Last close As at 05/08/2026
—
— 0.00 (0.00%)
Market capitalisation
—
Research: Metals & Mining
P2 Gold owns 100% of the Gabbs property in Nevada, where past exploration has identified a resource of 2.0Moz Au and 3.5Moz AuE in an area with paved highway access and power lines crossing the property on otherwise low-utility land within 45 minutes of services in the town of Hawthorne. The Gabbs Project was the subject of a preliminary economic assessment (PEA) in May 2024, which calculated an NPV5 for the project of
| Year end | Revenue (C$m) | PBT (C$m) | EPS (C$) | DPS (C$) | P/E (x) | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/24 | 0.0 | (2.6) | (0.02) | 0.00 | N/A | N/A |
| 12/25e | 0.0 | (1.7) | (0.00) | 0.00 | N/A | N/A |
| 12/26e | 0.0 | (0.7) | (0.00) | 0.00 | N/A | N/A |
| 12/27e | 0.0 | (0.7) | (0.00) | 0.00 | N/A | N/A |
Having completed its PEA, P2’s plan is to: 1) undertake and complete a full definitive feasibility study (DFS) of the Gabbs Project in FY26 and Q127, 2) complete permitting between H226 and end-2027, 3) construct the project between H227 and H129 (implying completing financing in early 2027) and 4) achieve first production in H228 and commercial production shortly thereafter.
P2’s share price of
P2 Gold owns 100% of the Gabbs property on the north-western end of the Fairplay Mining
District, between Reno and Las Vegas in Nevada, US. Past exploration has identified
a resource of 2.0Moz Au and 3.5Moz AuE in an area with paved highway access and power
lines crossing the property on otherwise low-utility land within 45 minutes of the
conurbation of Hawthorne in Mineral County and the nearby Hawthorne Army Depot. The
Gabbs Project was the subject of a May 2024 PEA, which calculated an NPV5 for the project of
P2’s share price of
P2 and the Gabbs Project are unusually sensitive to metals price fluctuations. According
to our calculations, each 10% change in metals prices results in a change in our valuation
of the company and project of c 45.6%, while each 10% change in unit operating costs
changes them by c 24.7%. This provides a distinct opportunity for investors in that
spot prices of metals are currently materially higher than those used in P2’s PEA
(eg
P2 raised
The Gabbs property is situated in the north-western end of the Fairplay Mining District, between Reno and Las Vegas in Nevada, US. The area has been extensively (if intermittently) explored since the late 19th century. However, an appreciation of its prospectivity may be gleaned from the adjacent Paradise Peak deposit (a high-sulphidation, epithermal gold-silver-mercury deposit discovered in 1983), which was mined by FMC from 1985 to 1993 and produced 1.46Moz gold, 38.9Moz silver and 457t mercury.
The earliest recorded work on the Gabbs property was in January 1888, when John Sullivan discovered a ‘ledge’ of gold more than 266m in length and 61–123m wide. A 30m shaft with accompanying crosscut was excavated at the time and the Sullivan claim was patented (as the ‘Sullivan Lode’) in 1905. Relatively little history was subsequently recorded on the project until 1967 when it was acquired by Omega Resources. It then passed through a number of hands until 1970, when McIntyre Mines optioned the property and completed 16 drill holes, before passing it on to Homestake in 1971, which completed an additional 16 holes.
From 1971 until 2010, exploration activities were carried out by a number of operators, including Cominco, Placer American, Glamis Gold, Gwalia Gold and, lastly, Newcrest, which completed 24,765m of drilling in 87 holes (average 284m/hole). In conjunction with petrographic studies, extensive rock and soil geochemical sampling, mapping, ground magnetics and induced polarisation (IP), Newcrest also produced a mineral resource estimate for Sullivan of 33.1Mt at 0.55/gt Au and 0.25% Cu that contained 0.6Moz Au and 83kt Cu. While encountering anomalous areas however, the geophysical surveys identified no clear, ‘bulls-eye’ anomalies typical of large, mineralised porphyries and hence Newcrest sold the property again in 2010.
Up to this point (2011), approximately 500 drill holes had been completed on the property in total, of which approximately half targeted the Sullivan deposit. In addition to the orientation induced polarisation survey, historical geophysical work also included regional gravity surveys and a property scale ground magnetic survey, which showed that the Sullivan and Lucky Strike zones (see Exhibit 3, below) were associated with prominent magnetic highs that were open at depth. At the same time, re-interpretation of the ground magnetic and historical IP data identified features that were indicative of the source for the surface mineralisation.
In February 2021, P2 entered into an agreement with Borealis Mining Company, LLC (an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Waterton Precious Metals Fund II Cayman, LP) to acquire the Gabbs property. In July 2021, it then staked 66 new claims to expand the property southwards and, in February 2022, staked an additional 122 lode claims to expand it once again, albeit this time predominantly northwards. Simultaneously, it completed a Phase I drilling programme in 2021 and a Phase II drilling programme in 2022. The Phase I drilling programme comprised four diamond drill holes totalling 580m and 27 reverse circulation (RC) holes totalling 4,120m with the objective of testing the full thickness and lateral extent of the mineralisation and determining the geologic constraints of the Sullivan Zone. The Phase II programme, in 2022, comprised 20 RC drill holes totalling c 4,000m (13,123 ft) and focused on extending the Sullivan and Car Body zones and infilling and extending Lucky Strike.
Concurrent field mapping and prospecting by P2 located numerous showings and historical shafts, pits and trenches that overlay some of the interpreted deep-seated sources. In a further attempt to define these targets, a Natural Source Magneto Telluric (NSMT) survey was run over the project totalling 25.7 line kilometres, covering the (then) four known zones of mineralisation and the prospective source locations between them. The initial interpretation of the three-dimensional NSMT inversion model identified a high-priority area in the centre of the property that hosts a gold-copper porphyry exploration target. This area is below the Gold Ledge Zone (see Exhibit 3) and confirms the two-dimensional interpretation of the NSMT inversion model. For the moment however, an additional permit is required in order to drill it. In the meantime, in 2021, P2 contracted P&E Mining Consultants of Brampton, Ontario, to prepare an updated mineral resource estimate for the property, based on 397 historical drill holes, 87 Newcrest drill holes and 10 other St Vincent Minerals RC drill holes, but incorporating updated economic assumptions. The result was a pit-constrained mineral resource estimate (reported using a cut-off of 0.24g/t Au for oxide material and 0.30g/t AuE for sulphide material) of 26.2Mt of oxide mineralisation at an average grade of 0.72g/t AuE and 46.9Mt of sulphide mineralisation at an average grade of 0.82g/t AuE to give a total of 1.84Moz AuE contained within 73.1Mt at an average grade of 0.54g/t Au and 0.26% Cu.
In 2024, P2 contracted Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, Welsh Hagan Associates and P&E to prepare an NI 43-101 compliant PEA on the Gabbs Project, including an updated mineral resource estimate based on 547 drill hole records, comprising 397 ‘historical’ drill holes, 87 Newcrest drill holes, 10 St Vincent RC drill holes and four diamond and 49 RC P2 drill holes.
The report envisaged a joint heap leach and mill/float operation and was conducted
on a constant Q224 US dollar basis at a gold price of
One year later, in October 2025, the PEA was updated. The mine plan was left unchanged from the May 2024 PEA. However, metal process recoveries were improved to reflect the results of P2’s ongoing metallurgical programme. In addition, mining operating costs were increased by c 1%, mining capital costs (both initial and sustaining) by 7.25%, processing operating costs by 14% and processing capital costs by 2%. In deference to price moves in the metals markets, the October 2025 PEA was also conducted at updated base case precious metals prices. However, sensitivities were run at the May 2024 PEA’s metals prices and at spot prices in order to provide comparison and context for the update.
A comparison of the May 2024 PEA and the October 2025 PEA is provided in Exhibit 1, below. In addition to the changes in metals prices, readers’ attention is drawn to the change in production (a function of improved metallurgical recoveries), modest capital cost increases and slightly higher AISC cost increases (which rise with royalties and therefore also metals prices).
The Gabbs Property is situated within the Walker-Lane Trend at the north-western end of the Fairplay Mining District, between Reno and Las Vegas in Nevada, US. It is approximately 9km (5.6 miles) south-south-west of the town of Gabbs in Nye County, west-central Nevada, and is accessible by road via Highway 361 south-west from Gabbs to Pole Line Road and then 3.5km (2.2 miles) south to the centre of the property. It consists of 543 federal unpatented lode claims and one patented lode claim, which together constitute a contiguous claim block of approximately 45.25km2 (4,525ha or 16 square miles).
From a topographic perspective, Gabbs is situated in an area of dry rolling hills bounded to the west by the Gabbs Valley and to the east by the north-east trending Paradise Range. Surface elevations for the property area range from 1,395m (4,578ft) on the north-west corner of the claim block, to 1,770m (5,800ft) on the south-east. Vegetation is sparse, with light coverage of grasses and low shrubs.
The Gabbs property is located on or near the boundary between the Walker Lane Structural Trend to the west and the Great Basin region of the Basin and Range Province to the east. It consists of alternating linear north to north-north-east trending narrow ranges and broad alluvial basins formed during later Cenozoic crustal extension (from approximately 66m years ago, when the dinosaurs disappeared).
The Gabbs property geology consists of a Triassic age (252–201m years ago) volcano-sedimentary rock sequence overlain unconformably by a Tertiary (from 66m to 2.6m years ago) intermediate-felsic volcanic sequence. The Triassic geological section is intruded by a gabbro complex and monzonite and quartz-phyric intrusions. The Tertiary geological section is intruded by felsic/rhyolite dykes.
Mineralisation and hydrothermal alteration at the Gabbs property occurs in two principal styles:
The gold-copper mineralisation at three of the known zones, Sullivan, Lucky Strike and Gold Ledge, is hosted within what are interpreted to be sills associated with an alkaline gold/copper porphyry. The gold mineralisation at the fourth zone, Car Body, is interpreted to be nuggety, low-sulphidation epithermal mineralisation.
Porphyry gold-copper-molybdenum mineralisation occurs in two shallow dipping sill-like monzonite porphyry bodies at the Sullivan and Lucky Strike deposits and a vertically continuous body (possibly a plug) at Gold Ledge. Monzonite is an intrusive igneous rock, formed by the slow cooling of underground magma that has a moderate silica content and is enriched in alkali metal oxides. The sills may be rotated dykes or tectonically emplaced slabs of a porphyry stock. They range from 1m to over 100m thick and are laterally extensive. The Sullivan deposit, in particular, is exposed at the surface where the monzonite sill outcrops and is a vein stockwork hosted in Late Cretaceous (143–66m years ago) monzonite porphyry, in which the veins contain copper and gold. Note: a stockwork is a complex system of either structurally controlled or randomly oriented veins that are common in many ore deposit types and are also referred to as stringer zones.
Low-sulphidation deposits are common in the western half of northern Nye County and are widespread throughout much of the northern Great Basin. On the Gabbs Property, the Car Body deposit is an epithermal gold deposit hosted in similar Tertiary volcanic rocks to Paradise Peak. Whereas Paradise Peak was a high-sulphidation epithermal gold deposit however, Car Body is of the low-sulphidation type. Coarse gold is reported in RC drill chips from the Car Body deposit. However, the gold values are variable and difficult to reproduce between RC and diamond drill core, which indicates a strong ‘nugget effect’. Gold Ledge also has the potential to contain an epithermal gold deposit.
In estimating a mineral resource, P2’s geological consultants generated constraining conceptual pit shells and calculated separate cut-offs for the oxide (0.27g/t AuE) and sulphide (0.36g/t AuE) zones, based on the following economic parameters:
The results from the constraining pit shell have been used solely for the purpose of reporting mineral resources. They include inferred resources, but exclude any depletion as a consequence of historical mining, which is thought to be ‘minimal’. Nevertheless, it is ‘reasonably expected’ that the majority of inferred mineral resources may be upgraded to the indicated category with continued exploration.
The Gabbs PEA envisages the project’s development in two stages, with oxide ore initially being exploited by heap leach methods, followed by sulphide ore being exploited by a mill/float process route.
Open-pit waste and mineralised material will be mined by standard open-pit mining methods using an owner-operated mining fleet of 136t haul trucks and 15.3m3 hydraulic shovels. Mineralised material will then be fine crushed to P80 6.3mm (1/4”) in a three-stage crushing circuit using a system incorporating a jaw crusher, cone crushers and high-pressure grinding rollers (HPGR) prior to processing.
After the crushing circuit, the mineralised material will be agglomerated with cement and conveyor stacked on the heap leach pad in 8m lifts before cyanide leaching. The gold and copper bearing solution will be collected in a pregnant solution pond and pumped to the SART plant, which will liberate the cyanide consumed by the cyanide-soluble copper and allow it to be recycled back into the leach process. To achieve this, the pregnant solution will be acidified with sulphuric acid, then copper precipitated as sulphides by the addition of sodium hydrosulphide. The precipitate will be thickened and filtered to produce a copper filter cake for shipment to a smelter. The barren solution from the SART plant will then be processed in a carbon adsorption-desorption-recovery (ADR) plant to recover gold. The gold will be periodically stripped from the carbon using a desorption process before being plated onto stainless steel cathodes and then removed by washing, filtering and drying prior to being smelted to produce doré. For the first five years, the heap leach circuit will operate at a rate of 9Mtpa, before reducing to 4Mtpa.
The run-of-mine (ROM) sulphide material supplied to the mill will use the same crushing circuit as the heap leach facilities. The milled sulphide product will then be treated in a flotation plant to produce a copper concentrate suitable for sale. The flotation tailings will be thickened, then direct cyanide leached to dissolve gold, silver and copper. The leached solids will be washed in a counter current decantation (CCD) circuit to remove the dissolved metals and cyanide. The dissolved copper and silver will then be recovered from the CCD overflow solution in a SART plant as a copper/silver sulphide precipitate. Regenerated sodium cyanide from the SART plant will be recycled to the leach circuit. Gold in the SART plant barren solution will be recovered in an ADR plant and refined to produce doré. The CCD tails will be treated in a cyanide destruction circuit, filtered, and conveyed to a ‘dry stack’ storage facility.
Having completed its PEA, P2’s planned schedule to bring the Gabbs property into production is to:
These goals are well depicted in the Gantt chart, included in the company’s most recent corporate presentation, below:
P2 published an initial PEA on the Gabbs property in May 2024, which was updated one year later in October 2025. A comparison of the two is provided in Exhibit 1. In addition, Edison has built an initial financial model of the Gabbs Project on the basis of the information supplied in P2’s May 2024 and October 2025 PEAs, and a summary of the similarities and differences between the two (based both on P2’s assumptions and Edison’s) is provided in the table below:
In comparing Edison’s model with P2’s PEA results, it is notable that Edison’s NPV5 and IRR are lower, which is likely to be the result of the treatment of working capital
and salvage value. Whereas the PEA assumes an initial roll up of
Otherwise, we estimate that capital expenditure will be phased over two distinct periods: the first ahead of initial production of oxide ore in FY29 and the second ahead of incremental production of sulphide ore in FY34.
Thereafter, both models posit the project processing 9Mt ore per year over 13 full years at grades that fall to close to the life of mine average in the third year of operation:
The result (for both models) is gold production that averages 109koz per year, silver production that averages 175koz per year and copper production that averages 15kt per year over the 14 years of essentially full production:
Of note is the fact that there is a good correlation between gold and silver production over the life of the mine (returning a Pearson product moment correlation coefficient of 0.765), but one that is barely statistically significant for the number of data points between gold and copper (returning a correlation coefficient of 0.525).
As shown in Exhibit 6, P2 Gold’s PEA calculated a pre-tax IRR for the Gabbs Project
of 38.9% and a post-tax NPV5% of
Risk associated with the Gabbs Project may be assumed to comprise sovereign risk, execution risk, geological risk, metallurgical risk, engineering risk, management risk (possibly also including funding risk) and an overall risk of ‘commerciality’. Three of these risks – sovereign risk, execution risk (in the form of ‘stage of development’ risk, ie PEA or scoping study) and overall ‘commerciality risk’ – may immediately be adjusted for.
In our report Gold stars and black holes, published in January 2019, we calculated that companies with completed PEAs commanded valuations between -4.8% and 50.7% of attributable project NPV, with an average of 11.7% (see Exhibit 166 on page 82 of the report).
According to the Fraser Institute’s most recent survey, Nevada ranks as the world’s second most attractive jurisdiction for mining investment, behind only Finland:
The mean Fraser Institute investment attractiveness score for all jurisdictions is
58.93, which is between the scores for La Rioja (Argentina) and Kazakhstan. If this
is deemed to attract an average valuation of 11.7% of attributable NPV, and the top
and bottom halves of the sample are presumed to attract valuations with respect to
the average and pro rata to their scores, then a company with an average project in
Nevada may be expected to attract a valuation of 47.0% of attributable project NPV.
For P2, this would imply a valuation of
At the same time in Gold stars and black holes, we calculated a statistically significant relationship between the valuation of a company and its IRR, which is demonstrated in the graph below:
On the basis of the Gabbs Project’s PEA pre-tax IRR of 38.9%, therefore, P2 could
be expected to command a valuation equivalent to 27.6% of its NPV, or
Alternatively, if a multiple regression analysis between IRR and Fraser Institute
Investment Attractiveness scores and a company’s enterprise value/NPV ratio is performed,
and the resulting equation applied to Gabbs, a 34.1% enterprise value/NPV ratio is
predicted, which implies a valuation of
Edison’s company valuation of P2 differs from its project-based valuation of Gabbs
in that it includes net interest on debt and cash balances as well as making an assumption
regarding financing. In deference to P2’s published accounts, it is also denominated
in Canadian dollars (cf the project calculations, which are denominated in US dollars).
Given that the project is located in the United States however, for the most part,
the difference between our calculations in Canadian dollars and our calculations in
US dollars is only one of conversion. In our base case therefore, we assume that P2
will raise
Exhibit 13, below, summarises our valuation of both the Gabbs Project and P2 Gold on the basis of the scenarios set out:
Of note is the fact that P2’s discounted dividend valuation is at a material discount to the valuations implied by its project NPV (especially when adjusted to account for foreign exchange). This appears anomalous. As noted in our report Gold stars and black holes, companies with projects at PEA stage of development command valuations on average of 11.7% of project NPV. At its current share price, P2 is at an 87.7% discount to project NPV (ie its share price is at just 12.3% of attributable project NPV). This appears to take no account of its premium jurisdiction in particular (note that its IRR is quite close to the population average of 41.0% for companies with projects at PEA stage of development).
That it is relatively undervalued is also evidenced by the fact that – on the basis
of Edison’s model – its P/E ratio (at the current share price of
Finally, our valuation is sensitive to the extent to which P2 is able to extend its
life of operations from those set out in its initial PEA. According to our analysis,
the company will raise equity and begin development in FY27 (NB sensitivities are
shown below) and will begin commercial production in FY29. In our base case discounted
dividend scenario, we estimate that P2 will pay off all outstanding net debt in FY35,
at which point it will be generating free cash flows at a rate of c
Our estimate of P2’s free cash flows in FY35 is
If P2 is able to maintain this level of cash flows per share via organic investment
indefinitely, its valuation would stabilise at
Exhibit 16 demonstrates the sensitivity of both the terminal multiple and the current
valuation of P2 to extensions in the mine life of the Gabbs Project (NB readers attention
is drawn to the similarity between the
Exhibits 17 to 19 provide our estimate of the Gabbs Project’s quantitative sensitivity to metals prices, unit costs and pre-production capital expenditure, as well as our related discounted dividend valuation of P2 Gold.
Exhibit 20 similarly shows the variation in our discounted dividend valuation of the company based on a range of potential discount rates.
In addition to the above, our valuation of the company, in particular, is sensitive to the price at which future equity is raised, which is shown in Exhibit 21:
P2 raised
While the cash burn rate may very well accelerate as the company pursues its goals
of completing a full DFS by end-Q127 and permitting by end-Q427, we nevertheless regard
its net cash position as sufficient to fund it until the major equity fund-raising
required to raise project development capital in FY27. We estimate this will be in
the order of
Suite 789–999 West Hastings Street
Vancouver, BC
Canada V6C 2W2
Telephone: +1 778 655 6508
Fax: +1 855 610 2081
Website: www.p2gold.com
N/A
President and CEO, chairman: Joseph Ovsenek
Mr Ovsenek has over 20 years of international management and legal experience in the precious metals industry. He has been responsible for building teams and leading the growth of public resource companies from early exploration stage to production. Before founding P2 Gold, Mr Ovsenek was president and CEO of Pretium Resources, where he led the advance of the high-grade gold Brucejack Mine from exploration to production. Prior to Pretium, he served for 15 years in senior management roles for Silver Standard Resources (which sold Brucejack to Pretium). He holds a bachelor of applied science degree from the University of British Columbia and a bachelor of laws degree from the University of Toronto. Mr Ovsenek is a registered member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia and holds the Chartered Director (C.Dir) designation. He also currently serves as the president and CEO of Tudor Gold (which is developing the Treaty Creek project 10km to the north of Brucejack in BC’s Golden Triangle).
CFO: Grant Bond
Mr Bond has over 12 years of financial management experience in the mining industry. Prior to joining P2 Gold, he was the corporate controller of Pretium Resources, responsible for managing the accounting and financial reporting functions as Pretium evolved from an explorer into a profitable producer. In addition, he was responsible for the SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley) internal control framework. Mr Bond began his career in the assurance group at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP primarily focusing on mining clients. He is a Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA, CA) and holds a diploma in accounting and bachelor of science from the University of British Columbia.
Chief exploration officer and director: Ken McNaughton
Mr McNaughton is a professional geological engineer with over 30 years of global experience developing and leading mineral exploration programmes. Prior to P2 Gold he was chief exploration officer at Pretium Resources (which he joined in 2011), where he was responsible for greenfield exploration programmes to support the Brucejack project. Prior to Pretium, he was vice president, exploration at Silver Standard Resources for 20 years and, prior to that, he was employed by Corona Corp and its affiliate Mascot Gold Mines as a project geologist and engineer for projects in BC. He holds a bachelor of applied science degree and a master of applied science degree in geological engineering from the University of Windsor.
Executive vice president and director: Michelle Romero
Ms Romero has over 17 years of management experience in the mining industry. Prior to joining P2 Gold she was executive vice president, corporate affairs and sustainability at Pretium Resources, with responsibility for community affairs, ESG, enterprise risk management and human resources. Before Pretium, she was director, investor relations for Silver Standard Resources. She holds a bachelor of arts degree in journalism, a master of library science degree from Rutgers University and holds the Chartered Director (C.Dir.) designation.
K.C. McNaughton Esq.
J.J. Ovsenek Esq.
Ms M. Romero
M. Chalk Esq.
R. Macdonald Esq.
T.S.Q. Yip Esq.
8.25%
6.66%
0.71%
0.37%
0.16%
0.09%
Australia
Edison Investment Research Pty Ltd (Edison AU) is the Australian subsidiary of Edison. Edison AU is a Corporate Authorised Representative (1252501) of Crown Wealth Group Pty Ltd who holds an Australian Financial Services Licence (Number: 494274). This research is issued in Australia by Edison AU and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 of Australia. Any advice given by Edison AU is general advice only and does not take into account your personal circumstances, needs or objectives. You should, before acting on this advice, consider the appropriateness of the advice, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. If our advice relates to the acquisition, or possible acquisition, of a particular financial product you should read any relevant Product Disclosure Statement or like instrument.
New Zealand
The research in this document is intended for New Zealand resident professional financial advisers or brokers (for use in their roles as financial advisers or brokers) and habitual investors who are “wholesale clients” for the purpose of the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (FAA) (as described in sections 5(c) (1)(a), (b) and (c) of the FAA). This is not a solicitation or inducement to buy, sell, subscribe, or underwrite any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. For the purpose of the FAA, the content of this report is of a general nature, is intended as a source of general information only and is not intended to constitute a recommendation or opinion in relation to acquiring or disposing (including refraining from acquiring or disposing) of securities. The distribution of this document is not a “personalised service” and, to the extent that it contains any financial advice, is intended only as a “class service” provided by Edison within the meaning of the FAA (i.e. without taking into account the particular financial situation or goals of any person). As such, it should not be relied upon in making an investment decision.
United Kingdom
This document is prepared and provided by Edison for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or sol icitation for investment in any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. A marketing communication under FCA Rules, this document has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
This Communication is being distributed in the United Kingdom and is directed only at (i) persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments, i.e. investment professionals within the meaning of Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended (the "FPO") (ii) high net-worth companies, unincorporated associations or other bodies within the meaning of Article 49 of the FPO and (iii) persons to whom it is otherwise lawful to distribute it. The investment or investment activity to which this document relates is available only to such persons. It is not intended that this document be distributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other class of persons and in any event and under no circumstances should persons of any other description rely on or act upon the contents of this document.
This Communication is being supplied to you solely for your information and may not be reproduced by, further distributed to or published in whole or in part by, any other person.
United States
Edison relies upon the "publishers' exclusion" from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws. This report is a bona fide publication of general and regular circulation offering impersonal investment-related advice, not tailored to a specific investment portfolio or the needs of current and/or prospective subscribers. As such, Edison does not offer or provide personal advice and the research provided is for informational purposes only. No mention of a particular security in this report constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that or any security, or that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person.
London │ New York │ Frankfurt
20 Red Lion Street
London, WC1R 4PS
United Kingdom
Research: Investment Companies
JPMorgan European Discovery Trust (JEDT) is benefiting from improved performance under the management of Jon Ingram, Jack Featherby and Jules Bloch, who took over the reins at the beginning of March 2024. The managers are bullish on the prospects for European small-cap equities, which have lagged during a volatile time in the market, despite being one of the best-performing asset classes over the long term. Ingram, Featherby and Bloch employ a team-based approach to stock selection, seeking ‘hidden gems’, as a large percentage of the market’s performance has traditionally come from a few exceptional names. In recognition that there is heightened performance risk in macroeconomic, rather than fundamentally driven stock markets, the managers have prudently made changes to the portfolio, such as reducing the maximum size of its active stock weightings. The number of holdings has also been increased to the wider end of the typical 60–90 range.