Last close As at 05/08/2026
—
— 0.00 (0.00%)
Market capitalisation
—
Research: Metals & Mining
Leading Edge Materials (LEM) offers differentiated European exposure to scarce heavy rare earths through its 100%-owned Norra Kärr project in Sweden. The investment case is supported by tight ex-China DyTb supply, a bifurcating rare earth market and two near-term catalysts: the exploitation concession decision and the updated PFS. In this report, we focus on Dy-equivalent resource and valuation metrics, which we believe better capture Norra Kärr’s relative exposure to the heavy magnet rare earth segment of the value chain.
| Year end | Revenue ($m) | EBITDA ($m) | PBT ($m) | EPS ($) | P/E (x) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/24 | 0.0 | (1.8) | (2.0) | (0.01) | N/A |
| 10/25 | 0.0 | (2.3) | (2.3) | (0.01) | N/A |
| 10/26e | 0.0 | (2.4) | (2.4) | (0.01) | N/A |
Norra Kärr is a 100%-owned HREE project in southern Sweden, underpinned by a 110Mt resource grading 0.5% TREO. The 2021 PEA outlined a 26-year operation producing 5,341tpa of REO, including 284tpa of DyTb. Key upcoming catalysts are the exploitation concession decision and the updated PFS, expected in H226. Importantly, the Swedish Mining Inspectorate recommended approval of the exploitation concession in March, with the final decision pending from the Swedish government. The PFS is likely to focus on the upstream site configuration, including mining, extraction and physical mineral processing, as this workstream is most directly linked to environmental permitting. Boliden’s recent Nautanen concession decision is not directly comparable, but is an important example of the Swedish government giving weight to strategically significant domestic mineral supply.
Rare earth demand is supported by growth in permanent magnet applications across EVs, wind, defense, robotics and industrial uses, but the prospective supply response remains skewed towards NdPr. Many large ex-China projects offer limited DyTb exposure, creating a risk of structurally tight heavy rare earth supply. Norra Kärr stands out with a 52% HREO share, a 5.7% DyTb share and a low 2.5x NdPr/DyTb ratio, providing direct leverage to one of the most constrained parts of the magnet rare earth market. Its Swedish location also aligns with EU domestic supply objectives.
In our April initiation report, we valued Norra Kärr at
Rare earth demand is supported by growth in permanent magnet applications across electric vehicles (EVs), wind turbines, defense systems, robotics and other industrial uses. A standard EV traction motor typically uses c 1–3kg of neodymium and praseodymium (NdPr) based permanent magnets, while high-performance applications may also require c 50–200g of dysprosium (Dy) and/or terbium (Tb) to preserve magnetic strength at elevated temperatures and under demanding operating conditions. Although Dy and Tb account for a relatively small proportion of total magnet mass compared to NdPr, their role is critical, and substitution options remain limited.
While near-term NdPr demand growth appears to have moderated from the elevated rates seen in previous years, the industry’s prospective supply response remains uneven and heavily skewed to NdPr. Many of the largest ex-China development projects are primarily light rare earth element (LREE) operations, with relatively limited DyTb exposure. Large-scale upstream developments such as Arafura’s Nolans project and Lindian’s Kangankunde project could introduce meaningful NdPr volumes to the market, but offer minimal heavy rare earth exposure. This creates a risk that NdPr supply growth is delivered faster than for heavy rare earths, leaving Dy and Tb supply structurally tighter, particularly outside China.
As shown in Exhibit 1, Norra Kärr stands out within the LREE-dominant development pipeline, with a 52% HREO share of mineral resource, a 5.7% DyTb share and one of the lowest NdPr/DyTb ratios of 2.5x, compared with the peer average of 38.5x. This gives the asset lower exposure to broader light rare earth oversupply risk and more direct leverage to the constrained heavy magnet rare earth market. Yttrium (Y) has also attracted increasing market attention as a related HREE bottleneck, with recent shortages affecting aerospace, energy and semiconductor supply chains; this is relevant for Norra Kärr, where Y represents 34% of in-situ TREO. The project’s location in Sweden also provides LEM with differentiated European exposure to one of the most strategically important segments of the permanent magnet supply chain.
We note that headline total rare earth oxide (TREO) grade is not, in isolation, a reliable indicator of project value or strategic relevance. Higher-grade deposits can have relatively low in-situ basket values if they are dominated by lower-value light rare earth oxides, while heavy rare earth element (HREE)-rich projects can screen well despite more modest headline in-situ grades. This is particularly relevant for Dy and Tb, where ex-China supply is limited and pricing has become increasingly differentiated from broader rare earth benchmarks. We therefore believe it is instructive to compare projects on a Dy-equivalent basis.
On this basis, and using our long-term REO price assumptions, our analysis suggests
that Norra Kärr contains 80kt of attributable Dy-equivalent TREO, representing c 15%
of its total contained TREO resource. This compares favorably with most listed REE
development peers and supports a gross in-situ basket price of c
In our April initiation report on LEM, we valued the Norra Kärr project at
This valuation discount is even more pronounced on a Dy-equivalent basis, which we
believe is a more relevant comparison given Norra Kärr’s significant HREE weighting.
LEM trades at
We also believe this relative discount should be viewed against a changing REE pricing environment. Chinese export restrictions have contributed to increasingly segmented regional markets, particularly for Dy and Tb, where availability outside China remains limited. Recent press reports suggest China’s shipments of restricted rare earths to Japan fell sharply in March and April, with Dy and Tb exports reportedly at zero since January and Y shipments down more than 90% in the first four months of the year. In parallel, western offtake and government-supported pricing arrangements point to an emerging dual pricing regime, where security of supply outside China can command a significant premium to Chinese benchmark prices. Management’s comments also suggest that European governments and downstream users are increasingly focused on procurement visibility, regional supply chains and bilateral arrangements with upstream suppliers, while the EU Critical Raw Materials Act sets a benchmark for at least 10% of annual strategic raw material consumption to be met from EU extraction by 2030. We believe this backdrop is particularly relevant for Norra Kärr given its high DyTb exposure and Swedish location.
The key upcoming catalysts are the exploitation concession decision and the updated pre-feasibility study (PFS), expected in H226. Based on management’s comments, the PFS de-risking focus appears likely to be weighted towards the upstream Norra Kärr site configuration, including mining, extraction and physical mineral processing, as this is the workstream most directly linked to environmental permitting. This reflects the redesigned project concept, which separates the on-site mining and beneficiation from hydrometallurgical processing, now expected to be undertaken at a separate industrial site.
The exploitation concession decision would represent a major permitting milestone and should also improve LEM’s ability to progress offtake and financing discussions. The Swedish permitting backdrop appears incrementally more constructive following the government’s recent decision to reject the appeal against Boliden’s Nautanen copper exploitation concession. While Nautanen is not directly comparable to Norra Kärr and still requires environmental permitting, the decision is relevant as a recent example of the Swedish government giving weight to strategically important domestic mineral supply and reducing reliance on external jurisdictions.
Norra Kärr is LEM’s 100%-owned HREE project in southern Sweden and is the company’s principal value driver. The project is strategically positioned as one of Europe’s most advanced potential sources of Dy and Tb, two heavy magnet rare earths required in high-temperature permanent magnet applications. The 2021 preliminary economic assessment (PEA) outlined a long-life operation producing mixed/separated rare earth oxides from a eudialyte-bearing silicate deposit, with the development concept redesigned to reduce the on-site processing and environmental footprint.
Norra Kärr is an alkaline igneous intrusion hosted within the Precambrian Trans-Scandinavian Igneous Belt. The deposit consists of agpaitic grennaite, a peralkaline nepheline syenite, with eudialyte as the primary REE- and zirconium-bearing mineral. The current inferred resource totals 110Mt grading 0.5% TREO, 1.7% ZrO2 and 0.05% Nb2O5. The key differentiating feature is its REE distribution rather than headline grade: HREOs represent 52% of in-situ TREO, including 5.0% Dy, 0.7% Tb and 34.0% Y. We believe the yttrium content is increasingly relevant given recent market attention on Y as a potential ex-China supply-chain bottleneck in aerospace, semiconductor and energy applications. Magnet REOs represent c 20%, comprising c 14% NdPr and c 6% DyTb. The resource also contains c 65% nepheline syenite, supporting the industrial mineral by-product strategy. The earlier 2015 PFS achieved a higher resource classification, with a historical indicated resource of 31.1Mt at 0.61% TREO and a probable reserve of 23.6Mt at 0.59% TREO, highlighting the potential for the updated PFS to improve resource confidence.
The 2021 PEA envisaged a 26-year operation processing 1.2Mtpa of ore and producing an average of 5,341tpa of REO, including 722tpa of NdPr and 284tpa of DyTb. The mine plan is based on a conventional open-pit operation, with 29.3Mt of ore and 9.4Mt of waste mined over the life of mine, implying a low strip ratio of c 0.3x. On-site processing is limited to physical beneficiation, with run-of-mine material crushed, ground and upgraded through magnetic separation to produce a eudialyte-rich concentrate and a nepheline syenite by-product stream.
Downstream chemical processing is expected to be undertaken at a separate industrial
site rather than at Norra Kärr. The PEA flowsheet envisages two-stage sulphuric acid
leaching and solvent extraction to recover REEs, zirconium and niobium from the eudialyte
concentrate, with acid pugging/fuming used to manage silica gel formation, the main
technical challenge in processing complex silicate ores. The PEA estimated initial
capex of
The redesigned project concept materially reduces the environmental footprint of the mine site. Chemical processing has been removed from Norra Kärr, the design targets zero process water discharge, and the project footprint is materially smaller than under the previous concession application. The Swedish Mining Inspectorate formally recommended approval of the exploitation concession in March 2026, with the final decision now resting with the Swedish government. The updated PFS, expected in H226, is likely to focus on the upstream site configuration, physical beneficiation, environmental permitting pathway, by-product integration and refinement of the hydrometallurgical flowsheet.
General disclaimer and copyright
This report has been commissioned by Leading Edge Materials and prepared and issued by Edison, in consideration of a fee payable by Leading Edge Materials. Edison Investment Research standard fees are £60,000 pa for the production and broad dissemination of a detailed note (Outlook) following by regular (typically quarterly) update notes. Fees are paid upfront in cash without recourse. Edison may seek additional fees for the provision of roadshows and related IR services for the client but does not get remunerated for any investment banking services. We never take payment in stock, options or warrants for any of our services.
Accuracy of content: All information used in the publication of this report has been compiled from publicly available sources that are believed to be reliable, however we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this report and have not sought for this information to be independently verified. Opinions contained in this report represent those of the research department of Edison at the time of publication. Forward-looking information or statements in this report contain information that is based on assumptions, forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable, and therefore involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of their subject matter to be materially different from current expectations.
Exclusion of Liability: To the fullest extent allowed by law, Edison shall not be liable for any direct, indirect or consequential losses, loss of profits, damages, costs or expenses incurred or suffered by you arising out or in connection with the access to, use of or reliance on any information contained on this note.
No personalised advice: The information that we provide should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as, personalised advice. Also, the information provided by us should not be construed by any subscriber or prospective subscriber as Edison’s solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect, any transaction in a security. The securities described in the report may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors.
Investment in securities mentioned: Edison has a restrictive policy relating to personal dealing and conflicts of interest. Edison Group does not conduct any investment business and, accordingly, does not itself hold any positions in the securities mentioned in this report. However, the respective directors, officers, employees and contractors of Edison may have a position in any or related securities mentioned in this report, subject to Edison's policies on personal dealing and conflicts of interest.
Copyright 2026 Edison Investment Research Limited (Edison).
Australia
Edison Investment Research Pty Ltd (Edison AU) is the Australian subsidiary of Edison. Edison AU is a Corporate Authorised Representative (1252501) of Crown Wealth Group Pty Ltd who holds an Australian Financial Services Licence (Number: 494274). This research is issued in Australia by Edison AU and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 of Australia. Any advice given by Edison AU is general advice only and does not take into account your personal circumstances, needs or objectives. You should, before acting on this advice, consider the appropriateness of the advice, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. If our advice relates to the acquisition, or possible acquisition, of a particular financial product you should read any relevant Product Disclosure Statement or like instrument.
New Zealand
The research in this document is intended for New Zealand resident professional financial advisers or brokers (for use in their roles as financial advisers or brokers) and habitual investors who are “wholesale clients” for the purpose of the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (FAA) (as described in sections 5(c) (1)(a), (b) and (c) of the FAA). This is not a solicitation or inducement to buy, sell, subscribe, or underwrite any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. For the purpose of the FAA, the content of this report is of a general nature, is intended as a source of general information only and is not intended to constitute a recommendation or opinion in relation to acquiring or disposing (including refraining from acquiring or disposing) of securities. The distribution of this document is not a “personalised service” and, to the extent that it contains any financial advice, is intended only as a “class service” provided by Edison within the meaning of the FAA (i.e. without taking into account the particular financial situation or goals of any person). As such, it should not be relied upon in making an investment decision.
United Kingdom
This document is prepared and provided by Edison for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or sol icitation for investment in any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. A marketing communication under FCA Rules, this document has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
This Communication is being distributed in the United Kingdom and is directed only at (i) persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments, i.e. investment professionals within the meaning of Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended (the "FPO") (ii) high net-worth companies, unincorporated associations or other bodies within the meaning of Article 49 of the FPO and (iii) persons to whom it is otherwise lawful to distribute it. The investment or investment activity to which this document relates is available only to such persons. It is not intended that this document be distributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other class of persons and in any event and under no circumstances should persons of any other description rely on or act upon the contents of this document.
This Communication is being supplied to you solely for your information and may not be reproduced by, further distributed to or published in whole or in part by, any other person.
United States
Edison relies upon the "publishers' exclusion" from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws. This report is a bona fide publication of general and regular circulation offering impersonal investment-related advice, not tailored to a specific investment portfolio or the needs of current and/or prospective subscribers. As such, Edison does not offer or provide personal advice and the research provided is for informational purposes only. No mention of a particular security in this report constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that or any security, or that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person.
London │ New York │ Frankfurt
20 Red Lion Street
London, WC1R 4PS
United Kingdom
Research: Industrials
VinFast’s Q126 results showed strong delivery and revenue growth, but reported profitability was distorted by the extension and amendment of its free charging programme. Electric vehicle (EV) deliveries increased 61% y-o-y to 58,577 units, while e-scooter and e-bike deliveries rose 219% y-o-y to 143,136 units. Revenue increased 41.7% y-o-y to $920.7m. However, reported gross margin fell to -73.6%, from -35.2% in Q125 and -46.4% in Q425, mainly reflecting a $192m revenue deduction related to the free charging programme as well as revenue deferrals and net realisable value (NRV) adjustments. Under the programme, eligible vehicles sold before 10 February 2029 will receive free charging benefits for up to three years. Management has positioned the extension as a way to support scale, reduce barriers to EV adoption and reinforce demand across VinFast’s core markets, including Vietnam, India, Indonesia and the Philippines. Management reiterated FY26 delivery targets of at least 300,000 EVs and at least 2.5x FY25 two-wheeler deliveries, excluding potential deliveries under the Green and Smart Mobility (GSM) framework agreement. We maintain our valuation of $7.7/share, implying c 150% upside to the latest share price.