-centric and has a more rigorous process for
freelancers to join its platform, targeting mostly US and western contractors.
There is significantly more fragmentation on the private side; however, all business
models do share similarities with the listed peers. Several companies are vertical
specific, including Superside, Dribbble, Behance and Australian-based 99designs, which
provide digital design services.
Other platforms, like Guru, PeoplePerHour and Malt, are more pricing and job agnostic.
Additionally, the company competes with traditional methods of hiring a freelancer,
such as job boards, referrals and networking.
Large transactions are moving online
In today’s globalised economy, cross-border transactions are increasingly common and
a growing number of verticals are looking to move to online payment methods. Distance
may lead to information asymmetry between buyers and sellers, and there may be additional
risks for international parties such as different legal systems, currencies and regulations.
Regulators across the world are also becoming more stringent with financial institutions
and customers being KYC compliant, with the US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
a key example.
Secure escrow services offer a standardised and third-party platform, ensuring secure
exchanges of assets or funds, reducing the risk of fraud, non-payment or non-delivery.
Platforms can also handle the complexity of international hurdles, as well as compliance
with local regulation, providing a streamlined end-to-end service. Therefore, we believe
the opportunities for escrow platforms will only grow in a diverse range of verticals.
A concentrated market
Growing use of e-commerce, technological advancements and changing consumer behaviours
have expanded the payments processing landscape. Global payment networks like Mastercard
and Visa still play an important role in facilitating funds transfers between banks,
merchants and consumers. However, as digital and online payments grow in popularity,
new technologies are integrating into these networks to make transfers more efficient
and secure, as well as to provide consumers with more payment channels.
For consumers, solutions like PayPal, Apple Pay and Google Pay can make purchasing
easier and more efficient, while keeping transfers secure with biometric and authentication
technologies. Stripe and Square are typically B2B services, offering SMEs various
tools for e-commerce and in-person transactions. These well-known payment methods
tend to be used for smaller-value transaction payments. Conversely, Escrow.com, which
processes payments between c
US$1k and
US$100m, has significantly fewer competitors. In the large transactions processing market
there have been significantly fewer new entrants, where current alternatives to Escrow.com
are primarily banks and law firms. However, these options can come with a significantly
higher fee structure, potential conflicts of interest and limited interoperability
with online platforms. There are also blockchain escrow services, where complexity
may inhibit adoption, transactions are irreversible once recorded and there is limited
jurisdictional control.