2018 was a transformational year for Diversified Gas & Oil (DGO). The company completed four acquisitions during the financial year for approximately $1bn, and became the largest conventional gas producer in the Appalachian region, onshore US. DGO’s production increased from 6.6kboed to approximately 70.0kboed as of January 2019, from c 60,000 gross wells. DGO has been active in consolidating acquired operations and finalising plugging & abandonment (P&A) agreements, giving stakeholders greater certainty of short- to mid-term decommissioning costs. The strategy remains consistent to produce stable cash flows, while supporting cash returns, which equate to an 8.8% dividend yield. Pricing drives our valuation down marginally from 163.6p/share to 162.7p/share (less than -1%), due to slightly lower EIA-sourced gas price assumptions (-1% in FY19 and -4% in FY20).
Written by
Diversified Gas & Oil |
Maximising value from enlarged portfolio |
FY18 results |
Oil & gas |
26 March 2019 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analysts
Diversified Gas & Oil is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 was a transformational year for Diversified Gas & Oil (DGO). The company completed four acquisitions during the financial year for approximately $1bn, and became the largest conventional gas producer in the Appalachian region, onshore US. DGO’s production increased from 6.6kboed to approximately 70.0kboed as of January 2019, from c 60,000 gross wells. DGO has been active in consolidating acquired operations and finalising plugging & abandonment (P&A) agreements, giving stakeholders greater certainty of short- to mid-term decommissioning costs. The strategy remains consistent to produce stable cash flows, while supporting cash returns, which equate to an 8.8% dividend yield. Pricing drives our valuation down marginally from 163.6p/share to 162.7p/share (less than -1%), due to slightly lower EIA-sourced gas price assumptions (-1% in FY19 and -4% in FY20).
Year-end |
Revenue ($m) |
Adjusted EBITDA* ($m) |
PBT* |
Net cash/ (debt) ($m) |
Dividend yield** (%) |
Capex |
12/17 |
41.8 |
17.5 |
(1.5) |
(55.8) |
3.5 |
(93.1) |
12/18 |
289.8 |
146.2 |
71.0 |
(481.4) |
7.1 |
(766.8) |
12/19e |
449.0 |
240.6 |
128.1 |
(380.7) |
8.8 |
(32.3) |
12/20e |
418.8 |
219.0 |
113.5 |
(293.1) |
8.8 |
(23.5) |
Note: *EBITDA and PBT normalised for exceptional items including acquisition activity. **Dividend yield based on dividend declared for the period.
FY18 results and the year ahead
In 2018, DGO became the largest AIM-listed producer as value accretive transactions drove company-adjusted EBITDA to $146m from just $18m in FY17. Acquisitions were funded through a combination of equity and debt, and leverage remains within acceptable limits with Edison estimated net debt/EBITDA at 1.6x at end FY19. Options to pursue further growth exist mainly through the acquisition of value-accretive assets. However, with a net acreage of approximately 7.8m acres, there are several opportunities to consolidate production through drilling.
P&A agreements firmed with all primary states
DGO recently completed two important agreements on abandonment with the states of Kentucky and Pennsylvania and now has P&A agreements in place in the primary states in which the company operates. These agreements give DGO higher certainty in relation to its P&A obligations and an opportunity to bring previously neglected wells back into production. DGO has the ability to minimise the present value of this liability through well life extension leveraging its Smarter Well Management programme to extend the productive life of its wells.
Valuation: Base case at 162.7p/share
We decrease our valuation by less than 1% to 162.7p/share driven by lower gas price realisations, which are based on EIA forecasts (FY19 Henry Hub falls to $2.95/mcf from $2.99/mcf). Assuming a quarterly dividend of 3.40c/share as declared is maintained; this implies an FY19e dividend yield of 8.8% at the current share price.
FY18 results and forecast update
2019 was a transformative financial year for DGO, during which it completed four acquisitions for a total consideration of approximately $1bn. These included the entire share capital of Alliance Petroleum Corporation and assets from CNX Resources, EQT Corporation and Core Appalachia. The company became one of the largest conventional gas producers in Appalachia and the largest AIM-listed producer. DGO increased its production from 6.6kboed in FY17 to 41.0kboed in FY18 (+500%), increased company-adjusted EBITDA to $146m, while maintaining a healthy balance sheet with year-end 2018 net debt of $481m down to $451m as of 28 February 2019. We expect gearing to fall materially in FY19 in the absence of further acquisitions – we forecast year-end 2019 net debt/EBITDA of 1.6x.
Exhibit 1 below provides our updated forecasts for FY19 and FY20, which reflect DGO’s FY18 reported results and a small change to our underlying commodity price assumptions. Our 2018 estimates were in line with the FY18 results presented by the company. The biggest difference was observed in reported EBITDA, which includes a gain on acquisitions of $173m. FY18 Edison normalised EBITDA of $145m was in-line with the company-adjusted EBITDA of $146m which excludes one-off items associated with acquisitions in addition to non-cash acquisition gains. Our adjusted EBITDA for FY19 decreases by 1% to $241m and by 3% in FY20 to $219m, with both forecasts excluding potential uplift from M&A.
Exhibit 1: Edison estimates versus actuals
Actuals |
New |
Old |
Change |
||||||
2018 |
2019e |
2020e |
2018e |
2019e |
2020e |
2018e |
2019e |
2020e |
|
Production (kboed) |
41.0 |
67.7 |
65.0 |
41.0 |
67.7 |
65.0 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
Revenue ($m) |
290 |
449 |
419 |
278 |
451 |
426 |
4% |
0% |
(2%) |
EBITDA* ($m) |
337 |
241 |
219 |
145 |
242 |
226 |
132% |
(1%) |
(3%) |
Adjusted EBITDA* ($m) |
146 |
241 |
219 |
145 |
242 |
226 |
1% |
(1%) |
(3%) |
FCF ($m) – excluding acquisitions |
109 |
205 |
186 |
105 |
176 |
169 |
4% |
17% |
10% |
P&A expenditure ($m) |
2.8 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
Revenue/boe ($/boe) |
19.36 |
18.16 |
17.60 |
17.53 |
18.85 |
17.69 |
10% |
(4%) |
0% |
Opex**/boe ($/boe) |
7.36 |
7.02 |
6.98 |
7.37 |
7.03 |
7.00 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
G&A/boe ($/boe) |
2.71*** |
1.30 |
1.30 |
1.30 |
1.30 |
1.30 |
108% |
0% |
0% |
Cash costs/boe ($/boe) |
10.07 |
8.32 |
8.28 |
8.67 |
8.33 |
8.30 |
16% |
0% |
0% |
Capex/boe ($/boe) |
1.36 |
1.31 |
0.99 |
1.36 |
1.31 |
0.99 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
HH Gas price assumption ($/mcf) |
3.26 |
2.95 |
2.91 |
3.26 |
2.99 |
3.02 |
0% |
(1%) |
(4%) |
WTI ($/bbl) |
65.06 |
56.13 |
58.00 |
65.06 |
54.19 |
60.76 |
0% |
4% |
(5%) |
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: *Edison adjusted EBITDA excludes reported acquisition gains. **Includes lease operating expense (LOE), gathering and transport (G&T) and ad valorem and severance taxes. ***Includes non-recurring acquisition costs.
Growth strategy
DGO reaffirmed its intentions to pursue the acquisition of value-accretive, low-risk, long-life, low decline rates to enhance free cash flow per share. Opportunities also exist to enhance EBITDA and margins through ‘self-help’ including the reduction of unit operating costs, optimisation of production operations and by assiduous management of previously overlooked assets. DGO’s net acreage has grown to approximately 7.8m acres. Meanwhile, opportunities exist to continue to consolidate mature conventional production in Appalachia, where we see a growing opportunity set in the areas of mature unconventional gas and coal-bed methane (CBM).
Appalachia gas prices and differentials
Over the past decade, natural gas production in the Appalachian region has grown faster than pipeline capacity, driving down the regional discount relative to Henry Hub. More recently, an increased pipeline capacity and associated infrastructure has led to the narrowing of differentials and lower price seasonality, benefiting Appalachian producers.
|
Exhibit 2: Spot prices in Appalachian region gas hubs |
Exhibit 3: Major export pipelines in the Appalachia |
|
|
|
Source: Bloomberg, Edison Investment Research |
Source: DGO |
|
Exhibit 2: Spot prices in Appalachian region gas hubs |
|
|
Source: Bloomberg, Edison Investment Research |
|
Exhibit 3: Major export pipelines in the Appalachia |
|
|
Source: DGO |
Marcellus gas production has been a catalyst for activity in the midstream sector, with supplementary gas pipeline capacity taking gas molecules to meet demand from LNG exporters on the southern coast. The EIA expects US LNG exports to increase from 1.9bcfd in 2017 to 5.1bcfd by the end of 2019, in addition to natural gas exports to Mexico (pipeline capacity to Mexico has tripled since 2010). Pipeline capacity constraints and transport tariffs drive the differential between the Appalachian region gas hub pricing and Henry Hub, which stands at a DGO volume-weighted average discount of c $0.32/mcf.
Exhibit 4: Appalachia gas market spreads
Price index |
Volumes |
2018 basis ($/mcf) |
||
2017 |
2018 |
Average |
Low – High |
|
TCO |
7% |
43% |
($0.24) |
($0.20) - ($0.30) |
Dom South |
40% |
27% |
($0.54) |
($0.41) - ($0.77) |
TGP Z2 |
0% |
16% |
($0.24) |
($0.18) - ($0.32) |
TETCO M2 |
27% |
5% |
($0.55) |
($0.43) - ($0.72) |
ETENN |
0% |
5% |
$0.31 |
$0.31 - $0.31 |
Transco Leidy |
13% |
2% |
($0.66) |
($0.32) - ($1.43) |
Other |
13% |
2% |
($0.55) |
($0.16) - ($1.43) |
Weighted average |
($0.32) |
($0.24) - ($0.37) |
||
Source: DGO, Edison Investment Research
Overall, the long-term fundamentals for US natural gas pricing and regional differentials remain one of increasing supply and demand. As can be seen in Exhibits 5 and 6 below, natural gas underground storage in both the US east and south central regions is at a five-year low, supporting lower differentials for DGO. Also, since the acquisition of the midstream assets, DGO gained optionality that allows the company to redirect gas to more favourable markets, avoiding regional capacity constraints and achieving higher realised prices, as can be seen in the shift in volumes in Exhibit 4. DGO also has approximately 75% of its production hedged for the next three years and is largely protected from short-term gas price volatility. However, DGO received relief from banks to allow management the discretion to decrease the hedged volumes so DGO can be more flexible and opportunistic. DGO may choose to hedge as liquidity improves in order to receive better pricing given current backwardation in the forward strip.
|
Exhibit 5: US east region weekly working gas in underground storage |
Exhibit 6: US south central region weekly working gas in underground storage |
|
|
|
Source: EIA, Edison Investment Research |
Source: EIA, Edison Investment Research |
|
Exhibit 5: US east region weekly working gas in underground storage |
|
|
Source: EIA, Edison Investment Research |
|
Exhibit 6: US south central region weekly working gas in underground storage |
|
|
Source: EIA, Edison Investment Research |
Our oil and gas base case price assumptions are provided in the table below and include our assumed average realised gas price differential relative to Henry Hub. In our base case, we assume WTI in line with EIA forecasts for 2019 and 2020 at $56.13/bbl and $58.00/bbl respectively, rising to $70.00/bbl long term (2022). For Henry Hub we assume a gas price of $2.95/mcf in 2019, $2.91/mcf in 2020 and $3.10/mcf long term (2022). Prices are inflated by 2.5% from 2022.
Exhibit 7: Edison’s valuation pricing assumptions
Commodity benchmarks |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
WTI ($/bbl) |
65.06 |
56.13 |
58.00 |
63.87 |
70.00 |
Henry Hub ($/mcf) |
3.26 |
2.95 |
2.91 |
3.00 |
3.10 |
NGL* ($/bbl) |
11.00 |
11.00 |
11.00 |
11.00 |
11.00 |
Premium/(discount) to benchmark |
Oil ($/bbl) |
Gas ($/mcf) |
NGL ($/bbl) |
||
DGO Legacy Assets |
(1.28) |
(0.50) |
0.00 |
||
2018 Acquisitions - Kentucky |
(9.23) |
(0.26) |
45% of WTI |
||
2018 Acquisitions - N West Virginia |
(4.04) |
(0.31) |
0.00 |
||
2018 Acquisitions - S West Virginia |
(6.83) |
(0.31) |
0.00 |
||
2018 Acquisitions - Virginia |
(4.68) |
0.46 |
0.00 |
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: *As per EQT Acquisition CPR (June 2018).
Abandonment agreements now cover all primary states
Since our last note in January 2019, DGO has completed two important agreements on abandonment with the states of Kentucky and Pennsylvania. It now has plugging and abandonment agreements in place in the primary states in which the company operates. Key terms reached with the state of Kentucky, where DGO operates approximately 7,500 wells, include plugging 25 non-producing wells in 2019 and a minimum of 20 non-productive wells per annum from 2020 until 2023. During the same 2020–2023 period, the company will plug or return to production at least 50 wells per annum, of which up to 30 wells per annum can be previously non-productive wells that DGO places back into production. DGO will post a $1.5m bond to the benefit of the state of Kentucky, which the state will release following DGO’s fulfilment of its obligations under the five-year agreement.
In Pennsylvania, DGO operates c 23,000 wells, corresponding to approximately 40% of all DGO’s wells. Reaching a 15-year agreement (extendable to 20 years) with the state authorities is a significant milestone, which brings clarity and assurance to DGO’s asset retirement obligations and commitments for the short and medium term. Key terms reached with the state of Pennsylvania include plugging a minimum of 20 wells per annum and either returning to production or plugging an additional 30 wells, representing a total of 50 wells per annum for the next 15 years. DGO will also assess all of its wells by 2024 and provide an initial report in 2021 followed by a final assessment in 2024, listing the wells it intends to return to production and those it intends to plug. Similar to the state of Kentucky, DGO will post a $7m bond to the benefit of the state of Pennsylvania, which the state will release following DGO's fulfilment of its obligations under the agreement.
In Exhibits 8 and 9 below, it is possible to see the difference between Edison, DGO and third-party decommissioning assumptions and the impact on NPV. Our P&A schedule and cost assumptions remain the same as in our last valuation. We assume 125 wells are retired per year until 2035 and 1,000 per annum thereafter, broadly in line with the agreements reached between the company and state regulators. At an initial P&A cost of $24,000 per well, inflated 2.5% per year, this results in a 30-year NPV10 of $99m. DGO recently updated internal P&A assumptions, which assume the retirement of 105 wells per year in the first five years, followed by 140 wells per year until year 15, and 1,100 wells annually onwards. Taking into consideration DGO’s P&A average cost per well, per state and the number of wells it operates in each state, we estimate a weighted average P&A cost of $24,240 per well. If we were to use DGO’s abandonment schedule and a $24,240 P&A cost, inflated at 2.2% per annum, this would result in an NPV10 of $102m. This NPV is unlikely to correspond exactly with DGO’s internal estimated liability as there are likely to be differing assumptions on the timing of abandonment of high-cost/deep well locations. Third-party valuation is based on an external valuation conducted in September 2018 before the Core Appalachia acquisition and before the recently announced agreements with state authorities.
|
Exhibit 8: P&A assumptions and NPV |
Exhibit 9: Cumulative NPV*10 and P&A wells |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source: Edison Investment Research, DGO. Note: *NPV might be affected by the timing of P&A (eg more expensive wells being P&A in later periods). NPVs calculated for 30 years of liabilities. |
Source: Edison Investment Research, DGO. Note: *NPV might be affected by the timing of P&A (eg more expensive wells being P&A in later periods). |
|
Exhibit 8: P&A assumptions and NPV |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source: Edison Investment Research, DGO. Note: *NPV might be affected by the timing of P&A (eg more expensive wells being P&A in later periods). NPVs calculated for 30 years of liabilities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exhibit 9: Cumulative NPV*10 and P&A wells |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source: Edison Investment Research, DGO. Note: *NPV might be affected by the timing of P&A (eg more expensive wells being P&A in later periods). |
Valuation
We value DGO using a conventional NAV approach based on the NPV10 of the company’s producing assets minus overheads and net financial liabilities. A full breakdown of our NAV is provided in Exhibit 10, using data available in the company’s last published prospectus and CPR, as well as public sources. We include the abandonment schedule, mentioned earlier in this note, of 125 wells per year until 2035, and 1,000 wells per year thereafter across the portfolio, and abandonment costs of $24,000 per well in line with estimates provided by the company and US onshore industry averages.
We do not include any incremental value for M&A potential or infill drilling. However, it is important to recognise that management has created material value for shareholders through asset acquisition at attractive valuations. Larger players are looking to recycle cash from mature unconventional producers into high-return drilling opportunities. Also not included in our valuation is the infill drilling opportunity present on existing leases. The value of M&A upside potential or risked infill drilling NPV is uncertain but likely more than zero.
We also include a discounted value for payments DGO receives for third-party use of services and midstream assets in our valuation – currently estimated at c $26m pa or $215m in our NAV. We note that DGO has over 10,500 miles of pipeline and more than 50 compressor stations, which give it access to processing facilities and higher liquids volumes, resulting in higher realised prices and unit costs improvement.
Exhibit 10: Edison detailed NAV breakdown for DGO
Recoverable reserves |
Net risked value |
Risked value |
|||||
Asset |
Country |
Diluted WI |
CoS |
Net post royalty |
NPV10/boe |
||
% |
% |
mmboe |
$/boe |
$m |
p/share |
||
Net (debt)/cash at end-2018 |
(481.4) |
(68.7) |
|||||
SG&A – NPV10 of 3yrs |
(77.0) |
(11.0) |
|||||
Hedging Impact |
30.7 |
4.4 |
|||||
Third-party volume discounted revenues |
214.7 |
30.6 |
|||||
Production |
|||||||
Kentucky |
US |
90% |
100 |
219 |
5.0 |
816.0 |
116.4 |
Ohio |
US |
82% |
100 |
16 |
5.3 |
86.0 |
12.3 |
Pennsylvania |
US |
82% |
100 |
110 |
2.2 |
240.2 |
34.3 |
Tennessee |
US |
82% |
100 |
5 |
4.4 |
20.9 |
3.0 |
Virginia |
US |
81% |
100 |
11 |
5.5 |
36.8 |
5.2 |
West Virginia |
US |
84% |
100 |
146 |
5.6 |
253.7 |
36.2 |
Core NAV |
507 |
1,140.6 |
162.7 |
||||
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: Number of shares = 542.7m, FX: US$/£0.77 (due to the recent volatility in exchange rates and for the sake of consistency, we assume FX based on the average of the last six months before the end of each quarter).
Exhibit 11 breaks down our valuation by asset class showing where our base case core NAV sits relative to the current share price. The waterfall below suggests that the market is not fully valuing DGO’s 1P PDP reserves (474m boe), nor its third-party revenues from midstream assets, and may be overpricing the NPV of decommissioning liabilities.
|
Exhibit 11: NAV waterfall |
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research |
Key sensitivities: Gas price and LOE
Key drivers of DGO’s valuation are gas price and LOE. The table below provides a base case valuation sensitivity to these key drivers. Our base assumes a long-term (2022) gas price of $3.10/mcf and LOE of $5.06/boe (LOE excludes gathering and transport, SG&A and production taxes), both inflated by 2.5% thereafter.
Our oil and gas base case price assumptions are in line with the EIA’s latest forecasts for 2019 at $56.13/bbl, rising to $70.00/bbl long term (2022). For Henry Hub, we assume a gas price of $2.95/mcf in 2019 and $3.10/mcf long term (2022).
Exhibit 12: Valuation sensitivity to LOE and gas price assumption
LOE $/boe |
|
-25% |
-15% |
5.06 |
+15% |
+25% |
$/mcf long-term |
||||||
-25% |
130.3 |
120.3 |
105.3 |
90.2 |
80.1 |
|
-15% |
153.5 |
143.5 |
128.4 |
113.4 |
103.4 |
|
3.10 |
187.7 |
177.7 |
162.7 |
147.6 |
137.6 |
|
+15% |
222.6 |
212.5 |
197.5 |
182.5 |
172.5 |
|
+25% |
245.5 |
235.5 |
220.5 |
205.5 |
195.5 |
Source: Edison Investment Research
Financials
As mentioned above, DGO’s key drivers of FCF and dividends will be gas realisations and LOE, since under the company’s current mode of operation maintenance and drilling capex spend is minimal.
Below we provide our net debt, net debt/EBITDA and FCF forecasts based on our underlying commodity price assumptions. We forecast a quarterly dividend payment of 13.6c/share in 2019, equating to a yield of 8.8% at the current share price. We also assume FCF is used to reduce net debt and gearing with net debt/EBITDA falling from 1.6x in FY19 to 1.3x by FY20e (management target a 2-2.5x net debt/adjusted EBITDA leverage ratio) in the absence of further acquisitions. In November 2018, DGO closed on a $1.5bn five-year senior secured credit facility, with an initial borrowing base of $725m priced at Libor plus 2.75–3.25% depending on utilisation. Undrawn debt capacity provides visibility on debt funding for future acquisitions.
|
Exhibit 13: Net debt and net debt/EBITDA |
Exhibit 14: CFO and FCF* generation |
|
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research |
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: *Post-tax cash flow, prior to working cap movements and after capex. |
|
Exhibit 13: Net debt and net debt/EBITDA |
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research |
|
Exhibit 14: CFO and FCF* generation |
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: *Post-tax cash flow, prior to working cap movements and after capex. |
Exhibit 15: Financial summary
|
|
US$m |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019e |
2020e |
Year-end December |
|
|
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
PROFIT & LOSS |
|||||||
Revenue |
|
|
17.1 |
41.8 |
289.8 |
449.0 |
418.8 |
Cost of sales |
(15.3) |
(28.4) |
(149.8) |
(244.0) |
(233.8) |
||
Gross profit |
1.7 |
13.3 |
140.0 |
205.1 |
185.0 |
||
General & admin |
(2.8) |
(8.9) |
(40.5) |
(32.1) |
(30.9) |
||
Other |
(0.8) |
(0.4) |
18.0 |
- |
- |
||
Exceptionals inc gain on acquisitions |
24.3 |
37.2 |
177.6 |
- |
- |
||
Reported EBITDA |
|
|
26.5 |
48.7 |
337.0 |
240.6 |
219.0 |
Adjusted EBITDA (non-IFRS) |
|
|
4.3 |
17.5 |
146.2 |
240.6 |
219.0 |
Depreciation |
(4.0) |
(7.5) |
(42.0) |
(67.7) |
(65.0) |
||
Operating Profit (adjusted non-IFRS) |
|
|
0.3 |
10.0 |
104.2 |
172.9 |
154.0 |
Reported EBIT |
22.5 |
41.2 |
295.0 |
172.9 |
154.0 |
||
Net interest |
10.1 |
(11.5) |
(33.2) |
(44.8) |
(40.5) |
||
Profit Before Tax (adjusted non-IFRS) |
|
|
10.3 |
(1.5) |
71.0 |
128.1 |
113.5 |
Profit Before Tax (reported) |
|
|
32.5 |
29.7 |
261.8 |
128.1 |
113.5 |
Tax |
(14.8) |
(2.3) |
(60.7) |
(34.6) |
(30.6) |
||
Profit After Tax (adjusted non-IFRS) |
(4.5) |
(3.7) |
10.3 |
93.5 |
82.8 |
||
Profit After Tax (reported) |
17.7 |
27.5 |
201.1 |
93.5 |
82.8 |
||
Average Number of Shares Outstanding basic (m) |
42.0 |
120.1 |
386.6 |
542.6 |
542.6 |
||
Average Number of Shares Outstanding fully diluted (m) |
42.0 |
120.3 |
387.9 |
541.8 |
541.8 |
||
EPS - normalised (c) |
|
|
(10.7) |
(3.1) |
2.7 |
17.2 |
15.3 |
EPS - normalised fully diluted (c) |
|
|
(10.7) |
(3.1) |
2.7 |
17.3 |
15.3 |
EPS - (IFRS) (c) |
|
|
42.1 |
22.9 |
52.0 |
17.2 |
15.3 |
Dividend per share declared (c) |
- |
5.4 |
11.2 |
13.6 |
13.6 |
||
Gross margin (%) |
10.2 |
31.9 |
48.3 |
45.7 |
44.2 |
||
EBITDA margin (%) |
155.0 |
116.6 |
116.3 |
53.6 |
52.3 |
||
Operating margin (before GW and except.) (%) |
1.5 |
23.9 |
36.0 |
38.5 |
36.8 |
||
BALANCE SHEET |
|||||||
Non current assets |
|
|
81.1 |
223.3 |
1,445.4 |
1,410.0 |
1,368.5 |
Intangible assets |
76.8 |
215.3 |
1,093.0 |
1,057.6 |
1,016.1 |
||
Tangible assets |
3.3 |
6.9 |
324.8 |
324.8 |
324.8 |
||
Investments |
1.0 |
1.0 |
27.7 |
27.7 |
27.7 |
||
Current assets |
|
|
4.7 |
29.6 |
111.6 |
111.6 |
111.6 |
Stocks |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Debtors |
3.1 |
13.9 |
78.5 |
78.5 |
78.5 |
||
Cash |
0.2 |
15.2 |
1.4* |
1.4* |
1.4* |
||
Other/ restricted cash |
1.4 |
0.5 |
31.8 |
31.8 |
31.8 |
||
Current liabilities |
|
|
(38.5) |
(15.3) |
(64.3) |
(64.3) |
(64.3) |
Creditors |
(11.3) |
(15.0) |
(64.0) |
(64.0) |
(64.0) |
||
Short term borrowings |
(27.2) |
(0.4) |
(0.3) |
(0.3) |
(0.3) |
||
Long term liabilities |
|
|
(38.2) |
(123.1) |
(743.8) |
(688.2) |
(637.7) |
Long term borrowings |
(10.1) |
(70.6) |
(482.5) |
(381.8) |
(294.2) |
||
Other long term liabilities (inc. decomm.) |
(28.1) |
(52.5) |
(261.3) |
(306.4) |
(343.4) |
||
Net assets |
|
|
9.2 |
114.4 |
748.9 |
769.1 |
778.2 |
CASH FLOW |
|||||||
Operating cash flow |
|
|
5.1 |
6.9 |
87.7 |
237.1 |
210.0 |
Capex inc acquisitions |
(9.2) |
(93.1) |
(766.8) |
(32.3) |
(23.5) |
||
Other |
0.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Equity issued |
(3.2) |
73.7 |
393.0 |
(30.8) |
(25.1) |
||
Dividends |
(1.0) |
(5.8) |
(31.3) |
(73.3) |
(73.8) |
||
Net cash flow |
(8.2) |
(18.3) |
(317.4) |
100.7 |
87.6 |
||
Opening net debt/(cash) |
|
|
42.8 |
37.1 |
55.8 |
481.4 |
380.7 |
HP finance leases initiated |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Other |
13.9 |
(0.5) |
(108.2) |
0.0 |
(0.0) |
||
Closing net debt/(cash) |
|
|
37.1 |
55.8 |
481.4 |
380.7 |
293.1 |
Source: DGO, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Assumes DGO maintains a minimum cash balance of $1m and pays down debt.
|
|
Research: TMT
mVISE has announced preliminary 2018 results showing revenue growth of 52% to €22.5m, and adjusted operating profit doubling to c €1.8m. Earnings were driven by growth in sales of the group’s high-margin software products and a solid performance by the consulting business. We expect the boost to the number of new channel partners at SaleSphere in Q419 and the creation of a new marketing promotion for mVise’s elastic.io in January to provide further impetus to earnings growth this year. With digitalisation of German industry giving the group strong growth impetus, while trading at a discount to its peer group.