Arbuthnot Banking Group
Written by
Arbuthnot Banking Group |
Adapting well to opportunities |
Annual results |
Banks |
10 May 2016 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next event
Analysts
Arbuthnot Banking Group is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
With its long-term track record, Arbuthnot Banking Group (ARBB) places great emphasis on stability and experience and has also been adroit in taking opportunities that emerged in the post-financial crisis environment. The acquisition and recent sale of Everyday Loans Group has provided scope for additional organic loan growth at both Arbuthnot Latham and 51.9%-owned Secure Trust Bank (STB). While near-term returns on equity will be diluted by excess capital, successful development of loan books should underpin a stronger valuation.
Year end |
Operating |
PBT* |
EPS* |
DPS |
P/E |
Yield |
12/14 |
126.3 |
26.3 |
84.5 |
26.0 |
17.8 |
1.7 |
12/15 |
167.1 |
37.7 |
101.2 |
29.0 |
14.8 |
1.9 |
12/16e |
159.9 |
35.0 |
91.3 |
31.0 |
16.4 |
2.1 |
12/17e |
186.8 |
50.3 |
132.3 |
34.0 |
11.3 |
2.3 |
Note: *PBT and EPS are on an underlying basis with 2014 and 2015 including discontinued operations. 2016 dividend excludes proposed 25p special
2015 results
The group reported a pre-tax profit of £34.2m (£37.7m on an underlying basis), including Everyday Loans Group (ELG), an increase of 52%. Both the retail and private banks (Secure Trust and Arbuthnot Latham respectively) have made good progress (see pages 2-4). The sale of ELG was completed in April 2016 and is expected to generate a net profit of about £115m. Reflecting this, a special dividend of 25p is expected to be paid to ARBB shareholders.
Outlook
The main prospective driver for STB is the opportunity to continue to expand its loan books rapidly, further increasing diversification and the emphasis on asset-backed lending. The fact that it still has relatively small market shares in the areas it is addressing suggests good potential for profitable growth. At Arbuthnot Latham continued healthy growth in the client base, assets under management and the development of a commercial bank to serve entrepreneurial clients and SMEs are positive drivers for future income. On a more cautious note there are risks in the macro environment in the UK with the EU membership referendum a near-term source of uncertainty together with downward trend in UK (and global) GDP growth estimates. In the event of a sharp market correction, however, the group could be afforded the chance to make an opportunistic acquisition.
Valuation: Upside as surplus capital employed
Comparing ARBB with a broad peer group of challenger banks, specialist lenders and wealth managers appears to place it broadly in the pack in terms of price to book valuation. However, our ROE/COE and sum-of-the-parts valuations point to a value of about 1,670p, indicating 11% upside from the current level (page 8).
Growing retail, commercial and private bank
ARBB has a history dating back to 1833 when Arbuthnot & Latham was formed in Great St Helens. The group now comprises the private bank Arbuthnot Latham and Secure Trust, a retail bank with a growing commercial arm. Arbuthnot Latham offers private banking, whole of market wealth planning and a discretionary investment management service. Primarily a UK onshore bank, Arbuthnot Latham opened an office in Dubai in 2013 to provide access to the region. The bank is developing a commercial bank to serve the financial needs of entrepreneurial customers and SMEs. In April 2016 Ian Henderson was appointed as chief executive of Arbuthnot Latham and will join the board of Arbuthnot Banking Group. He joins from Secure Trust Bank where he had been responsible for strategic development and was chief executive for personal lending and mortgages. Previously he had been chief executive of Kensington Group and Shawbrook Bank.
Secure Trust was listed on AIM in November 2011; ARBB has a 51.92% stake in the company. Since the financial crisis, the STB loan book has been diversified and grown rapidly with an increasing emphasis on secured lending, a move that has been furthered by the sale of Everyday Loans Group to Non Standard Finance in the second half of 2015 (completed April 2016). The sale is expected to realise a profit of £115m that creates capital headroom to continue loan book growth with an emphasis on motor, retail and SME lending within the existing portfolio and additionally the development of the nascent mortgage activity, which management see as having the potential to provide a third leg for STB.
2015 results
Prominent features of 2015 for the group were the sale of ELG and strong loan book growth, particularly at STB. There was a good pace of new client signings at Arbuthnot Latham accompanied by particularly strong growth in deposits and continued expansion of the loan book. Key data points included the following:
■
Statutory pre-tax profit of £34.2m, including ELG, was up 52%
■
Pre-tax profit on an underlying, continuing basis increased 46% to £26.0m
■
Sale of ELG, completed April 2016, expected to generate £115m profit
■
Loan book at STB (ex-ELG) grew by 82% and by 15% at Arbuthnot Latham
■
AUM at Arbuthnot Latham +11% to £739m
■
Full year dividend 29p, +7.4%
■
ARBB is to pay a special dividend of 25p following the disposal
■
Core Tier 1 capital ratio 11.7% versus 14.0% reflecting loan book expansion
In the financial statement the discontinued activity is shown as a one line after tax entry. In the table below (Exhibit 1) we collate the operating income, pre-tax profit and underlying earnings per share for the continuing and discontinued activities.
Exhibit 1: Summary of continuing and discontinued results
ELG |
Continuing |
Group |
||||
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
|
Operating income |
34,237 |
40,395 |
92,049 |
126,693 |
126,286 |
167,088 |
Pre-tax profit |
8,583 |
11,663 |
13,931 |
22,568 |
22,514 |
34,231 |
Adjustments |
0 |
0 |
3,831 |
3,433 |
3,831 |
3,433 |
Underlying pre-tax profit |
8,583 |
11,663 |
17,762 |
26,001 |
26,345 |
37,664 |
Underlying EPS (p) |
46.3 |
65.5 |
84.5 |
101.2 |
||
Source: Arbuthnot Banking Group annual report pp 13, 98, 99.
Retail banking – Secure Trust Bank
We have reviewed STB’s results in our note Growing into its capital. Loan growth continued its rapid growth in 2015 with an increase of 73% (including ELG) taking compound growth since 2010 to 64% (see Exhibit 2). Within this the greatest growth in absolute terms was in the real estate finance and point of sale finance (Exhibit 3). The real estate loan book is spilt roughly evenly between funding for residential developments and residential investment finance (professional buy to let). In percentage terms the most recently established areas saw the fastest growth: asset finance (hire purchase and finance leases) and commercial finance (invoice discounting and debt factoring).
|
Exhibit 2: STB customer loans |
Exhibit 3: STB segmental customer loans (£m) |
|
|
|
Source: Secure Trust Bank |
Source: Secure Trust Bank |
|
Exhibit 2: STB customer loans |
|
|
Source: Secure Trust Bank |
|
Exhibit 3: STB segmental customer loans (£m) |
|
|
Source: Secure Trust Bank |
Net interest income grew by 49% (including ELG) in 2015, below the 68% growth rate of average loan balances reflecting mix changes and, potentially, distortions introduced by simple averaging of loan balances in a period of rapid growth. Reflecting this, the net interest margin was lower at 12.7% versus 14.0%. The impairment charge as a percentage of the average loan book increased from 1.9% to 2.3%, an increase from a low base that can be attributed to mix changes and rapid growth.
Funding policy is unchanged with limited exposure to wholesale and interbank funding. Fixed term, fixed rate customer lending is broadly matched with customer deposits on a similar basis. The average tenor of deposits has been increased to match the liability position, with term deposits accounting for 57% of the total at the year end, compared with 54% and 44% in 2014 and 2013 respectively. The cost of funds has benefited from trends in market rates as maturing deposits have been replaced at lower rates. The interest cost as a percentage of average deposits fell from 2.8% in 2014 to 2.6%.
STB raised £50m of fresh equity capital in the second half of 2014 to support further growth in the loan book and during 2015 the CET1 ratio fell from 18.7% to 13.6%. Adjusting for the ELG disposal, STB’s year end CET1 would have been 24.1%.
Private Bank – Arbuthnot Latham
Profit before tax increased from £3.6m to £6.0m in 2015 (+65%). This progress was despite incurring a £1.1m cost relating to a new banking system being installed to support growth and service levels. Other unusual costs included £0.3m start-up costs for the new commercial banking business and £0.4m of costs arising from a planned purchase of a mortgage portfolio abandoned when it became clear that regulatory capital requirements relating to this would be double the level initially envisaged. Without these unusual costs profit would have been £7.9m.
Underlying this profit increase was a 21% increase in operating income reflecting in turn a 30% increase in net interest income and a more modest 3% increase in fee income. Drivers of operating income included a 15% increase in customer loans to £619m with a record level of new loans at £250m. Customer deposits increased by 53% to £897m, benefitting from the recruitment of new, high quality private bankers. As shown in Exhibit 4, this resulted in the loan to deposit ratio moving back closer to levels seen prior to 2014. Assets under management increased by 11% to £739m and, reflecting stronger prior year growth, average AUM was up by 18%.
In Exhibit 5 we have shown how the level of total assets and AUM taken together have increased and calculated the level of operating income as a yield on this base. This has declined somewhat in the earlier years shown, probably reflecting a mix effect, including variations in the loan to deposit ratio, but thereafter has been stable at between 2.4% and 2.5%. The yield on total assets alone has been stable at around 4.4%.
|
Exhibit 4: Arbuthnot Latham loans and deposits |
Exhibit 5: Arbuthnot Latham yield on assets and AUM |
|
|
|
Source: Arbuthnot Banking Group |
Source: Edison Investment Research, Arbuthnot Banking Group |
|
Exhibit 4: Arbuthnot Latham loans and deposits |
|
|
Source: Arbuthnot Banking Group |
|
Exhibit 5: Arbuthnot Latham yield on assets and AUM |
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research, Arbuthnot Banking Group |
Below the operating income level, operating costs of £29.7m increased by 24%, reflecting in part the unusual costs mentioned above, the addition of new private bankers to the workforce and moves to new, larger premises in London and Exeter. Impairments relating to customer loans more than halved to £1.25m: the company report impairments as mainly relating to a legacy portfolio which has been resolved.
The rate of new client acquisition was healthy at 50 per month representing an increase of 20-25% on an estimated target client base of around 2,500.
Case study – Everyday Loans Group
The group highlights the purchase and sale of ELG as an example of management’s long-term approach to investment (in this case the investment was crystallised by an unsolicited approach from Non Standard Finance after roughly four and a half years of ownership).
The group has traditionally managed its balance sheet conservatively, particularly during the financial crisis avoiding areas of the market, such as unsecured personal lending, where risk /reward had become unattractive. Subsequently, in 2011 STB was listed and additional capital was raised for it through a rights issue. The company was therefore in a strong position to acquire ELG in 2012 for £1 and refinance the loan book of approximately £64m. The business returned to loan growth and added to its branch network, extending its geographical reach. Non Standard Finance disclosure shows that ELG’s receivables grew at a compound rate of 17.3% between 2012 and 2014 generating underlying compound revenue growth of 19.2%.
This set the scene for Non Standard Finance’s approach and the sale price agreed in December last year of £127m, including £20m worth of Non Standard Finance shares (an enterprise value to net operating profit after tax multiple of 18.1x). The transaction was been completed in April 2016 realising a profit expected to be more than £115m.
Outlook
For the retail bank, STB, the overriding point is that it accounts for very small shares of the broader markets it is addressing and with the major incumbent banks dealing with capital issues and focusing on core areas there is good scope for challenger/specialist lenders such as STB to record strong profitable growth in the medium term.
Following the ELG sale, STB has significant headroom to expand its loan book. In addition to expanding its existing activities, in particular the relatively new commercial businesses, the company is preparing the launch of its mortgage business, which could eventually become a third leg for STB of similar size to the consumer and commercial activities.
At Arbuthnot Latham there should be further benefit from the expansion of the loan book that has already taken place and there is potential for further sustained loan growth albeit probably not at the level recorded in 2015. Many of the loans are arranged on a bespoke basis to suit the particular requirements of entrepreneurial clients. Linked to this, Arbuthnot Latham has launched a commercial banking service to clients in the second half of last year providing loans to their corporate structures enabling them to receive personal and commercial financial support from one source, cementing the relationship. This offering was based on client demand and was initially focused on the media sector but this will be broadened to the commercial real estate and professional services sectors too. To support commercial banking there are 12 specialist bankers, a number that could more than double as the business expands.
The macro background in the UK remains uncertain with GDP forecasts being trimmed against the background of lower growth expectations for the global economy. The Office of Budget Responsibility, as an example, has reduced its central forecasts by 0.4 and 0.3 percentage points to 2.0% and 2.2% for 2016 and 2017 respectively. The result of the EU membership referendum could add to volatility. However, if existing forecasts were to prove close to the mark, this would provide a favourable background for development of the loan books of the retail and private bank activities with the level of unemployment expected to remain muted suggesting impairments could remain at low levels and demand for loans healthy.
Financials and forecasts
The difference between the 2015 result and our estimate and fresh, ex-ELG forecasts are shown in Exhibit 6. While earnings are expected to be diluted by the disposal this year we look for rapid growth in 2017 as surplus regulatory capital is progressively deployed through loan growth.
Exhibit 6: Actual vs estimate and new forecasts
|
Underlying EPS (p) |
Underlying PBT (£m) |
Dividend (p) |
||||||
|
Old |
New |
% chg. |
Old |
New |
% chg. |
Old |
New |
% chg. |
2015a/e |
103.4 |
101.2 |
-2% |
36.7 |
37.7 |
+3% |
28.0 |
29.0 |
4% |
2016e |
N/A |
91.3 |
N/A |
35.0 |
29.0 |
31.0 |
7% |
||
2017e |
N/A |
132.3 |
N/A |
50.3 |
N/A |
34.0 |
|||
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: EPS and PBT for 2015 include ELG. Dividend ex-proposed special.
A key feature of recent years has been the rapid growth in the loan book, particularly at STB (see Exhibit 7). We expect the most rapid growth in the forecast period to come from the commercial area within STB driven by a combination of growth from real estate and the relatively new asset finance and invoice discounting and debt factoring books. We have allowed for an apparently steep build up in the mortgage book but, given management’s expectation that this could provide a third leg for the business and the scale of the overall mortgage market, there should be significant scope for further growth, even within STB’s non-standard target market. At Arbuthnot Latham the development of commercial banking should augment loan growth but given the potentially lumpy nature of this business, including loan repayments, we have cautiously assumed 10% compound growth over the period shown.
Exhibit 7: Loan book development
Loan balances (£m) |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016e |
2017e |
2018e |
2015-18e CAGR |
Arbuthnot Latham |
178 |
211 |
238 |
289 |
341 |
536 |
619 |
681 |
749 |
824 |
10% |
Secure Trust Bank |
|||||||||||
Personal Lending |
15 |
22 |
44 |
68 |
78 |
88 |
74 |
74 |
78 |
82 |
3% |
Motor Finance |
5 |
31 |
63 |
90 |
115 |
138 |
166 |
199 |
239 |
286 |
20% |
Retail Finance |
6 |
16 |
21 |
26 |
70 |
117 |
220 |
276 |
344 |
430 |
25% |
Mortgage |
20 |
200 |
400 |
||||||||
Commercial (SME) |
2 |
143 |
468 |
839 |
1,116 |
1,359 |
43% |
||||
Others |
26 |
20 |
27 |
40 |
45 |
42 |
33 |
28 |
24 |
20 |
-15% |
Everyday Loans |
74 |
81 |
94 |
||||||||
Total for STB |
52 |
89 |
155 |
298 |
391 |
622 |
961 |
1,436 |
2,001 |
2,578 |
39% |
Source: Edison Investment Research, Arbuthnot Banking Group. Note ELG loans excluded from STB for 2015.
Our estimates for ARBB group net interest margin and the level of impairments (both expressed as a percentage of average loans) are shown in Exhibit 8. The reduction in net interest margin reflects the higher proportion of secured lending within STB, including the growth in the mortgage business from 2017. At Arbuthnot Latham we have assumed a broadly stable level of net interest margin. The level of impairments is expected to remain relatively low in the private bank at c 0.25% of average customer loans.
The group expense ratio (Exhibit 9) reflects our assumption that the growth in the loan book provides scale benefits with the initial expenses in some of the businesses falling away or being spread over a larger operating income base.
|
Exhibit 8: NII margin and impairment % |
Exhibit 9: Expense ratio |
|
|
|
Source: Arbuthnot Banking Group, Edison Investment Research |
Source: Arbuthnot Banking Group, Edison Investment Research |
|
Exhibit 8: NII margin and impairment % |
|
|
Source: Arbuthnot Banking Group, Edison Investment Research |
|
Exhibit 9: Expense ratio |
|
|
Source: Arbuthnot Banking Group, Edison Investment Research |
Turning to the regulatory capital position, the group’s Core Tier 1 ratio last year fell from 14.0% to 11.7% reflecting loan growth shown above and before the gain from the ELG sale is recognised. We estimate that the ratio could increase to 14.0% this year subsequently declining to c 11% by 2018 as loan growth absorbs regulatory capital headroom.
ARBB’s group pre-minority ROE was 14.6% last year and is expected to dip this year as the profit on sale of ELG bolsters equity before returning to c 14% by 2018 reflecting expansion of both the private and retail bank loan books. We estimate that new business is being written at a substantially higher return on equity, leveraging the group overhead, and over the next three years our estimates imply an average return of 27%. Management indicates a return of over 30% implying the potential for upside. In either case the group ROE should continue to expand beyond our forecast period, unless conditions were to change materially.
We include a segmental analysis of external revenues and pre-tax profits (ex-ELG) in Exhibit 10 and a group financial summary (Exhibit 13) can be found on page 9.
Exhibit 10: Segmental analysis (excludes Everyday Loans Group)
2014 |
2015 |
2016e |
2017e |
2018e |
|
Revenue from external customers |
|||||
Private banking (Arbuthnot Latham) |
33,885 |
42,792 |
45,858 |
49,937 |
54,398 |
Retail banking (Secure Trust) |
79,347 |
117,098 |
158,390 |
195,528 |
241,983 |
Operating divisions |
113,232 |
159,890 |
204,248 |
245,465 |
296,381 |
Central costs and internal adjustments |
7 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Group |
113,239 |
159,898 |
204,248 |
245,465 |
296,381 |
Pre-tax profit |
|||||
Private banking (Arbuthnot Latham) |
3,628 |
5,998 |
6,887 |
7,801 |
8,822 |
Retail banking (Secure Trust) |
17,755 |
25,174 |
33,857 |
49,751 |
63,495 |
Operating divisions |
21,383 |
31,172 |
40,745 |
57,552 |
72,317 |
Central costs and internal adjustments |
(7,452) |
(8,604) |
(8,490) |
(8,682) |
(8,879) |
Group |
13,931 |
22,568 |
32,255 |
48,870 |
63,438 |
Source: Edison Investment Research, Arbuthnot Banking Group. Note: pre-tax profit on statutory basis.
Valuation
As a starting point we show a comparative valuation table including a selection of challenger banks and specialist lenders together with three wealth managers. The significant differences between the companies and their markets means that caution should be applied in making comparisons but we note that in terms of calendar 2016 estimated P/Es, Arbuthnot sits between the averages for the lenders and the wealth managers. Its price to NAV ratio is towards the lower end of the range but the ROE shown is also at the lower end of the range.
Exhibit 11: Challenger/specialist lender and wealth manager comparative table
Price (p) |
Market Cap (£m) |
2016 P/E (x) |
Yield (%) |
ROE (%) |
Price to book (x) |
|
Arbuthnot Banking Group |
1,500.0 |
223.3 |
16.5 |
1.9 |
10.7 |
1.8 |
Secure Trust Bank |
2,820.0 |
513.0 |
17.6 |
2.6 |
21.6 |
3.6 |
1PM |
71.0 |
37.3 |
12.0 |
0.5 |
10.8 |
1.5 |
Aldermore |
182.3 |
628.5 |
7.0 |
0.0 |
17.2 |
1.2 |
Close Brothers |
1,190.0 |
1,784.0 |
9.8 |
4.5 |
18.2 |
1.7 |
Metrobank |
2,037.0 |
1,635.5 |
0.0 |
-16.4 |
4.0 |
|
OneSavings Bank |
288.0 |
700.1 |
7.5 |
3.0 |
29.1 |
2.2 |
Paragon |
297.4 |
852.4 |
7.1 |
3.7 |
11.2 |
0.9 |
Private and Commercial Finance |
31.0 |
49.3 |
15.2 |
0.0 |
13.4 |
2.2 |
Provident Financial |
2,856.0 |
4,215.8 |
16.4 |
4.2 |
33.0 |
5.9 |
Shawbrook |
270.4 |
677.4 |
8.4 |
0.0 |
20.0 |
1.8 |
S&U |
2,172.5 |
259.4 |
13.0 |
3.5 |
15.2 |
2.0 |
Average challengers/specialist lenders |
11.9 |
2.0 |
15.3 |
2.4 |
||
Brewin Dolphin |
277.7 |
785.9 |
15.7 |
4.3 |
19.1 |
3.5 |
Charles Stanley |
307.0 |
155.7 |
23.9 |
1.6 |
-1.3 |
1.8 |
Rathbones |
2,045.0 |
983.4 |
17.3 |
2.7 |
16.2 |
3.3 |
Average wealth managers |
19.0 |
2.9 |
11.3 |
2.9 |
||
Source: Bloomberg, Edison Investment Research. Note: Prices as at 10 May 2016.
Looking at the relationship between price to NAV and ROE more closely we can see in Exhibit 12 that ARBB is very much in the pack on this measure, suggesting no clear valuation indication. However, this depends on the prospects for growth and potential returns. As an example, the arrow next to Metrobank shows how the market appears content to value it broadly in line with its target ROE. While ARBB and STB returns on equity will fall initially following the sale of ELG, they appear set to increase again as they build out their loan books based on available regulatory capital.
|
Exhibit 12: Challengers/specialist lenders and wealth managers P/NAV versus ROE |
|
|
Source: Bloomberg, Edison Investment Research. ALD (Aldermore), ARBB (Arbuthnot Banking Grp), CBG (Close Brothers), MTRO (Metrobank), OPM (1PM), OSB (OneSavingsBank), PAG (Paragon), PFC (Private and Commercial Finance), PFG (Provident Financial), SHAW (Shawbrook), SUS (S&U), BRW (Brewin Dolphin), CAY (Charles Stanley) and RAT (Rathbones). As at 10 May 2016 |
A ROE/COE valuation gives a value of 1,656p (c 10% above the current share price) based on a tangible NAV for 2015 of 1088p after adjusting for the ELG transaction, using a cost of equity of 10%, 5% nominal growth, a sustainable ARBB shareholder ROE of 12.5% (just above our 2018 estimate) and including the potential 25p dividend to which shareholders are still be entitled. The group ROE (including the minority interest) was 14.6% last year or 18.6% excluding surplus capital, pointing to the potential to increase the return on shareholders’ equity over time. A sum of the parts exercise that takes the market value of STB, applies a 10% holding company discount, adds Arbuthnot Latham at 14x earnings and capitalises central costs at 10x gives a slightly higher figure of 1,687p.
Exhibit 13: Financial summary (£000s except where stated)
Year to end December |
2014 |
2015 |
2016e |
2017e |
2018e |
Profit and loss |
|||||
Net interest income |
68,027 |
103,693 |
136,718 |
164,446 |
201,152 |
Net commission income |
24,022 |
23,000 |
23,169 |
22,403 |
21,424 |
Total operating income |
92,049 |
126,693 |
159,887 |
186,849 |
222,576 |
Total G&A expenses (exc non-recurring items) below |
(66,165) |
(86,059) |
(100,900) |
(105,770) |
(120,520) |
Operating profit pre impairments & exceptionals |
25,884 |
40,634 |
58,987 |
81,080 |
102,056 |
Impairment charges on loans |
(11,953) |
(18,066) |
(26,733) |
(32,210) |
(38,618) |
Other income |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Operating profit post impairments |
13,931 |
22,568 |
32,255 |
48,870 |
63,438 |
Non-recurring items* |
0 |
0 |
115,000 |
0 |
0 |
Pre-tax profit |
13,931 |
22,568 |
147,255 |
48,870 |
63,438 |
CorporationTax |
(3,444) |
(5,436) |
(6,856) |
(9,701) |
(11,239) |
Tax rate |
24.7% |
24.1% |
4.7% |
19.9% |
17.7% |
Bank tax surcharge |
0 |
0 |
(709) |
(1,989) |
(3,131) |
Profit after tax - continuing basis |
10,487 |
17,132 |
139,690 |
37,179 |
49,068 |
Discontinued business |
6,529 |
9,392 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(Loss)/profit for year |
17,016 |
26,524 |
139,690 |
37,179 |
49,068 |
Minority interests |
(8,382) |
(13,798) |
(67,962) |
(18,311) |
(23,654) |
Net income attributable to equity shareholders |
8,634 |
12,726 |
71,728 |
18,868 |
25,414 |
Company reported pre-tax earnings adjustments |
3,831 |
3,433 |
(112,300) |
1,400 |
1,200 |
Company reported underlying earnings after tax and minorities |
17,762 |
26,001 |
34,955 |
50,270 |
64,638 |
Average basic number of shares in issue (m) |
14.7 |
14.7 |
14.7 |
14.7 |
14.7 |
Average diluted number of shares in issue (m) |
14.9 |
14.9 |
14.9 |
14.9 |
14.9 |
Reported diluted EPS (p) |
52.8 |
83.3 |
480.2 |
126.3 |
170.1 |
Underlying diluted, continuing basis EPS (p) |
46.3 |
65.5 |
91.3 |
132.3 |
175.3 |
Ordinary DPS (p) |
26.0 |
29.0 |
31.0 |
34.0 |
37.0 |
Special DPS (p) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
25.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Net interest/average loans |
7.61% |
7.39% |
7.44% |
6.77% |
6.55% |
Impairments/average loans |
1.34% |
1.29% |
1.45% |
1.33% |
1.26% |
Summary balance sheet |
|||||
Net customer loans |
1,158,983 |
1,579,512 |
2,116,877 |
2,749,920 |
3,401,734 |
Other assets |
287,639 |
652,047 |
589,057 |
577,130 |
614,112 |
Total assets |
1,446,622 |
2,231,559 |
2,705,934 |
3,327,050 |
4,015,845 |
Total customer deposits |
1,194,285 |
1,929,838 |
2,341,856 |
2,921,904 |
3,557,125 |
Other liabilities |
78,768 |
110,317 |
62,015 |
77,375 |
94,197 |
Total liabilities |
1,273,053 |
2,040,155 |
2,403,871 |
2,999,280 |
3,651,322 |
Net assets |
173,569 |
191,404 |
302,063 |
327,770 |
364,524 |
Minorities |
60,038 |
67,887 |
115,022 |
126,551 |
143,038 |
Shareholders' equity |
113,531 |
123,517 |
187,041 |
201,220 |
221,486 |
Changes in equity |
|||||
Opening shareholders' equity |
66,587 |
113,531 |
123,517 |
187,041 |
201,220 |
Total comprehensive income |
17,311 |
27,821 |
139,690 |
37,179 |
49,068 |
Sale of shares - STB |
24,327 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Issue of new shares in STB |
48,759 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Share based payments |
3,881 |
219 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
ARB dividends |
(3,871) |
(4,169) |
(8,404) |
(4,889) |
(5,348) |
Minority share of STB dividends |
(3,752) |
(6,036) |
(20,827) |
(6,782) |
(7,167) |
Movement in minority interests |
(39,711) |
(7,849) |
(47,135) |
(11,529) |
(16,487) |
Closing shareholders' equity |
113,531 |
123,517 |
187,041 |
201,220 |
221,486 |
Other data and ratios |
|||||
Period end shares in issue (m) |
15.3 |
15.3 |
15.3 |
15.3 |
15.3 |
NAV per share (p) |
743 |
808 |
1,224 |
1,317 |
1,450 |
Tangible NAV per share (tNAV) (p) |
669 |
737 |
1,153 |
1,246 |
1,378 |
Group ROE pre-minority |
13.2% |
14.6% |
10.0% |
11.8% |
14.2% |
Ordinary shareholders’ return on net assets post-minority |
14.8% |
16.1% |
8.7% |
10.0% |
12.2% |
Average loans |
893,549 |
1,402,814 |
1,837,640 |
2,428,313 |
3,071,539 |
Average deposits |
1,070,858 |
1,583,495 |
2,106,396 |
2,622,318 |
3,228,112 |
Loans/deposits |
97.0% |
81.8% |
90.4% |
94.1% |
95.6% |
Risk exposure |
952,971 |
1,346,009 |
1,799,346 |
2,282,434 |
2,755,404 |
Common equity tier 1 ratio |
14.0% |
11.7% |
14.0% |
12.0% |
11.1% |
Source: Company accounts, Edison Investment Research. Note: *£115m in 2015 relates to the sale of ELG.
|
International Biotechnology Trust