Last close As at 05/08/2026
—
— 0.00 (0.00%)
Market capitalisation
—
Research: Healthcare
Over the past several months Selvita has been executing on its new R&D-focused multi-year strategy funded by the share issue in March 2018 raising PLN134m and other sources. While sales continue to grow at an impressive rate in the Services business (up 53% in Q118), R&D progress across the pipeline has been reported in several publications in recent months. Our Selvita valuation is PLN1.30bn or PLN81.2/share versus PLN81.7/share previously.
Written by
Selvita |
Progress across pipeline; Services sales up 53% |
Q118 company update |
Pharma & biotech |
29 June 2018 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analyst
Selvita is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Over the past several months Selvita has been executing on its new R&D-focused multi-year strategy funded by the share issue in March 2018 raising PLN134m and other sources. While sales continue to grow at an impressive rate in the Services business (up 53% in Q118), R&D progress across the pipeline has been reported in several publications in recent months. Our Selvita valuation is PLN1.30bn or PLN81.2/share versus PLN81.7/share previously.
Year end |
Revenue (PLNm) |
PBT* |
EPS* |
DPS |
P/E |
Yield |
12/16 |
66.7 |
4.6 |
0.64 |
0.0 |
N/M |
N/A |
12/17 |
105.9 |
10.2 |
0.51 |
0.0 |
N/M |
N/A |
12/18e |
101.3 |
14.3 |
0.91 |
0.0 |
N/M |
N/A |
12/19e |
116.8 |
(4.5) |
(0.26) |
0.0 |
N/M |
N/A |
Note: *PBT and EPS are normalised, excluding amortisation of acquired intangibles, exceptional items and share-based payments.
Multiple data releases in Q118
Over the past several months Selvita has made progress with its projects across the pipeline and presented fresh preclinical data in several publications and a poster presentation at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in April 2018. These include a peer-reviewed article published in Oncotarget describing SEL24’s existing data in AML. The article highlights how SEL24 specifically inhibits PIM- and FLT3-ITD-related pathways and exhibits broader anti-tumour activity in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) models compared to selective FLT3-ITD or PIM inhibitors. The latest SEL120 data were presented at AACR in a poster presentation. Preparations for the clinical development of SEL120 are ongoing and a Phase I trial could start in Q119. Poster presentations on two other up-and-coming preclinical assets (SHMT2 and dual A2A/B2B inhibitors) are also summarised in this note.
Organic services sales growth continues
Selvita reported Q118 revenues of PLN23.3m (-13% y-o-y) were largely in line with our expectations. The y-o-y decrease was due to the significant increase in income recognized in Q117 following the out-licensing of SEL24 to Menarini Group. Adjusting for this, annual sales grew 35%. The Services segment generated sales of PLN13.6m (excluding subsidies) in Q118, up 53% y-o-y, reflecting continuing solid organic growth. The disclosed cash position at end May 2018 was PLN158m, which includes proceeds from the share issue in Q118. Debt at end FY17 was PLN4.9m. Small changes to our adjusted estimates have a minimal effect on adjusted EPS.
Valuation: Revised to PLN1.30bn or PLN81.2/share
Our Selvita valuation is virtually unchanged at PLN1.30bn or PLN81.2/share versus PLN1.30bn or PLN81.7/share. Near-term catalysts include a data readout from the Phase I/II trial with SEL24 run by the Menarini Group, the initiation of the SEL120 Phase I trial and the potential out-licensing of a preclinical project from the early pipeline.
Selvita is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited
R&D update: Multiple data publications across pipeline
Selvita has been executing on its new, multi-year strategy following a successful share issue in March 2018 that raised PLN134m. The company will raise additional funds from sales, subsidies and loans to a total expected amount of c PLN390m. All the money raised will fund Selvita’s accelerated R&D strategy and expansion of other business areas over the next several years. We discussed in detail the company’s ongoing programmes in our last outlook report. Since then Selvita has made progress with its projects across the pipeline and presented fresh preclinical data in several publications as well as posters at the AACR in April 2018.
|
Exhibit 1: Selvita’s R&D pipeline |
|
|
Source: Selvita |
Targeted therapeutics: SEL24/MEN1703 – Phase I/II enrolling
The Phase I/II trial with SEL24 in AML has resumed in all three US recruitment sites after the clinical hold had been lifted by the FDA in December 2017 and two additional US sites were opened. Menarini Group, which has in-licensed the asset, and Selvita continue to expect the first data by the end of this year. In March 2018, a peer-reviewed article was published in Oncotarget describing SEL24’s existing data in AML. The article highlights how SEL24 specifically inhibits PIM- and FLT3-related pathways and exhibits broader anti-tumour activity in AML compared to selective FLT3 or PIM inhibitors.
FMS-like tyrosine kinase receptor-3 gene (FLT3) is one of the most common genetic lesions in AML (around 25% of newly diagnosed AML cases) and, although its inhibition has been shown to be effective in clinical trials, resistance to treatment develops rapidly. The latest achievement in this area was Daiichi Sankyo’s results presentation from its Phase III QuANTUM-R study at the European Hematology Association (EHA), 14-17 June in Stockholm, Sweden. The trial tested quizartinib as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory AML with FLT3-ITD mutations after first-line treatment with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The results demonstrated that quizartinib significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) compared to standard of care salvage chemotherapy (27% versus 20% respectively, at week 52). While this is positive news and quizartinib is likely to capture some market share when launched, this is a subgroup of difficult patients who carry the FLT3-ITD mutation and have already failed first-line treatment; there are no other targeted therapies approved for these patients (around 25% of newly diagnosed AML cases carry the mutation and most of them relapse). In addition, as described below, Selvita’s SEL24 is potentially effective in AML despite the FLT3 status, pan-FLT3 inhibitor. Lastly, while the OS improvement in the QuANTUM-R trial was significant, in absolute terms it amounted to a median OS of 27 weeks in the quizartinib arm and 20.4 weeks in the standard of care arm; this means the unmet medical need will still be high. We presented a more detailed overview of the FLT3 inhibitor landscape in our last outlook report.
PIM kinases are major oncogenes and downstream targets with expression triggered by FLT3-induced STAT5 activity. The expression of PIM kinases amplifies FLT3’s oncogenic potential in addition to other pro-oncogenic signalling, thus presenting a rationale for a dual FLT3/PIM inhibition. Previously, third-party data have shown PIM expression increases cancer resistance to FLT3 inhibitors, while PIM inhibition would restore cancer sensitivity to FLT3 inhibitors. Selvita’s SEL24, a first-in-class dual inhibitor of PIM and FLT3 kinases, can simultaneously inhibit both kinases and provides a novel treatment strategy. The newly published results summarise data from various in vitro and in vivo studies of SEL24 comparing it to control or active treatment with a selective PIM inhibitor (AZD1208, AstraZeneca) or FLT3 inhibitor (AC220, Daiichi Sankyo):
■
Synergistic effect of dual inhibition. SEL24 has been described as a potent, dual inhibitor of PIM and FLT3 kinases and has anti-proliferative activity in AML cell lines, which was broader than that of selective PIM inhibitors or FLT3 inhibitors. The combination of AZD1208 and AC220 also demonstrated a synergistic effect further supporting a dual specificity treatment rationale.
■
Overcoming resistance. Point mutation in the activation loop of the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) is another type of activating mutation of FLT3. FLT3-TKD is known to cause resistance to FLT3-ITD specific inhibitors. Therefore, as expected, AML cell lines with FLT3-TKD mutation were less sensitive to a specific FLT3-ITD inhibitor (AC220). A selective PIM inhibitor (AZD1208) only marginally affected viability regardless of the FLT3 status. In stark contrast, SEL24 with its dual targeting was similarly effective in all tested mutant FLT3 cells.
■
Efficacy in vivo animal models (Exhibit 2). SEL24 was tested in several in vivo xenograft models.
•
In a single-agent test in mice bearing FLT3-ITD tumours (MV-4-11) a dose dependent reduction in tumour volume by 67-82% has been observed (Exhibit 2A). In the FLT3-WT (wild-type, ie not mutated) model (MOML-16) c 100% tumour growth inhibition was observed at certain doses.
•
To compare the efficacy of SEL24 versus PIM inhibitor AZD1208 and FLT3-ITD inhibitor AC220, the drugs were used in two models – MOLM-13 (FLT3-ITD) and KG-1 (FLT3-WT). SEL24 reduced tumour growth by c 50% in both models. AZD1208 had a variable effect with 20% response in FLT3-ITD and 60% in FLT3-WT. AC220 had no effect in FLT3-WT mice, but reduced the volume growth in the FLT3-ITD tumour by 100% surpassing the effect of SEL24 (Exhibits 2B, A). Researchers stipulated that this could have been caused by SEL24’s relatively short half-life. Previously, other in-house data (not included in the article) showed higher tumour growth inhibition by SEL24 with twice-daily dosing (the current study used a once-daily regime) (Exhibit 2B).
Of particular note is that SEL24 had a largely similar effect in both the FLT3-WT and FLT3-ITD models (although in the FLT3-ITD model there is the potential to observe even higher efficacy with different dose regimens as explained above). PIM kinases are known to be expressed also in FLT3-WT AML cells. Therefore SEL24 could, theoretically, potentially be used to treat AML patients even with FLT3-WT status. However, while a biomarker to identify AML patient status already exists in FLT3, in the PIM case it still needs to be developed, ie to identify which patients are likely to respond better to SEL24 with respect to PIM status. Selvita has already done some work in identifying such biomarkers. While SEL24 is in the hands of Menarini, the potential to expand the accessible AML patient population beyond FLT3-ITD could become attractive and patient stratification according to selected PIM biomarkers could be part of the later stage clinical development of SEL24, in our view.
In our previous outlook report we described other selective FLT3 and PIM inhibitors in the industry, existing data with these agents and the competitive advantages of SEL24 given its dual mechanism of action.
|
Exhibit 2: In vivo models with SEL24, AZD1208 and AC220 |
|
|
Source: W Czardybon et al. MOLM-16, MV-4-11, KG-1 and MOLM-13 cell lines were implanted subcutaneously in immunodeficient mice. |
Targeted therapeutics platform: SEL120 – new data presented
Preparations for the clinical development of SEL120 (first-in-class selective CDK8 inhibitor) are ongoing. Selvita plans to file an IND application in 2018, with a Phase I trial following subsequently, likely in Q119. CDK8 is a uniquely differentiated target and plays a part in a multi-protein complex that regulates gene expression. So far, preclinical studies point to potential efficacy in haematological malignancies, which should be further explored in Phase I. Preclinical efficacy has also been established in solid tumours, such as colorectal cancer or triple-negative breast cancer, and in combination therapies with immunoncology products, which are all potential indications for expansion in later trials. In addition, Selvita is developing SEL120 in cooperation with the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society for AML. Newest preclinical findings were presented at the AACR conference in April 2018, while previous data have been discussed in our outlook reports.
With the AACR presentation, Selvita demonstrated the anti-cancer effects of SEL120 by the elimination of leukaemia stem cells (LSCs). LSCs can be described as a subtype of AML cells that are the most difficult to eliminate with conventional therapy and the most responsible for relapse due to their capacity of self-renewal, proliferation and differentiation (D Pollyea et al). While described in the 1990s, treatments specifically targeting cancer stem cells are still in development stages (X Wang et al). Newly presented results describing SEL120’s effects in vitro and in vivo AML models include:
■
Activated STAT signalling and CD34 expression were previously described as features of leukaemia stem cells (LSC) that contribute to AML relapse through treatment-resistant clones. Selvita has shown that SEL120 is effective with nanomolar activity in these cell lines.
■
Treatment of CD34+ cells (feature of LSCs) with SEL120 resulted in decreased levels of CD34+ and increased levels of CD38+ on the cell surface, indicating that SEL120 induces cell differentiation, ie immature leukaemic cells turn into mature blood cells. Gene expression analysis also confirmed such a pattern.
■
SEL120 was shown to have a synergistic effect when administered after the treatment with cytarabine and caused increased cancer cell death and decreased population of CD34+ cells. Cytarabine is one of the core combination drugs in treating AML.
■
In an in vivo model CD34 enriched or depleted MOLM-16 (AML) cells were inoculated subcutaneously into mice and CD34+ tumours exhibited the most robust tumour growth (Exhibit 3A). SEL120 was highly active in the CD34+ tumours (Exhibit 3B).
|
Exhibit 3: SEL120 is highly active in CD34+ tumours |
|
|
Source: E. Majewska et al. Selvita poster presentation, AACR meeting, Chicago, IL, April 2018 |
Cancer metabolism and immunometabolism: SHMT2 inhibitor
Of the multiple ongoing programmes in this platform (including two ongoing collaboration deals with Merck), in our last outlook report we introduced the company’s two internal programmes that are disclosed. The first revolves around a crucial metabolic pathway related to tumorigenesis involving serine synthesis. Over-activation of the serine synthesis pathway and upregulation of Serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT) makes cancer cells highly dependent on serine and has been described in over 20% of solid tumours. Selvita’s research focuses on the discovery of specific inhibitors of SHMT2. Selvita’s poster presentation at the AACR in April 2018 summarised the in vitro data accumulated so far. In cellular models, Selvita’s SHMT2 inhibitor has shown specificity and efficacy at nanomolar levels and the company is planning an in vivo proof-of-concept study for the lead molecules later this year.
Cancer metabolism and immunometabolism: A2A/A2B inhibitor
Natural molecule adenosine is a key element in immune regulation and many cancers have the ability to accumulate it, which allows them to escape detection by the immune system. Antagonising adenosine receptors (A2A/A2B) or inhibiting the enzymes of the adenosine synthesis pathway (CD39/CD73, another project in Selvita’s portfolio) was shown to restore the adenosine-suppressed anti-tumour response of the immune system.
While this type of technology is still mostly in early clinical development, over the past three years there have been multiple deals in the industry with values reaching $500m as large pharma in-license assets targeting this pathway. More recently, Arcus Biosciences, a US-based biotech company, underwent a successful IPO, raising $120m. The company is running Phase I/II trials with its lead drug candidates AB928, a dual adenosine receptor antagonist, and AB122, a PD-1 antibody. In September 2017, Taiho announced an option agreement with Arcus for a portfolio of regional rights in Asia (excluding China) to preclinical cancer immunotherapy candidates. The upfront and royalties were not disclosed, but Arcus will receive $35m over three years and could get $275m for each drug programme that Taiho in-licenses. Further news in this area came from a private Belgian biotech iTeos Therapeutics, which raised €75m from a consortium of investors in an oversubscribed funding round in June 2018. iTeos develops the A2A antagonist for cancer and aims to start clinical development with the new funds.
Selvita’s asset (SEL330) stands out, in our view, because of its dual A2A/A2B inhibition activity, while other technologies in the area mainly are selective A2A inhibitors. Selvita believes the relevant target populations could be broad, with the immunosuppressive environment prevalent in around 50% of all cancers. There is also a strong rationale for synergistic potential with checkpoint inhibitors. In Q118, Selvita continued work to identify the clinical candidate with the highest in vivo efficacy and also establish which combinations with other anticancer therapies (eg checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy) would be optimal for the clinical trials. Selvita’s poster presentation at the AACR meeting included existing data describing the discovery process and in vivo data. Main conclusions include:
■
Selvita’s discovered novel, dual A2A/A2B inhibitors are potent with picomolar activity in vitro.
■
SEL330 demonstrated dose-dependent activity to restore the adenosine agonist-impaired functionality of CD4+ and CD3+ human T-lymphocytes and rescue adenosine-suppressed cytotoxicity of NK cells. This indicates the potential to restore the anti-tumour response of the patient’s immune system.
■
SEL330 demonstrated synergistic activity with PD-1 inhibitor in syngeneic mouse cancer model (Exhibit 4).
|
Exhibit 4: SEL330 is synergistic with anti‐PD‐1 in mouse models |
|
|
Source: P. Węgrzyn, M. Gałęzowski et al. Selvita poster presentation, AACR meeting, Chicago, IL, April 2018 |
Immunology platform: STING inhibitors
The most advanced immunooncology project in this platform is STING (stimulator of interferon genes) pathway modulators. A STING receptor is a known mediator of the immune system, which when activated induces expression of type I interferon and other T-cell recruitment factors. This results in the activation of dendritic cells, which act as antigen presenting cells. The ultimate outcome is the specific immune response with ‘trained’ CD8+ T cells attacking the cancer. The strategic opportunity for STING agonists could be patients not responding to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), but also there is potential for use in combination with CPIs. The strong rationale for combinations is based on the fact that CPIs act late in the immunity cycle (makes the tumour ‘visible’ to T cells), while the STING pathway appears to prime the production of cancer-specific T-cells, so both technologies are potentially synergistic. Selvita identified a potentially first-in-class small molecule of the STING agonist, a direct protein binder. This unique structure and optimised ADME properties distinguish Selvita's compounds from the competitors that develop derivatives of nucleic acid which, due to their chemical nature, can mainly be used for inconvenient intratumoural injections. In Q118, Selvita worked on the optimisation of the lead compound, which is planned to be tested in in vivo proof-of-concept studies in 2018.
Another project in the inflammation field, NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitors, was spun out to NodThera and seeded together with Epidarex Capital in 2016 (detailed overview). Recent news outlined NodThera’s £28m fundraising from a consortium of investors, which indicates active development since then. NodThera centres on NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitors, a first-in-class technology, based on the scientific programme originated and developed at Selvita since 2012. Inflammasomes have been identified as the molecular mechanism behind the activation cascade of interleukin (IL)-1. IL-1 is a family of pro-inflammatory cytokines that have been widely implicated in pain, inflammation and autoimmune conditions and more recently in cancer. Therefore, NodThera’s focus is currently rather broad as the asset is in a preclinical stage. This will be narrowed down once past the proof-of-concept clinical trials, for which the new funds should be sufficient, according to the company.
Financials
Selvita’s reported Q118 revenues of PLN23.3m (-13% y-o-y) were largely in line with our expectations. The y-o-y decrease was due to a significant increase in income recognized in Q117 after the company out-licensed SEL24 to Menarini Group. Adjusting for this, annual sales grew by 35%. Selvita reports in three business segments: Services, Innovation (income from SEL24 was included in this segment) and Bioinformatics. Selvita’s commercial revenues include external income from customers allocated to the three segments, while subsidies are allocated to each of the segments. In Q118 commercial income was PLN17.9m (up 25%) and subsidies were PLN5.3m (up 88% y-o-y).
■
The Services segment generated sales of PLN13.6m (excluding subsidies) in Q118, an increase of 53% y-o-y, reflecting continuing solid organic growth.
■
Commercial revenues from the Innovation segment decreased 63% to PLN7.0m in Q118. The main reason was a PLN9.6m income item that was booked after the out-licensing of the most advanced product, SEL24, to the Menarini Group in March 2017. Commercial revenues from this segment come from payments related to different partnerships, such as milestone payments from drug discovery collaborations, and therefore tend to be volatile from quarter to quarter, but offer potentially higher margins. In the longer term, the Innovation segment includes Selvita’s own R&D pipeline activities so developing it is a strategic goal, which will be supported by substantial investments, according to plans.
■
Bioinformatics (Ardigen) segment recorded income of PLN1.5m versus PLN1.9m a year ago. This business was spun out from Selvita (which currently holds 52% of the shares) in October 2015. FY17 sales were PLN6.9m, a 101% y-o-y increase, so while still a small business for Selvita, the growth rate is encouraging.
Operating profit of PLN-874k was also in line with our expectations. As Selvita accelerates its R&D strategy, overall group profitability is not the core focus, in our view, as value creation is reoriented towards inflection points in R&D. Reported net profit of PLN19.9m includes PLN20.8m, which was the result of a change in treatment of Nodthera’s shares from the equity method to a fair value method. Selvita reported cash of PLN158m, which includes proceeds of PLN134m gross from the share issue in Q118, and it had PLN4.7m in debt.
We have made only minor revisions to our estimates. Namely, we have slightly increased FY18 subsidies from PLN29m to PLN30m, as May’s backlog is already PLN29.4m, and slightly increased depreciation. This has a minimal net effect on EPS. Our current FY18 revenue estimate is PLN101.3m growing to PLN116.8m in FY19. We forecast total operating costs rising from PLN92.7m to PLN107.9m in FY18 due to increasing R&D activities and continued increase in capacity in the Services segment. In addition, Selvita announced it will no longer capitalise certain R&D costs to be compliant with IFRS and will expense them in the P&L. Notably, our financial forecasts do not include any subsequent milestone payments from Menarini Group. Profit before tax, net profit and EPS in Exhibit 5 are adjusted for the change in accounting method of Nodthera’s shares from equity method to fair value.
Exhibit 5: Key changes to our financial forecasts and introduction of FY19 forecasts
PLN000s |
FY17 |
FY18e |
FY19e |
||||
Acual. |
Old |
New |
Change (%) |
Old |
New |
Change (%) |
|
Revenue |
105,872 |
100,294 |
101,294 |
+1% |
116,816 |
116,816 |
+0% |
---Services |
44,208 |
55,260 |
55,260 |
+0% |
67,417 |
67,417 |
+0% |
---Innovation |
36,727 |
8,000 |
8,000 |
+0% |
22,207 |
22,207 |
+0% |
---Bioinformatics |
6,885 |
7,574 |
7,574 |
+0% |
8,331 |
8,331 |
+0% |
---Subsidies |
17,591 |
29,000 |
30,000 |
+3% |
18,400 |
18,400 |
+0% |
Operating profit/loss (norm) |
13,222 |
1,324 |
(6,554) |
N/M |
3,420 |
(4,580) |
N/M |
Profit/loss before tax (norm)* |
10,183 |
260 |
(7,618) |
N/M |
2,415 |
(5,587) |
N/M |
Profit/loss after tax (norm)* |
7,315 |
247 |
(7,249) |
N/M |
2,246 |
(5,196) |
N/M |
EPS (norm) (PLN)* |
0.51 |
0.02 |
(0.49) |
N/M |
0.14 |
(0.33) |
N/M |
Source: Selvita accounts, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Indicated lines normalised for costs associated with share-based incentive programme: PLN5.9m in 2016 and PLN583k in 2017.
Valuation
Our valuation of Selvita is virtually unchanged at PLN1.30bn or PLN81.2/share versus PLN1.30bn or PLN81.7/share previously. We maintain our valuation approach and assumptions as discussed in detail in our recent outlook report. We use DCF-based calculations with a discount rate of 10% to value the core drug discovery services business and research collaborations. Separately, we use risk-adjusted NPV models with a discount rate of 12.5% for Selvita’s R&D projects in various stages.
Exhibit 6: Sum-of-the-parts Selvita valuation
Product |
Launch |
Peak sales |
NPV |
NPV/share (PLN) |
Probability |
rNPV |
rNPV/share (PLN) |
|
Innovation |
||||||||
SEL24 |
2023 |
750 |
681.5 |
42.7 |
15.0% |
135.0 |
8.5 |
|
SEL120 |
2025 |
1,500 |
1,431.5 |
89.6 |
10% |
166.4 |
10.4 |
|
SMARCA2 inhibitor |
2030 |
1,000 |
659.6 |
41.3 |
2% |
104.4 |
6.5 |
|
A2A/A2B antagonist |
2030 |
1,000 |
735.0 |
46.0 |
2% |
101.4 |
6.4 |
|
SHMT2 inhibitor |
2031 |
1,000 |
446.9 |
28.0 |
2% |
70.4 |
4.4 |
|
Merck collaborations |
2026 |
2,000 |
46.4 |
2.9 |
5% |
7.6 |
0.5 |
|
Services (including Ardigen) |
Market |
DCF (2018-2027) |
100% |
175.5 |
11.0 |
|||
Terminal value |
100% |
382.8 |
24.0 |
|||||
Net cash (at end May 2018) |
100% |
153.3 |
9.6 |
|||||
Valuation |
4,001.0 |
250.5 |
1,296.8 |
81.2 |
||||
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: WACC = 12.5% for product valuations, WACC = 10% for Services segment.
Exhibit 7: Financial summary
PLN'000s |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018e |
2019e |
||
Year end 31 December |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
||
PROFIT & LOSS |
|||||||
Revenue |
|
|
56,077 |
66,721 |
105,872 |
101,294 |
116,816 |
of which: Services (research outsourcing) |
23,052 |
23,052 |
32,404 |
44,208 |
55,260 |
||
Innovation platform |
15,416 |
18,353 |
36,727 |
8,000 |
22,207 |
||
Subsidies |
14,700 |
12,067 |
17,591 |
30,000 |
18,400 |
||
Bioinformatics |
2,561 |
3,431 |
6,885 |
7,574 |
8,331 |
||
EBITDA |
|
|
10,235 |
8,264 |
18,462 |
(436) |
1,891 |
Operating Profit (before amort. and except.) |
6,802 |
4,646 |
6,802 |
4,646 |
13,222 |
||
Intangible Amortisation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Exceptionals/Other* |
(4,729) |
(5,860) |
(583) |
0 |
0 |
||
Operating Profit |
2,073 |
(1,214) |
12,639 |
(6,554) |
(4,580) |
||
Net Interest |
748 |
947 |
(1,956) |
18 |
75 |
||
Share in profit/(loss) of asocs. and JVs** |
0 |
0 |
(1,016) |
(1,082) |
20,787 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Profit Before Tax (norm) |
|
|
7,540 |
4,577 |
10,183 |
14,251 |
(4,505) |
Profit Before Tax (reported) |
|
|
2,821 |
(1,283) |
9,600 |
14,251 |
(4,505) |
Tax |
(5) |
0 |
(831) |
(713) |
315 |
||
Deferred tax |
3,417 |
3,968 |
(2,037) |
0 |
0 |
||
Profit After Tax (norm) |
10,952 |
8,545 |
7,315 |
13,539 |
(4,190) |
||
Profit After Tax (reported) |
6,233 |
2,685 |
6,732 |
13,539 |
(4,190) |
||
Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m) |
13.1 |
13.1 |
13.4 |
13.8 |
14.9 |
||
EPS - normalised (PLN) |
|
|
0.84 |
0.64 |
0.51 |
0.91 |
(0.26) |
EPS - reported (PLN) |
|
|
0.48 |
0.20 |
0.47 |
0.91 |
(0.26) |
Dividend per share (PLN) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
BALANCE SHEET |
|||||||
Fixed Assets |
|
|
16,718 |
41,451 |
43,701 |
96,944 |
129,236 |
Intangible Assets |
2,274 |
6,640 |
2,638 |
2,638 |
2,638 |
||
Tangible Assets |
8,597 |
21,833 |
31,377 |
63,832 |
96,124 |
||
Other |
5,847 |
12,979 |
9,686 |
30,474 |
30,474 |
||
Current Assets |
|
|
48,524 |
47,669 |
59,873 |
173,253 |
161,016 |
Stocks |
1,174 |
1,403 |
1,591 |
1,569 |
1,548 |
||
Debtors |
17,961 |
16,320 |
19,226 |
19,226 |
19,226 |
||
Cash |
28,807 |
29,095 |
36,124 |
149,527 |
136,995 |
||
Other |
582 |
851 |
2,932 |
2,932 |
3,247 |
||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
(16,319) |
(18,933) |
(26,752) |
(27,390) |
(26,678) |
Creditors |
(3,927) |
(7,883) |
(10,873) |
(10,873) |
(10,873) |
||
Provisions |
(3,327) |
(3,600) |
(5,150) |
(5,150) |
(5,150) |
||
Deferred revenues |
(7,384) |
(5,469) |
(8,451) |
(8,451) |
(8,451) |
||
Short term borrowings |
(33) |
(859) |
(912) |
(912) |
(912) |
||
Other |
(1,648) |
(1,122) |
(1,366) |
(2,004) |
(1,291) |
||
Long Term Liabilities |
|
|
(2,043) |
(14,477) |
(12,826) |
(37,826) |
(62,826) |
Long term borrowings |
0 |
(4,792) |
(3,982) |
(28,982) |
(53,982) |
||
Deferred revenues |
(1,513) |
(6,382) |
(4,233) |
(4,233) |
(4,233) |
||
Other long term liabilities |
(529) |
(3,303) |
(4,611) |
(4,611) |
(4,611) |
||
Net Assets |
|
|
46,880 |
55,710 |
63,996 |
204,981 |
200,749 |
CASH FLOW |
|||||||
Operating Cash Flow |
|
|
(16,430) |
(6,280) |
10,265 |
(30,439) |
(16,456) |
Net Interest |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Tax |
0 |
0 |
717 |
(74) |
(713) |
||
Capex |
(5,190) |
(21,210) |
(21,558) |
(38,574) |
(38,763) |
||
Acquisitions/disposals |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
||
Financing |
27,314 |
303 |
715 |
127,490 |
0 |
||
Dividends |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other (incl. subsidies) |
18,834 |
21,859 |
19,174 |
30,000 |
18,400 |
||
Net Cash Flow |
24,529 |
(5,329) |
9,323 |
88,403 |
(37,531) |
||
Opening net debt/(cash) |
|
|
(4,787) |
(28,773) |
(23,445) |
(31,230) |
(119,633) |
HP finance leases initiated |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Exchange rate movements |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
(543) |
0 |
(1,537) |
0 |
0 |
||
Closing net debt/(cash) |
|
|
(28,773) |
(23,445) |
(31,230) |
(119,633) |
(82,101) |
Source: Company accounts, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Non-cash cost related to the employee stock options programme. **Profit and loss from 2016 include share in Nodthera’s earnings according to an equity method valuation; in Q118 this was changed to fair value method. Please note that the share number changed in 2017 as a result of Nodthera's capital increase.
|
|
Research: Industrials
Confirmation of a “very successful” start to 2018 is reassuring, given a softening in H217 after marked progress in the preceding half. Albeit from a low base and not strictly comparable, EBIT in Q118 more than trebled, thereby underpinning management guidance of a full-year outturn once again up by a third, after adjusting for 2017 exceptionals. Prospects are also positive for next year as consensus forecasts of a further 10% rise in revenue on a tight cost base drive trading margin to 10%, which management regards as a “realistic target” (9% 2018e and only back to pre-crisis level). Despite investment (8% of 2017 sales) finances are robust.