Last close As at 05/08/2026
—
— 0.00 (0.00%)
Market capitalisation
—
Research: Real Estate
While headline figures are again affected by FX movements, underlying performance was robust in H120 against the backdrop of a challenging operating environment. As a growing and essential part of the supply chain, all of Raven’s warehouse properties continued to operate during COVID-19, occupancy increased and more than 99% of rents were collected. Although the pandemic continues to cloud the economic outlook, warehouse demand-supply fundamentals continue to be robust.
Raven Property Group |
Positive developments obscured by FX |
FY20 interim results & outlook |
Real estate |
10 September 2020 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analyst
Raven Property Group is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
While headline figures are again affected by FX movements, underlying performance was robust in H120 against the backdrop of a challenging operating environment. As a growing and essential part of the supply chain, all of Raven’s warehouse properties continued to operate during COVID-19, occupancy increased and more than 99% of rents were collected. Although the pandemic continues to cloud the economic outlook, warehouse demand-supply fundamentals continue to be robust.
Year end |
Net revenue* |
Adj earnings** |
Adj EPS** |
DPS |
NAV/ |
Yield |
P/NAV |
12/18 |
118.3 |
20.0 |
3.1 |
3.00 |
48 |
10.2 |
0.61 |
12/19 |
126.5 |
43.2 |
7.7 |
3.50 |
76 |
11.9 |
0.39 |
12/20e |
113.3 |
(19.3) |
(4.0) |
2.25 |
44 |
7.6 |
0.67 |
12/21e |
106.4 |
14.0 |
2.7 |
2.25 |
45 |
7.6 |
0.66 |
Note: *Net rental and related income. **Adjusted earnings and EPS excluding valuation movements, depreciation, share-based payments and exceptional items.
Robust H120 performance
Raven is now primarily a rouble operating business, but continues to report in sterling. While rouble weakness had a negative impact on reported financials in H120 and has continued since, the underlying performance was very robust. Occupancy increased to 93% from 90% at end FY19, offsetting in rouble terms the expected continuing drag from the run-off of legacy US dollar leases. Rouble property valuations were stable despite the continuing decline in Russian interest rates, and with the key interest rate at 4.25%, prime yields of 11–12% look increasingly attractive. In sterling terms, underlying PBT before FX movements was £16.8m (H119: £18.9m), but IFRS net earnings swung to a loss of £31.7m from a profit of £26.2m. NAV per share was 58p compared with 76p at end FY19. The company will now proceed with the final FY19 distribution of 2.25p by way of a tender offer on the basis of one in 16 shares at 36p a share.
Uncertain forecasting environment
Changes to our forecasts primarily reflect continued rouble weakness and allow for the re-designation of convertible preferred shares into new ordinary and preference shares, effective 30 September. We assume the current spot rate of £/RUB98 giving a H220 average of £/RUB97 vs £/RUB87.3 in H120. In underlying terms, we expect further modest occupancy gains to end-FY21, stable rouble net revenue (despite further US dollar lease run-off), well contained costs and a benefit from lower borrowing costs. We have assumed no property revaluation movements, but believe the prospects are positive based on market fundamentals and the decline in Russian interest rates. Using the end-H120 £/RUB rate would lift our FY21e adjusted earnings by more than 70% to £35.3m and NAV per share to 66p.
Valuation: High yield and discount to NAV
Based on the FY21e distribution, the ordinary share yield is 7.6% and benefits fully from any narrowing of the significant discount to NAV/share, while being highly geared to NAV changes. The preference shares (RAVP) yield is c 10%.
Leading investor in Russian logistics warehouse sector
Raven Property Group, founded in 2005, is a self-managed investor in modern, Grade A, Russian warehouse assets through acquisition and development. At 30 June 2020, the portfolio comprised c 1.9m sqm of logistics warehouse property (of which c 70% is in the Moscow region) and c 50k sqm of office property in St Petersburg and is valued at £1.3bn. At end H120, the portfolio was 93% let to predominantly large Russian or international companies operating mainly across the retail, distribution, manufacturing and third-party logistics sectors, with e-commerce growing quickly from a small base and representing an increasing share (6% at H120 v 4% at end-FY19). The group comprises the core investment property division, a third-party logistics business in Russia (RosLogistics) and an immaterial UK residential property developer (Raven Mount).
The ordinary shares are listed on the main market of the London Stock Exchange (LSE), with secondary listings on the Moscow and Johannesburg stock exchanges. The group also has preference shares and redeemable convertible preference shares listed on the LSE. Shareholders recently voted to re-designate the convertible preference shares into new ordinary and new preference shares, effective 30 September 2020. This simplification of the capital base should be positive for liquidity in the ordinary and preference shares, and removes uncertainty surrounding conversion.
|
Exhibit 1: Portfolio split by area |
Exhibit 2: Warehouse tenants by sector |
|
|
|
Source: Raven Property Group. Note: At 30 June 2020. |
Source: Raven Property Group. Note: At 30 June 2020. |
|
Exhibit 1: Portfolio split by area |
|
|
Source: Raven Property Group. Note: At 30 June 2020. |
|
Exhibit 2: Warehouse tenants by sector |
|
|
Source: Raven Property Group. Note: At 30 June 2020. |
Income-focused strategy
Raven is the leading long-term investor in Grade A logistics warehouses with the aim of growing rental income and progressive shareholder distributions. Warehouse space per capita in the large Russian market remains relatively low by European standards, while logistics demand is benefiting from similar modern retailing trends that have been seen globally, with e-commerce demand continuing to expand. The property investment market in Russia is fragmented and immature, but the total value of transactions increased by 41% to $4.1bn in 2019. Domestic buyers remained the largest part of the market, with western capital almost non-existent, foreign investment instead coming from China and the Middle East. A broadening and deepening of the investment market would be a welcome development that could be expected to support valuations. Prime Russian warehouse yields of 11–12% are well above more developed international markets and compare favourably with Russian official interest rates at 4.25% and on a declining trend. The company’s income-focused strategy has remained constant since IPO, but in recent years has adapted to meet the challenges of volatile economic and currency/oil market conditions as well as sanctions. Most significantly, the group has effectively completed its transition to a rouble-denominated business model with legacy US dollar leases accounting for just 14% of warehouse space at end FY19 and US dollar-denominated debt completely refinanced.
Robust H120 performance
While headline figures are again affected by FX movements, underlying performance was robust in H120 against the backdrop of a challenging operating environment. As a growing and essential part of the supply chain, all of Raven’s warehouse properties continued to operate during COVID-19, occupancy increased and more than 99% of rents were collected. Although the pandemic continues to cloud the economic outlook, warehouse demand-supply fundamentals continue to be robust.
Rouble weakness impacted on sterling presentation
To a very large extent, Raven is now a rouble-denominated operating business that reports in sterling and makes shareholder distributions (ordinary and preference share) in sterling at group level. At the level of the rouble-based operating subsidiaries, the main exceptions to this are the residual US dollar-denominated leases (14% of the warehouse total by space, but more by gross rental income; we estimate c 25%) and euro-denominated secured debt (41% of total secured debt), both of which we expect to decline further. As a result, changes in the value of the rouble impact on reported earnings and net asset value as reported in sterling. During FY19, the strength of the rouble versus sterling had a positive impact on income and NAV, but the subsequent COVID-19 inspired financial market volatility, oil price weakness and continuing geopolitical tensions have seen the rouble weaken significantly, during H120 and since.
Against sterling, the end-H120 closing rate was c 6% below end FY19, while the H120 average rate was c 3% below H119. Compared with the euro, the end-H120 closing rate was c 12% lower than end FY19, while the average rate was c 3% below H119.
Exhibit 3: Rouble weakness affected the results presented in sterling
H119 |
FY19 |
H120 |
|
Period end (balance sheet): |
|||
US$/£ |
1.27 |
1.31 |
1.23 |
Rouble/£ |
79.91 |
81.15 |
86.36 |
£/€ |
1.11 |
1.17 |
1.10 |
Period average (income statement): |
|||
US$/£ |
1.29 |
1.26 |
1.26 |
Rouble/£ |
84.51 |
80.75 |
87.30 |
£/€ |
1.14 |
1.13 |
1.14 |
Source: Raven Property Group
In the income statement, the impact of rouble weakness was:
■
At the subsidiary level, an increase in the cost of euro-denominated debt and an unrealised foreign exchange loss on the value of that debt.
■
At the group level, a reduction in the sterling equivalent of the rouble income, substantially offset by a similar reduction in rouble costs.
In the balance sheet, the main impact is on the translation into sterling value of rouble-denominated net assets, primarily the investment property portfolio and rouble-denominated debt.
Key H120 financial highlights
Exhibit 4: Summary of H120 financial performance
H120 |
H119 |
FY19/FY18 |
||||||
£m unless stated otherwise |
Underlying |
Adj |
Reported IFRS |
Underlying |
Adj |
Reported IFRS |
Underlying |
Adjustments |
Investment property |
55.8 |
0 |
55.8 |
60.2 |
0 |
60.2 |
-7% |
|
RosLogistics |
3.8 |
0 |
3.8 |
4.1 |
0 |
4.1 |
-6% |
|
Net rental and related income |
59.6 |
0.0 |
59.6 |
64.3 |
0.0 |
64.3 |
-7% |
|
Administrative expenses |
(10.0) |
(0.9) |
(10.9) |
(11.4) |
(1.0) |
(12.4) |
-12% |
Depreciation, abortive project costs |
Share based payments and other long-term incentives |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(0.9) |
(0.9) |
Excludes non-cash settled |
|
Share of profit of JV |
(0.1) |
0.0 |
(0.1) |
0.7 |
0.0 |
0.7 |
||
Gain on disposal of JV |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Disposal gain |
|
Net finance expense |
(32.7) |
(6.3) |
(39.1) |
(35.9) |
(19.3) |
(55.2) |
-9% |
Loan/issue fees & derivative value change |
Profit before tax, FX, and property revaluation |
16.8 |
(7.2) |
9.6 |
17.6 |
(21.1) |
(3.5) |
-5% |
|
FX gain/(loss) |
(23.8) |
0.0 |
(23.8) |
18.9 |
0.0 |
18.9 |
||
Property revaluation |
0.0 |
(12.5) |
(12.5) |
0.0 |
18.2 |
18.2 |
Unrealised revaluation gain |
|
Profit before tax |
(7.0) |
(19.7) |
(26.7) |
36.6 |
(3.0) |
33.6 |
||
Tax |
(3.4) |
(1.6) |
(5.1) |
(4.2) |
(3.2) |
(7.4) |
Tax in respect of adjustments |
|
Profit after tax |
(10.4) |
(21.3) |
(31.7) |
32.4 |
(6.2) |
26.2 |
||
Per share items |
||||||||
Basic EPS (p) |
(2.16) |
(6.59) |
5.31 |
4.30 |
-141% |
|||
Diluted EPS (p) |
(2.16) |
(6.59) |
4.16 |
3.89 |
-152% |
|||
Distribution per share (p) |
0.00 |
1.25 |
-100% |
|||||
Basic NAV per share (p) |
58 |
67 |
-13% |
|||||
Diluted NAV per share (p) |
58 |
67 |
-13% |
|||||
Source: Raven Property Group data
On the company’s underlying earnings basis, H120 performance was robust before the negative year-on-year impact of unrealised foreign exchange movements, comprising:
■
Net rental and related income was c 7% lower in H120 compared with H119 (£59.6m versus £64.3m), with the continued unwinding of legacy US dollar-denominated leases (at above current market rents) accounting for around half of the decrease and the translation impact into sterling for the balance.
■
Rent collection remained high with more than 99% of rents due collected in the period. A small amount of rent is subject to agreed deferral (RUB119m compared with H120 gross rents of c £5,000m), most of which is expected to be collected by the end of the year, and in a very few cases, discounts have been provided to struggling tenants that will amount to RUB22.8m for the year.
■
Lower administrative expenses were driven by lower employment costs, with no bonuses accrued in H120.
■
Underlying net finance costs reduced to £32.7m from £35.9m in H119, benefiting from an increasing share of rouble-denominated debt and falling rouble interest rates, with a positive translation effect into sterling, partly offset by a negative translation effect on remaining euro-denominated debt costs. The key official Russian interest rate has fallen by 3.25% over 12 months and 1.5% over six months to the current 4.25%.
■
Underlying profit before tax and unrealised foreign exchange movements were c 4.5% lower at £16.8m (H119: £17.6m), with the drop in income substantially offset by lower administrative expenses and financing costs.
■
The unrealised foreign exchange loss of £23.8m (H119: profit of £18.9m) mainly relates to the movement in the carrying value of the euro-denominated debt in the Russian subsidiaries. As a result of the £42.7m swing in the unrealised FX result, there was an underlying loss before tax of £7.0m in H120 compared with a profit of £36.6m in H119.
Compared with IFRS earnings, the main adjustments to underlying earnings relate to depreciation, unrealised valuation movements in respect of properties and derivative instruments, amortisation of the convertible preference share redemption premium, long-term incentive payments that are settled in shares (no impact in H120), and other non-recurring items.
■
In rouble terms, there was little underlying movement in property valuations (-0.3%). Including this underlying movement (the negative translation effect of £83.7m is captured within the other comprehensive income adjustment), property improvement investment of £8.8m and movements in lease incentive adjustments, the reported revaluation loss was £12.5m (H119: profit of £18.2m).
■
The underlying tax charge of £3.4m primarily relating to the operations of the Russian subsidiaries and withholding tax payments on overseas transfers within the group, while the IFRS tax charge of £5.1m also includes deferred tax movements in relation to property valuation movements.
■
The IFRS net loss was £31.7m (FY19: profit of £26.2m), while other comprehensive income also included a net foreign currency translation adjustment of negative £54.8m resulting from rouble weakness. Sterling net assets were £279.3m (end FY19: £365.8m) and basic and diluted NAV per share was 58p (end FY19: 76p basic and 75p diluted; H119: 67p).
■
The cash position remained strong, increasing to £85.0m from £68.1m at end FY19, including additional bank debt drawdown of c £20m, net of repayments and loan amortisation. The loan to value ratio for the secured bank debt was 54.3%.
■
The H219 distribution of 2.25p per share, payment of which was deferred by the company due to the global uncertainty, will now proceed by way of a tender offer on the basis of one in 16 shares at 36p per share.
■
Discussed in detail below, the re-designation of convertible preference shares into new ordinary and new preferred shares, approved by shareholders in July, will take effect on 30 September 2020.
Key operational developments
Raven Property’s portfolio of 1.89m sqm of Grade A warehouse space (and 40,000 sqm of office space) operated successfully in H120 despite the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown. With logistics networks being an essential part of the supply chain, all the warehouse assets remained in operation and, as noted above, cash rent collection was not significantly affected. Portfolio occupancy and average occupancy improved further during the half, with occupier demand benefiting from the shift towards e-commerce, while speculative development activity has in many cases been deferred.
■
Portfolio occupancy increased to 93% from 90% at the end of 2019, while average occupancy was 92% in H120 compared with 90% in H119. New lettings of warehouse space in H120 amounted to 141k sqm with a further c 173k sqm of existing leases renegotiated and extended, including a renewal of c 66k sqm and simultaneous new letting of 25k sqm, both for 10 years, to X5 Retail Group (the leading Russian food retailer) in Moscow. Vacated space amounted to c 67k sqm, including one significant tenant in March (18.3k sqm). H220 lease maturities amount to 142k with 92k sqm of potential lease breaks. Management is expecting c 121k sqm of maturing tenants and c 10k sqm of breaks to vacate, but hopes to further increase occupancy by year end. It has already successfully re-let c 44k sqm of the space to be vacated to Wildberries (the largest Russian online retailer) on a short-term basis for e-commerce fulfilment, while an additional c 21k sqm of new lets and lease extensions have been completed and more than 17k sqm is the subject of letters of intent.
Exhibit 5: Warehouse leasing summary
000 sqm |
2020e |
2021e |
2022e |
2023e |
2024–32e |
Total |
Maturity profile at 1 January 2020 |
235 |
316 |
253 |
262 |
633 |
1,699 |
Renegotiated/extended |
(64) |
(89) |
(14) |
(1) |
(5) |
(173) |
Breaks exercised |
11 |
17 |
2 |
10 |
139 |
|
Maturity profile of renegotiations |
5 |
0 |
0 |
(3) |
(8) |
(6) |
Vacated/terminated |
(63) |
(1) |
(3) |
0 |
0 |
(67) |
New lettings |
18 |
52 |
2 |
1 |
68 |
141 |
Maturity profile at 30 June 2020 |
142 |
295 |
240 |
269 |
827 |
1,773 |
Maturity profile with breaks |
234 |
538 |
204 |
289 |
508 |
1,773 |
Source: Raven Property Group
■
Rouble-denominated leases now account for 76% of total warehouse space, up from 71% at end 2019, with the share of US dollar-denominated rents reducing to 14% of the total (end FY19: 16%). Voids and a small amount of space let on euro-denominated leases account for the balance. The average rouble warehouse rent is RUB4,833 per sqm, with a weighted average term to maturity of 4.2 years. The average US dollar rent is $160 per sqm with a weighted average term to maturity of 1.6 years.
Both the warehouse and office markets in which Raven operates are now effectively rouble markets and we expect Raven’s remaining US dollar leases to fully unwind over the next three years (1.6 years is an average of longer and shorter maturities). At the period-end exchange rate, the average US dollar rent is equivalent to c RUB11,200, more than double the average rouble-denominated rent. In part, this premium reflects the high-spec nature of much of the space (eg cold store units) and so a direct comparison is not entirely valid. Nevertheless, the continued unwinding of long-term dollar contracts will act as a drag on revenues which management seeks to mitigate through void reduction and indexation of rouble leases, and possibly acquisitions, with the potential for market rent growth to provide additional support. Rouble leases are indexed to Russian CPI, but may also specify a minimum level. The average indexation of Raven’s rouble-denominated leases at end FY19 was c 5% pa, above the c 3.4% year-on-year increase in CPI reported in July 2020.
■
The St Petersburg office portfolio performed well in the context of the pandemic and lockdown. End-period occupancy was lower at 90% compared with 93% at end FY19, although c 1.2m sqm of vacant space was successfully let with maturities of c 2.6m sqm. Average rouble rent per sqm increased to 14,641 from 13,988 at end FY19.
■
The portfolio (including properties under development) was externally valued by Jones Laing LaSalle (JLL) at £1.3bn. As noted above, there was little change in the underlying rouble valuation of the portfolio (-0.3%) despite the significant reduction in Russian official benchmark interest rates (by 3.5% to 4.25% over 12 months, of which 1.5% was in H120). JLL notes the uncertain market conditions resulting from the pandemic and that pending more certainty and market transaction evidence it has taken a prudent approach.
Exhibit 6: Selected warehouse valuation inputs
Selected valuation inputs |
Cap rates |
ERV (rouble per sqm)* |
||
H120 & 2019 |
2018 |
H120 & 2019 |
2018 |
|
Moscow warehouse |
10.25–11.25% |
10.5–11.50% |
3,700–4,500 |
3,500–3,800 |
St Petersburg warehouse |
11.50% |
11.75% |
3,900–4,150 |
3,800 |
Regional warehouse |
11.50% |
11.75% |
3,800–4,200 |
3,800 |
St Petersburg office |
11.0–12.0% |
11.25–12.25% |
11,789–12,491 |
10,976–12,366 |
Source: Raven Property Group. Note: *Estimated rental value.
The Russian economy and warehouse market
Economy relatively well positioned to manage challenge
Although Russian GDP growth was a modest 1.3% in 2019 (2018: 2.5%) it was accelerating towards year end. Q120 growth was 1.6%, reinforcing hopes that 2020 would see a revival on the back of large infrastructure modernisation projects. Those hopes were dashed by the COVID-19 pandemic, which first affected the economy in February/March through a sharp reduction in the value of Russian exports, particularly linked to the collapse in oil prices. This was followed in April/May by the domestic shutdown in an effort to control the spread of the virus. Preliminary reports indicate an 8.5% contraction in Q220 GDP, within the range of official expectations. Compared with the last oil price crash, the Russian financial position appears to be in a significantly better position, entering the pandemic with twin budget and external surpluses, and foreign exchange and gold reserves at multi-year highs. While the floating rouble has seen the currency decline to mitigate the effects of the external economic shock, strong internal and external financial balances have provided room for fiscal stimulus and for interest rates to decline. Inflation has picked up a little from a year-on-year low of 2.3% in February to 3.6% in August, but the key policy interest rate has fallen 3.25% over a year to the current 4.25%.
|
Exhibit 7: Rouble versus sterling |
Exhibit 8: Brent crude oil price in US$ |
|
|
|
Source: Bloomberg, 7 September 2020 |
Source: Bloomberg, 7 September 2020 |
|
Exhibit 7: Rouble versus sterling |
|
|
Source: Bloomberg, 7 September 2020 |
|
Exhibit 8: Brent crude oil price in US$ |
|
|
Source: Bloomberg, 7 September 2020 |
Warehouse market
Russia is a large economy with good potential for long-term growth. In that context, warehouse space per capita remains relatively low by European standards, while logistics demand is benefiting from similar modern retailing trends that have been seen globally, with e-commerce demand continuing to expand.
After continuing to improve through 2019 and into the early part of 2020, demand-supply conditions in the warehouse market appear to have remained robust, despite the impact of the pandemic, with a good level of occupier demand and an increasingly tight supply of good-quality, modern logistics and warehouse space. In both the Moscow and St Petersburg markets, vacancy has reduced and prime warehouse rents have improved over the past three years. Prime rents sit at around the RUB4,000–4,100 per sqm level, while prime yields remain in the region of 11–12%. Despite the economic shock of the pandemic, occupier demand for warehouse space appears to have remained robust, while speculative developments have in many cases been deferred.
|
Exhibit 9: Moscow warehouse supply vs demand and vacancy |
Exhibit 10: Moscow prime warehouse rents and yields |
|
|
|
Source: Raven Property Group H120 results presentation. JLL Research |
Source: Raven Property Group H120 results presentation. JLL Research |
|
Exhibit 11: St Petersburg warehouse supply vs demand and vacancy |
Exhibit 12: St Petersburg prime warehouse rents and yields |
|
|
|
Source: Raven Property Group H120 results presentation. JLL Research |
Source: Raven Property Group H120 results presentation. JLL Research |
|
Exhibit 9: Moscow warehouse supply vs demand and vacancy |
|
|
Source: Raven Property Group H120 results presentation. JLL Research |
|
Exhibit 11: St Petersburg warehouse supply vs demand and vacancy |
|
|
Source: Raven Property Group H120 results presentation. JLL Research |
|
Exhibit 10: Moscow prime warehouse rents and yields |
|
|
Source: Raven Property Group H120 results presentation. JLL Research |
|
Exhibit 12: St Petersburg prime warehouse rents and yields |
|
|
Source: Raven Property Group H120 results presentation. JLL Research |
Compared with the wider European market, Russian warehouse rents remain at relatively low levels, while yields are significantly higher. Notwithstanding the relative lack of development of the Russian property investment market, this is a positive indicator for value creation over the medium to longer term. In the near term, against a positive fundamental sector backdrop and compared with international markets and local interest rates, Russian warehouse valuations appear very well underpinned with upside potential.
|
Exhibit 13: Selected European warehouse rents |
Exhibit 14: Selected European warehouse yields |
|
|
|
Source: Raven Property Group H120 results presentation. JLL Research |
Source: Raven Property Group H120 results presentation. JLL Research |
|
Exhibit 13: Selected European warehouse rents |
|
|
Source: Raven Property Group H120 results presentation. JLL Research |
|
Exhibit 14: Selected European warehouse yields |
|
|
Source: Raven Property Group H120 results presentation. JLL Research |
Forecast and financials
Our forecasts are based on the current £/RUB rate
As noted above, changes in the value of the rouble impact on reported earnings and net asset value as reported in sterling, and the continuing rouble weakness since end H120 is substantially allowed for in our forecasts. Despite the Russian national balance sheet being relatively well positioned, with internal and external debt levels among the lowest globally and financial reserves at an historically high level, we have not assumed any meaningful recovery and have based our estimates on current rates (£/RUB98 at the time of writing compared with £/RUB86.4 at the end of H120). We estimate an average H220 rate of £/RUB97 compared with a H120 average of £/RUB87.3.
As a result we expect a further unrealised negative impact on the income statement NAV in H220, relating to the translation of euro-denominated debt into roubles within the operating subsidiaries, and also at group level, within other comprehensive income, in respect of the reduction in the sterling-equivalent value of the rouble net assets. We estimate the aggregate effect of these at c £102m compared with end-H120 net assets of £279.3m. This is substantially offset by the gain that will be recorded on cancellation of the convertible preferred shares and including retained earnings.
We estimate that a 1% strengthening/(weakening) of the rouble versus sterling compared with our forecast increases/(decreases) net assets by c 1.7%.
Net rental and related income
For the core property investment business our forecasts allow for a continued run-off of the remaining US dollar-denominated rents offset by indexation of rouble-denominated rents and improving occupancy. For occupancy, we assume a further slight improvement in H220 (to c 94% from 93% at end H120) with a further increase to 96% in FY21. In rouble terms, we expect net rental income to be broadly flat (c RUB9.7bn) over FY20/21, at a similar level to FY19, but at our assumed FX rates there is a downward trend in the sterling presentation due to rouble weakness.
There is a similar FX effect on our forecasts for RosLogistics. In rouble terms, we expect a relatively modest 4% decline in net rental and related income in FY20, with some impact on logistics shipping volumes from the pandemic, with modest c 2% growth in FY21.
Exhibit 16: Net rental and related income
(£m) |
FY19 |
FY20e |
FY21e |
Property investment gross revenues |
158.5 |
141.5 |
132.1 |
Property investment net rental and related income |
117.9 |
106.1 |
99.4 |
RosLogistics gross revenues |
16.7 |
13.8 |
13.6 |
RosLogistics net rental and related income |
8.4 |
7.2 |
6.9 |
Raven Mount gross revenues |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Raven Mount net rental and related income |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Group total |
|||
Gross revenues |
175.4 |
155.3 |
145.8 |
Net rental and related income |
126.5 |
113.3 |
106.4 |
Source: Raven Property Group data, Edison Investment Research forecasts
A c 10% improvement in the value of the rouble would add c £10m to group net rental and related income (with a similar impact from a further rouble decline), while each 1% change in occupancy compared with our assumptions affects net rental and related income and underlying earnings by c £1m.
Exhibit 17 shows our revised forecasts for FY20 and FY21. Due to the pandemic and capital activity, our last forecasts were published in August 2019 and reflect a rouble exchange rate of £/RUB80. If we were to apply a similar £/RUB80 on a full-year basis to our FY21 revised forecast for underlying profit before tax excluding FX, this would increase to £42.2m. The underlying (ex-FX) improvement in our FY21 forecast in sterling terms is driven by lower expenses and finance costs, the latter reflecting significantly reduced interest rates.
Exhibit 17: Summary of underlying earnings and forecast changes
New estimates @ £/RUB98 spot |
Last published (August 2019 @ £/RUB80 spot |
|||
£m unless stated otherwise |
FY20e |
FY21e |
FY20e |
FY21e |
Gross revenue |
155.3 |
145.8 |
175.8 |
170.3 |
Property operating expenditure & cost of sales |
(42.0) |
(39.4) |
(48.7) |
(47.4) |
Net rental & related income |
113.3 |
106.4 |
127.1 |
122.9 |
Administrative expenses |
(19.9) |
(19.9) |
(25.6) |
(26.2) |
Share-based payments and other long-term incentives |
(0.3) |
(1.0) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Share of profit of joint ventures |
(0.1) |
0.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Underlying operating profit before FX gains/(losses) |
93.0 |
85.5 |
102.4 |
97.7 |
Net finance expense |
(63.6) |
(60.6) |
(73.7) |
(73.9) |
Underlying profit before tax (excluding FX) |
29.4 |
24.9 |
28.7 |
23.8 |
FX losses |
(40.2) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Underlying profit before tax |
(10.7) |
24.9 |
28.7 |
23.8 |
Tax |
(8.5) |
(10.9) |
(6.5) |
(5.8) |
Effective tax rate |
N/M |
43.9% |
22.5% |
24.5% |
Underlying profit after tax |
(19.3) |
14.0 |
22.3 |
18.0 |
Basic underlying eps (p) |
(4.01) |
2.66 |
4.72 |
3.93 |
Fully diluted underlying EPS (p) |
(4.01) |
2.66 |
4.72 |
3.93 |
Source: Edison Investment Research forecasts
Taxation
In part, the underlying increase in our forecast PBT is offset by an increase in assumed tax. We have applied the standard 20% Russian tax rate to underlying PBT excluding FX movements and preference share interest, the former being non-tax deductible (until realised) and the latter reflecting the distribution nature of the preference share payment (rather than a tax-deductible cost), subject to local withholding tax, At the (unadjusted) group level, on an IFRS basis, the tax charge also includes deferred tax in respect of the investment property valuation movement. Our forecasts do not assume an underlying movement other than to factor in FX effects. Raven is registered in Guernsey, where it is tax exempt, but is liable for tax on its operations in Russia (its main operating subsidiaries) and the UK, as well as in its Cyprus (holding company). Russia is a relatively low tax jurisdiction, but changes to the tax code in respect of certain overseas tax treaties are possible and the group structure is designed to deal with the commercial risks of operating in Russia rather than to take advantage of tax benefits offshore.
Reconciliation to IFRS earnings
As noted above, our IFRS earnings forecasts shown in Exhibit 22 on page 16 of this note also include a relatively small amount of depreciation, unrealised valuation movements in respect of properties and derivative instruments, amortisation of the convertible preference share redemption premium (until re-designation on 30 September), and long-term incentive payments that are settled in shares (no impact in H120).
We have not assumed any changes in the value of interest rate derivatives used to manage interest rate exposure, nor do we assume any underlying change in the value of investment properties, denominated in roubles. Given the positive fundamentals in the Russian warehouse market and the wide gap between valuation yields and interest rates, especially compared with more developed markets elsewhere, the prospects for valuation gains appear favourable. We estimate that a 1% increase/(decrease) in the value of the portfolio is equivalent to c 1.8p increase/(decrease) in our forecast end-FY20 NAV per share, assuming no change in the £/RUB exchange rate and after deferred tax.
Raven currently operates two share schemes to reward and incentivise executives and senior staff in addition to discretionary bonus payments. While no accruals were made in H120, the FY19 charge was £5.5m. The annual performance incentive (API) is payable in cash or shares (ordinary and preference) based on performance against a range of financial and operating targets set annually. The maximum amount payable to an individual is capped at 50% of basic salary if paid in cash or 175% of basic salary if paid in shares, which are required to be held for three years. As a condition of the scheme there was no API payable for 2018. The FY19 API accrual was £4.3m, representing 89.5% of the total potential award. The five-year performance plan (FYPP) is a long-term incentive scheme which is open to the executive directors and other senior managers, allowing participants to invest into the FYPP a number of existing holdings in the company. These must continue to be retained for five years from the commencement of the plan (until 31 March 2023), at which point the company will match the investment with up to three times the value of the shares held based on annual compound total shareholder returns (‘TSR’) of between 4% and 12% over the period. Any award under the plan will be settled by the issue of ordinary shares. No accrual was made in FY19 or H120.
The FY19 charge also included £0.6m of other staff bonuses and £0.5m in respect of the now lapsed 2016 retention scheme. FY19 underlying earnings included a charge of £4.9m in respect of assumed cash settlements and the IFRS charge also included the non-cash settlement of the 2016 retention scheme.
In our forecasts we have allowed for bonus payments of £0.3m in H220 and £1.0m in FY21, all within underlying earnings.
Debt funding
At the end of H120, FY19 secured borrowing amounted to £703m (FY19: £689m), including c £6m of unamortised loan arrangement fees carried within payables. The borrowings comprised 17 different debt facilities, with an average cost of 5.7%. The weighted average term to maturity was 4.3 years, with only 4% (two facilities) maturing before 2023. Compared with the investment property portfolio value (including properties under development) of £1,253m, the gross loan to value ratio (LTV) was 54.3%.
|
Exhibit 18: Debt maturity profile |
|
|
Source: Raven Property Group |
Historically, the portfolio had been funded by US dollar debt to match US dollar-denominated rents. With the market-led move to rouble-denominated leases, Raven has been transitioning its funding towards rouble-denominated debt, removing a structural FX mismatch. US dollar debt has been replaced initially with a mix of rouble- and euro-denominated debt, the latter recognising the slow decline in rouble borrowing rates despite falling inflation. The end-H120 mix was 59% rouble debt and 41% euro debt compared with 58%:42% at end FY19. Given the significant reduction in rouble interest rates over the past year, we expect a further significant shift towards rouble debt. Secured debt amortisation (£16.2m in H120) is focused on the euro-denominated debt and represents an ongoing shift away from euro debt as it is refinanced.
The secured bank debt is floating rate, but Raven has entered a series of interest rate derivative financial instruments that cap its interest rate exposure to the underlying benchmark borrowing rates (before the lending margin) at a weighted average 5.36%, leaving the group positively exposed to the decline in market rates.
Cash flow and distributions
Exhibit 19 shows our forecasts for net operating income/cash flow after interest on secured and unsecured debt. We forecast c £11m pa in FY20 and FY21, supporting our distribution per share assumption of 2.25p in each year. From September 2020, the permanent capital structure will comprise the enlarged base of ordinary shares and preference shares, while the redeemable convertible preference shares will disappear. The (non-convertible) preference shares earn a cumulative 12% dividend on the fixed issue amount per share of 100p and rank ahead of the ordinary shares. This fixed charge in respect of preference and convertible preference shares provides ordinary shareholders with significant asset and income gearing. The total ‘fixed’ charge on cash flows from preference shares will not change materially following the re-designation of the convertible preference share element, and the prospects for ordinary share distributions will remain sensitive to sterling movements in net cash generated from operations, and the £/RUB exchange rate. A c 1% increase/(decrease) in operating cash flow increases/(decreases) total net operating income after interest (and ordinary shareholder distribution capacity) by more than 5%. Using H120 exchange rates, we estimate that net operating income/cash flow after interest would be c £16m in FY20 and c £22m in FY21.
Exhibit 19: Net operating income after interest
£m unless stated otherwise |
FY18 |
FY19 |
FY20e |
FY21e |
Net cash generated from operating activities |
96.1 |
93.1 |
79.2 |
74.8 |
Interest received |
3.3 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
1.6 |
Bank borrowing costs paid |
(50.0) |
(54.7) |
(44.8) |
(39.3) |
Pref dividends |
(11.3) |
(11.3) |
(15.3) |
(25.9) |
Convertible preference dividend |
(12.7) |
(12.5) |
(9.5) |
0.0 |
Total net operating income after interest |
25.3 |
16.6 |
11.7 |
11.1 |
Per share total net operating income after interest (p) |
3.9 |
2.9 |
2.4 |
2.1 |
Distribution per ordinary share (p) |
3.00 |
3.50 |
2.25 |
2.25 |
Source: Raven Property Group data, Edison Investment Research forecasts
Equity gearing
Although the convertible preference share re-designation increases the equity base, at current exchange rates this is more than offset by unrealised FX losses. As a result, we expect the gearing of ordinary shareholders to changes in asset values to remain relatively high. We estimate that a 1% increase/(decrease) in the sterling value of the portfolio is equivalent to a c 1.8p increase/(decrease) in NAV per share after allowance for deferred tax.
Exhibit 20: Asset gearing
£m |
FY19 |
FY20e |
FY21e |
Total assets |
1,518 |
1,282 |
1,272 |
Preference shares |
(110) |
(254) |
(254) |
Convertible preference shares |
(217) |
0 |
0 |
Other liabilities |
(825) |
(778) |
(778) |
Ordinary shareholders' equity |
366 |
250 |
241 |
Equity/assets |
24% |
20% |
19% |
Source: Raven Property Group historical data, Edison Investment Research
Valuation
Investors in the ordinary shares are fully exposed to share distributions and NAV movements, and would benefit from a closing of the wide discount to NAV.
Despite sometimes volatile economic and market conditions, Raven has consistently made distributions to shareholders through share repurchases effected by way of tender offers. Since listing, it has repurchased and cancelled more than 280m ordinary shares. After a delay during the uncertainty created by the COVID-19 pandemic, Raven will now proceed with the final distribution in respect of FY19 of 2.25p (making 3.5p for the year). Because of the delay, rather than two distributions in respect of FY20, management says it will make one payment to be determined at the end of the year.
|
Exhibit 21: Distributions to ordinary shareholders |
|
|
Source: Raven Property Group. |
Our forecast 2.25p distribution for FY20 represents a yield of c 7.6%, while the shares are trading at a c 40% discount to FY20e NAV per share.
At a price of 124p, the yield on the (non-convertible) preference shares is just under 10% based on the fixed yield of 12% on the nominal value of 100p. The preference shares have the added security of ranking ahead of the ordinary shares for distributions but do not provide the upside exposure underlying income, property valuations and a recovery in the rouble versus sterling.
Sensitivities: The economy and geopolitics
The global economy has entered a highly uncertain stage, triggered by the spread of COVID-19. The Russian economy faces specific challenges from its sensitivity to oil prices, and continuing political and economic tension with the US resulting in continuing economic sanctions. However, there has been a significant adaptation to sanctions and this may mitigate the effects of external economic events. These country-specific risks have the impact of reinforcing normal sector risks including occupancy and rent levels, funding access and cost, and property valuations. We highlight the following:
■
Warehouse supply-demand. Although supported by long-term structural shifts in distribution, weaker economic growth, lower investment and consumer demand would negatively affect the demand for warehouse space. Occupancy and market rent levels could fall.
■
Volatility in FX markets. As discussed above, as a primarily rouble-operating business reporting in sterling, rouble weakness has a negative impact on reported income and NAV, and weakens the company’s ability to service its remaining euro-denominated secured debt and sterling-denominated preference shares.
■
Rent reversion. The 14% of remaining legacy US dollar-denominated leases are an average $160 per sqm, approximately twice the average level of Raven’s rouble-denominated leases. The run-off of these leases over the next three years will act as a drag on rental income.
■
Gearing. The LTV of the secured borrowings is c 54%, although property valuations are relatively low by international standards and yields high. Given the significant funding provided by fixed-rate, sterling-denominated preference shares, the asset and income gearing of ordinary shareholders is significantly increased.
■
The Russian legal system and its laws and practice in respect of taxation, foreign investment and trade, and legal ownership may be subject to changes or to changes in interpretation in ways that cannot be anticipated.
Exhibit 22: Financial summary
Period ending 31 December. (£m) |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020e |
2021e |
INCOME STATEMENT |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
Gross revenue |
177.0 |
162.6 |
175.4 |
155.3 |
145.8 |
Property operating expenditure & cost of sales |
(47.3) |
(44.4) |
(48.9) |
(42.0) |
(39.4) |
Net rental and related income |
129.7 |
118.3 |
126.5 |
113.3 |
106.4 |
Administrative expenses |
(22.1) |
(25.2) |
(25.4) |
(22.4) |
(21.0) |
Share based payments and other long-term incentives |
(3.5) |
(2.9) |
(5.5) |
(0.3) |
(1.0) |
FX gains/(losses) |
6.1 |
(2.5) |
27.5 |
(40.2) |
0.0 |
Share of profit of joint ventures |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.3 |
(0.1) |
0.0 |
Operating profit/(loss) before realised/unrealised property gains (EBIT) |
111.8 |
89.4 |
124.3 |
50.4 |
84.4 |
Realised/unrealised gains on investment property |
28.2 |
(121.0) |
48.3 |
(12.5) |
0.0 |
Operating profit |
140.1 |
(31.6) |
172.6 |
37.9 |
84.4 |
Net finance expense |
(71.7) |
(83.3) |
(107.6) |
(73.4) |
(64.0) |
Gain on cancellation of Convertible Preference shares |
44.9 |
||||
Profit before tax |
68.3 |
(114.9) |
65.1 |
9.4 |
20.4 |
Tax |
(25.2) |
(5.8) |
(19.0) |
(10.2) |
(10.9) |
Profit after tax |
43.1 |
(120.7) |
46.0 |
(0.8) |
9.5 |
Company underlying earnings |
43.4 |
20.0 |
43.2 |
(19.3) |
14.0 |
Basic IFRS EPS (p) |
6.50 |
(18.81) |
8.16 |
(0.16) |
1.81 |
Fully diluted IFRS EPS (p) |
6.27 |
(18.81) |
7.50 |
(0.16) |
1.81 |
Basic company underlying EPS (p) |
6.54 |
3.12 |
7.67 |
(4.01) |
2.66 |
Fully diluted company underlying EPS (p) |
5.68 |
3.08 |
6.35 |
(4.01) |
2.66 |
Distributions per ordinary share (p) |
4.00 |
3.00 |
3.50 |
2.25 |
2.25 |
Period end number of shares exc own held (m) |
655.4 |
612.5 |
480.8 |
570.4 |
535.9 |
Average number of shares (m) - basic |
663.5 |
641.6 |
563.9 |
480.5 |
525.3 |
Average number of shares (m) - fully diluted |
936.4 |
649.4 |
876.7 |
554.8 |
525.3 |
BALANCE SHEET |
|||||
Investment property |
1,159.2 |
1,175.4 |
1,337.7 |
1,106.3 |
1,111.3 |
Other non-current assets |
74.7 |
102.6 |
70.5 |
61.1 |
61.1 |
Total non-current assets |
1,233.9 |
1,278.0 |
1,408.2 |
1,167.4 |
1,172.4 |
Cash & equivalents |
197.1 |
73.5 |
68.1 |
76.5 |
62.3 |
Other current assets |
59.0 |
44.4 |
42.0 |
37.8 |
37.4 |
Total current assets |
256.2 |
117.8 |
110.1 |
114.2 |
99.7 |
Total assets |
1,490.1 |
1,395.8 |
1,518.3 |
1,281.6 |
1,272.1 |
Interest bearing loans & borrowings |
(78.9) |
(75.6) |
(60.2) |
(53.7) |
(53.7) |
Other current liabilities |
(79.5) |
(66.2) |
(51.7) |
(45.1) |
(44.7) |
Total current liabilities |
(158.3) |
(141.8) |
(111.9) |
(98.8) |
(98.4) |
Interest bearing loans & borrowings |
(547.4) |
(567.9) |
(623.2) |
(594.2) |
(594.2) |
Preference shares |
(108.3) |
(109.3) |
(110.3) |
(253.6) |
(253.9) |
Convertible preference shares |
(198.9) |
(206.1) |
(217.5) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Other non-current liabilities |
(85.4) |
(75.2) |
(89.6) |
(85.1) |
(85.1) |
Total non-current liabilities |
(939.9) |
(958.4) |
(1,040.6) |
(932.9) |
(933.2) |
Total liabilities |
(1,098.2) |
(1,100.2) |
(1,152.5) |
(1,031.6) |
(1,031.6) |
Net assets (and shareholders' equity) |
391.8 |
295.6 |
365.8 |
250.0 |
240.5 |
IFRS NAV per share (p) |
60 |
48 |
76 |
44 |
45 |
Fully diluted IFRS NAV per share (p) |
59 |
48 |
75 |
44 |
45 |
CASH FLOW |
|||||
Net cash generated from operating activity |
98.0 |
96.1 |
93.1 |
79.2 |
74.8 |
Property investment |
(161.3) |
(86.5) |
(24.0) |
(7.2) |
(5.0) |
Other investing activity |
7.3 |
14.3 |
7.8 |
1.3 |
0.2 |
Net cash generated from investing activity |
(154.0) |
(72.2) |
(16.2) |
(5.9) |
(4.8) |
Bank borrowing costs paid |
(49.5) |
(50.0) |
(54.7) |
(44.8) |
(39.3) |
Preference/convertible preference share dividends paid |
(21.0) |
(24.0) |
(23.8) |
(24.8) |
(25.9) |
Net own shares (acquired)/disposed |
(11.3) |
(28.3) |
(53.3) |
(10.8) |
(19.0) |
Debt drawn/(repaid) |
78.8 |
(20.8) |
50.9 |
20.5 |
0.0 |
Other financing activity |
97.5 |
(16.7) |
0.8 |
(2.1) |
0.0 |
Cash flow from financing activity |
94.5 |
(139.8) |
(80.1) |
(62.0) |
(84.2) |
Change in cash |
38.5 |
(115.9) |
(3.2) |
11.3 |
(14.2) |
Opening cash |
160.6 |
197.1 |
73.5 |
68.1 |
76.5 |
FX/other |
(2.0) |
(7.7) |
(2.1) |
(2.9) |
0.0 |
Closing cash |
197.1 |
73.5 |
68.1 |
76.5 |
62.3 |
Secured bank debt |
(626) |
(643) |
(683) |
(648) |
(648) |
Preference shares & Convertible Preference shares |
(307) |
(315) |
(328) |
(254) |
(254) |
Net (debt)/cash, including Pref. & Conv. Pref. |
(736.2) |
(885.4) |
(943.0) |
(825.0) |
(839.5) |
LTV on secured debt |
52.6% |
53.3% |
49.8% |
57.1% |
56.9% |
Source: Raven Property Group historical data, Edison Investment Research forecasts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Research: TMT
EMIS reported respectable results for H120 considering the uncertainty in the NHS and COVID-19 restrictions. The company expects to meet consensus estimates for FY20 and announced an interim dividend of 16p (+3% y o y). We have made minor changes to forecasts. Work on the product roadmap is ongoing with the first new data analytics product due in Q4. In our view, the rapid shift to digital working during the pandemic supports and potentially accelerates the adoption of technology within healthcare in the longer term.