Last close As at 05/08/2026
—
— 0.00 (0.00%)
Market capitalisation
—
Research: Financials
Secure Trust Bank
Written by
Secure Trust Bank |
A strategically flexible bank |
Company update |
Banks |
16 June 2016 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analysts
Secure Trust Bank is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders in Arbuthnot Banking Group (ARBB) have approved the sale of shares in Secure Trust Bank (STB) that will leave the former parent as a sub-20% shareholder in the group. STB already has significant capital headroom to accommodate strong organic loan growth following the sale of Everyday Loans Group. Its plan to seek a Main Market listing will enable it to appeal to a broader investor audience, leaving it better placed to consider share issuance, providing greater flexibility to pursue a wider range of strategic options. This comes at a time of rapid growth and proliferation of contenders among specialist lenders and challenger banks.
Year end |
Operating income (£m) |
PBT* |
EPS* |
DPS |
P/E |
Yield |
12/14 |
63.7 |
17.5 |
155.8 |
68.0 |
16.0 |
2.7 |
12/15 |
92.1 |
24.8 |
170.4 |
72.0** |
14.6 |
2.9 |
12/16e |
123.8 |
33.9 |
155.9 |
76.0 |
16.0 |
3.1 |
12/17e |
147.1 |
49.8 |
217.2 |
95.0 |
11.5 |
3.8 |
Note: *PBT and EPS are normalised, excluding amortisation of acquired intangibles, exceptional items and share-based payments. **2015 DPS ex 165p special dividend.
Growth and change create opportunity
Secure Trust Bank has recorded growth in customer loans and earnings per share of over 40% pa compound between 2011 and 2015 reflecting successful development of its specialist retail and commercial lending businesses against a favourable background in which the large banks’ attention is focused on core businesses and strengthening capital positions. While challengers and specialist lenders have generally seen strong growth, like STB, they still account for only a small part of the market. The emergence of a range of contenders, each with their own market and shareholder profile, creates a dynamic market and there should be opportunities for valuable scale efficiencies for a player that can successfully consolidate.
Independence an important turning point
The reduction of ARBB’s stake to below 20% and the planned move to the Main Market appears well timed, freeing STB to consider additional strategic options that may require equity issuance. While rapid growth and acquisitions carry risk, STB’s long history and the experience of its management team are positive indicators that organic growth will continue to be carefully managed and any acquisition candidate assessed in a balanced way.
Valuation: Still cautiously valued
We have not changed our earnings estimates or our ROE/COE-based valuation estimate of 3,600p. Using the same model the current share price implies a sustainable return on equity of below 15%, broadly consistent with our estimate for the current year, but markedly below subsequent years as surplus capital is employed.
New options for established specialist/challenger
Incorporated in 1954, Secure Trust (STB) is a well-established specialist lender, which, since 1985, has been a subsidiary of Arbuthnot Banking Group (ARBB). Secure Trust was floated on AIM in 2011 and in 2012 it acquired the Everyday Loans Group (unsecured personal lending). Then, in 2013, it purchased V12 Finance Group (point of sale retail loans) and the assets of Debt Managers Group (debt collection services). STB has traditionally focused on the provision of banking services to customers who may not have been well serviced by the large incumbent banks. The scope of business has progressively broadened in recent years from consumer unsecured lending to include motor, retail point of sale and business finance (which includes real estate finance, invoice discounting, factoring and asset finance).
In the years since the financial crisis the pace of STB’s loan growth has been rapid (64% annual compound 2010-15) focused in particular on secured lending. Exhibit 1 shows the progression and segmental analysis of customer lending. Furthering the trend to secured lending, the sale of Everyday Loans Group was announced last year and completed in April this year, generating a profit of £115m that supports the proposed payment of a special dividend of 165p (£30m) and provides substantial capital headroom (estimated pro forma common equity tier 1 ratio – CET1 – of 24%). Management has indicated that it aims to achieve three broadly equal legs to the business: consumer, business and mortgage lending.
|
Exhibit 1: STB customer loans since 2010 |
Exhibit 2: STB segmental customer loans (£m) |
|
|
|
Source: Secure Trust Bank |
Source: Secure Trust Bank |
|
Exhibit 1: STB customer loans since 2010 |
|
|
Source: Secure Trust Bank |
|
Exhibit 2: STB segmental customer loans (£m) |
|
|
Source: Secure Trust Bank |
No longer a subsidiary
In May 2016, ARBB announced the conditional sale of shares in STB to institutional shareholders, prospectively taking its shareholding from 51.9% to below 20%. The sale was priced at £25, a 10.7% discount to the closing price the day before the announcement. Following approval of the sale of shares at the ARBB general meeting this week, the sale will complete leaving the former parent as an 18.9% shareholder in STB. ARBB has undertaken not to sell further STB shares unless agreed by the book runner, Stifel.
From AIM to Main
The group has confirmed that, following completion of the share sale, it will seek to move from AIM to a premium listing on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange. In order to address the corporate governance structure as part of this process, the chairman of STB and chief executive of ARBB, Sir Henry Angest, has indicated that he intends to initiate a search for a new independent non-executive chairman for STB. The move is likely to take between three and six months.
Opens new options
The combination of STB’s change in status from being a quoted subsidiary and the move to the Main Market should enhance the company’s ability to issue equity by widening the potential investor audience. This in turn would broaden the range of strategic options for STB should an appropriate opportunity present itself.
In this respect, STB might arguably have greater flexibility than some of its peers. Among the specialist/challenger peers included in our comparative table (Exhibit 4), a number have significant strategic stakes that might be regarded as an overhang or complication were share issuance to be contemplated; Aldermore, Arbuthnot Banking Group, Metrobank, OneSavings Bank, Private & Commercial Finance, S&U and Shawbrook all have strategic shareholdings greater than 40% (source Thomson Reuters).
Our existing forecasts assume a continued rapid pace of organic loan growth at STB reflecting the favourable opportunity that exists for specialist lenders to address areas of the market that are non-core for the large incumbent banks. As shown in Exhibit 3, we assume ex-ELG customer loans grow from £961m in 2015 to £2,578m in 2018. (For further discussion of the market outlook and our estimates see our note Growing into its capital, 26 April 2016.)
Exhibit 3: Loan book estimates
£m |
2014 |
2015 |
2016e |
2017e |
2018e |
Personal unsecured |
88 |
74 |
74 |
78 |
82 |
Motor vehicles |
138 |
166 |
199 |
239 |
286 |
Retail finance |
117 |
220 |
276 |
344 |
430 |
Mortgage |
0 |
0 |
20 |
200 |
400 |
Total retail lending |
342 |
460 |
569 |
861 |
1,199 |
Real estate finance |
134 |
368 |
644 |
837 |
1,005 |
Asset finance |
5 |
71 |
95 |
129 |
155 |
Commercial finance |
5 |
29 |
100 |
150 |
200 |
Total commercial lending |
143 |
468 |
839 |
1,116 |
1,359 |
Other |
43 |
32 |
28 |
24 |
20 |
Total lending |
528.6 |
961 |
1,436 |
2,001 |
2,578 |
Source: Edison Investment Research, Secure Trust Bank. Note: Historical numbers ex-ELG.
In addition to the organic opportunity, which on our forecasts to end 2018 can be met with existing capital resources, the expansion in the number of challenger and specialist lenders in the UK market increases the potential for value-accretive M&A activity. This could provide scale efficiencies and shareholder value for participants.
STB’s name has been linked with Williams & Glyn and the Co-op Bank, for example, and STB’s Paul Lynam has been quoted in the Financial Times saying that the company would be interested in exploring whether Williams & Glyn would represent an opportunity, “alongside other things we review from time to time”. The apparent challenges in separating Williams & Glyn systems from parent RBS suggests this exploration may not take place in the near term.
STB’s management has not set out characteristics of a target it would consider, although it emphasises the importance of considering the balance of risk and reward when assessing the valuation of a potential purchase. We would also expect management to take account of any opportunity to diversify and lower the cost of funding while maintaining or increasing the breadth of exposures within the loan book. The existing and developing areas of expertise within STB span retail and commercial markets as indicated by the loan book analysis in Exhibit 3. In addition to this, the experience of Chief Executive Paul Lynam and Chief Financial Officer Neeraj Kapur are relevant. Lynam spent 22 years at NatWest and RBS before joining STB in 2010 with responsibilities that included running the SME banking business across the UK and four years as managing director of Lombard North Central (the largest finance and leasing business in Europe). Kapur spent 11 years in professional practice before joining RBS in 2001 and his roles included CFO at Lombard North Central; he joined the STB board in 2011.
Valuation comparisons
We have not changed our valuation calculation, which, based on an ROE/COE model, indicates a value of c 3,600p. Our assumptions include a cost of equity of 10%, nominal growth of 5% and a return on equity of 19% (similar to our estimate for 2018).
For reference we have refreshed our comparative table (Exhibit 4). STB trades at an above-average price to book, but also has an above-average historical ROE and yield.
Exhibit 4: Challenger/specialist lenders comparative table
Price |
Market Cap |
Hist PER |
Yield |
ROE |
Price to book |
|
Secure Trust Bank |
2,490.0 |
453.0 |
15.8 |
2.9 |
21.8 |
3.2 |
Arbuthnot Banking Group |
1,591.5 |
237.0 |
18.4 |
1.8 |
10.7 |
1.9 |
1PM |
67.0 |
35.2 |
18.1 |
0.5 |
10.8 |
1.4 |
Aldermore |
183.9 |
634.0 |
8.1 |
0.0 |
17.2 |
1.2 |
Close Brothers |
1,211.0 |
1,815.9 |
9.7 |
4.4 |
18.2 |
1.8 |
CYBG |
265.3 |
2,337.6 |
0.0 |
3.6 |
0.7 |
|
Metrobank |
2,052.0 |
1,647.6 |
0.0 |
-16.4 |
4.0 |
|
OneSavings Bank |
298.1 |
724.6 |
8.7 |
2.9 |
29.1 |
2.3 |
Paragon |
273.0 |
781.6 |
7.7 |
4.0 |
11.8 |
0.8 |
Private and Commercial Finance |
31.3 |
49.7 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
15.1 |
2.1 |
Provident Financial |
2,593.0 |
3,828.3 |
17.1 |
4.6 |
33.0 |
5.4 |
Shawbrook |
225.2 |
564.1 |
9.3 |
0.0 |
20.0 |
1.5 |
S&U |
2588.0 |
309.3 |
4.4 |
2.9% |
15.2 |
2.4 |
11.8 |
1.6 |
14.6 |
2.2 |
Source: Bloomberg, Edison Investment Research. Note: Prices as at 15 June 2016. *Ex-Metrobank.
A comparison of P/NAV versus ROE (Exhibit 5) shows STB broadly ‘in the pack’. Prospective growth for STB and the group’s ability to regain the historical return on equity of over 20% as it redeploys the capital released by the sale of ELG will be key drivers of future performance. The valuation of Metrobank is an obvious example of the market’s willingness to apply a multiple reflecting prospective profitability (management targets a return on equity of 20%). For STB the additional strategic flexibility that it will enjoy as an independent company with a listing on the Main Market broadens the scope for accretive M&A activity (although any transaction would also carry normal pricing and implementation risks).
|
Exhibit 5: Challenger banks/specialist lenders P/NAV versus ROE |
|
|
Source: Bloomberg, Edison Investment Research. Note: ALD (Aldermore), ARBB (Arbuthnot Banking Grp), CBG (Close Brothers), CYBG (CYBG plc), MTRO (Metrobank), OPM (1PM), OSB (OneSavings Bank), PAG (Paragon), PFC (Private and Commercial Finance), PFG (Provident Financial), SHAW (Shawbrook), SUS (S&U). |
Exhibit 6: Financial summary (£m except where stated)
Year end December |
2014 |
2015 |
2016e |
2017e |
2018e |
Net interest income |
49.2 |
78.9 |
110.9 |
135.5 |
168.8 |
Net commission income |
14.5 |
13.2 |
12.9 |
11.6 |
10.1 |
Total operating income |
63.7 |
92.1 |
123.8 |
147.1 |
178.9 |
Total G&A expenses (exc non-recurring items) below |
(37.5) |
(50.5) |
(64.8) |
(66.9) |
(78.7) |
Operating profit pre impairments & exceptionals |
26.2 |
41.6 |
59.0 |
80.2 |
100.2 |
Impairment charges on loans |
(8.7) |
(16.8) |
(25.1) |
(30.4) |
(36.7) |
Other income |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Operating profit post impairments |
17.5 |
24.8 |
33.9 |
49.8 |
63.5 |
Non-recurring items* |
0.0 |
0.0 |
115.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Pre-tax profit |
17.5 |
24.8 |
148.9 |
49.8 |
63.5 |
Corporation tax |
(3.6) |
(5.5) |
(6.9) |
(9.7) |
(11.2) |
Tax rate |
0.2 |
22.2% |
4.6% |
19.5% |
17.7% |
Bank tax surcharge |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(0.7) |
(2.0) |
(3.1) |
Profit after tax – continuing basis |
13.9 |
19.3 |
141.3 |
38.1 |
49.2 |
Discontinued business |
6.6 |
9.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(Loss)/profit for year |
20.5 |
28.7 |
141.3 |
38.1 |
49.2 |
Minority interests |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Net income attributable to equity shareholders |
20.5 |
28.7 |
141.3 |
38.1 |
49.2 |
Company reported pre-tax earnings adjustments |
7.2 |
2.8 |
(112.4) |
1.8 |
1.6 |
Company reported underlying earnings after tax and minorities |
26.1 |
31.0 |
28.4 |
39.5 |
50.5 |
Average basic number of shares in issue (m) |
16.7 |
18.2 |
18.2 |
18.2 |
18.2 |
Average diluted number of shares in issue (m) |
17.1 |
18.5 |
18.5 |
18.5 |
18.5 |
Reported diluted EPS (p) |
81.5 |
104.1 |
761.7 |
205.2 |
265.1 |
Underlying diluted EPS (p) |
155.8 |
170.4 |
155.9 |
217.2 |
277.6 |
Ordinary DPS (p) |
68.0 |
72.0 |
76.0 |
95.0 |
107.0 |
Special DPS (p) |
0.0 |
165.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Net interest/average loans |
9.71% |
9.97% |
9.26% |
7.88% |
7.37% |
Impairments/average loans |
1.72% |
2.12% |
2.10% |
1.77% |
1.60% |
Cost income ratio |
58.9% |
54.8% |
52.4% |
45.5% |
44.0% |
Net customer loans |
622.5 |
960.6 |
1,436.1 |
2,001.0 |
2,578.0 |
Other assets |
159.8 |
286.8 |
294.1 |
353.1 |
385.2 |
Total assets |
782.3 |
1,247.4 |
1,730.2 |
2,354.2 |
2,963.2 |
Total customer deposits |
608.4 |
1,033.1 |
1,421.9 |
1,961.8 |
2,527.4 |
Other liabilities |
49.0 |
73.1 |
69.1 |
129.3 |
141.1 |
Total liabilities |
657.4 |
1,106.2 |
1,491.0 |
2,091.1 |
2,668.6 |
Net assets |
124.9 |
141.2 |
239.2 |
263.1 |
294.6 |
Minorities |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Shareholders' equity |
124.9 |
141.2 |
239.2 |
263.1 |
294.6 |
Opening shareholders' equity |
61.6 |
124.9 |
141.2 |
239.2 |
263.1 |
Profit in period |
20.5 |
28.7 |
141.3 |
38.1 |
49.2 |
Other comprehensive income |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Ordinary dividends |
(10.2) |
(12.6) |
(13.3) |
(14.2) |
(17.6) |
Special dividend |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(30.0) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Share-based payments |
0.5 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Issue of shares |
53.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Share issuance costs |
(1.2) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Closing shareholders' equity |
124.9 |
141.2 |
239.2 |
263.1 |
294.6 |
Period end shares in issue (m) |
18.2 |
18.2 |
18.2 |
18.2 |
18.2 |
NAV per share (p) |
687 |
776 |
1,315 |
1,446 |
1,620 |
Tangible NAV per share (tNAV) (p) |
641 |
738 |
1,276 |
1,408 |
1,581 |
Return on average tNAV |
29.0% |
25.2% |
14.1% |
16.3% |
18.8% |
Average loans |
477.3 |
821.9 |
1,191.5 |
1,717.5 |
2,289.7 |
Average deposits |
499.7 |
827.9 |
1,206.0 |
1,687.3 |
2,244.8 |
Loans/deposits |
102.3% |
93.0% |
101.0% |
102.0% |
102.0% |
Risk exposure |
649.8 |
998.5 |
1,427.1 |
1,858.9 |
2,291.6 |
Common equity tier 1 ratio |
18.7% |
13.6% |
16.4% |
13.8% |
12.6% |
Source: Company accounts, Edison Investment Research. Note: *£115m in 2015 relates to the disposal of Everyday Loans Group.
|
Research: Investment Companies
Jupiter UK Growth Investment Trust