Since PO in 2013, Globalworth (GWI) has quickly grown to become the leading institutional office landlord in the Central and Eastern European (CEE) region. With market conditions in Romania and Poland remaining favourable, 2019 has seen this dynamic growth continuing, with GWI expanding its capital base and income-generating portfolio, extending its development pipeline with significant new joint ventures and simplifying the group structure.
Globalworth Real Estate Investments |
Dynamic growth continuing |
Interim results and update |
Real estate |
18 December 2019 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analyst
Globalworth Real Estate Investments is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Since PO in 2013, Globalworth (GWI) has quickly grown to become the leading institutional office landlord in the Central and Eastern European (CEE) region. With market conditions in Romania and Poland remaining favourable, 2019 has seen this dynamic growth continuing, with GWI expanding its capital base and income-generating portfolio, extending its development pipeline with significant new joint ventures and simplifying the group structure.
Year end |
NOI* |
EPRA earnings** (€m) |
EPRA EPS |
EPRA NAV/ |
DPS |
P/EPRA |
Yield |
||
12/17 |
51.1 |
16.8 |
17.9 |
8.84 |
44 |
1.05 |
4.8 |
||
12/18 |
133.4 |
60.9 |
46.0 |
9.04 |
54 |
1.02 |
5.8 |
||
12/19e |
143.8 |
79.0 |
43.4 |
9.09 |
60 |
1.02 |
6.5 |
||
12/20e |
176.1 |
103.6 |
46.6 |
9.37 |
60 |
0.99 |
6.5 |
||
12/21e |
195.4 |
119.1 |
53.6 |
9.82 |
60 |
0.94 |
6.5 |
||
12/22e |
211.8 |
135.3 |
60.9 |
10.31 |
60 |
0.90 |
6.5 |
||
Note: *NOI is net operating income. **EPRA earnings is adjusted for revaluation movements and other non-recurring items. ***EPRA NAV is adjusted for deferred tax liabilities, fair value of interest rate derivatives and other items.
Taking advantage of favourable conditions
The commercial property markets in Romania and Poland are supported by strong economic growth, above the EU average, and an increasing number of multinational companies operating in the region. Against this positive backdrop and taking advantage of a favourable funding position, GWI has continued consolidate its leading position and further expand its investment portfolio. By July the portfolio had reached €2.9bn with contracted rent of €184m and including the recent forward-purchase agreements will exceed €3bn. Due diligence continues on further opportunities with an aggregate consideration of more than €300m.
Strong growth but forecasts reduced
This note updates on recent developments including the interim results, the recent €264m equity issue, completed and targeted near-term acquisitions, and the new JV development opportunities. We update our forecasts, which given the dynamic growth of the group is like aiming at a moving target. While still forecasting strong growth, compared with our last published forecast our expectations for EPRA EPS (FY22: -14%), including the impact of higher lease incentive costs, lower rent indexation and platform investment. EPRA NAV (FY22: -9%) and DPS (FY22: -9%) are also lower. This does not include the acquisition-led growth that we confidently expect but cannot reasonably forecast, any benefit from Romanian yield tightening although management highlights improved volumes and positive transactional evidence for prime offices at yields below those quoted by local agents. At more than 7%, these remain above other CEE markets and the pre-2007 peak.
Valuation: Good income with capital growth
GWI is trading at around EPRA NAV with an FY19e yield of 6.5%. Management of existing investments, further developments and continuing accretive acquisitions all point to strong growth in earnings and cash flow.
Dynamic growth continuing
In the relatively short time since listing in 2013, GWI has become the leading institutional office landlord in the CEE region. Its dynamic development has continued during 2019, with the group taking advantage of favourable economic and market conditions to consolidate its position and expand its investment property platform in both Poland and Romania. The growth has been supported by two equity capital raisings (€501m gross in April 2019 and €264m gross in October 2019) and access to debt capital, attractively priced at a cost that remains well below asset yields. The April equity increase included the issue of c €153m worth of shares to fund the acquisition of minorities in the Polish subsidiary, which following completion of the minority buy-out was de-listed in September, marking a welcome simplification of the group structure.
In this note we update on the continued progress of the group, review the interim results that were released in September and provide an update on our forecasts and valuation.
Portfolio approaching €3bn in value
We estimate that adjusting the 30 June 2019 gross asset value of the portfolio for the two Polish standing asset purchases completed since and for the two recently agreed forward purchase agreements in Poland, the value of GWI’s portfolio is now above €3bn (end FY18: c €2.5bn). The near-term investment pipeline includes three additional Polish assets (one standing and two under construction) with a value of €135m and the group continues to perform due diligence on further investment opportunities with an aggregate consideration of more than €300m.
Exhibit 1: Recent investment agreements take gross asset value to more than €3bn
€m |
Estimated current |
31-Dec-18 |
Standing assets, Romania (wholly owned) |
1,119 |
1,095 |
Standing assets, Poland |
1,416 |
1,217 |
Total standing assets at 30 June 2019 |
2,535 |
2,312 |
Developments in progress, Romania |
65 |
45 |
Future developments/land |
60 |
36 |
Other |
7 |
|
Balance sheet investment property GAV at 30 June 2019 |
2,667 |
2,393 |
Add RBC JV asset (of which GWI share 50%)* |
78 |
69 |
GAV at 30 June |
2,745 |
2,463 |
H219 to date completed additions |
113 |
|
Total estimated current GAV |
2,858 |
|
H219 to date agreed forward purchases** |
185 |
|
Total estimated GAV including agreed forward purchases |
3,043 |
Source: GWI data, Edison Investment Research estimates. Note: RBC held within JV. GWI share of €78m GAV is 50%. **GWI expects completion in Q120.
During H119, GWI announced the acquisition of four new Polish investments, of which two completed before 30 June 2019 (Rondo Business Park and Warsaw Trade Tower) at an aggregate cost of €169.9m and two have completed since (Retro Office House and Silesia Star) at an aggregate cost of €113.2m.
Exhibit 2: Recently completed standing asset acquisitions
Asset |
Location |
Acquisition price (€m) |
GLA (000 sqm) |
Ann. contracted rent (€m) |
Occupancy at acq. |
Acquisition yield |
Full occ. yield. |
|
Rondo Business Park |
Krakow |
37.0 |
20.3 |
3.0 |
90% |
8.2% |
9.0% |
|
Warsaw Trade Tower |
Warsaw |
132.9 |
45.4 |
9.0 |
88% |
6.8% |
7.8% |
|
Retro Office House |
Wroclav |
58.8 |
21.9 |
3.9 |
100% |
6.6% |
6.6% |
|
Silesia Star |
Katowice |
54.4 |
29.2 |
4.8 |
100% |
8.8% |
8.8% |
|
Source: Globalworth data
With its most recent capital raise in October 2019, GWI provided details of a near-term Polish acquisition pipeline amounting to an expected €320m in aggregate, comprising one standing asset and four development assets at various stages of completion. In November it signed a preliminary agreement to acquire, on their completion (expected in Q120), two of the development assets with the maximum transaction consideration set at €185m.The final consideration is to be determined on their leasing status at completion and after customary deductions. The annual contracted rent of the two assets is expected to be c €12m. Assuming a successful conclusion to negations, we would expect a relatively fast conclusion of the standing asset purchase with remaining two development assets following in H220. The investment in these three assets is expected to be €135m and are forecast to contribute annual contracted rent of c €10m. Regardless of a successful conclusion, GWI indicates additional strong opportunities and has continued to invest in and build on its Romanian development pipeline (see the next section).
Existing developments progressing and new opportunities
The existing development pipeline in Romania has continued to make progress and in H119 the first facility of the second phase of the Timisoara Industrial Park (TIP, formerly TAP) was completed. It was 67% let at 30 June. Globalworth Campus Tower 3 is on course for completion by the end of this year and with the interim results GWI announced that the commercial space was 56% let (70% including expansion options) for a term of 10 years. Major leases have been signed with Allianz and Unicredit. Globalworth Square is due for completion in mid-2020.
Exhibit 3: Current and near-term development projects
Globalworth Campus T3 |
Globalworth Square |
Chitila Logistics Park (phase A)* |
Constanta Business Park (phase A)* |
|
Location |
Bucharest new CBD |
Bucharest new CBD |
Bucharest |
Constanta |
Type |
Office |
Office |
Logistics |
Logistics/Ind. |
Expected/potential delivery |
Q4 2019 |
Q2/Q3 2020 |
2020 |
2020 |
Expected GLA (000 sqm) |
35.5 |
28.4 |
23.9 |
21.3 |
Cost/capex to 30 June 2019 (€m) |
32.1 |
15.0 |
1.4 |
0.6 |
GAV at 30 June 2019 (€m) |
47.9 |
16.8 |
1.6 |
0.9 |
Estimated remaining capex (€m) |
23.8 |
40.7 |
9.3 |
8.6 |
Estimated annual rental income (€m) |
5.8 |
5.4 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
Estimated yield on cost |
10.5% |
9.7% |
9.9% |
10.1% |
Estimated yield on GAV plus remaining capex |
8.1% |
9.4% |
9.7% |
9.7% |
Source: Globalworth. Note: *50:50 JV. Shown at 100% values.
Against a favourable market backdrop GWI continues to build its activities in the logistics/light industrial sector, forming a joint venture partnership with Global Vison, a leading construction and property management company in Romania, for the development of new high-quality facilities in Constanta and Chitila, near Bucharest. Marking an increased emphasis on the sector, GWI has rebranded its activities under the ‘Globalworth Industrial’ banner.
The first phases of the Constanta and Chitila developments are included in the near-term development projects shown in Exhibit 3. More substantial further phases are planned in the coming years (Exhibit 4).
Exhibit 4: Planned future development projects
Chitila Logistics Park (phased)* |
Constanta Business Park (phased)* |
Timisoara Industrial Park (phased) |
Luterana |
Green Court D |
Globalworth West |
|
Location |
Bucharest |
Constanta |
Timisoara |
Bucharest new CBD |
Bucharest new CBD |
Bucharest new CBD |
Type |
Logistics |
Logistics/Ind. |
Logistics/Ind. |
Office |
Office |
Office |
Expected/potential delivery |
2020-2021 |
2021-24 |
2020-22 |
2021 |
2021 |
2021 |
Expected GLA ('000 sqm) |
52.7 |
549.7 |
155.6 |
26.4 |
16.2 |
33.4 |
Cost/capex to 30 June 2019 (€m) |
3.3 |
11.9 |
7.0 |
7.2 |
2.7 |
3.6 |
GAV at 30 June 2019 (€m) |
3.8 |
19.3 |
9.5 |
14.3 |
5.9 |
3.6 |
Estimated remaining capex (€m) |
18.3 |
221.5 |
58.5 |
40.4 |
26.7 |
41.8 |
Estimated annual rental income (€m) |
2.3 |
26.7 |
6.6 |
5.8 |
3.0 |
4.8 |
Estimated yield on cost |
10.7% |
11.4% |
19.0% |
12.2% |
10.1% |
10.6% |
Estimated yield on GAV plus remaining capex |
10.4% |
11.1% |
9.6% |
10.6% |
9.1% |
10.6% |
Source: Globalworth *50:50 JV. Shown at 100% values
Markets and funding conditions remain positive
Romania and Poland have the largest populations in the CEE region and are the two fastest-growing economies in Europe with a consistent record of high, above European-average growth rates since the global financial crisis. IMF forecasts look for GDP growth to moderate slightly from c 4% in both countries in 2019 but to remain well above the EU average. Both Romania and Poland have been major beneficiaries of multinational companies looking to take advantage of high-quality infrastructure, a skilled workforce, lower overall operating costs and proximity to Western Europe to expand in the region, often using it as a base from which to service parts of their European or global operations.
|
Exhibit 5: Romanian and Polish GDP growth versus EU average |
|
|
Source: IMF World Economic Database, October 2019 |
Expanding economies have created increasing demand for commercial real estate and especially for high-quality space to meet the needs of expanding multinationals. A tightening labour force also makes it increasingly important for employers to be able to offer an attractive working environment, to attract and retain staff but this could also begin to act as a drag on employment growth and office demand.
|
Exhibit 6: Romania office demand-supply |
Exhibit 7: Polish office demand-supply |
|
|
|
Source: Globalworth presentation October 2019 |
Source: Globalworth presentation October 2019 |
|
Exhibit 6: Romania office demand-supply |
|
|
Source: Globalworth presentation October 2019 |
|
Exhibit 7: Polish office demand-supply |
|
|
Source: Globalworth presentation October 2019 |
Both Romania and Poland have seen increasing levels of take up of office space, sufficient to absorb growth in the property stock and the growing access to quality properties has in turn supported rising investment volumes.
|
Exhibit 8: Investment volume |
Exhibit 9: Investment volume |
|
|
|
Source Globalworth presentation October 2019 |
Source: Globalworth presentation October 2019 |
|
Exhibit 8: Investment volume |
|
|
Source Globalworth presentation October 2019 |
|
Exhibit 9: Investment volume |
|
|
Source: Globalworth presentation October 2019 |
The Polish market (2018 investment volume of c €7bn) is much larger than the Romanian market although Poland has seen a welcome increase in liquidity with several years of investment volumes not far off €1bn.
Although prime office yields in Bucharest have declined over the past three years, the tightening has not kept pace with that seen in Warsaw, Budapest and Prague (1.0–1.5pp) and they remain noticeably higher and remain well above the c 6.0% seen at the 2007 pre-financial crisis market peak. GWI management continues to anticipate the gap with other CEE centres will narrow, which would have a positive impact on our EPRA NAV and total return forecasts. Management notes that transaction yields appear to have tightened but this is yet to be fully reflected in external valuations. Although the terms have not been publicly disclosed, it estimates that one recent Bucharest office transaction was agreed at 6.5–6.75% and more widely, latest bids in Bucharest for prime office buildings are being negotiated at below 7%.
|
Exhibit 10: Prime office yields |
|
|
Source: Globalworth presentation October 2019 |
Market conditions supporting strong leasing
The gross leasable space of the GWI investment portfolio was 1,139k sqm at 30 June 2019, increasing to 1,190k sqm including the July acquisitions of Retro Office House and Silesia Star. The H119 portfolio gross asset valuation adjusted for the July acquisitions at cost is €2.858m and splits c 46:54 between Romania and Poland. On the same basis, the contracted rent roll of €184.1m splits c 44:56. The weighted average lease length (WALL) was 5.0 years. Portfolio income is well spread across 36 standing investments comprising 59 standing properties let to established, blue chip, mostly international tenants. The office sector represents 81% of portfolio value and mixed office/retail a further 10%. The logistics/light industrial weighting of 4% is likely to increase as the expanded development pipeline is delivered. The land and development assets represent the 5% balance of the portfolio.
Favourable market conditions support strong leasing progress and H119 was the most active half-year in the group’s history. During the period GWI negotiated the take up (including expansions) or extensions of just over 100k sqm of commercial space let in Romania and Poland at a WALL of 7.3 years. New leases were signed at a WALL of 8.1 years, accounting for 82% of the take up and included tenants such as Allianz, UniCredit and NDB Logistics Romania as well as 37 other corporates. Leases were renewed or extended for 65 tenants including AXA (which signed a 10-year lease extension at Warsaw Trade Tower post acquisition), International Paper, Scheider Electric and Airbus Defence.
Occupancy of the commercial standing portfolio was 93.9% at H119 (94.8% including tenant options), down slightly from 95.1%/96.3% at end-FY18, mainly reflecting the effect of acquisitions and deliveries. On a like-for-like basis there was a small 0.5% decrease in H119 occupancy of the standing commercial assets, which was driven by movements of certain tenants within the Romanian portfolio, but the group is confident of the near-term scope for occupancy to increase.
Including the July acquisitions, commercial standing occupancy was 95.1% or 96.3% including tenant options.
Financials
Since our last published forecasts, Globalworth has reported interim results (in September) and completed a €264m (gross) capital raising while continuing to grow its standing income-generating investment portfolio and substantially adding to its pipeline of development projects. Below we briefly review the interim results then provide an update on our revised forecasts.
Interim results to 30 June 2019
Exhibit 11: Summary of H119 financials
€m unless stated otherwise |
H119 |
H118 |
H119/H118 |
FY18 |
Net property income |
68.0 |
51.7 |
31.5% |
133.4 |
Administrative expenses |
(7.0) |
(6.5) |
8.2% |
(15.3) |
Fair value gain on investment property |
49.0 |
38.6 |
34.1 |
|
Net other income & expense items |
(5.5) |
(1.5) |
(1.6) |
|
Operating profit |
104.6 |
82.3 |
27.1% |
150.7 |
Net finance expense |
(20.9) |
(19.1) |
9.7% |
(38.4) |
JV profit |
4.4 |
0.7 |
3.1 |
|
Profit before tax |
88.0 |
64.0 |
37.7% |
115.3 |
Current & deferred tax |
(12.2) |
(7.6) |
(15.4) |
|
Non-controlling interests |
(6.0) |
(6.6) |
(19.7) |
|
IFRS attributable net profit |
69.9 |
49.8 |
40.5% |
80.3 |
Adjust for: |
||||
Fair value gain on investment property |
(49.0) |
(38.6) |
(34.1) |
|
Other EPRA adjustments inc. tax and non-controlling interest effects |
16.5 |
15.8 |
14.7 |
|
EPRA earnings |
37.3 |
27.0 |
38.0% |
60.9 |
Basic IFRS EPS (€c) |
44.0 |
37.6 |
60.7 |
|
Diluted EPRA EPS (€c) |
23.4 |
20.4 |
14.6% |
46.0 |
DPS declared (€c) |
30.0 |
27.0 |
11.1% |
54.0 |
IFRS attributable net assets |
1,614 |
1,088 |
1,085 |
|
IFRS NAV per share (€) |
8.5 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
|
EPRA NAV |
1,754 |
1,201 |
46.1% |
1,200 |
EPRA NAV per share (€) |
9.1 |
9.1 |
-0.1% |
9.0 |
Investment properties as per balance sheet (€bn)* |
2,639 |
2,088.5 |
2,391 |
|
Net debt |
(967) |
(731) |
(1,052) |
|
Net LTV** |
36.2% |
35.0% |
44.0% |
Source: Globalworth data, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Does not include GWI share of JV assets. **GWI calculates H119 net LTV of 36.5% including adjustment for JV assets/liabilities (FY18: 43.9%)
The interim results showed strong growth, reflecting the expansion of the investment portfolio and underlying progress with the existing portfolio, including development completions, rental growth, and operational efficiency. H119 net operating income increased 31.5% on the prior-year period to €68.0m from €51.1m and EPRA earnings increased 38.0% to €37.3m or 23.0 cents per share (+14.6%). An increased dividend per share of 30.0 cents (H118: 27.0 cents) has been paid. EPRA NAV increased 46.1% to €1.75bn, including €348m of shares issued for cash at €9.10 per share to support its ongoing portfolio growth and benefitting from a 2.2% like-for-like increase in the value of the standing asset portfolio. Reflecting the 44% growth in share count, EPRA NAV per share was flat at €9.1.
Forecast update
Our updated forecasts include:
■
A detailed review of the interim results.
■
The Polish minority buy-out.
■
The October placing of 28.6m new shares at €9.25 per share, raising €264.3m gross.
■
All five assets contained within the near-term pipeline of acquisitions disclosed alongside the October capital raise. This includes the concluded preliminary agreement to acquire two properties at completion for a maximum €185m.
■
All of the near- and medium-term development projects shown in Exhibits 3 and 4 above to the extent that they fall within the forecast period (to end-FY22).
Not included in our forecasts but shown as a sensitivity below is the potential for additional capital growth that would result from a convergence of Bucharest office yields towards the lower levels seen in markets elsewhere in the CEE region.
Compared with our previous forecasts EPRA EPS is reduced, primarily as a result of an increase in our assumption for lease incentive costs, a reduction (from 2.0% pa to 1.75% pa) in assumed rent indexation linked to harmonised EU consumer price inflation, and increased administrative expenses as GWI further invests in its property management platform. For the Romanian portfolio the increase in assumed lease incentive costs reflects the recently reported trend and mirrors market-wide developments. For Poland, it further reflects the late 2018 unwinding of master lease and NOI guarantees that had been granted to the Polish subsidiary before GWI acquired it. GWI received a €21.5m one-off cash settlement in FY18 for the unwinding but became responsible for the small amount of vacant space. In H119 lease incentive costs represented 8.9% of gross rental income, up from 5.7% in FY18. Our revised forecasts assume a similar c 9% throughout the forecasting period. Investment in the property management platform is aimed at reinforcing GWI’s commitment to offer best-in-class services for tenants, which in turn should positively impact tenant retention, occupancy and income. By value, c 81% of standing office and mixed-use assets are now managed internally.
Forecast EPRA NAV is also lower than previously forecast reflecting the knock-on effect of the EPS reduction on retained earnings and a feed through to property valuations from reduced indexation (we continue to assume unchanged yields such that valuation gains are directly linked to rent growth) and the spreading of future development profits across an increased number of shares.
We have assumed an increase in full year DPS to 60 cents per share and that this is held flat until FY22, at which point it is fully covered by our forecast EPRA earnings.
Our revised forecasts are shown in Exhibit 12. However, given the continuing pace of development at GWI and the scale of its continuing ambitions we think it very likely these may change materially in the coming months.
Exhibit 12: Forecast revisions
NOI (€m) |
EPRA earnings (€m) |
EPRA EPS (€)* |
EPRA NAV per share (€)* |
DPS (c) |
|||||||||||
New |
Old |
Change |
New |
Old |
Change |
New |
Old |
Change |
New |
Old |
Change |
New |
Old |
Change |
|
FY19e |
143.8 |
154.3 |
-7% |
79.0 |
88.3 |
-11% |
43.4 |
50.1 |
-13% |
9.1 |
9.5 |
-5% |
60 |
54 |
11% |
FY20e |
176.1 |
185.8 |
-5% |
103.6 |
113.8 |
-9% |
46.6 |
59.6 |
-22% |
9.4 |
10.3 |
-9% |
60 |
58 |
3% |
FY21e |
195.4 |
201.6 |
-3% |
119.1 |
127.1 |
-6% |
53.6 |
66.6 |
-20% |
9.8 |
10.9 |
-10% |
60 |
62 |
-3% |
FY22e |
211.8 |
210.4 |
1% |
135.3 |
135.1 |
0% |
60.9 |
70.8 |
-14% |
10.3 |
11.3 |
-9% |
60 |
66 |
-9% |
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note *Fully diluted.
Our forecasts also include:
■
All the five near-term pipeline assets, each assumed to be 90% let at acquisition. The agreed forward purchase of two assets for €185m adds €12m pa to full occupancy rent and we expect this to contribute from mid-H120. The remaining three assets are assumed to be of equal size (each €45m and contributing €3m pa to full occupancy rent) with one (standing) asset contributing from the beginning of FY20 and two forward-purchase assets contributing from the beginning of FY21.
■
All the near-term development projects shown in Exhibit 3, in line with the assumptions provided by management. On a 100% basis, the expected capex required to complete these developments is c €82m, with an expected addition to contracted rental income of €13.2m pa. Allowing for the 50% JV interest in Chitila Logistics Park and Constanta Business Park, Globalworth’s share of the capex is €72m and its share of annual rent is €12.2m.
■
All the medium-term development projects shown in Exhibit 4, although later phases of Constanta Business Park fall outside of our forecasting period to end-FY22, with the costs and rental contribution in line with management estimates. We assume the wholly owned assets, Luterana, Green Court D and Globalworth West contribute from H221 and the remaining TIP II is delivered in three equal phases, contributing from end-FY20, end-FY21 and end-FY22 respectively. The expected capex required to complete these developments is c €167m, with an expected addition to contracted rental income of €20.2m pa. For Chitila Logistics Park we assume the remaining development contributes from H221, adding €2.3m of annual rental income (GWI share €1.15m) with capex of €18.3m (GWI share €9.15m). For Constanta Business Park we assume the remaining development is delivered in four equal phases, two of which are complete and contribute in the forecast period, from H221 and from H222, each contributing annual rent of €6.7m of which the GWI share is €3.35m. The capex required to complete these two phases is €110m (GWI share €55m) and we assume c €18m capex on the third, uncompleted, phase during FY22.
■
We assume GWI acquires 100% of the now completed Renault Bucharest Connected (RBC), developed as a 50:50 joint venture and housing Groupe Renault’s new headquarters in Romania and a dedicated auto design centre, at the end of FY19. This adds €5.7m to contracted rental income, while during FY19 we allow for GWI’s 50% share of this through the JV line in the income statement.
■
We assume the maintenance of a high level of occupancy across the portfolio as a whole. For the speculatively developed assets we assume 60–70% initial occupancy, followed by a steady increase towards the long-term level of c 95% that we assume for the portfolio as a whole (95.1% at end-FY18 for the standing commercial portfolio, including certain office rental guarantees).
■
For the standing assets we have assumed positive revaluation movement in line with rental growth. For the Romanian development assets, we assume some positive revaluation/development gain during the construction phase and full occupancy yields at completion of 7% for the office development assets and 8.5% for the industrial development assets. Specifically, we have not assumed any generalised market-driven changes in yield, either positive or negative, although as we discuss below there is potential for Romanian yields in particular to tighten, converging on the levels seen in more established regional markets.
NAV sensitivity to yield shift
As noted above, current market conditions suggest good potential for prime office yields to tighten in Bucharest in particular, where prime office yields remain well above the levels in other regional markets, valuations remain well below historical highs, and market liquidity has been increasing. GWI also believes that there is scope for revaluation gains on the Polish assets.
The full occupancy yield on the wholly owned Romanian commercial portfolio (i.e. excluding the RBC JV asset and the Upground Towers residential assets) was c 7.4% at end-H119 or 6.7% based on contracted rental income. For the overall wholly owned Romanian portfolio (including the Upground Towers residential assets) the full occupancy yield was 7.1%. The quality and location of the Romanian commercial assets is a positive feature.
At H119, the full occupancy yield on GWI’s Polish assets in Warsaw and a number of other key Polish cities where yields tend to be higher was c 6.7%. Management estimates the Warsaw asset yields are c 150bp above prime and although in part this reflects the smaller lot size of some of the properties, there remains scope for portfolio asset yields to tighten versus prime yields and for regional yields to tighten versus Warsaw.
In Exhibit 13 we show an updated sensitivity of our EPRA NAV forecasts to alternative full occupancy yield assumptions. We have included the potential impact of yield tightening in respect of the JV industrial development assets that are included in our forecasts at an assumed yield on completion of 8.5%, although this has a minimal impact on the overall sensitivity. We estimate that a 50bp tightening in yields across the portfolio would increase FY22 EPRA NAV per share by c €1.5, or c 15%. If confined to Romanian assets only, the same movement in NAV per share would equate to a c 100bp tightening in Romanian yields.
Exhibit 13: Impact of full occupancy yield change on EPRA NAV per share
Change in € per share |
% change versus forecast |
||||||||
Change in yield |
2019e |
2020e |
2021e |
2022e |
2019e |
2020e |
2021e |
2022e |
|
-1.00% |
2.4 |
2.8 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
24% |
27% |
30% |
31% |
|
-0.75% |
1.8 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
17% |
19% |
22% |
23% |
|
-0.50% |
1.1 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
11% |
12% |
14% |
15% |
|
-0.25% |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
5% |
6% |
7% |
7% |
|
No change in yield (i.e. as forecast) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|
0.25% |
-0.5 |
-0.6 |
-0.6 |
-0.7 |
-5% |
-6% |
-6% |
-7% |
|
0.50% |
-1.0 |
-1.1 |
-1.2 |
-1.3 |
-10% |
-11% |
-12% |
-13% |
|
Source: Edison Investment Research
Valuation
From FY14 (the first full year of operations following IPO) to the end of FY18 (the last full year reported) EPRA NAV total return (the change in EPRA NAV per share adjusted for dividends paid) was an aggregate 75%, an annualised compound return (without reinvesting dividends) of 11.9% pa. Having built a substantial income-generating portfolio over the period, we expect dividends to represent a growing share of future returns and based on our forecasts for the period FY19 to FY22 represent around two-thirds of the implied c 7% annualised return. Although the forecast returns are lower than those historically reported, they assume no Romanian yield convergence versus other CEE markets. Even on this basis we believe the returns are attractive in the context of the continuing low yield environment.
Exhibit 14: EPRA NAV total return history and forecast
FY14 |
FY15 |
FY16 |
FY17 |
FY18 |
FY14-18 |
FY19e |
FY20e |
FY21e |
FY22e |
FY19-22 |
|
Opening EPRA NAV per share (€) |
5.6 |
8.1 |
9.1 |
8.6 |
8.8 |
5.6 |
9.0 |
9.1 |
9.4 |
9.8 |
9.0 |
Closing EPRA NAV per share (€) |
8.1 |
9.1 |
8.6 |
8.8 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.1 |
9.4 |
9.8 |
10.3 |
10.3 |
DPS paid in period (€) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
2.4 |
EPRA NAV total return |
45.4% |
12.2% |
-5.6% |
5.8% |
7.8% |
75.3% |
6.8% |
9.7% |
11.2% |
11.1% |
40.1% |
Compound annualised total return |
11.9% |
7.0% |
Source: Globalworth data, Edison Investment Research
Based on the interim DPS of €0.30 we expect an aggregate DPS for FY19 of €0.60, representing a yield of 6.5%. Although the DPS is not fully covered by recurring earnings (we estimate 72% cover in FY19) we welcome management’s commitment to dividend payments and anticipate an increasing level of dividend cover over the forecast period (fully covered in FY22). Meanwhile the shares trade at around NAV.
Although there are no direct comparators to GWI, in Exhibit 15 we show a summary valuation and share price performance comparison of GWI with a small number of other quoted companies that are also significant investors in the CEE regional commercial property market within more broadly spread portfolios. For comparative purposes the table is based on last reported NAVs and trailing 12-month dividends declared. On this basis, GWI offers a significantly higher yield than the peer group average while trading at a slightly higher P/NAV. Compared with the more widely diversified peer group, Globalworth is focused on the CEE markets, and the strongly performing Romanian and Polish markets in particular.
Exhibit 15: Peer comparison table
Price (local) |
Market cap. (€m) |
P/NAV (x)* |
Yield (%)** |
P/E (x) |
Share price performance |
||||
1 month |
3 months |
12 months |
From 12M high |
||||||
NEPI Rockcastle |
7.75 |
4,657 |
1.10 |
7.0 |
14.8 |
0.6 |
-10.2 |
21.4 |
-15.9 |
IMMOFINANZ |
23.70 |
2,673 |
0.81 |
3.6 |
12.8 |
-3.6 |
-3.0 |
15.7 |
-9.7 |
CA IMMO |
36.85 |
3,631 |
1.04 |
2.4 |
27.2 |
5.9 |
14.0 |
27.2 |
-1.9 |
GTC |
9.51 |
1,093 |
0.92 |
3.9 |
16.3 |
2.0 |
-0.1 |
15.4 |
-3.1 |
Average (Ex-Globalworth) |
0.96 |
4.2 |
17.8 |
1.2 |
0.2 |
19.9 |
-7.6 |
||
Globalworth |
9.25 |
2,053 |
1.02 |
6.2 |
18.9 |
-1.1 |
-3.6 |
8.5 |
-5.6 |
Source: Company data. Refinitiv. Note: Prices at 18 December 2019. Note: *Based on last reported EPRA NAV. **Based on trailing 12 month DPS
Exhibit 16: Financial summary
Year ended 31 December (€000s) |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019e |
2020e |
2021e |
2022e |
INCOME STATEMENT |
|||||||
Rental income |
46.2 |
53.9 |
137.6 |
151.6 |
184.0 |
203.3 |
220.7 |
Net property operating expenses |
(2.6) |
(2.8) |
(4.2) |
(7.8) |
(7.9) |
(8.0) |
(8.9) |
Net operating income (NOI) |
43.6 |
51.1 |
133.4 |
143.8 |
176.1 |
195.4 |
211.8 |
Administrative expenses |
(7.7) |
(10.2) |
(15.3) |
(16.5) |
(19.0) |
(19.3) |
(19.7) |
Depreciation of long-term assets |
(0.2) |
(0.2) |
(0.4) |
(0.3) |
(0.3) |
(0.3) |
(0.3) |
Acquisition costs |
(0.1) |
(10.8) |
(1.2) |
(0.0) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Fair value gain on investment property |
6.7 |
6.7 |
34.1 |
77.5 |
89.3 |
103.2 |
97.1 |
Bargain purchase gain on acquisition of subsidiaries |
0.0 |
28.9 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Share based payments |
(0.0) |
(0.1) |
(0.5) |
(0.6) |
(0.5) |
(0.5) |
(0.5) |
FX gain/(loss) |
(0.1) |
(0.3) |
(1.2) |
(0.6) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Other net income/(expense) |
1.5 |
(4.1) |
(4.0) |
(5.9) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Change in fair value of financial instruments |
0.0 |
0.0 |
5.5 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
EBIT |
43.7 |
61.0 |
150.7 |
198.9 |
245.6 |
278.4 |
288.4 |
Net finance expense |
(31.5) |
(37.0) |
(38.4) |
(43.0) |
(45.4) |
(48.2) |
(50.6) |
JV |
0.0 |
2.2 |
3.1 |
4.9 |
1.5 |
10.7 |
12.8 |
Profit before tax (PBT) |
12.2 |
26.2 |
115.3 |
160.8 |
201.7 |
240.9 |
250.6 |
Tax charge |
(0.9) |
(2.4) |
(15.4) |
(19.3) |
(21.6) |
(25.4) |
(26.1) |
Profit after tax |
11.3 |
23.7 |
99.9 |
141.5 |
180.1 |
215.5 |
224.5 |
Minorities |
0.0 |
0.7 |
(19.7) |
(6.0) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Attributable profit after tax (PAT) |
11.3 |
24.4 |
80.3 |
135.5 |
180.1 |
215.5 |
224.5 |
EPRA earnings adjustments: |
|||||||
Fair value gain on investment property |
(6.7) |
(6.7) |
(34.1) |
(77.5) |
(89.3) |
(103.2) |
(97.1) |
Other EPRA adjustments |
4.0 |
(0.9) |
14.7 |
21.0 |
12.8 |
6.7 |
7.8 |
EPRA earnings |
8.6 |
16.8 |
60.9 |
79.0 |
103.6 |
119.1 |
135.3 |
Basic average number of shares (m) |
64.4 |
92.5 |
132.3 |
180.6 |
221.9 |
221.9 |
221.9 |
Fully diluted average number of shares (m) |
64.4 |
93.8 |
132.5 |
181.8 |
222.3 |
222.3 |
222.3 |
IFRS EPS - basic (c) |
17.6 |
26.4 |
60.7 |
75.0 |
81.2 |
97.1 |
101.2 |
Diluted EPRA EPS (c) |
13.3 |
17.9 |
46.0 |
43.4 |
46.6 |
53.6 |
60.9 |
DPS (c) |
0.0 |
44.0 |
54.0 |
60.0 |
60.0 |
60.0 |
60.0 |
Dividend cover |
0.4 |
0.9 |
0.72 |
0.78 |
0.89 |
1.01 |
|
BALANCE SHEET |
|||||||
Investment property |
980.9 |
1,792.4 |
2,391.0 |
2,942.5 |
3,387.6 |
3,581.0 |
3,697.5 |
Other non-current assets |
17.7 |
49.2 |
69.0 |
77.3 |
99.0 |
143.5 |
184.0 |
Total non-current assets |
998.6 |
1,841.6 |
2,460.0 |
3,019.8 |
3,486.5 |
3,724.5 |
3,881.5 |
Cash & equivalents |
221.3 |
273.3 |
229.5 |
363.6 |
20.9 |
11.9 |
20.4 |
Other current assets |
11.8 |
46.1 |
47.4 |
55.6 |
60.7 |
64.0 |
66.7 |
Total current assets |
233.2 |
319.4 |
277.0 |
419.3 |
81.6 |
76.0 |
87.0 |
Interest bearing loans & borrowings |
(375.6) |
(834.0) |
(1,235.1) |
(1,340.9) |
(1,396.4) |
(1,521.9) |
(1,577.4) |
Deferred tax liabilities |
(70.6) |
(99.6) |
(107.0) |
(121.0) |
(135.3) |
(151.8) |
(167.3) |
Other non-current liabilities |
(4.5) |
(13.1) |
(15.9) |
(45.6) |
(47.5) |
(49.2) |
(49.7) |
Total non-current liabilities |
(450.6) |
(946.7) |
(1,358.0) |
(1,507.4) |
(1,579.2) |
(1,722.9) |
(1,794.4) |
Interest bearing loans & borrowing |
(38.7) |
(36.4) |
(24.0) |
(4.6) |
(4.6) |
(4.6) |
(4.6) |
Other current liabilities |
(27.1) |
(41.5) |
(57.7) |
(51.1) |
(60.9) |
(66.6) |
(71.4) |
Total current liabilities |
(65.8) |
(77.8) |
(81.7) |
(55.7) |
(65.5) |
(71.3) |
(76.0) |
Net assets |
715.4 |
1,136.5 |
1,297.3 |
1,875.9 |
1,923.4 |
2,006.3 |
2,098.2 |
Non-controlling interests |
0.0 |
(67.6) |
(212.4) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Shareholders' equity |
715.4 |
1,068.9 |
1,084.9 |
1,875.9 |
1,923.4 |
2,006.3 |
2,098.2 |
Adjustments to EPRA: |
|||||||
Add deferred tax liability |
70.6 |
112.1 |
128.6 |
145.7 |
160.0 |
176.5 |
192.1 |
Add negative fair value of interest rate swap |
3.6 |
2.6 |
2.1 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
Other |
(5.7) |
(12.1) |
(15.5) |
(2.7) |
(2.4) |
(0.6) |
0.9 |
EPRA NAV |
783.8 |
1,171.5 |
1,200.2 |
2,020.8 |
2,082.9 |
2,184.1 |
2,293.0 |
Period end number of shares, fully diluted (m) |
91.5 |
132.5 |
132.7 |
222.3 |
222.3 |
222.3 |
222.3 |
Basic NAV per share (€) |
7.91 |
8.09 |
8.19 |
8.45 |
8.67 |
9.04 |
9.46 |
EPRA NAV per share (€) |
8.57 |
8.84 |
9.04 |
9.09 |
9.37 |
9.82 |
10.31 |
CASH FLOW |
|||||||
Net cash flows from operating activities |
19.9 |
10.1 |
80.1 |
31.7 |
117.2 |
129.1 |
139.7 |
Cash flows from investing activities |
(39.5) |
(388.0) |
(426.9) |
(359.3) |
(376.2) |
(124.4) |
(47.5) |
Cash flows from financing |
206.9 |
430.6 |
303.1 |
463.6 |
(83.7) |
(13.7) |
(83.7) |
Change in cash |
187.3 |
52.7 |
(43.7) |
136.0 |
(342.8) |
(9.0) |
8.5 |
FX |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|||
Opening cash |
31.0 |
218.4 |
271.0 |
227.3 |
363.6 |
20.9 |
11.9 |
Closing cash |
218.4 |
271.0 |
227.3 |
363.6 |
20.9 |
11.9 |
20.4 |
Adjustments to balance sheet cash |
3.0 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Balance sheet cash |
221.3 |
273.3 |
229.5 |
363.6 |
20.9 |
11.9 |
20.4 |
Debt as per balance sheet |
(414.2) |
(870.4) |
(1,259.1) |
(1,345.5) |
(1,401.0) |
(1,526.5) |
(1,582.0) |
Debt fair value adjustment |
0.0 |
(12.6) |
(20.5) |
(18.4) |
(18.4) |
(18.4) |
(18.4) |
Debt at nominal value |
(414.2) |
(883.0) |
(1,279.6) |
(1,363.9) |
(1,419.4) |
(1,544.9) |
(1,600.4) |
Net (debt)/cash |
(192.9) |
(609.7) |
(1,050.1) |
(1,000.3) |
(1,398.5) |
(1,533.0) |
(1,580.0) |
Net LTV |
19.7% |
34.0% |
43.9% |
33.6% |
40.9% |
42.4% |
42.4% |
Source: Globalworth historical data, Edison Investment Research forecasts
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Research: Investment Companies
The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR) has recently moved from a slightly geared to a small net cash position, as manager Alex Crooke seeks to lock in gains and await a more favourable re-entry point. The global fund is run as a collection of regional portfolios, with an overall tilt towards a value style of investment, although this varies from one sub-portfolio manager to another. Over 12 months to end-September almost all the regional portfolios have outperformed local indices, with the exception of the UK and the small and now largely liquidated nonAsian emerging markets allocation. BNKR invests for both capital and income growth, and is on track to grow its dividend by c 6% for FY19 (ended 31 October), a 53rd consecutive annual increase.