Brady
Written by
Brady |
Investment case remains sound |
Final results |
Software & comp services |
8 April 2016 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analysts
Brady is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brady had a difficult FY15, as turmoil in the commodities space resulted in business being deferred. Nevertheless, the commodities markets are showing signs of recovery and the commodities software sector benefits from broader business drivers such as regulatory changes while the sector remains underinvested in IT. Further, the group continues to use its position as a quoted company to consolidate the sector and in our view the acquisition of energycredit is a bold one, as it creates significant cross-selling opportunities and provides an opportunity to leverage energycredit’s offshore development facility. Hence, we believe the shares look attractive, tracing on c 12x our cash-adjusted FY17e earnings.
Year |
Revenue (£m) |
PBT* |
EPS* |
DPS |
P/E |
Yield |
12/14 |
31.0 |
5.1 |
5.3 |
1.9 |
10.3 |
3.5 |
12/15 |
27.4 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
54.5 |
N/A |
12/16e |
30.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
1.7 |
15.6 |
3.1 |
12/17e |
32.2 |
4.1 |
3.9 |
1.9 |
14.0 |
3.5 |
Note: *PBT and EPS are normalised, excluding amortisation of acquired intangibles, exceptional items and share-based payments.
Final results: 20 new deals in FY15
While FY15 got off to a good start, the rout in commodity prices through H2 affected the group’s customer base. Hence several deals that were anticipated in the second half were deferred, and the group announced a profits warning in late November. Nevertheless, 20 significant deals were signed in FY15, of which nine were cloud deals, and 27 contracts went live. Group revenues dipped 12% y-o-y (or 7% at constant currencies) to £27.4m, while adjusted operating profit fell 82% to £0.9m. The group acquired ScrapRunner in July and energycredit post period end.
Forecasts: energycredit added
Our forecasts are broadly maintained, albeit for the inclusion of energycredit, which was acquired in January, and gives a small boost to our earnings forecasts. We forecast energycredit to generate £1.5m of revenues in FY16 along with c 10% operating margins. In all, we forecast revenues to rise 12% in FY16 (6% excluding energycredit) and 5% in FY17. We expect the group to be cash generative from FY16, with net cash rising to £7.0m as at the end of FY16 and to £8.5m a year later. We believe our forecasts are conservative, based on an uncertain economic outlook. The energycredit acquisition alone provides potential for upgrades, as its solutions, which have historically only been targeted at the energy sector, are sector agnostic and Brady can therefore extend them to its broader customer base.
Valuation: Well positioned for commodities recovery
Brady trades on c 12x our cash-adjusted FY17 EPS, 1.2x EV/sales and c 8.3x EV/EBITDA. In our view, the group’s strong balance sheet (£6.6m cash and no debt) and streamlined cost base position Brady well for recovery. We note that Brady bounced back in FY14 from a disappointing FY13, and the shares now look undervalued if it can stage a similar recovery in FY16/FY17.
Investment summary: Commodities s/ware growth play
Company description: E/CTRM software vendor
Founded in 1985, Brady is a leading provider of trading and risk management software for global commodity markets. The group has 400+ customers worldwide, including some of the largest financial institutions and corporations, which depend on Brady's software solutions to deliver mission critical business transactions across their global networks. The group employs c 270 people with development centres in the UK (Cambridge), Norway (Bergen and Halden), Switzerland (Geneva) and India (Bangalore) and commercial offices in the US, UK, Europe and Singapore. Customers include Codelco, EDF, Gerald Metals, Glencore, HSBC, ICAP, Koch Industries, LG Intl, Noble Group, Norsk Hydro, Rio Tinto, Sims, Standard Bank, Statkraft, Statoil and Xstrata.
Financials: A mix of rental, licence, services and hosting
The group’s commodities, recycling and Switzerland-based energy scheduling unit typically operate a term-licence model, normally for five years. There is an annual 20% support and maintenance fee on top, along with services, which could potentially double the licence fee. The default delivery is a hosted cloud offering, which involves a recurring annual hosting fee. Close to half of new business is now hosted cloud and it generated c £1m of cloud revenues in FY15. The group’s Norwegian energy business operates an onsite rental model. Group revenue dipped 7% at constant currencies on FY15, having grown in year since FY06. 56% of FY15 revenues were recurring in nature, but this leaves a significant degree of lumpiness in the business model; much of the new business is signed in Q4. We are forecasting sales to grow by 6% organically in FY16 (12% including energycredit) and 5% in FY17. We expect adjusted operating profit to rise to £3.4m in FY16 and to £4.0m in FY17. Brady had net cash of £6.6m at the end of FY15 and we forecast this to increase to £7.0m at the end of FY16, after paying for energycredit, and to £8.5m a year later. The group has no financial liabilities.
Sensitivities: IT budgets and commodities cycles
Commodity markets are cyclical and subject to periods of extreme volatility. However, in our view, Brady’s greatest sensitivity, as with the typical enterprise software vendor, is the risk of IT department budget cuts in an economic downturn. The 2015 commodity selloff, which was related to the Chinese economic deceleration, was persistent and severe, and correlated across asset classes. The one E/CTRM asset class that performed relatively well in 2015, was petroleum, but Brady has no exposure in this space. The commodity selloff forced restructurings across the commodity trading sphere (c 50% of Brady’s customer base), as well as in the scrap metals space, and players deferred deals to conserve cash.
Valuation: Cheap when adjusted for the strong balance sheet
The stock trades on a P/E of 15.6x our FY16 earnings forecast, falling to 14.0x in FY17. On a cash-adjusted basis the numbers fall to c 13.7x and c 12.2x in the respective years. Our DCF model, assuming a weighted average cost of capital of 10%, values the shares at 100p, or c 84% above the current share price. This target is supported by current customer win rates, potential for cross-selling, and the scope to add further acquisitions to broaden the customer base into new geographies.
Exhibit 1: Forecast changes
Revenue (£m) |
Adjusted EBITDA (£m) |
EPS (p) |
|||||||
Old |
New |
Change (%) |
Old |
New |
Change (%) |
Old |
New |
Change (%) |
|
2015 |
27.4 |
27.4 |
0 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
5 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0 |
2016e |
29.0 |
30.5 |
5 |
3.9 |
4.0 |
5 |
3.3 |
3.5 |
4 |
2017e |
32.2 |
4.6 |
3.9 |
||||||
Source: Brady (historical), Edison Investment Research (forecasts)
Final results: Strong pipeline, acquisition benefits
The final results were in line with our forecasts, which we last revised in December. While FY15 got off to a good start, the rout in commodity prices through H2 affected the group’s customer base. This was particularly prevalent across commodity trading houses, which represent c 50% of the customer base, as well as in the recycling space. Hence several deals that were anticipated in the second half were deferred, and the group announced a profits warning in late November. Nevertheless, 20 significant deals were signed in FY15, which was the same as FY14, while 27 contracts went live. Nine of the new deals were hosted in the cloud, up from six in 2014, providing the group with additional recurring revenues. Group revenues dipped 12% (or 7% at constant currencies) to £27.4m, while adjusted operating profit fell 82% to £0.9m. The group ended the period with £6.6m cash and no debt. Brady acquired ScrapRunner in September 2015 and energycredit in early January 2016. The annual dividend was passed in order to conserve cash. We believe this was primarily to ensure the group has adequate resources to make further acquisitions without having to raise additional funds from shareholders.
|
Exhibit 2: Significant new licence deals |
|
|
Source: Brady |
Strategy: The provider of choice for natural resources software
Brady, which has established itself as the largest European headquartered E/CTRM (energy/commodity trading, transaction and risk management) company, seeks to be the definitive provider of choice for natural resources software solutions. Brady is the largest player in metals globally, has the largest European energy installed base and is the biggest in US recycling. The group now has over 400 customers, including many blue-chip, household names, and a large part of new business, including the largest deals in FY15, are upsells to existing customers.
We highlight the following points on the group strategy.
■
A hosted cloud offering, in partnership with Rackspace, is the group’s default solution, available across all business units, and 45% of new deals were cloud deals in FY15, up from 30% in FY14. Around £1m of revenues were from the cloud product in FY15.
■
A key objective is to build the group’s recurring revenue base, which consists of support and maintenance revenues, software rental and cloud revenues.
■
Brady seeks to take advantage of disruption among its major competitors, which have been acquired by private equity in recent years, and has been building market share. Brady has an estimated at c 3% of the global commodities software market while its key competitors Triple Point and Openlink are both losing market share.
■
Brady seeks to use the group’s strong balance sheet and public company status to further consolidate the commodities software space, having completed eight acquisitions in the last seven years. We note that Brady is able to leverage the acquired products by utilising the group’s established global sales and support infrastructure, which smaller software vendors are typically lacking. Further, it can cross-sell the products to its existing customer base.
Three business units
The original Brady plc developed a strong position delivering trading and risk solutions to the metals markets and was floated on AIM in 2004. Gavin Lavelle, CEO, joined in 2007. Comsoft was acquired in 2009 to broaden the metals offering into concentrates. Viveo Switzerland was acquired in March 2010, establishing the group in the softs & agricultural space. Viz Risk Management was acquired in December 2010, establishing the group in the electricity and gas sector, which was boosted by the acquisitions of Navita and Syseca in 2012. SAI was acquired in 2014, immediately establishing the group as a major player in the recycling space, and further boosted by ScrapRunner in 2015.
Group contribution dipped 31% to £6.5m, as business deferrals in H2 resulted in FY15 numbers not meeting earlier expectations. Hence, Brady took £2.0m out of the business late in FY15 and these benefits are expected to flow through in FY16. These cost savings were spread across the group’s non-revenue generating activities. The performance was also affected by currency moves, which reduced revenues by £1.3m and contribution by £0.5m. This was due to the weak Norwegian krone, which has since staged a recovery, rallying by c 9% since year-end. An FY15 highlight was the improvement in profitability in the group’s Energy business unit, following the division’s restructurings, which involved it transitioning to a common go-forward platform.
Exhibit 3: Divisional breakdown and reconciliation of EBITDA definitions
FY14 |
FY15 |
|||||
Revenues |
Contribution |
Margin |
Revenues |
Contribution |
Margin |
|
£000 |
£000 |
% |
£000 |
£000 |
% |
|
Commodities business unit |
14,420 |
5,859 |
40.6 |
12,414 |
3,662 |
29.5 |
Energy business unit |
12,589 |
2816 |
22.4 |
10,738 |
2,779 |
25.9 |
Recycling business unit |
4,006 |
787 |
19.6 |
4,222 |
70 |
1.7 |
Group total |
31,015 |
9,462 |
30.5 |
27,374 |
6,511 |
23.8 |
Amortisation of acq'd intangible assets |
(1,613) |
(1,640) |
||||
Central and shared costs |
(4,675) |
(5,830) |
||||
Operating profit before exceptionals |
3,174 |
(959) |
||||
Add Back: |
||||||
Depreciation |
573 |
582 |
||||
Amortisation of capitalised development |
928 |
1,187 |
||||
Amortisation of acquired intangibles |
1,613 |
1,640 |
||||
EBITDA (Brady definition) |
6,288 |
20.3 |
2,450 |
9.0 |
||
Deduct: Amortisation of capitalised dev't |
(928) |
(1,187) |
||||
Add back: Share-based payments |
232 |
243 |
||||
Adjusted EBITDA (Edison definition) |
5,592 |
18.0 |
1,506 |
5.5 |
||
Source: Brady
Commodities (c 45% of FY15 group revenues)
Brady merged its UK-based Metals business unit with its Geneva-based Physicals business unit in 2013 to form an enlarged Commodities division. Brady is the world’s leading provider of trading and risk management software for the global metals markets, and is installed with producers, fabricators, merchants, banks and brokers around the globe. Also, it has leadership in the LME market (over 50% of LME Cat 1 members use Brady software, which is mainly for back and middle office processes). The Physicals business was acquired in late 2010, then known as Viveo Switzerland. It focuses on commodities for physical delivery, operating across soft commodities, metals and oil & gas.
The division’s revenues dropped 14% (15% on constant currency basis) to £12.2m. The contribution dipped by 37% to £3.7m, to give a contribution margin of 29% (FY14: 41%). This division was heavily affected by the contagion in the commodity markets, particularly in relation to the major global commodity traders, several of which underwent restructurings. Sales highlights included major contracts signed with one of the world's largest commodity companies and the brokerage division of a large Japanese multinational, covering base and precious metals and agricultural commodities. Another highlight was the signing of four new start-up commodity trading companies, which selected cloud-based solutions for cotton, metals and concentrates trading and risk management. There has been a trend in the spinoff of trading units from major traders, and it is encouraging to see Brady picking up this new business.
Energy (c 39% of group revenues)
Brady has the largest installed base of ETRM (energy trading, transaction and risk management) solutions in Europe. The division was formed via the acquisitions of Viz Risk Management in 2010 and Navita in 2012, both of which are based in Norway, and Switzerland-based syseca in 2012. Brady provides solutions that support electricity and gas trading, covering trading and risk management, logistics, data management and settlement. Most solutions are sold on a recurring rental basis and c 75% of the division’s revenues are recurring. The group does not offer specialised solutions for the petroleum market.
FY15 revenues slipped 15% to £10.7m while the contribution fell 1% as the margin recovered to 26%. On a constant currency basis, revenues fell 1% while the contribution rose 18%. Eight new significant contracts were secure, including four new clients. There were 10 go-lives, including five contracts that were signed earlier in the year and two implementations of the first release of Brady's integrated pan-European power scheduling and balancing solution. In 2016, the division stands to benefit from the creation of a common settlement system for the Nordic markets, replacing the existing country-based systems, and Brady has 24 customers participating in a beta solution.
Recycling (c 16% of group revenues)
Brady is the largest supplier of software solutions to the recycling industry in the US, where six of the 10 largest recycling companies are customers, and 50% of ferrous scrap is processed with Brady’s software. The division was formed with the acquisition of SAI, based in Maumee, Ohio, in 2012. The business unit develops and licenses highly specialised software that scrap metal businesses use to manage their business processes. The core solution, CRES, offers a complete end-to-end solution from scrap yard to accounting for the supply-chain management, profit margin analysis and forecasting for recycling organisations in the ferrous, non-ferrous, paper and steel sectors. Around 1,000 scrap yards use Brady’s software in the US.
The division’s revenues rose 5%, but were flat on a constant currency basis, to £4.0m, while the contribution dropped 91% to £0.1m. The division’s customer base was affected by sliding scrap metals prices, which were largely related to the weak Chinese market. Nevertheless, Brady was selected by Sims Metal Management (ASX: SGM), the world's largest recycling company, to implement Brady’s software in all its facilities in Australia, New Zealand and New Guinea. We would expect this rollout to extend to Europe in due course, as it is part of Sims’ larger plan to standardise all its global operations.
Investment: Sustained investment in product development
R&D expenditure dipped 8% to £6.7m, representing 24.5% of revenues in FY15, compared with 23.5% in FY14. The group has c 140 technology staff, up from 25 six years ago, including 40 in Bangalore, which joined as part of the energycredit acquisition post-period end. Brady believes it can make significant cost savings to its R&D programme by leveraging its facility in Bangalore.
Pension deficit
The group’s pension deficit increased from £1.9m to £2.2m. However, we note that Brady has no defined benefit schemes (where the company takes on the investment risk). The deficit relates to two Swiss defined contribution pension schemes, which it is required under IFRS to account for as if they are defined benefit schemes because Brady guarantees them. However, they are insured with Zurich Insurance. Hence we have not included the deficit in our adjusted debt numbers.
Outlook: Pipeline remains strong
Last year’s profits warning related to a lengthening of sales cycles, due to a deterioration of market conditions in the commodity sector. However, Brady says the deals have been deferred rather than cancelled. As a consequence of the deferrals, the company reduced costs by c £2m, which will help to underpin FY16 profitability and cash flow.
While the overall market outlook remains uncertain, Brady is confident that it will continue to take market share demonstrated by its ability to sign and deliver increasingly large contracts with global leaders and its strong list of referenceable customers who already rely on Brady systems to run their businesses. Brady has visibility over c 65% of FY16 revenues.
Despite the uncertain market conditions, Brady benefits from healthy underlying business drivers, including a market underinvested in IT, along with regulation, compliance and risk-related factors. Brady operates in a large, global market: everybody on the planet is reliant on commodities and energy; the recycling market is growing strongly; and Brady continues to be well placed for profitable growth.
|
Exhibit 4: FY15 revenue breakdown by type, region and business unit |
|
|
Source: Brady |
Acquisition of energycredit
In early January Brady announced the acquisition of energycredit, a provider of credit risk management solutions for the energy and commodity markets, from Temenos for an undisclosed sum. Brady has had energycredit on the radar for a number of years and we believe it is an interesting time to buy a credit risk management solutions business given the current turmoil in the commodity markets and there is an opportunity to extend the solution to other asset classes.
Founded in 1995, energycredit is headquartered in London, with c 55 employees. It also has a commercial office in Houston, Texas, and a development centre in Bangalore, India, where it has 40+ employees. energycredit offers a traditional licence business model, with professional services and support and maintenance. A typical licence is in the £0.5m to £1.5m range, including delivery and customisation. Nearly all of its customers are in the energy sector, including household names such as Royal Dutch Shell, Statoil, RWE and Chevron. Nevertheless, the product itself is sector agnostic and Brady plans to extend it across new verticals by targeting its existing customer base. Brady also plans to leverage the Bangalore development centre across its other asset classes, which should help to put downward pressure on R&D costs.
Forecasts: Broadly maintained with energycredit added
Our forecasts are broadly maintained, albeit for the inclusion of energycredit, which was acquired in early January. We forecast energycredit to generate £1.5m of revenues in FY16 (nearly 12 months) along with c 10% operating margins. In all, we forecast revenues to rise 12% in FY16 (6% excluding energycredit) and 5% in FY17. We assume R&D eases to £6.6m in FY16 (21.5% of sales), noting that cost reductions have not yet had much impact, of which 25% are capitalised. We assume that energycredit cost £0.5m. We expect the group to be cash generative from FY16, with net cash rising to £7.0m as at the end of FY16 and increasing to £8.5m a year later.
We assume dividends resume this year at a 50% payout ratio, noting FY16 EPS is still at a depressed level, and move progressively higher thereafter.
Exhibit 5: Forecast changes
Revenue (£'000s) |
2015e |
2015 |
|
2016e |
2016e |
|
2017e |
|
Forecast |
Actual |
Change |
Old |
New |
Change |
New |
Revenue (£'000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licence revenues |
5,000 |
5,200 |
4 |
5,956 |
5,982 |
0 |
6,190 |
Recurring fees (software rental, hosting and support) |
15,773 |
15,300 |
(3) |
16,259 |
16,076 |
(1) |
17,152 |
Services and development |
6,635 |
6,900 |
4 |
6,800 |
6,969 |
2 |
7,178 |
energycredit |
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
1,650 |
Group revenue |
27,408 |
27,374 |
(0) |
29,016 |
30,527 |
5 |
32,170 |
Growth (%) |
(11.6) |
(11.7) |
|
5.9 |
11.5 |
|
5.4 |
Cost of sales (before dev cost capn) |
(10,770) |
(11,647) |
8 |
(11,288) |
(11,298) |
0 |
(11,485) |
Capitalisation of dev'ment costs (net) |
932 |
780 |
(16) |
728 |
341 |
(53) |
(62) |
Gross profit |
17,570 |
16,507 |
(6) |
18,456 |
19,570 |
6 |
20,623 |
Gross margin (%) |
64.1 |
60.3 |
|
63.6 |
64.1 |
|
64.1 |
Selling & administrative expenses |
(16,680) |
(15,583) |
(7) |
(15,179) |
(16,136) |
6 |
(16,620) |
Adjusted operating profit |
890 |
924 |
4 |
3,277 |
3,434 |
5 |
4,003 |
Operating profit margin (%) |
3.2 |
3.4 |
|
11.3 |
11.2 |
|
12.4 |
Growth (%) |
(82.3) |
(81.6) |
|
268.2 |
271.6 |
|
16.6 |
Net interest |
40 |
31 |
|
80 |
50 |
|
60 |
Profit before tax (norm) |
930 |
955 |
3 |
3,357 |
3,484 |
4 |
4,063 |
Amortisation of acquired intangibles |
(1,613) |
(1,640) |
|
(1,613) |
(1,640) |
|
(1,640) |
Share-based payments |
(250) |
(243) |
|
(275) |
(263) |
|
(275) |
Exchange differences |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
Exceptional items |
(500) |
(656) |
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
Profit before tax |
(1,433) |
(1,584) |
11 |
1,469 |
1,582 |
8 |
2,148 |
Tax charge |
(139) |
(142) |
|
(587) |
(610) |
|
(813) |
Minority interest |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
Profit after tax |
(1,573) |
(1,726) |
10 |
882 |
972 |
10 |
1,335 |
Adjusted EPS (p) |
1.0 |
1.0 |
3 |
3.3 |
3.5 |
4 |
3.9 |
P/E – adjusted EPS (x) |
54.5 |
|
15.6 |
|
14.0 |
Source: Brady (historicals), Edison Investment Research (forecasts). Note: Prices at 7 April 2016.
We believe our forecasts are conservative, based on a subdued economic backdrop and there are a number of reasons why the risks are now shifting to the upside.
■
Commodity prices have since made a recovery, and that is reflected in the share prices of many participants.
■
With c 65% of FY16 revenues in the bag, a couple of large deals late in the year could push through upgrades.
■
The Norwegian krone has staged a recovery, rallying by c 9% since year-end, which boosts the group’s Energy business unit.
■
The energycredit acquisition provides significant potential for upgrades, as its solutions, which have historically only been targeted at the energy sector, are sector agnostic and Brady can therefore extend them to its broader customer base.
■
There is a significant opportunity to shift R&D work to energycredit’s Bangalore development centre. Brady estimates it can save £500k for every 10% of R&D shifted offshore. We believe it could potentially save £1.5m a year over the next three years by shifting 30% of R&D to Bangalore.
■
Brady believes there is an excellent opportunity to buy distressed assets in the current market.
Sensitivities: Users subject to volatile commodities
Commodity markets are cyclical and subject to periods of extreme volatility. However, while falling commodities prices hurt producers, they are beneficial to traders and manufacturers, who also purchase the group’s software. Further, falling commodities can force producers to drive through efficiencies, which can involve them upgrading or replacing their in-house software with Brady’s software. The 2015 commodity selloff, which was related to the Chinese economic deceleration, was persistent and severe, and correlated across asset classes. This forced restructurings across the commodity trading sphere, with players deferring deals to conserve cash. Nevertheless, target commodity customers (producers, fabricators, traders, etc) are generally well capitalised, dealing with high volumes, yet are significantly under-invested in IT trading platforms. Strong regulatory and compliance drivers are also pushing demand for improved IT systems.
We highlight the following sensitivities:
■
Economic slowdown – commodities and financial sector IT budgets are subject to pressure in an economic slowdown.
■
Mining/commodities – the group’s clients operate in cyclical industries, whether producers and fabricators or brokers and traders. Nevertheless, these businesses have a continued need to invest and maintain their IT systems. We note that Brady Energy operates in the electricity and gas sectors, and Brady has little exposure to the highly competitive petroleum markets.
■
Competitive environment – products are at risk of being surpassed by competitors. Existing competitor rivalry may put pressure on pricing.
■
Acquisition risk – implementation risk in the acquisition strategy.
Valuation: Unique asset, peer M&A at high multiples
Brady has been signing and delivering significantly larger licence agreements and expanding its customer base of high-quality, blue-chip names. This provides strong references, and creates the momentum for further deals.
The major commodity software sector deals executed at high EV/sales multiples in late 2011 and mid-2013. These deals highlight the popularity of the commodity software space, particularly from private equity, and Brady remains the only quoted asset in the sector. This gives Brady a significant advantage over major peers, which have been losing market share, as the business is more transparent as a quoted company.
We note that since the trading news, Kestrel Partners, Brady’s largest shareholder, has used the weakness in the share price to accumulate a 23% shareholding.
We highlight the following points on the group’s valuation:
■
Traditional P/E valuation: the stock trades on 15.6x our earnings forecasts in FY16, falling to 14.0x in FY17. These numbers are well below Brady’s peers (see Exhibit 7). Nevertheless, these figures are also affected by the cash balances, currently subject to low interest rates. Adjusted for the c £6.6m adjusted net cash, we estimate the ratings are 13.7x and 11.2x respectively.
■
Cash flow: in the seven years to FY15, the group generated cumulative operating cash flow of £19.4m and free cash flow of £5.4m. We forecast £1.0m free cash flow in FY16 rising to £3.1m in FY17, which provides free cash flow yields of 2.1% and 6.8% respectively.
■
Discounted cash flow valuation: based on our forecasts, along with conservative medium-term revenue growth assumptions (averaging 5.9% over 10 years), a long-term margin target of 25%, a 2% terminal growth rate and a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 10%, our DCF model values the shares at 100p, 84% above the current share price. A 1% cut in the WACC to 9% would increase the valuation to 117p. Discounting back from our forecasts, the market is attributing a break-even WACC of 15.5% to the stock.
Exhibit 6: Cash flow
(£’000) |
FY09 |
FY10 |
FY11 |
FY12 |
FY13 |
FY14 |
FY15 |
FY16e |
FY17e |
Adjusted operating profit |
1,297 |
1,844 |
3,241 |
4,924 |
2,470 |
5,019 |
924 |
3,434 |
4,003 |
Depreciation (incl s/w) |
174 |
278 |
412 |
516 |
652 |
573 |
582 |
604 |
637 |
Adjusted EBITDA |
1,471 |
2,122 |
3,653 |
5,440 |
3,122 |
5,592 |
1,506 |
4,038 |
4,640 |
Working capital |
(450) |
(22) |
(641) |
(1,966) |
69 |
(695) |
139 |
(1,221) |
(322) |
Amortisation of devt costs |
30 |
111 |
314 |
544 |
731 |
928 |
1,187 |
1,300 |
1,860 |
Exceptional costs/misc |
(127) |
(1,045) |
(490) |
(2,559) |
355 |
384 |
(469) |
(400) |
0 |
Operating cash flow |
924 |
1,166 |
3,000 |
1,459 |
4,277 |
6,209 |
2,363 |
3,717 |
6,178 |
Net interest |
45 |
19 |
68 |
64 |
29 |
58 |
31 |
50 |
60 |
Tax paid |
(585) |
644 |
(161) |
(168) |
(378) |
(420) |
(416) |
(488) |
(650) |
Purchase fixed assets (incl s/w) |
(179) |
(306) |
(657) |
(427) |
(497) |
(618) |
(624) |
(672) |
(708) |
Capitalised development |
(391) |
(598) |
(1,038) |
(1,947) |
(1,945) |
(1,801) |
(1,967) |
(1,641) |
(1,798) |
Free cash flow |
(186) |
925 |
1,212 |
(1,019) |
1,486 |
3,428 |
(613) |
967 |
3,082 |
Source: Brady (historicals), Edison Investment Research (forecasts)
■
Peer comparison: the stock trades on 1.2x FY17e revenues and 8.3x FY17e EV/EBITDA – both measures are attractive relative to the stock’s larger UK-listed peers.
Exhibit 7: Peers
Local |
Share |
Market cap |
EV/sales |
EV/EBITDA |
PE |
||||
currency |
Price |
Millions |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
|
Brady |
GBP |
54.50 |
45 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
9.5 |
8.3 |
15.8 |
14.0 |
1) UK-quoted financial software peers |
|||||||||
Fidessa |
GBP |
2396.00 |
921 |
2.7 |
2.6 |
12.4 |
11.8 |
29.1 |
27.6 |
First Derivatives |
GBP |
1590.00 |
385 |
3.5 |
3.1 |
17.9 |
15.4 |
32.1 |
28.1 |
Microgen |
GBP |
150.00 |
89 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
9.4 |
9.0 |
16.1 |
15.2 |
StatPro* |
GBP |
74.00 |
48 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
13.0 |
10.8 |
27.6 |
20.4 |
Lombard Risk |
GBP |
12.38 |
38 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
7.3 |
5.8 |
30.9 |
13.8 |
Medians (excl Lombard) |
2.6 |
2.5 |
12.7 |
11.3 |
28.4 |
24.0 |
|||
2) Selection of financial software peers quoted in other countries |
|||||||||
Broadridge |
USD |
58.62 |
6966 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
11.9 |
11.1 |
21.1 |
19.3 |
GBST |
AUD |
4.20 |
283 |
2.3 |
2.2 |
13.4 |
10.3 |
19.4 |
14.0 |
FIS |
USD |
63.89 |
20752 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
11.0 |
10.1 |
17.0 |
14.7 |
Iress |
AUD |
11.44 |
1831 |
5.0 |
4.6 |
16.1 |
14.5 |
24.9 |
21.4 |
Linedata |
EUR |
40.90 |
299 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
7.0 |
6.8 |
13.6 |
13.6 |
SimCorp |
DKK |
289.60 |
12018 |
5.4 |
5.1 |
22.7 |
21.6 |
30.9 |
29.2 |
SS&C |
USD |
62.01 |
6311 |
5.7 |
5.3 |
14.0 |
11.9 |
19.2 |
16.0 |
Medians |
3.3 |
3.2 |
13.4 |
11.1 |
19.4 |
16.0 |
|||
Source: Edison Investment Research forecasts (Brady and StatPro), Bloomberg consensus data (all other companies). Note: Prices as at 8 April 2016. *Edison forecasts.
■
Sector M&A: sector M&A has slowed since Triple Point was acquired in mid-2013 by ION Investments, which is backed by TA Associates, a US-based private equity firm for $900m, or 5x FY12 sales and 15x operating income. ION also acquired FFastFill, an AIM-quoted derivative trading software-as-a-service (SaaS) company in February 2013, for c £98m or c 3.8x FY14 sales, c 26x operating profits and c 25x earnings. These deals make Brady, trading on 1.2x FY17 revenues, look undervalued. We note that all of the group’s key competitors, apart from SunGard, were involved in sector deals in 2011, with Openlink acquired by Hellman & Friedman, Solarc purchased by Openlink and Triple Point acquired by Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe. The suggestion from the market was that these deals were transacted at multiples in the region of 3.3-4.6x sales. Also, EKA Software Solutions received a significant investment from Silver Lake Partners in October 2013.
■
Acquisitions: further deals could create additional value for shareholders if Brady is able to cross-sell the acquired applications to its existing customer base.
Exhibit 8: Financial summary
£'000s |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016e |
2017e |
||
Year end 31 December |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
||
PROFIT & LOSS |
||||||||
Revenue |
|
|
28,136 |
29,355 |
31,015 |
27,374 |
30,527 |
32,170 |
Cost of Sales |
(10,063) |
(11,119) |
(10,977) |
(10,867) |
(10,957) |
(11,547) |
||
Gross Profit |
18,073 |
18,236 |
20,038 |
16,507 |
19,570 |
20,623 |
||
EBITDA |
|
|
5,440 |
3,122 |
5,592 |
1,506 |
4,038 |
4,640 |
Adjusted Operating Profit |
|
|
4,924 |
2,470 |
5,019 |
924 |
3,434 |
4,003 |
Amortisation of acquired intangibles |
(1,276) |
(1,613) |
(1,613) |
(1,640) |
(1,640) |
(1,640) |
||
Exceptionals items |
(2,563) |
355 |
(2,143) |
(469) |
0 |
0 |
||
Share based payments |
(345) |
(313) |
(232) |
(243) |
(263) |
(275) |
||
Operating Profit |
740 |
899 |
1,031 |
(1,428) |
1,532 |
2,088 |
||
Net Interest |
64 |
29 |
58 |
31 |
50 |
60 |
||
Profit Before Tax (norm) |
|
|
4,988 |
2,499 |
5,077 |
955 |
3,484 |
4,063 |
Profit Before Tax (FRS 3) |
|
|
804 |
928 |
1,089 |
(1,397) |
1,582 |
2,148 |
Tax |
(345) |
189 |
(630) |
(329) |
(610) |
(813) |
||
Profit After Tax (norm) |
4,643 |
2,249 |
4,315 |
813 |
2,874 |
3,250 |
||
Profit After Tax (FRS 3) |
459 |
1,117 |
459 |
(1,726) |
972 |
1,335 |
||
Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m) |
75.6 |
80.9 |
81.3 |
82.7 |
83.2 |
83.6 |
||
EPS – normalised (p) |
|
|
6.1 |
2.8 |
5.3 |
1.0 |
3.5 |
3.9 |
EPS – FRS 3 (p) |
|
|
0.6 |
1.4 |
0.6 |
(2.1) |
1.2 |
1.6 |
Dividend per share (p) |
1.60 |
1.70 |
1.85 |
0.00 |
1.70 |
1.90 |
||
Gross Margin (%) |
64.2 |
62.1 |
64.6 |
60.3 |
64.1 |
64.1 |
||
EBITDA Margin (%) |
19.3 |
10.6 |
18.0 |
5.5 |
13.2 |
14.4 |
||
Adjusted Operating Margin (%) |
17.5 |
8.4 |
16.2 |
3.4 |
11.2 |
12.4 |
||
BALANCE SHEET |
||||||||
Fixed Assets |
|
|
42,851 |
39,137 |
32,614 |
31,461 |
30,229 |
28,598 |
Intangible Assets |
40,999 |
37,519 |
30,996 |
29,831 |
28,532 |
26,830 |
||
Tangible Assets |
1,158 |
983 |
1,076 |
1,147 |
1,214 |
1,285 |
||
Deferred tax |
694 |
635 |
542 |
483 |
483 |
483 |
||
Current Assets |
|
|
16,874 |
15,420 |
16,948 |
13,633 |
14,846 |
16,800 |
Stocks |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Debtors |
9,036 |
8,198 |
7,368 |
7,039 |
7,850 |
8,272 |
||
Cash |
7,838 |
7,222 |
9,580 |
6,594 |
6,996 |
8,528 |
||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
(11,401) |
(11,200) |
(10,545) |
(10,804) |
(10,423) |
(10,504) |
Creditors |
(11,401) |
(11,200) |
(10,545) |
(10,804) |
(10,423) |
(10,504) |
||
Short-term borrowings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Long-Term Liabilities |
|
|
(6,717) |
(4,467) |
(4,651) |
(4,814) |
(4,814) |
(4,814) |
Long-term borrowings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other long-term liabilities |
(6,717) |
(4,467) |
(4,651) |
(4,814) |
(4,814) |
(4,814) |
||
Net Assets |
|
|
41,607 |
38,890 |
34,366 |
29,476 |
29,838 |
30,080 |
CASH FLOW |
||||||||
Operating Cash Flow |
|
|
1,459 |
4,277 |
6,209 |
2,363 |
3,717 |
6,179 |
Net Interest |
64 |
29 |
58 |
31 |
50 |
60 |
||
Tax |
(168) |
(378) |
(420) |
(416) |
(488) |
(650) |
||
Capex |
(2,374) |
(2,442) |
(2,419) |
(2,591) |
(2,312) |
(2,506) |
||
Acquisitions/disposals |
(17,983) |
(751) |
0 |
(1,186) |
(566) |
(66) |
||
Financing |
17,780 |
125 |
338 |
469 |
0 |
0 |
||
Dividends |
(1,206) |
(1,296) |
(1,378) |
(1,524) |
0 |
(1,485) |
||
Net Cash Flow |
(2,428) |
(436) |
2,388 |
(2,854) |
402 |
1,532 |
||
Opening net debt/(cash) |
|
|
(10,304) |
(7,838) |
(7,222) |
(9,580) |
(6,594) |
(6,996) |
Other |
(38) |
(180) |
(30) |
(132) |
0 |
0 |
||
Closing net debt/(cash) |
|
|
(7,838) |
(7,222) |
(9,580) |
(6,594) |
(6,996) |
(8,528) |
Source: Brady (historicals), Edison Investment Research (forecasts)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|