UK election – If the polls are right, UK risk premium set to fall

Published on 11 December 2019


Author: Alastair George

Alastair George is Edison’s chief investment strategist. He has extensive experience, having worked in global markets as a fund manager and risk arbitrageur since the 1990s. With an academic background in engineering and data science, he is well versed in the data-focused analysis of financial and political events.

Summary

If the current Conservative lead in the polls is reflected in this week’s UK election, it would appear an outright majority is within reach for Boris Johnson’s Conservative Party. In this note, we examine the potential outcomes of a workable Conservative majority. We suggest that there may be a rally in UK banks and asset managers, a short-term recovery in stocks that would have been affected by Labour policies, a continued rotation into UK mid-cap stocks and beneficiaries in the housing and infrastructure sectors.

UK risk premium reduces with a shift to the centre

In the event of a Conservative majority, the position of Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the opposition may become untenable. A change to the Labour leadership and a shift to more centrist policies on both sides of the political spectrum are arguably as important to reducing the perception of UK political risk as resolving Brexit. If the risk of a radical government in the UK recedes, so should the risk premium. The uncertainty of the last two years has led to potential pent-up demand for private investment, for which we are seeing evidence in subdued 2019 economic activity yet significant forward order books. Should this investment spend become unlocked, the UK may again become a more attractive home for capital.

Valuations: Only UK banks stand out as cheap

UK equities have underperformed global indices by 14% since the EU referendum. However, a relief rally has already started, with the more domestically focused UK mid-cap sector outperforming the large-cap sector by 10% since the summer. The combination of a weak sterling and the structural attractions of the UK has led to overseas corporate interest, with a number of public companies being acquired by non-UK corporates and private equity firms. A look at valuations suggests that only the bank sector is significantly undervalued. However, the key issue for durable equity returns is whether we see improved investor sentiment after the election drive an improvement in the real economy – and if we do, the potential for upgrades to consensus earnings forecasts should not be understated.

Likely winners

  • High-quality stocks continue to outperform and trade on a premium given potential trade deal uncertainties.
  • Short-term rally in rail, mail, water and energy stocks that risked nationalisation.
  • UK banks and asset managers, as the yield curve steepens and asset flows out of UK equities stop and become net inflows.
  • UK mid-cap stocks continue to outperform large-cap overseas earners.
  • House builders and infrastructure plays benefit from manifesto pledges.

Likely losers

  • Overseas earners or exporters with a UK listing, as sterling appreciates.

 
Winners and losers: the companies shown above do not translate into buys and sells as other themes (and valuation parameters) may conflict with this one.

Global perspectives: Re-centring UK politics

  • In recent years, UK investing has become something of a special situation. Investors in the UK have had to consider a fundamental re-write of the UK’s relationship with the EU and the rest of the world. This uncertainty has pressured investment and growth. Populism has also pushed an unusual polarisation of UK politics, with the UK’s Labour Party now proposing a clearly socialist manifesto, an anathema to equity investors more used to a laissez-faire approach to the corporate sector.
  • Consensus points to the obvious – the UK Conservative Party is in a strong position in the closing days of the election campaign. Provided the current c 10-point lead in the polls is maintained, it would appear an outright majority is within reach. If so, we can agree that this should trigger a rapid resolution to ratifying the Withdrawal Agreement and the UK’s exit from the EU. However, it does not resolve the question of a future trade agreement – which is where the focus will immediately shift.

2019 political party opinion polls

Source: Edison Investment Research, PollBase

  • A polling disaster for Labour increases the likelihood of a shift in British politics back to a competition for the middle-ground. Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s position may be untenable in the event of a Conservative majority. UK-specific political risks such as a major expansion of the state’s role in the UK economy may recede, as support for more popular centrist opposition policies increases. A reduction in the risk premium for UK assets should be expected in such circumstances.
  • UK equities have underperformed global indices. Across the major sectors, UK equities have underperformed global peers by 14% on average since the EU referendum. This may be a substantial gap, but it is insufficient in our view to draw investors in on this reason alone. There are also other dynamics to consider, such as the increasing impact of global digital business on UK retail and real estate.
  • Sterling is partway through a significant re-rating. Sterling remains below its long-run trade-weighted average, but the recent rally suggests a Conservative victory is already discounted or at least in part. We would expect steady rather than spectacular gains in the currency from this point in the event of a Conservative majority.
  • In common with global peers, UK government bonds remain unappealing at currently low yields. We recognise the economic data are mixed, but a political relief rally would in our view be associated with modestly higher yields as UK GDP growth expectations improve and business investment rebounds as uncertainty recedes.
  • Post-election UK: business as usual rather than euphoria. The Conservative manifesto is conservative with modestly increasing government expenditure rather than any bonanza. We expect any post-election bounce will give way to a more measured but positive market reaction over the course of 2020. Valuations of UK equities are only modestly discounted relative to historical norms, rather than outrageously cheap in our view.

UK election: Re-centring British politics

Delivery of Brexit and a defeat of radical Corbynism?

Opinion polls may have been misleading in recent years but there are no alternative data that provide any greater clarity on the outlook for the next UK parliament. At present, it appears that the UK’s Conservative Party is on course for an outright majority, provided its c 10-point lead in the polls is maintained. This puts PM Johnson on course to deliver Brexit as promised in early 2020. Such an outcome also represents a significant defeat for the Labour Party, which appears to have become caught on a radical manifesto whose popularity may have peaked.
Exhibit 1

At first sight, this appears to be qualitatively something of a best-case (realistic) scenario for UK investors, who have suffered systematic underperformance across sectors since the EU referendum of 2016. We believe the political deadlock and uncertainty since then may have been as damaging to the UK’s economic prospects as the direct impact of Brexit itself. As Exhibit 1 shows, the combination of a weak currency and unfavourable sector performance has meant UK equities have underperformed global indices by 14% on average since the EU referendum.

Exhibit 1: Consistent underperformance of UK sectors since the 2016 EU referendum


Source: Source: Refinitiv. Price returns as of 9 December 2019.

Nevertheless, we believe a relief rally in UK assets may already be underway. Mid-cap UK indices, which have proportionately greater exposure to the UK domestic economy, have outperformed large-cap peers by over 10% since the summer. UK-listed large-caps may have suffered somewhat by the rise in sterling, which on a trade-weighted basis is now 6% higher over the same period, Exhibit 2. The risk premium for UK assets has clearly diminished in recent months as political risks, which include both a continued parliamentary deadlock in respect of Brexit and a Labour-led administration, have receded.

Exhibit 2: Trade-weighted sterling recovers as the political risks recede

Source: Refinitiv, Bank of England

In our view, a modest Conservative majority is probably the most UK investor-friendly political scenario at this time. Investors will be thankful that the more radical Labour proposals for employee ownership and board representation, and nationalisation of utilities are looking increasingly theoretical possibilities, both for this election and for the future as UK politics shift back to the centre ground, post-Brexit.

Conservative win offers more of the same to the UK

The Conservative election manifesto offers few distractions from the central campaign message of ‘get Brexit done’ and instead pitches a message of business-as-usual, which for many companies will be a welcome relief from the political volatility of the past three years. Avoidable errors that cost votes at the previous elections – such as a promised review of state care provisions – have been dropped. Additional funding has been promised for the traditional electoral priorities such as the NHS and police forces.

These near-sacred offerings on public services may be necessary gambits to win over the electorate, but suggest limited practical change based on spending projections. Under the Conservative manifesto, plans for the overall fiscal trajectory of the UK to the middle of the next decade would be largely unchanged from previous announcements. The contrast with Labour and the Liberal Democrats is stark – both have promised to raise annual spending by £60–80bn pa, lifting the government share of GDP close to that of other European nations. For investors, the Conservative stability in spending plans is, in our view, one less risk to incorporate into asset prices.

General government spending as total % of GDP in 2017

Source: OECD National Accounts Statistics: National Accounts at a Glance

However, there are Conservative proposals for infrastructure investment over the next 10 years of approximately £100bn in the areas of transport, housing and civic development. We are reluctant to consider these initiatives as a reason to invest in the UK, however; this will be the fourth time a £100bn infrastructure spend has been promised by the government in this decade, and the effects to date on the listed corporate sector have been modest at best.

For the Labour Party, plans for further additional spending on infrastructure come with a state-directed approach and nationalisation of key segments of the economy. This would in our view clearly be an unwelcome development for investors in UK infrastructure, despite the promised increased levels of government spending.

UK valuations below average – but only modestly, except for bank sector

Since the EU referendum, the combination of a weak sterling and discounted valuations has not gone unnoticed. Corporate and private equity buyers have spotted the dual discounts in UK equities and sterling, and it has led to M&A activity, as shown in Exhibit 3. M&A is typically driven by more than one factor, but recent opportunistic in-bound deal announcements for Cobham, Greene King and Entertainment One highlight the appetite of non-UK corporate buyers for UK assets.

Exhibit 3: Recent UK M&A Activity

    • UK target
    • Date
    • Acquiror
    • Size of Deal (£m)
  • accesso Technology
  • 24/07/2019
  • N/A
  • N/A
  • – Sector: Technology
    – Acquiror Country: N/A
    – Acquiror’s Sector: N/A
  • – Sector: Retail
    – Acquiror Country: UK
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Private Equity
  • Brady
  • 14/10/2019
  • Hanover Active Equity
  • 8
  • – Sector: Technology
    – Acquiror Country: Luxembourg
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Private Equity
  • BTG
  • 20/11/2019
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • 3,256
  • – Sector: Healthcare
    – Acquiror Country: US
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Healthcare
  • CityFibre
  • 23/04/2018
  • Connect Infrastructure Bidco
  • 538
  • – Sector: Telecommunication
    – Acquiror Country: UK
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Financials
  • Cobham
  • 25/07/2019
  • Advent International
  • 3,945
  • – Sector: Industrials
    – Acquiror Country: US
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Private equity
  • Dairy Crest
  • 22/02/2019
  • Saputo
  • 966
  • – Sector: Consumer
    – Acquiror Country: Canada
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Consumer
  • – Sector: Retail
    – Acquiror Country: US
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Consumer
  • – Sector: Industrials
    – Acquiror Country: Isle of Man
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Private equity
  • Elegant Hotels
  • 18/10/2019
  • Marriott International
  • 101
  • – Sector: Consumer
    – Acquiror Country: US
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Consumer
  • – Sector: Oil & Gas
    – Acquiror Country: Norway
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Oil & Gas
  • Fenner
  • 17/03/2019
  • Michelin
  • 1,300
  • – Sector: Industrials
    – Acquiror Country: France
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Industrials
  • Greene King
  • 19/08/2019
  • CK Asset Holdings
  • 2,635
  • – Sector: Retail
    – Acquiror Country: Hong Kong
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Industrials
  • Inmarsat
  • 19/03/2019
  • Apax Partners
  • 2,521
  • – Sector: Telecommunication
    – Acquiror Country: UK
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Private equity
  • Jimmy Choo
  • 25/07/2017
  • Michael Kors
  • 896
  • – Sector: Retail
    – Acquiror Country: US
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Retail
  • – Sector: Materials
    – Acquiror Country: Germany
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Consumer
  • Merlin Entertainment
  • 28/06/2019
  • Kirkbi
  • 3,281
  • – Sector: Consumer
    – Acquiror Country: Denmark
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Financials
  • Millennium & Copthorne
  • 07/06/2019
  • City Developments
  • 2,227
  • – Sector: Leisure
    – Acquiror Country: Singapore
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Real Estate
  • Murgitroyd
  • 15/10/2019
  • Sovereign Capital Partners
  • 61
  • – Sector: Consumer
    – Acquiror Country: UK
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Private Equity
  • Premier Technology Services
  • 20/06/2019
  • Macquarie Group
  • 265
  • – Sector: Industrials
    – Acquiror Country: Australia
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Financials
  • Randgold Resources
  • 22/09/2018
  • Barrick Gold
  • 5,000
  • – Sector: Mining
    – Acquiror Country: Canada
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Mining
  • RPC Group
  • 31/01/2019
  • Berry Global Group
  • 3,216
  • – Sector: Materials
    – Acquiror Country: US
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Materials
  • – Sector: Technology
    – Acquiror Country: Canada
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Technology
  • Shire
  • 29/11/2018
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals
  • 46,000
  • – Sector: Pharmaceuticals
    – Acquiror Country: Japan
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Pharmaceuticals
  • Sky
  • 20/09/2018
  • Comcast
  • 30,600
  • – Sector: Media
    – Acquiror Country: US
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Media
  • Sophos
  • 14/10/2019
  • Thoma Bravo
  • 2,856
  • – Sector: Technology
    – Acquiror Country: US
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Private Equity
  • StatPro
  • 20/09/2019
  • Confluence Technologies
  • 152
  • – Sector: Technology
    – Acquiror Country: US
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Industrials
  • – Sector: Technology
    – Acquiror Country: Malaysia
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Financials
  • – Sector: Industrials
    – Acquiror Country: US
    – Acquiror’s Sector: Real estate

Source: Refinitiv, Edison calculations. Note: companies in orange represent Edison Investment Research clients.

Given the disappointing performance of the UK stock market since the EU referendum, we are somewhat disappointed to find that only the bank sector stands out in terms of a discounted valuation compared to historical trading levels. We have taken the simple average of the P/E, price to book and dividend yield discount compared to the 15-year history for each sector. On this basis, there is a modest degree of undervaluation of around 10% for energy, basic industries, non-cyclical consumer goods and utilities, but this is hardly exceptional from a valuation perspective.

Exhibit 4: UK bank sector looks cheap but other UK sectors at best only modestly undervalued

Source: Refinitiv, Edison calculations

We believe the UK bank sector is worthy of closer examination for 2020 on a valuation basis, yielding close to 5% and on a forward book value multiple of 0.75x. Stability in the political dimension and a pick-up in loan demand may improve sentiment towards a UK sector that has languished, following a long period of recapitalisation and a torrent of financial claims from legacy business practices.

However, outside the banking sector it is more difficult to detect a substantive ‘Brexit’ discount following the rally in the mid-tier segment of the UK stock market since October. We would prefer to characterise the overall market as modestly undervalued, which underpins our belief that the market gains assuming a Conservative majority are in turn likely to be modest in the first instance but may build over time, on the assumption of a recovery in business investment and easing political risks.

Sterling remains at the lower end of its 15-year range on a trade-weighted basis, Exhibit 2, but has already made a meaningful recovery since the announcement of PM Johnson’s Withdrawal Agreement during October. We believe that markets have sensed that the political deadlock has been broken and have moved to reflect the likely election result.

In a similar manner to equities, further gains in sterling in our view are likely to be predicated on a positive evolution of both the domestic UK economy in early 2020 and the tone of the EU/UK negotiations in respect of a future trade agreement. The time to be aggressive on sterling was in our view during Q3, when there was real concern that a no-deal Brexit was a possibility. Exhibit 2 may also somewhat overstate the case for sterling, which has been on a declining trend in real terms since the 1990s.

US $ TO UK £ (WMR) – EXCHANGE RATE since 1990


Source: Refinitiv

The sterling surge around the time of Chancellor Osborne’s mini boom prior to the EU referendum coincided with a 30% decline in the euro, following the introduction of the ECB’s quantitative easing programme. This was a factor in sterling’s strength at that time, which was separate from Brexit and in any case is unlikely to be repeated in 2020. Furthermore, in coming quarters the UK economy must contend with this quarter’s 8% currency appreciation headwind; a further significant advance would risk becoming disruptive to the UK economy and is therefore in our view less likely.

While the UK may leave the EU with the Withdrawal Agreement in place in January, we believe that no-deal concerns should not have faded so quickly from the political discourse. There remain risks to sterling and UK equities, such as a failure to achieve a UK/EU deal on a future trade agreement, which would in effect put the UK on the same WTO trading terms as a no-deal Brexit.

Conclusion

It is tempting to express the view that the resolution of the UK’s parliamentary deadlock following the election will trigger a major uplift in UK asset prices. However, an overall Conservative majority is precisely what public polls have consistently indicated during the election campaign and we believe this has been at least partially discounted in asset prices in recent months, notably in sterling and mid-cap UK equities. We believe a modest fillip on the day cannot be excluded in the event of the election matching expectations, but larger gains will have to wait for evidence of an improvement in UK business investment and constructive progress towards an EU/UK future trade agreement.

From a fiscal perspective, a Conservative victory in the 2019 UK election is not about change but continuity. Therefore, in the absence of a significant fiscal boost, the primary benefit to investors in UK assets following the election should be a reduction in uncertainty. This should not be underestimated as a source of returns for equity investors; in the best case, improved market and business sentiment can lead to a positive cycle of improved business investment and profit growth for the UK corporate sector.

Following a Conservative win, any re-centring of British politics in 2020 and beyond would significantly reduce international perceptions of UK political risk after a difficult decade of introspection. The act of Brexit may yet catalyse a new consensus on the UK’s role in the world. A return of UK popular support to the political middle ground would allow a greater sense of national purpose and open the way for international business investment into this new UK proposition.

Nevertheless, the Conservative Party offer of continuity is double-edged. In respect of Brexit, there may be some disappointment by mid-2020 as investors realise the negotiation of a permanent trade agreement between the UK and EU will be complex, time-consuming and may involve further brinksmanship by both sides. Furthermore, until this is resolved, this issue is likely to act as a drag on UK business investment, at least for sectors linked to export markets.

We note the underperformance of UK sectors relative to global peers on a relative basis since the EU referendum, which suggests a degree of further catch-up performance in 2020. However, following the recent rally, investors must consider all relevant factors before attributing underperformance to Brexit. For example, with the acceleration of the transition to a digital economy in recent years, for sectors such as retail or retail property there has been a permanent loss of profitability for smaller domestic companies unused to facing global competitors.

Nor should the election-specific nature of this note distract attention from the continued run of mixed incoming economic data in respect of the global economy during December, which will have an at least equal weight in determining the direction of UK asset prices in 2020 as the UK election.

Stocks themes that benefit from a Conservative win

If the polls are correct and a Conservative majority is the outcome of the 12 December election, then we would anticipate a positive reaction in equity markets reflecting the reduction in uncertainty and lowered political risk and a gradual rally in sterling. Set out below are some key themes we expect to play out in the event of a Conservative win.

Quality stocks will continue to outperform on a 12-month view

Given our expectation that trade-deal concerns are likely to persist, we would continue to expect the polarised market where investors are prepared to pay premiums for high-quality stocks to continue. Edison’s Illuminator screen identifies stocks that are delivering the attributes of a high-quality business and we highlighted Coats Group, Rightmove, 4imprint, Gamma Communications, FDM Group, JD Sports, Hilton Food Group, Avon Rubber, Greggs and Fever-Tree as stocks to focus on in our November publication.

Performance- Illuminator to FTSE All-Share Index

Source: Edison Investment Research

In addition to the Illuminator names, we highlight two others:

  • Games Workshop Group (GAW.L, market cap £1.8bn), a leading international specialist designer, manufacturer and multi-channel retailer of miniatures, scenery, artwork and fiction for tabletop miniature games set in its fantasy Warhammer worlds which has strong IP and strong barriers to entry with the potential to scale internationally. The company has continued to beat earnings expectations and is growing rapidly.
  • Strix (KETL.L, market cap: £340m) is an Isle of Man-based company engaged in designing, manufacturing and supplying kettle safety controls as well as other components and devices involving water heating and temperature control, steam management and water filtration. The company benefits from 90% recurring revenues as its kettles are replaced on average every three and a half years, and an income stream that is heavily patent protected and enforced vigorously through intellectual property actions. Operating profit margins are in excess of 30% and it has a c 85% conversion rate of cash profit to operating cash flow. Strix aims to raise its market share to 40% by 2021, mainly by raising market share in less regulated markets from 20 to 28%, and lifting its share in China to 50%. Trading on c 11x forward earnings and with a cash-rich balance sheet, we believe Strix remains attractively valued and somewhat isolated from geopolitical risks.
  • Relief rally in Corbyn policy stocks

    The Corbyn pledge of bringing ‘rail, mail, water and energy companies into public ownership’ led to investors avoiding a number of stocks and sectors. The removal of this risk could lead to a near-term bounce in names such as Royal Mail (RMG.L, market cap £2.2bn), BT (BT.L, market cap £19bn), National Grid (NG.L, market cap £31bn), SSE (SSE.L, market cap 14bn), United Utilities (UU.L, market cap £6bn), Pennon (PNN.L, market cap £4bn), Go-Ahead Group (GOG.L, market cap £868m), National Express (NEX.L, market cap £2bn) and FirstGroup (FGP.L, market cap £1bn).

    Apart from these obvious names, we would highlight John Laing Group (JLG.L, market cap £2bn). The UK represents a much-diminished part of JLG’s portfolio and an even smaller part of the pipeline for growth. Although highly unlikely given the latest polls, the prospect of a Labour government, given its anti-PFI stance, is a clear negative, but one that is well understood by the market and reflected in JLG’s strategy of minimising the importance of the UK (a trend of the last two to three years).

    Rally in banks and UK asset management stocks

    As noted earlier in our valuations section, UK banks are notable for being on discounted valuations. If 2018 and 2019 have been characterised by uncertainty, the removal of some of that uncertainty has the potential to unlock pent-up private investment (see comment of Severfield below as a further example). Should we start to see this improvement in investment after the election, we believe UK banks are likely to rally on improving economic conditions and growth, and the potential for a steeper yield curve benefiting future earnings.

    Following the EU referendum, the UK has also seen an outflow from UK asset managers. We would anticipate that that these flows have the potential to reverse if the outlook for the UK as risk premiums for UK assets fall.
    Stocks to highlight include Barclays (BARC.L, market cap £30bn), Lloyds Banking (LLOY.L, market cap £44bn), Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS.l, market cap £28bn) on the large cap banks, Jupiter Fund Management (JUP.L, market cap £1.8bn), Standard Life Aberdeen (SLA.L, market cap £7.3bn) and M&G (MNG.L, market cap £5.8bn). On the mid cap segment we would highlight Polar Capital (POLR.L, market cap £512m) and Gresham House (GHE.L, market cap £161m). We also believe that names such as Numis (NUM.L, market cap £278m) are worth focusing on as ECM activity levels are likely to pick up from the lows of 2019.

    Housing, infrastructure and energy efficiency stocks to benefit

    The 2019 Conservative manifesto appeared to water down previous 2017 proposals to build 300,000 homes a year. That target was always regarded with some scepticism given that level of new-build completions has not been achieved over the last two decades. In FY18/19, the figure reached 213,000 for new-build completions and including conversions was 241,000. Instead there is a pledge to continue progress towards the 300,000 target and a commitment to build one million new homes over the next parliament (200,000 a year, effectively). We think that the supportive policy towards the housing sector, in particular extending Help to Buy to 2023, plus the removal of market uncertainty and a pledge to hold income taxes, will be a boost to the housing sector.

    The housing policy came with a commitment to spend on infrastructure (schools, GP surgeries, etc) before housing and a pledge to invest £100bn on new infrastructure. The pledge to improve energy efficiency for social housing by committing to spend £6.3bn in England is also noteworthy.

    In terms of stocks, house builders such as Taylor Wimpey (TW.L, market cap £6n), Persimmon (PSN.L, market cap £8bn), Barratt Developments (BDEV.L, market cap £7bn), Redrow (RDW.L, market cap £2bn), Bovis (BVS.L, market cap £2bn) and the less well-known Inland Homes are all likely to benefit. We also think names such as Sureserve (SURS.L, market cap £52m), which are focused on improving energy efficiency for housing associations, may benefit as well.

    On the infrastructure side, a key difference to the subdued activity of 2019 vs a decade ago was that when Severfield (SFR.L, market cap £226m) came to report interims this year, it had a significantly larger order book compared to a decade ago. The uncertainty of 2019 has led to decisions being deferred and we believe this has a good probability of starting to unwind in 2020. Severfield is fairly late stage in the cycle as structural steel tends to be used in the later stages of a construction process.

    Polypipe’s (PLP.L, market cap £1bn) products are used much earlier in the infrastructure cycle. Operating in the residential, commercial, civil and infrastructure sectors, this manufacturer of plastic piping systems benefits from diverse growth drivers. Historically, Polypipe has maintained its high operating margin and resilient performance in challenging trading environments. With an acquisitive strategy of becoming a ‘one-stop shop’ for its customers, we believe it is well placed to diversify further by geography. Polypipe has a flexible cost base and a high operating margin at c 18%. Notwithstanding recent acquisitions, net debt stands at c 2x adjusted cash profits, which indicates that the group is not over-stretching itself at present. Given the higher quality of earnings relative to the sector, we believe the shares are attractively priced trading on 12x forward earnings.

    Continued rotation out of large-cap beneficiaries of weak sterling

    We have already seen the FTSE 250 outperform the FTSE 100 over the last year as the attractions of the more domestically focused FTSE 250 have grown. We would anticipate this continuing in the event of a Conservative win. FTSE 100 earners such as Diageo, GlaxoSmithKline and Glencore are likely to come under pressure. In the FTSE 250, we would highlight stocks such as:

    • HarbourVest (HVPEa.L, market cap £1bn), a listed private equity play that has demonstrated a strong track record of delivering uncorrelated NAV returns but, despite the UK making up a small proportion of its portfolio, the stock price has been highly correlated to the UK market.
    • TalkTalk (TALK.L, market cap £1bn), a UK telecom services provider, where the sale of FibreNation, which stalled when Jeremy Corbyn raised the possibility of nationalising BT, has a greater probability of concluding.
    • Primary Health Properties (PHP.L, market cap £2bn), a long-term investor in primary healthcare properties in the UK and Republic of Ireland. The commitments to increase NHS spend on building GP surgeries are supportive. Accelerating rental growth, asset management initiatives, acquisition opportunities, the capital resources to fund these, lower debt costs and significant refinancing opportunities all bode well for future growth.
    • Subscribe
      Related Content

      ResearchThemesEvents

      ExplainsInsights


General disclaimer and copyright
This report has been prepared and issued by Edison. Edison Investment Research standard fees are £49,500 pa for the production and broad dissemination of a detailed note (Outlook) following by regular (typically quarterly) update notes. Fees are paid upfront in cash without recourse. Edison may seek additional fees for the provision of roadshows and related IR services for the client but does not get remunerated for any investment banking services. We never take payment in stock, options or warrants for any of our services.
Accuracy of content: All information used in the publication of this report has been compiled from publicly available sources that are believed to be reliable, however we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this report and have not sought for this information to be independently verified. Opinions contained in this report represent those of the research department of Edison at the time of publication. Forward-looking information or statements in this report contain information that is based on assumptions, forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable, and therefore involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of their subject matter to be materially different from current expectations.
Exclusion of Liability: To the fullest extent allowed by law, Edison shall not be liable for any direct, indirect or consequential losses, loss of profits, damages, costs or expenses incurred or suffered by you arising out or in connection with the access to, use of or reliance on any information contained on this note.
No personalised advice: The information that we provide should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as, personalised advice. Also, the information provided by us should not be construed by any subscriber or prospective subscriber as Edison’s solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect, any transaction in a security. The securities described in the report may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors.
Investment in securities mentioned: Edison has a restrictive policy relating to personal dealing and conflicts of interest. Edison Group does not conduct any investment business and, accordingly, does not itself hold any positions in the securities mentioned in this report. However, the respective directors, officers, employees and contractors of Edison may have a position in any or related securities mentioned in this report, subject to Edison's policies on personal dealing and conflicts of interest.
Copyright: Copyright 2019 Edison Investment Research Limited (Edison). All rights reserved FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”) © FTSE 2019. “FTSE®” is a trade mark of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and is used by FTSE International Limited under license. All rights in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings vest in FTSE and/or its licensors. Neither FTSE nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings or underlying data. No further distribution of FTSE Data is permitted without FTSE’s express written consent.

Australia
Edison Investment Research Pty Ltd (Edison AU) is the Australian subsidiary of Edison. Edison AU is a Corporate Authorised Representative (1252501) of Crown Wealth Group Pty Ltd who holds an Australian Financial Services Licence (Number: 494274). This research is issued in Australia by Edison AU and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 of Australia. Any advice given by Edison AU is general advice only and does not take into account your personal circumstances, needs or objectives. You should, before acting on this advice, consider the appropriateness of the advice, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. If our advice relates to the acquisition, or possible acquisition, of a particular financial product you should read any relevant Product Disclosure Statement or like instrument.

New Zealand
The research in this document is intended for New Zealand resident professional financial advisers or brokers (for use in their roles as financial advisers or brokers) and habitual investors who are “wholesale clients” for the purpose of the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (FAA) (as described in sections 5(c) (1)(a), (b) and (c) of the FAA). This is not a solicitation or inducement to buy, sell, subscribe, or underwrite any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. For the purpose of the FAA, the content of this report is of a general nature, is intended as a source of general information only and is not intended to constitute a recommendation or opinion in relation to acquiring or disposing (including refraining from acquiring or disposing) of securities. The distribution of this document is not a “personalised service” and, to the extent that it contains any financial advice, is intended only as a “class service” provided by Edison within the meaning of the FAA (i.e. without taking into account the particular financial situation or goals of any person). As such, it should not be relied upon in making an investment decision.

United Kingdom
This document is prepared and provided by Edison for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation for investment in any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. A marketing communication under FCA Rules, this document has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
This Communication is being distributed in the United Kingdom and is directed only at (i) persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments, i.e. investment professionals within the meaning of Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended (the "FPO") (ii) high net-worth companies, unincorporated associations or other bodies within the meaning of Article 49 of the FPO and (iii) persons to whom it is otherwise lawful to distribute it. The investment or investment activity to which this document relates is available only to such persons. It is not intended that this document be distributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other class of persons and in any event and under no circumstances should persons of any other description rely on or act upon the contents of this document.
This Communication is being supplied to you solely for your information and may not be reproduced by, further distributed to or published in whole or in part by, any other person.

United States
The Investment Research is a publication distributed in the United States by Edison Investment Research, Inc. Edison Investment Research, Inc. is registered as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison relies upon the "publishers' exclusion" from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws. This report is a bona fide publication of general and regular circulation offering impersonal investment-related advice, not tailored to a specific investment portfolio or the needs of current and/or prospective subscribers. As such, Edison does not offer or provide personal advice and the research provided is for informational purposes only. No mention of a particular security in this report constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that or any security, or that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person.