Over 2017 BiondVax crystallised its late-stage development plans for lead asset M-001, a potentially universal influenza vaccine. Following its discussions with the regulatory authorities and gaining access to new capital (European Investment Bank and share issues), the company confirmed on 27 December 2017 that it will initiate a pivotal Phase III trial on its own for a universal flu vaccine indication (likely to start in Q318). We have revised our assumptions substantially and increased our valuation to $200m (NIS689m) or $32.4/ADS (NIS2.80/share) from $165m previously.
Written by
BiondVax Pharmaceuticals |
Phase III for universal flu vaccine starts in 2018 |
Company update |
Pharma & biotech |
15 January 2018 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analysts
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Over 2017 BiondVax crystallised its late-stage development plans for lead asset M-001, a potentially universal influenza vaccine. Following its discussions with the regulatory authorities and gaining access to new capital (European Investment Bank and share issues), the company confirmed on 27 December 2017 that it will initiate a pivotal Phase III trial on its own for a universal flu vaccine indication (likely to start in Q318). We have revised our assumptions substantially and increased our valuation to $200m (NIS689m) or $32.4/ADS (NIS2.80/share) from $165m previously.
Year end |
Revenue (NISm) |
PBT* |
EPS* |
DPS |
P/E |
Yield |
12/15 |
0.0 |
(10.2) |
(0.10) |
0.0 |
N/A |
N/A |
12/16 |
0.0 |
(9.2) |
(0.07) |
0.0 |
N/A |
N/A |
12/17e |
0.0 |
(24.9) |
(0.13) |
0.0 |
N/A |
N/A |
12/18e |
0.0 |
(18.5) |
(0.07) |
0.0 |
N/A |
N/A |
Note: *PBT and EPS are normalised, excluding amortisation of acquired intangibles, exceptional items and share-based payments.
M-001 as a universal, standalone vaccine
BiondVax now plans to move directly into Phase III with M-001 as a standalone influenza vaccine. The company has explored various paths to the market, including targeting smaller populations such as a pandemic primer for stockpiling or a seasonal primer for populations at risk. After the consultation with the regulatory authorities and gaining access to the €20m loan from the European Investment Bank (EIB), BiondVax attracted new equity investments and now is preparing the Phase III trial for the ultimate goal of developing a standalone universal influenza vaccine.
Focused development strategy to reach the market
The upcoming Phase III study will be conducted in Europe and will involve participants over the age of 50 because BiondVax views this group as the primary target population. The elderly population is typically considered at risk in guidelines, which therefore recommend vaccination. Therefore, this target population could be the fastest route to the market. If the Phase III trial is successful there is the potential to expand to other age groups as well as to other markets, like the US, where vaccination guidelines are the most comprehensive and cover the whole population from six months of age.
Valuation: Increased to $200m (NIS689m)
We have increased our valuation of BiondVax to $200m (NIS689m) or $32.4/ADS (NIS2.80/share) from $165m (NIS577m) or $26.8/ADS (NIS2.34/share) after a substantial revision of our assumptions. We now include a universal, multi-seasonal flu vaccine indication in the US and Europe for the elderly, eventually expanding across all age groups, and for national stockpiling. BiondVax’s financial position improved substantially over 2017, which will allow the company to invest more in late-stage development and retain more of M-001’s value if a potential licensing deal emerges in the future.
Phase III likely to start in Q318
The preliminary clinical trial design (Exhibit 1) includes recruitment of around 7,700 participants aged 50+ years who will be stratified into two groups ie those below 65 years and those who are 65+ years of age. M-001 will be administered intramuscularly on day 1 and again on day 21. Participants will be recruited mainly in Eastern European countries, as seasonal vaccine coverage rates in these countries tend to be smaller compared to Western countries, therefore recruitment could be faster and pose less ethical concerns (vaccinating with M-001 instead of conventional seasonal vaccine). At least one season will be allowed for follow-ups, with interim reports likely after each season. Since flu seasons tend to fluctuate in terms of infection prevalence, the trial is designed to have flexible enrolment which will allow recruitment of the additional required participants in season 2 and season 3 if needed.
Regulatory authorities currently evaluate seasonal vaccines based on influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) antibodies, which correlate with protection, ie seasonal vaccine manufacturers do not need to conduct robust, large-scale clinical trials every year. Since the M-001 vaccine does not induce the production of these antibodies, BiondVax plans to evaluate the clinical efficacy of vaccination with M-001 by measuring the reduction in influenza-like illness (ILI) rate and severity, a robust primary clinical endpoint. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) confirmed that a single pivotal efficacy trial that proves efficacy against laboratory-proven ILI would be sufficient for an approval in the EU.
The trial is planned to start prior to the 2018/19 flu season (late Q318). BiondVax’s financial position improved substantially over 2017, but we maintain our scenario that with current funding the company could initiate the study and make substantial progress, although to finish it additional funds will be needed. According to BiondVax, these funds could come from various sources including non-dilutive funds, equity raises or partnering (we assume partnership deal as described in the Valuation section).
Exhibit 1: Potential Phase III trial with M-001 design
Trial |
Season 1 |
Season 2 |
Season 3 (optional) |
||
Day 1 |
Day 21 |
Day 180 follow-up |
Follow-up |
Follow-up |
|
Intervention |
1mg M-001 |
1mg M-001 |
Safety, PCR and culture testing if influenza-like illness is observed in subjects |
||
Control |
Placebo |
Placebo |
|||
Source: BiondVax. Note: PCR – polymerase chain reaction.
Market expansion strategy
We note that the upcoming Phase III study will involve participants who are over the age of 50, which BiondVax views as the primary target population. Typically, guidelines consider the elderly population to be most at risk and therefore recommend vaccination, so this target population could be the fastest route to the market. If the Phase III trial is successful there is potential for it to be expanded to other age groups, although for the time being it is not clear whether a bridging study will be needed. In terms of geographies, the EMA agreed that the upcoming study, if successful, would be sufficient for registration in Europe. To register M-001 in the US, BiondVax expects the FDA to use the data from the European study.
The use of M-001 as a multi-seasonal flu vaccine is the primary indication, although national stockpiling is a distinctive opportunity as well. If approved, M-001 could become a preferred vaccine for national stockpiles, in our view.
Clinical testing to date: Encouraging immunogenicity
To date, BiondVax has conducted two Phase I/II trials and four Phase II trials involving 698 participants across different age groups. Phase IIb BVX-007 was the latest trial to report the data in July 2017, which further confirmed the findings from previous studies. M-001 has been shown to have a good safety profile, elicit immunogenicity to multiple flu virus strains and activate both humoral and cellular immune responses (cell-mediated immunity), as opposed to the mainly strain-specific humoral arm stimulation elicited with conventional seasonal flu vaccines. Exhibit 2 summarises M-001’s clinical trial results to date.
Exhibit 2: Summary of completed trials with M-001
Trial |
Age group |
Year and Phase |
Size (n) |
Comments |
BVX-002 |
18-49 years |
2009, Phase I/II |
63 |
The study demonstrated safety and immunogenicity of two doses of M-001 intramuscular injection with or without an adjuvant. |
BVX-003 |
55-75 years |
2010, Phase I/II |
60 |
Safety and immunogenicity of two doses of M-001 intramuscular injection with or without an adjuvant was demonstrated in elderly patients. |
BVX-004 |
18-49 years |
2011, Phase II |
200 |
In addition to more safety data (primary endpoint), the double-blind, placebo-control trial tested the idea of seasonal vaccine priming with M-001. The results demonstrated that increased humoral and cellular responses were detected after co-administration of adjuvanted M-001 with seasonal vaccine as compared to after co-administration of placebo with seasonal vaccine. |
BVX-005 |
65 years+ |
2012, Phase II |
120 |
In addition to more safety data (primary endpoint), the trial tested different priming regimes (one or two doses of 0.5mg of M-001; adjuvanted with aluminium phosphate or not) of vaccination with M-001 followed by seasonal vaccine in elderly population with the secondary endpoints being humoral (hemagglutination inhibition assay, HAI) and cell mediated (CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes producing IFN-gamma) immune responses. Results echoed previous trials showing safety and activation of both humoral and cellular responses. BiondVax revisited the study later on, when it exposed the blood plasma from the BVX-005 trial to H3N2 epidemic strain (2014/15) that did not exist in 2012. The immunogenicity was measured using HAI, which worked because M-001 was used as a primer to seasonal vaccine. The results showed that the level of protective antibodies against H31N2 was significantly higher in the M-001 primer group than in the control (seasonal vaccine only in 2012 study). Around of 50% of the participants in the M-001 group showed immunogenicity against the new strain versus only 10% in the control group (statistically significant). |
BVX-006 |
50-64 years |
2015, Phase II |
36 |
Further safety and immunogenicity data from more intensive regimens: with regular 0.5mg (established in previous trials) and higher 1.0mg doses and three-dose regimen followed by seasonal vaccine. Results were consistent with the previous data and no significant side effects were noticed in the higher dose group. M-001 primed broader immune response than those strains included in the seasonal vaccine. |
BVX-007 |
18-60 years |
2017, Phase IIb |
219 |
This was a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial that enrolled 219 adults into three arms: M-001 doses of 0.5mg and 1.0mg, and placebo. The total monitoring period was 180 days. The primary endpoints of safety and cellular immune response were both achieved echoing positive data from the previous trials. |
Source: BiondVax
In November 2017, BiondVax announced that it had signed a clinical trial agreement for a Phase II clinical trial with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH). As guided before, the trial will be funded by the NIH and, according to plans this will be the last Phase II study. The US study (n=120) is designed to test M-001’s priming effect before the administration of seasonal vaccine (the other group will receive placebo and seasonal vaccine). The study is expected to start after the end of the 2017/18 flu season.
EIB loan and share issues pave way for Phase III
In addition to successful share issues in January and September 2017, the €20m loan from the European Investment Bank (EIB) was a game changing event for BiondVax, in our view, as it allowed it to proceed to Phase III trial with M-001. The agreement was signed on 19 June 2017 and over the next three years the company will be able to draw down all the money presuming the development milestones related to the lead universal flu vaccine candidate M-001 are met. The new funds are available via Horizon 2020, the EU Research and Innovation Framework Programme for 2014-20, managed by the European Commission and the European Investment Bank Group. We believe that before the loan was agreed, BiondVax underwent a substantial due diligence process to demonstrate the potential of its universal flu vaccine’s potential. We therefore take it as an external validation of BiondVax technology, which could also raise the company’s profile when approaching potential partners.
The loan is interest-free; remuneration will vary depending on royalties from net sales of M-001 once approved. BiondVax retains an option to repay the loan and repurchase the royalties at any time. The company can draw down in three tranches within 12, 24 and 36 months, which will also depend on certain agreed milestones eg manufacturing of first clinical batch for the Phase III clinical trials. The tranches are repayable five years after each drawdown. The funds from EIB cannot exceed 50% of the total financing requirement for the M-001 development and related activities.
M-001 multi epitope-based vaccine vs conventional
Innate and acquired immune system roles combating flu virus
There are two immune system types: innate and acquired. Innate is the in-born, non-specific ability to defend against infections, while acquired immunity is specific to a pathogen and is responsible for a long-lasting effect eg vaccination. Most vaccines in use today work by inducing antibody based immunity (acquired), but animal models and early-stage clinical trials have suggested that generating cellular immunity via T-cell responses (innate) may induce broad protection that current vaccines lack. Furthermore, humoral immunity (antibodies) is effective against extra-cellular antigens, while a virus’s life cycle is mainly inside the cells and therefore not exposed to antibodies. Cell-mediated immunity is more effective against intra-cellular infections including the influenza virus. The role of cellular immunity (innate) among others includes the direct clearance of virally infected cells, the indirect recruitment of other immune cells and also B cell stimulation (humoral response) leading to specific antigen antibody production.
Exhibit 3: Basics of influenza virus and seasonal vaccination
Influenza virus classification |
Types: A, B and C. Influenza A viruses are subtyped according to their surface antigens (glycoproteins): hemagglutinin (HA, 18 serotypes) and neuraminidase (NA, 11 serotypes), eg H1N1. Influenza B viruses are separated into two lineages (Yamagata and Victoria), but are not subtyped.1 Virus A has been the cause of all flu pandemics in humans, while virus A and B cause seasonal epidemics2. Influenza C infections cause mild respiratory illnesses. Q. M. Sheikh. Towards the knowledge-based design of universal influenza epitope ensemble vaccines. Bioinformatics, 32(21), 2016, 3233–3239. |
Virus mutation |
The viral RNA genome spontaneously mutates, resulting in gradual changes in the seasonal viruses known as antigenic drift. Since the new serotype is still somewhat similar to the prior one a large percentage of the people will still be immune. Larger genetic changes, called antigenic shift, is caused by re-assortment of the genome segments and occurs particularly in the hemagglutinin protein of influenza A viruses. This can create a pandemic with uncontrolled spreading throughout the population. |
Pandemics are the result of antigenic shift |
Only type A viruses cause pandemics as they have a reservoir in animals (birds, swine, bats). Genetic mixing between viruses of human and animal origin occasionally leads to a viable influenza A virus strain to which humans have little or no immunity. A recent example was the 2009 outbreak of H1N1 of swine origin (‘swine flu’). Type A H5N1 and H7N9 (avian) is currently causing the greatest pandemic concern. Highly pathogenic H5N6 and H5N8 are other two avian flu type A viruses that are spreading across Europe and Asia through multiple bird species with the latest H5N6 outbreak in poultry farms reported in South Korea this month. |
Seasonal flu |
At any one time there is a mix of influenza viruses circulating in the human population. For the 2016-17 season vaccines are recommended to contain influenza strains A(H3N2), A(H1N1)pdm09 (2009 swine flu pandemic) and one or two B virus lineages (depending on whether the vaccine is trivalent or quadrivalent). |
Vaccine strain selection |
It takes around six months to produce the most widely used, egg-based influenza vaccines. Therefore, based on circulating virus samples, the World Health Organisation (WHO) annually predicts which seasonal A and B strains will likely dominate the next season. Vaccine manufacturers produce a new three-strain (trivalent, TIV) or four-strain (quadrivalent, QIV) influenza vaccine accordingly. However, antigenic drift/shift during the months between selection (in March) and vaccine distribution (September-November) can result in a mismatch between the strains in the vaccine and those circulating in the population. In this case the vaccine may not provide adequate protection. |
Source: Edison Investment Research
Conventional seasonal vaccines and ‘multimeric’ M-001
Most current flu vaccines are subunit vaccines. The virus is grown, then inactivated and its surface antigens (eg HA) are used for immunisation. Other existing types of vaccines are live attenuated typically delivered as nasal sprays or injections.3 These vaccines rely on triggering humoral (acquired) response to the common variable surface regions of the influenza virus, therefore are highly strain specific. BiondVax’s technology, in-licensed from Yeda Research and Development (Weizmann Institute of Science), is based on peptide technology, which uses a combination of conserved and common epitopes from influenza virus proteins.
T. Gottlieb and T. Ben-Yedidia. Epitope-based approaches to a universal influenza vaccine. Journal of Autoimmunity 2014, 1-6.
The conserved epitope-based approach focuses on the minimal component of a viral protein that activates the lymphocyte. Typically this corresponds to short peptides from 8-10 amino acids for the activation of T-cells and longer regions of up to 20 amino acids for activating B-cells. Based on technology developed by Professor Ruth Arnon at the Weizmann Institute (Professor Arnon is also known as the co-developer of Copaxone, the blockbuster multiple sclerosis drug), BiondVax has designed a vaccine specifically to activate both the cellular (T-cells destroy virus infected cells) and the humoral (B-cells produce specific antibodies against the virus) arms of the immune system, both of which are now recognised to play an important role in controlling influenza infection. A number of targets for influenza vaccine have been investigated by BiondVax and other researchers that would activate both T-cell and B-cell responses. These include conserved ‘stalk’ domain of hemagglutinin antigen, nucleoprotein (NP), Matrix 1 (M1) and Matrix protein 2 (M2e) among others.
The engineered ‘multimeric’ vaccine M-001 contains nine conserved and common epitopes (short peptides) from HA, M1 and NP viral antigens (Exhibit 4). The epitopes are combined into a single recombinant protein easily manufactured in E. coli bacteria. These specific epitopes activate both arms of the immune system.
|
Exhibit 4: In total nine conserved epitopes from HA, M1 and NP antigens comprise M-001 |
|
|
Source: BiondVax; T. Gottlieb and T. Ben-Yedidia. Epitope-based approaches to a universal influenza vaccine. Journal of Autoimmunity 2014, 1-6. |
Exhibit 5: Comparison of M-001 and conventional flu vaccines
BiondVax M-001 |
Conventional flu vaccine |
Broader immune system activation: designed to activate antibodies (humoral response) and specific T and B lymphocytes (cellular response); evidence of cross-protection to other strains. |
Often limited to anti-HA antibody induction. No cross immunity conferred to non-vaccine strains. |
Broad coverage of strains: covers different type A and B seasonal and pandemic influenza strains, both current and future. |
Limited to 2 A strains and 1-2 B strains. Requires new vaccine each season and separate stockpiles for each pandemic with a limited possibility that the correct strain was stockpiled. |
Shorter production time: 6-8 weeks. Invaluable in a pandemic outbreak. |
Long production time: 16-24 weeks lead-time. Requires forward planning. |
Year round production, ability to stockpile: M-001’s conserved peptide components eliminate the need to reformulate the vaccine every season; enables year-round, flexible production and stockpiling according to demand. |
Inflexible: the WHO selects three to four strains in Q1 each year; these are produced and distributed in the Northern Hemisphere during September to November. |
Egg-free production method in bacterial system. |
Egg-based manufacture: lengthy, costly and can cause allergic reactions. |
Source: Edison Investment Research, BiondVax
High disease burden and low flu vaccine effectiveness
In the US, seasonal flu causes around 23,000 deaths a year, mainly in the elderly, and 200,000 hospitalisations (CDC). Worldwide there are estimated to be 3-5 million severe cases annually resulting in 250,000-500,000 deaths (WHO). Children under two years, those aged 65 and over and the chronically ill are most at risk. For example, around 90% of seasonal flu related deaths occur in elderly people, as influenza worsens outcomes or existing chronic conditions (CDC). Molinari et al estimated that in the US the economic impact of seasonal influenza was $10.4bn in direct medical costs alone, with a significantly larger burden due to lost lives, earnings and productivity of $87.1bn.4 According to EvaluatePharma, the worldwide influenza vaccine market was $4.3bn, with Fluzone (Sanofi, quadrivalent) reaching top $1.5bn in sales in 2015.
Seasonal vaccines often fail to protect from flu infection due to the mismatch of the forecasted and prevailing virus strains, but also because of possible low efficacy even if there is a match. According to the CDC, the average overall adjusted vaccine effectiveness for influenza seasons in the general population has been approximately 40% over 2004-2016, partly due to the antigenic drift of influenza virus strains (‘strain mismatch’), while the variation was significant over the same 2004-2016 from as low as 10% (2004) to as high as 60% (2010). Despite increasing vaccination rates, effectiveness is even lower in the elderly due to immunosenescence. There is a need for a more reliable vaccine that is both more immunoprotective and with coverage against a wider range of flu strains for the entire population and in particular for the elderly.
Consensus view on universal flu vaccine
On 10 August 2016, BiondVax participated in the ‘Eighth WHO meeting on development of influenza vaccines that induce broadly protective and long-lasting immune responses’ held in Chicago, US. The WHO’s Global Vaccine Plan calls for at least one licensed universal influenza vaccine by 2020 in response to poor effectiveness rates with conventional seasonal vaccines. The WHO monitors the progress and conducts periodic meetings with experts, who provide thought leadership about the development of innovative influenza vaccines. In our view, the clinical data so far and the positioning of M-001 are broadly in line with the consensus view about the universal vaccine.
Valuation
Our valuation of BiondVax is increased to $200m (NIS689m) or $32.4/ADS (NIS2.80/share) from $165m (NIS577m) or $26.8/ADS (NIS2.34/share) after substantial revision of our assumptions. We note that there are c 86m out-of-the money options and warrants outstanding (weighted average exercise price of $6.4/ADS). We value BiondVax based on a risk-adjusted NPV analysis using a 12.5% discount rate and including net cash of $22.6m (NIS78.1m), which takes into account cash at end-Q317 and short-term deposits.
Exhibit 6: Sum-of-the parts summary of BiondVax valuation
Product |
Launch |
Peak sales ($m) |
Full rNPV ($m) |
Technology probability |
Licensing deal probability |
BiondVax’s rNPV ($m) |
rNPV/ |
rNPV/ |
Comments |
Standalone universal vaccine |
2023 |
1,260 |
281.3 |
60% |
30% |
93.9 |
15.23 |
1.31 |
Full rNPV reflects the valuation as if BiondVax develops and markets M-001 by itself assuming all associated costs. The licensing deal was modelled on the basis of full rNPV split at 50% (BiondVax):50% (partner). |
National stockpile |
2026 |
680 |
166.7 |
60% |
30% |
83.4 |
13.53 |
1.17 |
|
Net cash ($) |
22.6 |
100% |
22.6 |
3.68 |
0.32 |
||||
Valuation ($) |
470.7 |
199.9 |
32.44 |
||||||
Valuation (NIS) |
1,623.1 |
689.2 |
2.80 |
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: WACC = 12.5% for product valuations.
Revision of valuation assumptions
In our initiation report, we assumed a scenario in which BiondVax would develop M-001 in a stepwise manner, with a pandemic primer and seasonal primer for at-risk populations being the first indications, and then expanding to a universal, standalone influenza indication, which is the ultimate goal, but also the most R&D-intensive. With the new funds from the EIB and the recent share issue and an input from the regulatory authorities, BiondVax is able to initiate the Phase III trial on its own for the ultimate universal vaccine indication. We have therefore revised our valuation and now include the universal flu vaccine indication and national stockpile potential. As discussed on page 2 (market expansion strategy), the upcoming Phase III trial will involve 50-year-olds+, but, if successful, we believe it is likely that the company would pursue expansion into other age groups. In addition, BiondVax expects to use the Phase III data to file for FDA approval. Subsequently, national stockpiling could be a realistic opportunity, which we also include in our valuation. Below we summarise the main changes to our assumptions compared to our previous reports.
■
Indications. We previously included a seasonal primer indication and pandemic (stockpiled) vaccine primer for M-001 in the US and Europe. We now include a universal flu vaccine indication and national stockpiling (M-001 as a pandemic vaccine) in both the US and Europe.
■
To reflect the broader indication – M-001 as a standalone vaccine – we reduce our technology success probability from 70% to 60% and maintain our 30% probability for a partnership deal.
■
Phase III costs and funding. As previously, we assume a study cost of $50m and we maintain our scenario that BiondVax will able to establish a partner, who will co-fund the study. Following successful share issues in 2017, BiondVax reported cash and short-term deposits of $22.1m (NIS78.1m) and also has access to a €20m loan from the EIB. This means that the company’s financial position has improved substantially. Previously, we assumed a Phase III cost split of $15m/$35m (BiondVax/partner), but we now assume $35m/$15m.
■
Assumed licensing deal terms. Due to the lack of benchmark deals to model the out-licensing we have used NPV split between BiondVax and the partner to calculate milestone payments. We described the deal mechanics in our initiation report (see ‘Licensing deal assumptions and calculations’). Because of the larger Phase III co-funding, we have increased BiondVax’s NPV share from 35% to 50% with the partner getting the remaining half. To justify such a split, we calculate royalty payments up to 13% to BiondVax and total milestone payments of $2.3bn related to R&D and commercial achievements, which are split between the universal flu vaccine indication and national stockpiling.
■
Market expansion. We assume launch in Europe for 50-year-olds+ in 2023 and in the US in 2024. While the requirements to expand into a younger age group are not clear, we believe this should be less arduous than the upcoming Phase III study. We include $20m to be spent by the partner and the launch for <50-year-olds in 2025 in both geographies. We assume that the US and European countries will start purchasing M-001 for national stockpiles from 2026 and 2027, respectively. The US BARDA has a goal to stockpile for 20 million of critical workforce. We use this as a market size for the US and half of that in Europe because of the fragmented market. We assume the stockpile will be built over three years, with one-third replaced every year.
■
Vaccination coverage rates (accessible target population). We assume vaccines effectiveness of four years meaning that individuals vaccinated with M-001 in year 1 will not need to be vaccinated again until year 4. This lag reduces the individuals available for vaccination in year 2 and 3 in the model. Currently, around 45% of people in the US are vaccinated against influenza with this number being relatively stable over the past five to six seasons (CDC). CDC recommends that everyone aged from six months or older should get a flu vaccine, which shows a very proactive stance aiming for full protection, as opposed to European countries where recommendations vary significantly, with the only unanimous recommendation for elderly people. In our view, M-001 market uptake would be substantially affected by what recommendation level M-001 reaches. We assume a more conservative target population when modelling M-001 in European countries. Currently only up to around 25% of the population is vaccinated in western European countries, which we use as an assumption of coverage rate in 14 European countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Netherlands and Switzerland).
■
We have reduced our market penetration rate from 25% to 20% to reflect the inclusion of specific population subgroups in previous indications. A universal flu vaccine indication would mean that M-001 will be accessible to the broader market and will compete with seasonal vaccines.
Our other assumptions remain unchanged as discussed in previous reports (initiation and subsequent revision) with key ones being:
■
Premium pricing of $25 per person; the current trivalent vaccine price per dose in the US is around $8-9 and quadrivalent $13-15, indicating that newer quadrivalent vaccines managed to attract a premium, although whether the additional protection against type B virus confers a clinical benefit is still not clear.
■
We assume that M-001 will be marketed by the partner with patent protection until around 2035. Commercial assumptions include 10% COGS, 10% sales and marketing expenses for stockpiling and 15% for the universal flu vaccine indication. In addition, we assume a 3% pay away from net sales to the original licence holder, Yeda Research.
Financials
BiondVax’s 9M17 operating expenses were $2.5m (NIS8.8m), of which R&D and G&A costs were $1.5m (NIS5.1m) and $1.1m (NIS3.7m) respectively. We revised our total OPEX estimate for 2017 downwards from $4.4m (NIS15.2m) to $3.3m (NIS11.4m) due to better than expected R&D spend. We expect a pick-up in R&D spend (estimate of $5.0m or NIS17.2m for 2018) as the company initiates the Phase III trial.
BiondVax is in a much better financial position than a year ago. The company reported cash and short-term deposits of $22.1m (NIS78.1m) at end-Q317 ($7.1m or NIS 27.4m at end-2016) following successful share issues in January and September 2017. In addition, the company now has access to €20m from the EIB. We estimate cash of $27.7m (NIS95.5m) at end-2017. Notably, as previously our forecast includes the first drawdown of €6m from the European Investment Bank (EIB) loan (more detailed discussion on page 3). However, according to the agreement the first drawdown could be completed within a 12-month period since the agreement was signed in June 2017, so it may slip into 2018. As previously, we assume that BiondVax will draw down €6m in each of 2017 and 2018 (according to the agreement, the first two drawdowns are between €4-6m), while the last drawdown will include the rest. Cash reach depends mainly on the actual costs of the Phase III trial. Our assumption is $50m, however costs related to such a large-scale trial with estimated 7,700 participants enrolled over two to three years are difficult to estimate. As explained above, our base case scenario is that the company will need additional funding to complete the trial. In addition to the completion of the trial, marketing and expansion into other age groups and geographies will require further funds, therefore, we assume a partnership agreement with a large pharma (in year 2020 in our model).
In our financial forecasts we also reflect plans to build a manufacturing facility. As announced previously, around €4m should be invested in the construction of the manufacturing plant and, as previously, we include capex of €0.5m, €2.25m and €2.25m in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively.
Exhibit 7: Financial summary
NIS'000s |
2015 |
2016 |
2017e |
2018e |
||
December |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
||
PROFIT & LOSS |
||||||
Revenue |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Cost of Sales |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Gross Profit |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Research and development |
(7,906) |
(7,794) |
(6,667) |
(17,241) |
||
EBITDA |
|
|
(10,675) |
(11,279) |
(10,671) |
(17,438) |
Operating Profit (before amort. and except.) |
(11,303) |
(11,900) |
(11,389) |
(18,682) |
||
Intangible Amortisation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Exceptionals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Operating Profit |
(11,303) |
(11,900) |
(11,389) |
(18,682) |
||
Net Interest |
1,104 |
2,716 |
(13,475) |
140 |
||
Profit Before Tax (norm) |
|
|
(10,199) |
(9,184) |
(24,864) |
(18,542) |
Profit Before Tax (reported) |
|
|
(10,199) |
(9,184) |
(24,864) |
(18,542) |
Tax |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Profit After Tax (norm) |
(10,199) |
(9,184) |
(24,864) |
(18,542) |
||
Profit After Tax (reported) |
(10,199) |
(9,184) |
(24,864) |
(18,542) |
||
Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m) |
105.5 |
135.1 |
198.2 |
261.4 |
||
EPS - normalised (NIS) |
|
|
(0.10) |
(0.07) |
(0.13) |
(0.07) |
EPS - normalised and fully diluted (NIS) |
|
(0.10) |
(0.07) |
(0.13) |
(0.07) |
|
EPS - (reported) (NIS) |
|
|
(0.10) |
(0.07) |
(0.13) |
(0.07) |
Dividend per share (NIS) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Gross Margin (%) |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
||
EBITDA Margin (%) |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
||
Operating Margin (before GW and except.) (%) |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
||
BALANCE SHEET |
||||||
Fixed Assets |
|
|
4,379 |
3,971 |
5,305 |
11,245 |
Intangible Assets |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Tangible Assets |
2,044 |
1,443 |
2,777 |
10,767 |
||
Investments |
2,335 |
2,528 |
2,528 |
478 |
||
Current Assets |
|
|
36,928 |
26,139 |
99,355 |
101,014 |
Stocks |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Debtors |
1,442 |
815 |
3,800 |
3,800 |
||
Cash |
33,470 |
15,705 |
94,355 |
97,214 |
||
Other* |
2,016 |
9,619 |
1,200 |
0 |
||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
(1,699) |
(1,375) |
(1,963) |
(2,901) |
Creditors |
(1,699) |
(1,375) |
(1,963) |
(2,901) |
||
Short term borrowings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Long Term Liabilities |
|
|
(69) |
(76) |
(24,016) |
(47,956) |
Long term borrowings |
0 |
0 |
(23,940) |
(47,880) |
||
Other long term liabilities |
(69) |
(76) |
(76) |
(76) |
||
Net Assets |
|
|
39,539 |
28,659 |
78,681 |
61,401 |
CASH FLOW |
||||||
Operating Cash Flow |
|
|
(10,262) |
(9,688) |
(207) |
(15,239) |
Net Interest |
(5) |
35 |
(13,475) |
140 |
||
Tax |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Capex |
(34) |
0 |
(2,052) |
(9,233) |
||
Acquisitions/disposals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Financing |
33,753 |
0 |
62,025 |
0 |
||
Other |
406 |
(8,112) |
8,419 |
3,250 |
||
Dividends |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Net Cash Flow |
23,858 |
(17,765) |
54,710 |
(21,082) |
||
Opening net debt/(cash) |
|
|
(9,612) |
(33,470) |
(15,705) |
(70,415) |
HP finance leases initiated |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Closing net debt/(cash) |
|
|
(33,470) |
(15,705) |
(70,415) |
(49,334) |
Source: Edison Investment Research, BiondVax accounts. Note: *Other = other liquid cash resources.
|
|
Research: Healthcare
We are initiating coverage on Clal Biotechnology Industries (CBI), an Israel/Boston-based healthcare investment company with an extensive portfolio incorporating a diverse range of technologies, indications and stages of development. CBI holds direct investments in 10 companies (nine biotech and one medical device company), most importantly MediWound, a NASDAQ-listed wound care company, and Gamida Cell, which is developing a universal bone marrow transplant (BMT) product. Also, BioCanCell and Biokine have programmes in Phase III or Phase III ready. We value the company at NIS918m or NIS5.87 per share.