Wincanton
Written by
Wincanton |
Focus on the core to pay dividends |
Initiation of coverage |
Industrial support services |
9 March 2016 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next event
Analysts
Wincanton is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The disposal of Records Management is effectively the end of the current phase of restructuring, with net debt reduced from a peak of £270m to £45m in FY16e and Wincanton now back on the front foot. A programme of continuous improvements has increased the resilience of the core UK logistics business with improved margins and profits. Despite its market leadership the rating remains at a discount to its global peers and our valuation range (219-242p). Another potential catalyst is the resumption of dividends.
Year end |
Revenue |
PBT* |
EPS* |
DPS |
P/E |
Yield |
03/14 |
1,098.0 |
25.6 |
16.6 |
0.0 |
9.5 |
N/A |
03/15 |
1,107.4 |
31.4 |
21.1 |
0.0 |
7.3 |
N/A |
03/16e |
1,146.7 |
33.1 |
22.3 |
0.0 |
6.9 |
N/A |
03/17e |
1,138.1 |
33.3 |
22.4 |
7.0 |
6.9 |
4.5 |
Note: *PBT and EPS are normalised, excluding intangible amortisation, exceptional items and share-based payments.
Now on front foot after restructuring and refocusing
Following the over-expansion in its pan-European ambitions and high levels of debt, the group has been implementing a five-step action plan of restructuring, disposal, refinancing, reducing pension fund risk and onerous leases. This has improved cash generation and put the group back on the front foot. Following a series of disposals (including Records Management for £60m in November 2015), debt levels are now much reduced and it appears we are nearing the conclusion of the current phase, which will allow dividends to be reconsidered having been cancelled in 2011.
Contract logistics resilient and well placed to grow
The core UK contract logistics business is now a more resilient business, helped by industry diversification and the bias towards open book contracts. The complexity of supply chains and growth in multichannel retailing is underpinning the move towards outsourcing and benefiting specialist logistics providers. With the financial constraints removed, Wincanton looks well placed in a robust market to use its strength as a ‘leading national player’ to gain share against its global competitors.
Valuation: Reflecting the past not the current position
We believe the share price continues to reflect history rather than the significant progress that has been made in reducing debt levels and managing the pension fund deficit. A prospective P/E ratio of 6.9x seems modest, but our preferred metric is EV/EBITDA, including the pension fund liability as debt. With Wincanton trading on FY16e EV/EBITDA of 6.0x, our valuation range of 219p (7.3x, c 40% discount to international peers, including DHL, XPO and Kuehne & Nagel) to a DCF-derived 242p, implies 30-48% upside. Our valuation reflects the company’s cash-generative nature and the likely resumption of dividends in FY17e. The potential initial 4%+ yield also provides support and a catalyst for wider investor interest.
Investment summary
Company description: Focused UK logistics specialist
After restructuring and the disposal of its loss-making mainland European operations, Wincanton is now focused on providing a market-leading logistics solution to its customers in the UK and Ireland. While the economic environment is both tough and challenging, the group is seen as a progressive supplier that has embraced technology to provide a broad supply chain solution and leverage its strong operational capabilities. With sales of c £1.1bn, it is one of the market leaders in the UK logistics sector with its flexibility and strong relationship with customers reflected in new business wins and high contract retention. A well-managed supply chain is increasingly seen as a competitive advantage with this partnership beneficial to both Wincanton and its customers.
Financials: Mixed results, but disposal another positive step
The interims announced in November were in line with expectations with a very strong performance in Contact Logistics, offset by short-term problems in the Specialist businesses.
■
A 5.7% growth in Contact Logistics revenues translated in to a 16.7% increase in underlying operating profits, with margins at 5% helped by project fee income and strong KPIs leading to gain share payments. Strong momentum in new business wins and contract renewals.
■
In contrast, the Specialist businesses disappointed and reported a small loss, as Containers suffered from volatility in volumes and Pullman from a mispricing two home-delivery contracts.
■
The disposal of Records Management for £60m (net £55m) will allow a further reduction in debt levels and increase the group's focus while giving it operational and strategical flexibility.
Valuation: Time to start focusing on the business
A historic share price graph tells a story, with the price peaking in 2007 at 423p before collapsing after the financial crisis to 37p in 2012 before a subsequent recovery to its current price of 155p.
■
While Wincanton suffered from over-expansion and specific problems in its former European operations, through the period the UK Contract Logistics business has proved a very resilient performer. The balance sheet was the major issue with debt peaking above £270m prior to refinancing in 2012 and combined with a large pension fund liability to unnerve investors.
■
A period of significant restructuring and disposals has improved the balance sheet with debt forecast to be c £45m at the end of FY16e. A recovery plan has reduced the risk profile of the pension scheme, although the deficit of £125m remains high reflecting low discount rates.
A lack of a clear UK comparator leads us to make a comparison with its international logistics peer group. The high level of average debt combined with pension fund liability suggests an EV/EBITDA is the most appropriate valuation metric. The company currently trades on FY16e EV/EBITDA of 6.0x and a large discount to our valuation range of 219p (peer group) to 242p (DCF) suggests 30-48% upside. For reference we also note the 2015 takeover of Norbert by XPO at 9x EV/EBITDA.
Sensitivities: Operational and financial risk profile much lower
The Contract Logistics business is seen as a key partner in managing the supply chain cost effectively and providing a flexible service solution. Broadening the industry exposure to include construction and defence increased the resilience to any customer-specific issues or macro pressures. Open book contracts also reduce the risk profile with Wincanton protected by the customer against any volumes shortfalls or cost escalations (from rising oil prices, for example). Much reduced debt levels have increased the group’s financial flexibility and will allow it to further normalise its trading relationships; we view the risk with the pension fund deficit as contained.
Company description: UK logistics specialist
Since its inception delivering milk, Wincanton has evolved significantly into other industry sectors and broadened its service offering, fully utilising technology to deliver a market-leading logistics solution in the UK and Ireland. The group has a reputation for delivering very high levels of operational excellence and efficiency. This helps blue chip customers to unlock the potential in their supply chain and has driven a high renewal rate of existing contacts and new business momentum.
History, balance sheet and recent strategy
Wincanton demerged from Uniq (formerly Unigate) and subsequently floated in May 2001 with the aim of transforming itself from a relatively small UK logistics provider into a leading European supply chain services group. This involved a series of acquisitions over the rest of the decade to expand its European operations (P&O Trans European, Premium Logistics) and move into other sectors (construction, defence) and broaden its service offering. While some of these acquisitions proved successful and remain a key part of UK logistics business today, others were more problematic, particularly the move into Europe where a relatively high fixed cost bases were exposed by the economic slowdown and never achieved adequate returns.
The timing of this expansion was also unhelpful with a weakened balance sheet, high borrowings and large pension deficit leaving Wincanton very exposed as the 2007/08 financial crisis unfolded. The board initiated a strategic review in 2010, segmenting the business into four general areas.
Exhibit 1: 2010 strategic review
Classification |
% of revenues |
Activity |
Growth markets |
11 |
Construction, Defence, Containers, Records Management |
Performing businesses |
55 |
Retail, Pullman, German logistics & intermodal |
Mature |
9 |
Energy, Milk, Consumer Goods |
Sub-scale, underperforming |
25 |
Food Service, France, Netherlands, German Road |
Source: Wincanton results presentation March 2011
The priorities were to focus on the business's organic growth, target a significant reduction in the level of debt and seek an improvement in profitability through a major reduction in both operating and overhead costs. Following Eric Born's promotion to chief executive in December 2010, the decision was taken to completely dispose and exit its European operations and focus on its core UK logistics businesses. The board decided to suspend the dividend in June 2011 ahead of the forthcoming bank refinancing and pension review, saving c £17m pa. When combined with the plan to reduce debts, this allowed some flexibility to invest in higher-growth areas. The board structure also evolved with the appointments of a new chairman (Steve Marshall) and FD (Adrian Colman – now chief executive from August 2015).
Actions taken since strategic review
Wincanton has now completed the bulk of the disposals to return it to being a pure UK logistics provider raising c £148m in gross proceeds, which, given many of the operations were making negligible returns or loss-making (£8m total profits), restored some shareholder value.
Exhibit 2: Disposals since 2010
Date |
Name |
Description |
Price (£m) |
Turnover (£m) |
Operating profit (£m) |
Aug/10 |
Recycling |
Recycling |
17.5 |
18 |
0.3 |
Jun/11 |
German Road +Holland Logistics |
Transport & Logistics |
28 |
€446 |
loss |
Aug/11 |
Other European Logistics |
Transport & Logistics |
32 |
€558 |
€4.1 |
Mar/12 |
Culina (20% associate) |
Chilled Logistics |
11 |
- |
Associate 1.2 |
Nov/15 |
Records Management |
Document Management |
60 |
22.4 |
3.5 |
Total |
148.5 |
- |
- |
Source: Edison Investment Research
The disposals have combined with a number of other actions to restore the group to a more healthy financial position and improve shareholder confidence.
■
A significant restructuring of the UK infrastructure was undertaken, identifying excess properties and resulting in a £34m provision for onerous leases in 2012. The cash outflow for this has peaked (2015: £12m) with commitments much lower and vacant space down to 3%.
■
The decision to cancel the dividend in 2011 resulted in a cash-flow saving of £17m pa.
■
The pension fund adopted a de-risking strategy including closure to new entrants, a change from RPI to CPI, change in asset mix and an increase in liability hedging. A recovery plan was agreed with a cash contribution of £14.7m pa until 2024. Despite these measures with a discount rate of 3.8%, the headline deficit at £125m remains high.
After recently disposing of Records Management and with net debt reduced from a peak of £270m to c £45m in FY16e (£62m in H116), we are approaching the end of the balance sheet phase and management can focus on the growth opportunities in UK logistics and the possibility of a dividend.
Revised strategy – delivering and exploiting the potential
The stretched financial position has led to significant pressure on working capital over the last few years and, while a good discipline it was potentially constraining growth potential. Now back on the front foot, having normalised supplier relationships it can be slightly more aggressive with the aim of growing market share and absolute profitability, but in a controlled and risk averse manner.
While the board is committed to ongoing cost reductions and cash generation, the increased focus on Contract Logistics and excellent recent operational performance (strong KPIs and top of the league margins) leaves the business well positioned to grow and exploit its undoubted potential.
The three key strategic growth pillars are to:
■
deliver operational improvements to customers and maintain high level of contract retention;
■
improve ‘share of wallet’ with existing customers by cross-selling a wider range of services; and
■
acquire new customers through improved prospecting and service propositions.
Market background supportive for specialist providers
With sales approaching c £1.1bn, Wincanton is a top two supply chain logistics provider in the UK in what remains a relatively fragmented market, despite some consolidation among the global players. The UK logistics market is estimated at £36bn (source: Institute of Logistics), and while it is directly linked to economic health and business activity, it has resilience and has consistently grown faster than GDP, helped by the complexity of supply chains and the evolution of multi-channel retailing. Currently it is estimated there is a 50/50 split between in-house supply of warehousing and transport compared with outsourcing. A specialist logistics company can deliver supply chain management and warehousing services to provide a flexible, cost-effective and efficient solution. The adoption of technology allows a fully integrated service to give a competitive edge, with retailers particularly suited and more advanced in their adoption of outsourcing due to the growth in multi-channel retailing and their complex needs and service requirements.
While a dynamic and changing marketplace provides many opportunities, we see outsourcing as one of the main drivers for growth due to enhanced business performance and increased competitiveness. The drivers for outsourcing include:
■
allowing customers to focus on their core areas of expertise;
■
delivering efficiency and better productivity at a reduced cost;
■
enabling customers to offer new, faster and improved levels of service; and
■
providing access to a wider range of specialist expertise not available in house.
Overall, the market background (source: Barclays and Moore Stephens survey) is supportive for specialist logistic providers who embrace this challenging market and are happy to become an integral part of the supply chain and build a longer term ‘cost effective’ partnership. While we have seen some global consolidation of logistics providers, industry pricing seems rational and we believe Wincanton can take advantage of being a strong local player and use its renewed financial strength and entrenched customer relationships to gain market share.
Contract Logistics (84% of revenues, 90% EBITA)
This division represents the bulk of Wincanton providing a range of transport, warehousing and supply chain services to a blue chip customer base. It employs over 15,500 people and operates from 200 sites across the UK covering 13m sq. ft. of warehousing space and using 4,000 vehicles. Since disposing of its loss-making mainland European operations in 2011, the renewed focus on the UK market has allowed Wincanton to build on its strong, profitable base business and reputation in the area.
While the headline changes were being made in Europe, the UK business also underwent a fundamental change. It addressed the main elements of the cost base – people, properties and vehicles – and by improving use of transport and properties and becoming cost-effective it was well placed to share these operational efficiencies with existing and new customers. The group is undoubtedly more resilient and risk averse, and is now modifying the strategy to maintain market leadership and enhance future growth prospects. The three main elements of this strategy are to:
■
continue to drive improvements to existing operations and service propositions;
■
establish broader supply chain solutions; and
■
drive ongoing cost reductions.
The effectiveness of this strategy means that despite modest revenue declines caused by the economic slowdown, Wincanton has been able to grow operating profits and margins from 3.2% to 4.8% (2011-15). The broadening of industry exposure (Exhibit 3) has built further resilience into the business to withstand general macroeconomic pressures or industry-specific issues helped by the use of open book contracts (Exhibit 4).
|
Exhibit 3: 2015 end-market split – industry vertical |
Exhibit 4: 2015 Contract Logistics contract mix |
|
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research, Wincanton accounts |
Source: Edison Investment Research, Wincanton accounts |
|
Exhibit 3: 2015 end-market split – industry vertical |
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research, Wincanton accounts |
|
Exhibit 4: 2015 Contract Logistics contract mix |
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research, Wincanton accounts |
Despite a diversified customer base, retail remains an important part of the mix representing c 50% of revenues. A key part of its traditional retail customer base under significant ‘group’ pressures and needs a flexible and cost effective supply chain to respond to the challenging conditions. For example, both Tesco and M&S realigned their supply chains in 2014/15 and as open book clients, Wincanton reshaped accordingly without the need for major restructuring. Retail remains a challenging environment and Wincanton’s customer base expects its logistics provider to be an increasingly integral part of the supply chain. This helps contract retention but the service needs to be innovative and flexible while remaining cost-effective.
In addition, the growth in multi-channel and internet retailing is seen as an important growth opportunity and helpful to the outsourcing trend. The growing complexity of the supply chain increases the need to provide a wider ‘managed solution’ including store support, central stock holding and scheduling. Multichannel also places increased pressure on the supply chain to maintain service levels and consumer experience. As evidenced by its new contracts with Williams Sonoma and Screwfix, Wincanton looks well placed, with the proposed takeover of Home Retail by Sainsbury's (both clients) also a good example of this multichannel strategy.
Recruiting industry-facing management expertise has proved helpful to push into other sectors and is combined with best-in-class innovative solutions. Although some sectors, such as Construction, have been slower to adopt outsourcing by applying best practice from Retail, the recent contract win with Howden Joinery shows the potential for growth. While outsourcing is the dominant long-term growth trend in Logistics, certain industries from time to time go through a phase of insourcing, prevalent in the historic Tankers business in 2015, but the division was capable of more than offsetting this elsewhere with other new wins and contract extensions.
While typical contracts last three to five years, many of Wincanton’s customers have been with the group for more than 20 years (Sainsbury's, Heinz and Britvic), indicative of high service levels and contract retention. Renewals obviously involve some negotiations on price, but as the partnership develops and the service broadens, the group and its technology become embedded and integrated into the supply chain and more difficult to displace. A high-quality, stable customer base produces a reliable and steady revenue stream. Exhibit 5 shows its blue chip customer base.
Exhibit 5: Customer snapshot
Augusta Westland |
CEMEX |
Home Retail |
Marks & Spencer |
Sainsbury |
Argos |
Dairy Crest |
Howdens Joinery |
Morrisons |
Tesco |
ASDA |
Glaxo SmithKline |
Kingfisher |
Premier Foods |
Total |
BAE Systems |
HJ Heinz |
Lafarge |
Proctor & Gamble |
Waitrose |
Britvic |
Halo Foods |
Loaf.com |
Rolls-Royce |
Williams Sonoma |
Source: Wincanton accounts
The resilience of the income stream is an encouraging attribute given the economic background. A number of factors contribute to this including the diversity of customers and industries, but a key factor has been the use of open book contracts as a key part of the operating model and risk management process. Retail is a prime user of open book contracts and mix between open and closed book contracts has stabilised at 67/33%.
Whereas in closed book contracts the group retains the principal risk and hence seeks to earn higher margins, open book contracting protects Wincanton against volume shortfalls and cost fluctuations, and improves the visibility and security of the income stream. Open book contract arrangements mean Wincanton earns a management fee for a logistics service with all costs and expenses tightly managed, but agreed and invoiced to the customer. The major cost elements of property and vehicles can be owned by either parties, but as part of the risk management process the exposure is matched to the length of the contract with no residual risk if the contract is not renewed. The clarity over the cost base is beneficial to both parties and helpful to the outsourcing trend while not reducing the need for closer collaboration to seek great efficiency. In comparison, the lower risk profile of open book contracts tends to initially earn a lower margin. However, in addition to the basic management fee Wincanton can earn extra profits via selling higher-value technology services or by achieving strong operational performance, earn KPI bonuses or benefit from gain share arrangements. By achieving market-leading operating statistics Wincanton looks to have a loyal customer base, which is shown in the high renewal rates (90%+), and by consistently meeting KPI targets the division is earning top-of-the-range margins at close to 5%.Overall the business looks in very good operational shape and with the financial constraints easing, is well positioned to add extra business to a resilient base business and gain market share in a challenging and dynamic marketplace with the trend to outsourcing set to continue.
Specialist businesses (16% of revenues, 10% of EBITA)
Three businesses (Containers, Pullman and Records Management) have formed a standalone Specialist division since the strategic review. This structure was formed to ensure they fully used their specialist capabilities to provide wider supply chain services but with a dedicated management team seeking to exploit the superior growth potential while supporting its customer base.
The recent disposal of its high-margin Records Management business for £60m at an attractive valuation (£55m net proceeds imply 11x EV/EBIDTA) suggests this strategy has proved successful and created value for shareholders. However, post this disposal (least synergy with Contract Logistics) and combined with the recent problems at Pullman, the benefits of remaining a standalone division look limited and in our view should be reconsidered. With customer overlap, it appears that closer integration with Contract Logistics would enable best working practices to be adopted and there seems to be potential for both revenue and cost synergies.
At the interims, issues at both Containers and Pullman left the division loss-making. Containers suffered temporary problems due to volatility in its customers' volume requirements and a lack of flexibility in its staffing cost base. This was exacerbated by the current driver shortage and Containers has put in place various operational improvement plans. The difficulties at Pullman centred on two problem contracts, where poor contract structure in terms of pricing and underestimating volumes caused further provisions (c £2m) to be taken. Pullman has now exited both contracts, recruited a new executive team and returned to its core fleet maintenance service, which has historically been a solid performer. Despite recent difficulties in the medium term, both remaining businesses should be capable of turnaround and achieving Group average margins.
Management
Since the start of the decade there has been a major change in the board's composition, with all three top positions changed as the business evolves from the strategic review and restructuring. Steve Marshall joined as chairman in 2011 and has been overseeing the implementation of the plan, supported by Eric Born and Jon Kempster in the early-stage restructuring and financial negotiations. Adrian Colman was appointed as FD in 2013, before stepping up to chief executive in August 2015, to be supported by Tim Lawlor as FD.
We regard the changes as evolution rather than revolution and a natural progression given the different strengths and skills required, as the focus moves from restructuring to operational measures. Wincanton has been successful in the initial phase of the restructuring and debt reduction and believe the recent changes will prove to be a smooth transition and allow the next stage of strategic plan to be implemented, supported by a strong operational management team.
Sensitivities
As shown by the volatile historic share price chart, the share price has been heavily influenced in the past by both operational and financial issues. We believe Contract Logistics is now a very resilient business with strong operational and financial performance. In addition, the group has made significant progress in reducing debt levels and pension deficit risk. Key sensitivities are:
■
Macro issues: The Contract Logistic business has managed the challenging economic conditions and recent pressures in the Retail sector well. With the majority of the contacts open book, the risk to volume shortfalls and cost fluctuation are much reduced.
■
Financial: Debt is substantially below peak levels, reflecting a period of strong cash generation and helped by a number of disposals (raising some £148m) with a net debt forecast of £45m at March 2016. This would give the business extra flexibility and allow it to benefit from lower interest charges as more expensive debt facilities are replaced.
■
Pension liability: Much has been done to reduce the pension fund risk, but the deficit remains stubbornly high at £125m due to low discount rates (3.8%) and may be perceived as a risk and deter some investors. Actions including closure to new members, a liability hedging programme and a recovery plan agreed with the trustees, involving a cash payment of £14.7m pa.
■
Company-specific issues: The recent problems at Pullman and the Containers businesses, while disappointing, look to be solvable and will benefit from closer integration with Contact Logistics. Driver shortages are an industry problem, with plans to improve retention in place.
Valuation – discount to global peers and DCF
As we near the conclusion of the current phase of the restructuring plan, we believe the share price continues to reflect past issues rather than the consistent progress made in the core Contact Logistics business (CAGR EBIT 2012-16e +9% pa and improved margins to 5.0%). Operationally the business is much stronger with a very resilient income stream and strong market position, and is well placed to benefit from further outsourcing and market share gains. The possibility of dividends resuming in 2016/17 also underpins the shares with a potential initial yield of c 4.5%.
Concern over both the financial position and the pension fund deficit appear to overshadow the share price but appears misplaced. Helped by disposal proceeds of c £148m, net debt has reduced from a peak of £270m to £62m in H116 with improvement in all financial covenants. The pension fund deficit remains high but manageable, and in terms of valuation we treat it as debt.
The lack of any direct UK comparators doesn’t help valuations; however, with Wincanton competing in the UK logistics market with global competitors it is this global peer group that makes the most logical comparison. A P/E of 6.9x 2016e looks modest, but we believe an EV/EBITDA is the most appropriate valuation metric taking into account average debt levels and the pension fund deficit.
Despite substantial reduction in net debt over the period, EV/EBITDA of 6.0x FY16e (to March 2016) using average net debt, remains at a significant discount to UK and international peers. Exhibit 6 below includes global competitors and for reference three UK comparators (although not directly comparable as services and ratings vary significantly). Assuming the multiple expands to 7.3x EV/EBITDA (c 40% discount to international peers), this suggests a base valuation of 219p and upside of c 30%. In addition, as sector consolidation continues the 2015 acquisition of Norbert Dentressangle by XPO Logistics (implied EV/EBITDA of 9x) is another potential valuation point.
Exhibit 6: Global/UK comparator group
Price |
Market cap |
2015e |
2016e |
2015e |
2016e |
2015e |
2016e |
2015e |
2016e |
|
(local ccy) |
(£m) |
P/E |
EV/Sales |
EV/EBITDA |
EV/EBITA |
|||||
Global logistics peers |
||||||||||
Deutshce Post (DHL) |
24 |
21918 |
16.6 |
12.4 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
7.9 |
6.6 |
12.6 |
9.2 |
Kuehne & Nagel |
135 |
11186 |
23.7 |
22.3 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
14.7 |
14.1 |
17.9 |
16.8 |
DSV |
277 |
5332 |
22.7 |
21.9 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
16.3 |
15.4 |
19.0 |
18.4 |
Panalpina |
105 |
1715 |
25.9 |
19.9 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
11.8 |
9.7 |
13.2 |
9.9 |
XPO Logistics |
26 |
2027 |
-54.5 |
22.8 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
15.4 |
5.8 |
53.1 |
15.7 |
Average |
|
|
22.2 |
19.9 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
13.2 |
10.3 |
15.7 |
14.0 |
UK Peer Group |
|
|
||||||||
Clipper Logistics |
255 |
255 |
24.1 |
18.6 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
13.7 |
10.9 |
18.4 |
14.6 |
DX Group |
19 |
38 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
3.1 |
3.0 |
UK Mail |
280 |
154 |
19.2 |
13.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
7.1 |
5.8 |
8.0 |
10.6 |
Average |
15.4 |
11.6 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
7.8 |
6.4 |
9.8 |
9.4 |
||
|
|
|||||||||
Wincanton |
155 |
191 |
7.0 |
6.9 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
4.8 |
4.9 |
Wincanton (inc pension deficit + ave debt) |
0.3 |
0.3 |
6.0 |
6.1 |
6.8 |
7.0 |
||||
Source: Edison Investment Research, Bloomberg consensus. Note: Peers mainly Dec year end; Wincanton March year end (2015e is FY16 estimate); estimates are not calendarised. Share prices at 8 March 2016.
■
In addition to the peer group valuation, we believe the share price is also underpinned by our base case DCF with explicit forecasts until 2020 (CAGR EBIT 3% pa), a terminal growth rate of 1% and WACC of 9%. We have also included the pension fund deficit (£100m, net of tax) and net debt of £48m (FY15 adjusted for disposals and average debt levels). If we flex our WACC/terminal growth rate assumptions by +/-0.5%, the valuation range widens to 204-291p.
■
With debt levels reduced and the cost of onerous leases coming to end, even allowing for the resumptions of dividends the group should be increasingly cash-generative given its asset-light model. This financial and operational flexibility gives base case DCF upside to 242p (+48%).
Exhibit 7: DCF – explicit forecasts until 2020, WACC 9%, terminal growth rate 1%
Year End 30 March (£m's) |
2015 |
2016e |
2017e |
2018e |
2019e |
2020e |
Terminal Value |
|||
EBIT |
49.7 |
49.4 |
48.2 |
52.1 |
55.0 |
57.9 |
||||
Less cash taxes |
-6.9 |
-6.7 |
-6.8 |
-10.4 |
-11.0 |
-11.6 |
||||
Tax rate % |
22% |
20% |
20% |
20% |
20% |
20% |
||||
NOPLAT |
42.8 |
42.8 |
41.4 |
41.7 |
44.0 |
46.4 |
||||
Working Capital |
-18.8 |
-62.4 |
-12.8 |
-4.6 |
-4.7 |
-4.9 |
||||
Add back depreciation |
14.4 |
13.7 |
13.7 |
14.8 |
15.3 |
15.8 |
||||
Less capex |
-10.0 |
-10.0 |
-10.5 |
-12.5 |
-14.5 |
-16.5 |
||||
Free cash flow |
28.4 |
-15.9 |
31.8 |
39.5 |
40.1 |
40.8 |
36.9 |
|||
|
||||||||||
WACC |
9% |
9% |
9% |
9% |
9% |
9% |
9% |
|||
Year |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4.0 |
||||
Discount factor |
|
1.00 |
0.92 |
0.84 |
0.77 |
0.71 |
0.71 |
|||
Discount cash flow |
|
-15.9 |
29.2 |
34.7 |
32.3 |
30.2 |
340.9 |
|||
NPV |
|
451.3 |
467.2 |
438.1 |
403.4 |
371.1 |
340.9 |
|||
DCF valuation |
£m |
p/share |
Discount rate (post-tax, nominal) |
|
||||||
EV |
433.2 |
366 |
|
8.0% |
8.5% |
9.0% |
9.5% |
10.0% |
||
Net debt - adjusted for disposal + average debt |
47.6 |
40 |
Terminal growth |
0.0% |
252 |
229 |
209 |
191 |
174 |
|
Pension Deficit - net post tax |
100.0 |
84 |
0.5% |
272 |
247 |
224 |
204 |
187 |
||
Equity value |
285.6 |
242 |
1.0% |
296 |
267 |
242 |
220 |
200 |
||
Number of shares ('000) |
118.4 |
|
1.5% |
323 |
291 |
262 |
237 |
216 |
||
Equity value (p/share) |
242 |
|
2.0% |
355 |
317 |
285 |
257 |
233 |
||
Current share price |
164 |
|
||||||||
Upside / (downside) |
47% |
|
||||||||
Source: Edison Investment Research
Financials – interim results and Edison forecasts
Exhibit 8: H116 financial results to September 2015
(£m) – 6mths until Sept |
H115 |
H116 |
% +/- |
Contract Logistics |
464.1 |
490.6 |
5.7% |
Specialist businesses |
86.8 |
92.2 |
6.2% |
Group Revenues |
550.9 |
582.8 |
5.8% |
Group EBIT |
24.9 |
23.5 |
-5.6% |
Group margin |
4.5% |
4.0% |
|
Contract Logistics EBIT |
20.9 |
24.4 |
16.7% |
Contract Logistics margin |
4.5% |
5.0% |
|
Specialist businesses EBIT |
4.0 |
-0.9 |
n/a |
Specialist businesses margin |
4.6% |
neg |
|
Interest |
-9.0 |
-8.3 |
|
Profit before Tax |
15.9 |
15.2 |
-4.4% |
Source: Wincanton Interim announcement
The interims announced in November 2015 were robust and in line with market expectations. Net debt was lower at £62.2m (average net debt of £124m) vs £66.9m (£141m) in H115 and will be further reduced by the disposal of Records Management. Gross pension deficit stood at £125m (£144m at FY15). A 5.7% growth in Contact Logistics revenues translated into a 16.7% increase in EBIT, with 5% margins helped by project fee income and gain share payments. There was good momentum with contact wins and extensions in the period. In contrast, the Specialist businesses segment disappointed and reported a small loss, as Containers suffered from volume and cost issues while the contract problems at Pullman led to a further £2m provision ahead of termination.
Exhibit 9: Historic divisional results and Edison forecasts
(£m's) - Year to March |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016e |
2017e |
Contract Logistics |
1143.7 |
1023.8 |
923.2 |
930.1 |
928.8 |
978.5 |
998.1 |
Specialist businesses |
184.6 |
179.0 |
163.6 |
167.9 |
178.6 |
168.2 |
140.0 |
Group Revenues |
1328.3 |
1202.8 |
1086.8 |
1098.0 |
1107.4 |
1146.7 |
1138.1 |
Contract Logistics |
3.2% |
3.4% |
4.0% |
4.1% |
4.8% |
5.0% |
4.6% |
Specialist businesses |
5.5% |
5.1% |
5.1% |
5.8% |
2.7% |
0.4% |
1.7% |
Group margin |
3.5% |
3.6% |
4.2% |
4.4% |
4.5% |
4.3% |
4.2% |
Contract Logistics |
36.6 |
34.6 |
36.9 |
38.3 |
44.8 |
48.8 |
45.8 |
Specialist businesses |
10.1 |
9.2 |
8.4 |
9.7 |
4.9 |
0.7 |
2.4 |
Group EBIT |
46.7 |
43.8 |
45.3 |
48.0 |
49.7 |
49.4 |
48.2 |
Amortisation of acq'd intangibles |
-8.1 |
-8.2 |
-7.3 |
-6.5 |
-6.5 |
-4.6 |
-4.4 |
Exceptionals |
-18.3 |
-68.0 |
0.0 |
15.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Net interest |
-16.7 |
-15.0 |
-24.0 |
-22.4 |
-18.3 |
-16.4 |
-14.9 |
Adjusted pre-tax profit |
11.7 |
-39.2 |
21.3 |
41.4 |
31.4 |
33.1 |
33.3 |
Tax reported |
0.6 |
6.8 |
-3.9 |
-7.5 |
-5.6 |
-5.7 |
-5.8 |
Tax rate underlying (%) |
25% |
28% |
28% |
25% |
22% |
20% |
20% |
Adjusted profit after tax |
22.4 |
20.7 |
15.4 |
19.3 |
24.5 |
26.4 |
26.5 |
Minorities |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Net profit |
22.8 |
21.1 |
15.4 |
19.3 |
24.5 |
26.4 |
26.5 |
EPS adjusted (p) |
19.6 |
16.9 |
13.3 |
16.6 |
21.1 |
22.3 |
22.4 |
Source: Wincanton accounts, Edison Investment Research
Our financial forecasts are driven by the following assumptions:
■
With much lower debts and a removal in this financial constraint, we expect a targeted growth plan to be put in place and articulated while retaining good financial control and risk disciplines.
■
The contract logistics business has proved very resilient to fluctuation in economic conditions, demonstrating a gradual increase in profits and margins. With revenues improving 5.7% y-o-y at the interim stage, we assume annual growth of 2% in 2017 estimates with a modest fall in margins from peak levels and resulting in a slight fall in divisional profits from 2016.
■
The Specialist 2017 estimate reflects no contribution from Records Management or losses from Pullman contracts now exited. A modest turnaround in margins to c 1.7% is assumed.
■
With EBITA relatively flat, a stable PBT is predicated on lower interest costs, as lower absolute debt levels and a reduction in interest cost (c 1%) from exiting expensive facilities benefits the bottom line (£14.9m interest estimate, includes non-cash pension/insurance £6.6m).
|
Exhibit 10: Debt reduction since 2011 |
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research |
■
The chart above shows the significant reduction in debt levels as a result of disposals and positive cash generation. Whilst management have indicated a normalisation in working capital, a low capex requirement and reduction in onerous leases suggests further debt reduction and a reduction in the swing from average to period-end debt (c £30m).
■
With average debt/EBITDA now well below 2x and the pension fund liability and onerous leases under control, in our view a resumption in dividends looks likely in 2016/17e.
Exhibit 9: Financial summary
£m |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016e |
2017e |
||
Year end 31 March |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
||
PROFIT & LOSS |
|||||||||
Revenue |
|
|
1,328.3 |
1,202.8 |
1,086.8 |
1,098.0 |
1,107.4 |
1,146.7 |
1,138.1 |
Cost of Sales |
(1,264.2) |
(1,144.3) |
(1,022.8) |
(1,030.0) |
(1,039.5) |
(1,072.9) |
(1,079.6) |
||
Gross Profit |
64.1 |
58.5 |
64.0 |
68.0 |
67.9 |
73.8 |
58.5 |
||
EBITDA |
|
|
69.0 |
60.8 |
60.4 |
61.2 |
62.0 |
61.0 |
59.8 |
Operating Profit (before amort. and except.) |
|
46.7 |
43.8 |
45.3 |
48.0 |
49.7 |
49.4 |
48.2 |
|
Intangible Amortisation |
(8.1) |
(8.2) |
(7.3) |
(6.5) |
(6.5) |
(4.6) |
(4.4) |
||
Exceptionals |
(18.3) |
(68.0) |
0.0 |
15.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Other |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Operating Profit |
20.3 |
(32.4) |
38.0 |
57.3 |
43.2 |
44.8 |
43.8 |
||
Net Interest |
(16.7) |
(15.0) |
(24.0) |
(22.4) |
(18.3) |
(16.4) |
(14.9) |
||
Profit Before Tax (norm) |
|
|
30.0 |
28.8 |
21.3 |
25.6 |
31.4 |
33.1 |
33.3 |
Profit Before Tax (FRS 3) |
|
|
3.6 |
(47.4) |
14.0 |
34.9 |
24.9 |
28.5 |
28.9 |
Tax |
0.6 |
6.8 |
(3.9) |
(7.5) |
(5.6) |
(5.7) |
(5.8) |
||
Profit After Tax (norm) |
22.4 |
20.7 |
15.4 |
19.3 |
24.5 |
26.4 |
26.5 |
||
Profit After Tax (FRS 3) |
4.2 |
(40.6) |
10.1 |
27.4 |
19.3 |
22.8 |
23.1 |
||
Minority interest |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Net Income (norm) |
22.8 |
21.1 |
15.4 |
19.3 |
24.5 |
26.4 |
26.5 |
||
Net Income (FRS 3) |
4.6 |
(40.2) |
10.1 |
27.4 |
19.3 |
22.8 |
23.1 |
||
Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m) |
114.4 |
115.1 |
115.8 |
116.1 |
116.3 |
118.4 |
118.4 |
||
EPS - normalised |
|
|
19.6 |
16.9 |
13.3 |
16.6 |
21.1 |
22.3 |
22.4 |
EPS - normalised and fully diluted |
|
|
19.6 |
16.9 |
12.8 |
15.3 |
18.9 |
20.7 |
20.8 |
EPS - (IFRS) |
|
|
3.7 |
(35.3) |
8.7 |
23.6 |
16.6 |
19.2 |
19.5 |
Dividend per share |
14.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
7.0 |
||
Gross Margin (%) |
4.8 |
4.9 |
5.9 |
6.2 |
6.1 |
6.4 |
5.1 |
||
EBITDA Margin (%) |
5.2 |
5.1 |
5.6 |
5.6 |
5.6 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
||
Operating Margin (before GW and except.) (%) |
3.5 |
3.6 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
4.5 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
||
BALANCE SHEET |
|||||||||
Fixed Assets |
|
|
391.3 |
236.5 |
220.4 |
191.3 |
185.4 |
174.9 |
167.5 |
Intangible Assets |
157.4 |
123.2 |
114.4 |
105.5 |
96.8 |
89.8 |
83.3 |
||
Tangible Assets |
208.6 |
84.5 |
73.1 |
61.7 |
58.2 |
56.6 |
55.7 |
||
Investments |
15.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
||
Other |
9.6 |
28.8 |
32.9 |
24.0 |
30.3 |
28.4 |
28.4 |
||
Current Assets |
|
|
467.1 |
331.2 |
254.9 |
273.6 |
246.8 |
249.7 |
256.5 |
Stocks |
10.3 |
6.7 |
7.1 |
6.4 |
5.8 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
||
Debtors |
272.6 |
92.5 |
81.2 |
81.5 |
86.5 |
107.3 |
111.6 |
||
Cash |
88.3 |
165.6 |
103.2 |
131.9 |
105.8 |
76.9 |
76.9 |
||
Other |
95.9 |
66.4 |
63.4 |
53.8 |
48.7 |
60.3 |
62.8 |
||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
(595.3) |
(434.5) |
(356.8) |
(368.9) |
(379.5) |
(340.2) |
(351.8) |
Creditors |
(246.4) |
(100.1) |
(90.2) |
(81.4) |
(84.6) |
(77.4) |
(80.5) |
||
Short term borrowings |
(11.1) |
(59.7) |
(13.9) |
(12.1) |
(35.3) |
(21.3) |
(21.3) |
||
Other |
(337.8) |
(274.7) |
(252.7) |
(275.4) |
(259.6) |
(241.5) |
(250.0) |
||
Long Term Liabilities |
|
|
(370.1) |
(401.6) |
(405.0) |
(346.0) |
(314.4) |
(254.9) |
(237.4) |
Long term borrowings |
(229.0) |
(220.4) |
(196.9) |
(184.7) |
(128.1) |
(100.3) |
(90.8) |
||
Other long term liabilities |
(141.1) |
(181.2) |
(208.1) |
(161.3) |
(186.3) |
(154.6) |
(146.6) |
||
Net Assets |
|
|
(107.0) |
(268.4) |
(286.5) |
(250.0) |
(261.7) |
(170.5) |
(165.3) |
CASH FLOW |
|||||||||
Operating Cash Flow |
|
|
69.9 |
67.6 |
36.9 |
70.4 |
46.8 |
1.7 |
50.1 |
Net Interest |
(14.9) |
(19.4) |
(14.2) |
(14.0) |
(12.8) |
(10.0) |
(8.5) |
||
Tax |
0.0 |
(0.5) |
(0.3) |
(2.4) |
(4.2) |
(5.2) |
(5.7) |
||
Capex |
(38.0) |
(28.5) |
(4.6) |
(1.7) |
(9.7) |
(9.9) |
(10.5) |
||
Acquisitions/disposals |
10.6 |
61.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
48.7 |
0.0 |
||
Financing |
(12.0) |
(36.5) |
(12.5) |
(11.6) |
(12.1) |
(13.0) |
(13.0) |
||
Dividends |
(17.0) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(2.8) |
||
Net Cash Flow |
(1.4) |
44.0 |
5.3 |
40.7 |
8.0 |
12.4 |
9.5 |
||
Opening net debt/(cash) |
|
|
152.0 |
151.8 |
114.5 |
107.6 |
64.9 |
57.6 |
44.7 |
HP finance leases initiated |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Other |
1.4 |
(6.7) |
1.6 |
2.0 |
(0.7) |
0.5 |
0.0 |
||
Closing net debt/(cash) |
|
|
151.8 |
114.5 |
107.6 |
64.9 |
57.6 |
44.7 |
35.2 |
Source: Edison Investment Research, company accounts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Research: Investment Companies
Seneca Global Income & Growth Trust