Last close As at 05/08/2026
GBP0.36
▲ −0.60 (−1.66%)
Market capitalisation
GBP71m
Research: Consumer
Topps Tiles’ (TPT’s) FY25 results clearly demonstrated the profit leverage available as incremental revenue and services from the Mission 365 growth initiatives combined with more favourable end markets. Revenue growth was broad based across all divisions, which fed through to higher gross margins for all divisions and the group. Management remains confident in the growth strategy and the Mission 365 financial goals, which offer substantial upside from the current share price if achieved over the next few years.
| Year end | Revenue (£m) | PBT (£m) | EPS (p) | DPS (p) | P/E (x) | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/24 | 251.8 | 6.3 | 2.39 | 2.40 | 18.8 | 5.3 |
| 9/25 | 295.8 | 9.2 | 3.43 | 2.90 | 13.1 | 6.4 |
| 9/26e | 313.4 | 11.4 | 4.50 | 3.51 | 10.0 | 7.8 |
| 9/27e | 332.4 | 14.3 | 5.27 | 3.90 | 8.5 | 8.7 |
TPT’s FY25 adjusted PBT, which excludes the contribution by CTD Tiles (CTD), grew by 46% y-o-y to £9.2m, at the top-end of consensus expectations. The results reflect increasing growth rates as we move down the income statement, with 6.8% growth in adjusted revenue and c 8% growth in adjusted gross profit. Trade customers have been the engine of the growth, with many of the Mission 365 growth initiatives focused on this important and loyal customer group, while the weak trends for retail customers appear to have stabilised between H1 and H2. In addition to the better-than-expected profit performance, shareholder returns surprised on the upside, with the strong jump in profit enabling management to begin normalising the dividend payout ratio towards the stated long-term policy of a 67% payout on adjusted earnings.
We make no significant changes to our FY26 estimates for the time being as we offset a slight reduction in CTD revenue with a new contribution from Fired Earth, for which management has yet to quantify the financial benefits. TPT has a number of self-help drivers, including better trading and profitability from CTD and Tile Warehouse, as well as more to come from Mission 365. We introduce forecasts for FY27, with 6% revenue growth to £332m and 25% growth in adjusted PBT to a margin of 4.3% versus FY25’s 3.1% and FY26’s 3.6%. Our forecast for FY27 compares with management’s Mission 365 target for FY29 of £363–398m, implying an acceleration in revenue growth beyond FY27. We expect strong growth in adjusted PBT beyond FY27 as our estimate of £14.3m compares with a projected range of £29.0–39.8m when applying management’s margin target of 8–10%.
TPT trades at a significant discount to our unchanged discounted cash flow (DCF)-based valuation of 116p/share. Applying more appropriate peer-based valuations, and TPT’s own historical multiples, both of which take account of relative profitability, supports our DCF-based valuation, which includes FY29e adjusted PBT towards the middle of management’s financial goals.
FY25 was strong year for the group, with Mission 365 growth initiatives along with a more favourable trading environment than the previous year.
On an underlying basis (ie excluding CTD) revenue grew by 6.8%, gross profit increased by 7.7% (as the gross margin moved to 53.8% from 53.3% in FY24), adjusted PBT increased by 46% to £9.2m and adjusted EPS by 43.5% to 3.43p per share. After TPT’s Q425 trading update, we raised our FY25 revenue estimate to be consistent with management’s indicated figures but retained our low-end estimates for adjusted PBT.
CTD contributed revenue of £30.4m, which was consistent with management’s commentary since the acquisition was announced.
Relative to our previous estimates, underlying gross profit was marginally ahead, while CTD’s gross profit was light. Therefore, cost control was better than we had anticipated in order to deliver adjusted PBT at the top end of consensus.
Management’s commentary indicates good progress across many of the five key elements of the Mission 365 strategy:
Trade customers have been the engine of growth, with many of the above Mission 365 initiatives specifically aimed at them, given their importance as brand ambassadors and their levels of repeat custom. At the group level (including the newly acquired revenue of CTD), trade customers represent 75% of sales. The importance of trade customers is apparent when looking at the Topps Tiles branded stores, as revenue from retail customers continues to decline year-on-year. However, we note signs of stabilisation in absolute revenue from H1 to H2 in FY25, the first time this has happened in the last four financial years.
The prolonged Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) review of the CTD acquisition not only disrupted trading but also required a high level of one-off and advisory costs. The trading loss of £1.7m was a little higher than originally anticipated and one-off costs amounted to £5.2m, so in total weighed on reported PBT to the tune of £6.9m. Management anticipates CTD will generate a profit in FY26, which we assume will be H2 weighted given the CMA review and continuing challenging backdrop.
The improvement in the adjusted gross margin reflects a combination of positive influences such as better price inflation, lower discounts and better sourcing, partially offset by a greater contribution from the lower-margin business versus Topps Tiles branded stores and greater trade penetration.
There were a few headwinds with higher staff costs in FY25, including the 6.7% increase in the National Living Wage and the increase in employer National Insurance contributions from April, as well as higher performance-related pay. The company also invested in marketing and systems and to support growth in Online Pure Play so that on a gross basis adjusted operating expenses increased by £10m versus FY24, or just over 8%. Management’s focus on cost savings and efficiencies and some savings from operating fewer stores (297 Topps Tiles branded stores at end FY25 versus 301 at the end of FY24) restricted growth in adjusted operating costs to about 4.7% in FY25. This was lower than the 7.75% growth in adjusted operating profit, and hence there was a significant improvement in the adjusted operating margin.
Total adjusting items, both operating and financial, netted out to a £0.9m benefit versus statutory profit.
The strong profit growth enabled management to surprise with a much higher final dividend, which took the FY25 total dividend to 2.9p per share, versus our estimate of 2.6p per share. The payout ratio on adjusted EPS was 85%, lower than FY24’s 100%, as the company moves towards its medium-term target for a payout ratio of 67%.
Underlying operating cash flow generation before working capital improved versus FY24, however free cash flow generation was much lower than the previous year mainly due to two items. First, and most significant, FY25’s working capital was marginally negative versus the inflow reported for FY24, which was helped by the phasing of payments to trade creditors, which fell after the FY24 period end. Second, CTD’s operational cash flows and the advisory fees for the CMA review weighed on free cash flow.
By the period end the adjusted net cash position of £7.4m, before lease liabilities of £99.8m, was marginally lower than FY24’s £8.7m. The drawings from the company’s £30m revolving credit facility were lower at £11.0m versus £15.0m at the end of FY24.
Given the lacklustre consumer sentiment over the last few months, ahead of the Budget, it is no surprise revenue growth in the first nine weeks of FY26 has softened a little from the strong growth in Q424 and versus the positive growth reported through FY25.
Here it is worth highlighting that for the first time since the start of FY24 the company is reporting positive growth on a positive comparative from the prior year, instead of reporting positive growth on an easy comparative. Through FY25, the company enjoyed good revenue momentum, and it was clear that trends were improving as the year progressed, with positive two-year revenue growth through Q325 and Q425, having been negative for Q125 and Q225.
The overall consumer confidence indicator has been quite range-bound through 2025 so far.
With the publication of the results, management announced the acquisition of the Fired Earth brand, IP, website and c £2.5m of inventory out of administration for a total consideration of £3.0m. This looks like an attractive valuation based on the inventory alone, and even more so in the context of the £15m of revenue Fired Earth reported in the year ended September 2024, suggesting good customer appeal for its high-end and quality products. Fired Earth was loss-making with an operating loss of £1.7m in that year, but this should have less of a negative effect on Topps Tiles as it has not acquired the company’s store base. Management provided little commentary on the expected strategy for the brand and the expected financial effects of the transaction. However, we believe Topps Tiles’ more extensive store portfolio and trade initiatives should be helpful for the Fired Earth brand.
Management’s commentary suggests plenty of opportunity to improve profitability in the coming year. The main driver will be further developing the Mission 365 initiatives, which should be positive for revenue, all other things being equal, and profitability. CTD should not hold back group profitability, with management confident of delivering a profit in FY26, and there should be other drivers to better profitability (eg moving Tile Warehouse to a profit from a £0.5m loss in FY25).
There are no significant overall changes to our FY26 estimates, as the first-time revenue contribution from Fired Earth offsets a slight reduction in our forecast CTD revenue, as a store disposal is deferred into FY26. We introduce forecasts for FY27, with 6% revenue growth to £332m and 25% growth in adjusted PBT to a margin of 4.3% versus FY25’s 3.1% and FY26’s 3.6%. Our FY27 revenue forecast compares with management’s Mission 365 target for FY29 of £363–398m, implying a good ramp in growth beyond FY27. Equally, we are implying strong growth in adjusted PBT beyond FY27 as our FY27 estimate of £14.3m compares with a projected range of £29.0–39.8m for FY29 when applying management’s margin targets of 8–10% to the revenue.
As we roll forward our estimates, we update our valuation from our August Outlook note. All valuation measures point to a share price well north of the current share price.
Our DCF-based valuation of 116p per share is unchanged, with an estimated weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 8.5% and a terminal growth rate of 2%. Our FY29 revenue estimate of £380m is towards the middle of the Mission 365 revenue target and we assume an adjusted PBT margin of 8.2%, at the low end of management’s target range of 8–10%. Therefore, there is upside to our valuation if management achieves the top end of its Mission 365 targets.
The sensitivity of the valuation to changes in our estimated WACC and terminal growth rate is as follows:
TPT does not have a direct quoted peer, but there are a number of companies with a partial product overlap. Below we show its revenue growth rates, profitability and multiples with two sets of quoted peers: manufacturers and distributors of products that are exposed to the same end markets, and retailers exposed to housing-related spend. We have annualised all figures to TPT’s September year-end using a simple average of their annual figures, which likely understates the seasonality of the peers.
Consensus estimates expect mid-single-digit revenue growth on average for both sets of peers (ie a continued recovery). The peers have a wide range of gross and operating margins, with TPT’s operating margin comparable to its retail peers. Despite our estimates for similar revenue growth and profitability, TPT trades at a high discount to the retail peers and offers a more attractive dividend yield.
There is a high correlation between prospective EV/sales multiples and operating margins for the UK retailers, and we can see TPT trades at a discount to its warranted valuation of 0.68x sales if we apply the line of best fit with a projected FY26 operating margin of 6.2%, or 0.98–1.2x if it can achieve the Mission 365 margin targets.
Applying these prospective EV/sales multiples to the Mission 365 financial goals and discounting the valuation back to today suggests a share price range of 97–141p, with an average of 119p.
For each historical year, in Exhibit 9, we show the high, average (figure shown on the chart) and low EV/sales multiples. To make the comparison more valid over time, we exclude IFRS 16 liabilities from our calculation of enterprise value, while recognising IFRS 16 also makes comparison of the reported operating margin across time difficult. The multiples differ slightly from those shown in the peer valuation table as they include lease liabilities.
TPT’s average EV/sales multiple since FY12 has been 0.70x, and therefore FY26’s prospective EV/sales multiple of 0.25x looks low in the context of its long-term average in isolation and considering our projected levels of profitability.
Applying the long-term average EV/sales multiple to our FY26 sales estimate indicates a share price of 115p, which is consistent with our DCF-based valuation.
General disclaimer and copyright
This report has been commissioned by Topps Tiles and prepared and issued by Edison, in consideration of a fee payable by Topps Tiles. Edison Investment Research standard fees are £60,000 pa for the production and broad dissemination of a detailed note (Outlook) following by regular (typically quarterly) update notes. Fees are paid upfront in cash without recourse. Edison may seek additional fees for the provision of roadshows and related IR services for the client but does not get remunerated for any investment banking services. We never take payment in stock, options or warrants for any of our services.
Accuracy of content: All information used in the publication of this report has been compiled from publicly available sources that are believed to be reliable, however we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this report and have not sought for this information to be independently verified. Opinions contained in this report represent those of the research department of Edison at the time of publication. Forward-looking information or statements in this report contain information that is based on assumptions, forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable, and therefore involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of their subject matter to be materially different from current expectations.
Exclusion of Liability: To the fullest extent allowed by law, Edison shall not be liable for any direct, indirect or consequential losses, loss of profits, damages, costs or expenses incurred or suffered by you arising out or in connection with the access to, use of or reliance on any information contained on this note.
No personalised advice: The information that we provide should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as, personalised advice. Also, the information provided by us should not be construed by any subscriber or prospective subscriber as Edison’s solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect, any transaction in a security. The securities described in the report may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors.
Investment in securities mentioned: Edison has a restrictive policy relating to personal dealing and conflicts of interest. Edison Group does not conduct any investment business and, accordingly, does not itself hold any positions in the securities mentioned in this report. However, the respective directors, officers, employees and contractors of Edison may have a position in any or related securities mentioned in this report, subject to Edison's policies on personal dealing and conflicts of interest.
Copyright 2025 Edison Investment Research Limited (Edison).
Australia
Edison Investment Research Pty Ltd (Edison AU) is the Australian subsidiary of Edison. Edison AU is a Corporate Authorised Representative (1252501) of Crown Wealth Group Pty Ltd who holds an Australian Financial Services Licence (Number: 494274). This research is issued in Australia by Edison AU and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 of Australia. Any advice given by Edison AU is general advice only and does not take into account your personal circumstances, needs or objectives. You should, before acting on this advice, consider the appropriateness of the advice, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. If our advice relates to the acquisition, or possible acquisition, of a particular financial product you should read any relevant Product Disclosure Statement or like instrument.
New Zealand
The research in this document is intended for New Zealand resident professional financial advisers or brokers (for use in their roles as financial advisers or brokers) and habitual investors who are “wholesale clients” for the purpose of the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (FAA) (as described in sections 5(c) (1)(a), (b) and (c) of the FAA). This is not a solicitation or inducement to buy, sell, subscribe, or underwrite any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. For the purpose of the FAA, the content of this report is of a general nature, is intended as a source of general information only and is not intended to constitute a recommendation or opinion in relation to acquiring or disposing (including refraining from acquiring or disposing) of securities. The distribution of this document is not a “personalised service” and, to the extent that it contains any financial advice, is intended only as a “class service” provided by Edison within the meaning of the FAA (i.e. without taking into account the particular financial situation or goals of any person). As such, it should not be relied upon in making an investment decision.
United Kingdom
This document is prepared and provided by Edison for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or sol icitation for investment in any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. A marketing communication under FCA Rules, this document has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
This Communication is being distributed in the United Kingdom and is directed only at (i) persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments, i.e. investment professionals within the meaning of Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended (the "FPO") (ii) high net-worth companies, unincorporated associations or other bodies within the meaning of Article 49 of the FPO and (iii) persons to whom it is otherwise lawful to distribute it. The investment or investment activity to which this document relates is available only to such persons. It is not intended that this document be distributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other class of persons and in any event and under no circumstances should persons of any other description rely on or act upon the contents of this document.
This Communication is being supplied to you solely for your information and may not be reproduced by, further distributed to or published in whole or in part by, any other person.
United States
Edison relies upon the "publishers' exclusion" from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws. This report is a bona fide publication of general and regular circulation offering impersonal investment-related advice, not tailored to a specific investment portfolio or the needs of current and/or prospective subscribers. As such, Edison does not offer or provide personal advice and the research provided is for informational purposes only. No mention of a particular security in this report constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that or any security, or that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person.
London │ New York │ Frankfurt
20 Red Lion Street
London, WC1R 4PS
United Kingdom
Research: Industrials
Theon’s recently announced c €1bn contract is the largest ever awarded by European NATO members for night vision goggles, highlighting the group’s strong market position and market leading technology as well as providing sales visibility out to 2029. We see this announcement as an inflection point in establishing Theon as a premium defence-related investment.