Rockhopper Exploration recently announced that its Greater Mediterranean assets generated $10.3m revenue in 2019 as it focused on progressing with Sea Lion Phase 1 development. In January, Rockhopper and Premier Oil announced that a Heads of Terms (HoT) had been signed with Navitas Petroleum to farm in for a 30% interest in the Sea Lion project. Despite the current macroeconomic situation, the company announced that progress has been made to convert the HoT into finalised agreements. Completion of the sale of its Egyptian assets, together with the HoT, leaves the company in a stable financial position. Our risked valuation now stands at 24.4p/share (-54%) for our mid-case based on revised long-term price assumptions, reflecting current market expectations.
Written by
Rockhopper Exploration |
Parties committed to completing Sea Lion deal |
FY19 results |
Oil & gas |
23 April 2020 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analyst
Rockhopper Exploration is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rockhopper Exploration recently announced that its Greater Mediterranean assets generated $10.3m revenue in 2019 as it focused on progressing with Sea Lion Phase 1 development. In January, Rockhopper and Premier Oil announced that a Heads of Terms (HoT) had been signed with Navitas Petroleum to farm in for a 30% interest in the Sea Lion project. Despite the current macroeconomic situation, the company announced that progress has been made to convert the HoT into finalised agreements. Completion of the sale of its Egyptian assets, together with the HoT, leaves the company in a stable financial position. Our risked valuation now stands at 24.4p/share (-54%) for our mid-case based on revised long-term price assumptions, reflecting current market expectations.
Year-end |
Revenue |
PBT* |
Cash from operations ($m) |
Net cash** |
Capex** |
12/18 |
10.6 |
(7.1) |
5.4 |
40.4 |
(15.8) |
12/19 |
10.3 |
(20.6) |
(0.2) |
17.2 |
(23.9) |
12/20e |
2.2 |
(4.5) |
(8.3) |
10.2 |
(10.9) |
12/21e |
1.7 |
(4.1) |
(5.2) |
5.3 |
0.0 |
Note: *PBT normalised, excluding amortisation of acquired intangibles, exceptional items and share-based payments. **Assumes capex ahead of first oil funded by Premier and Navitas interest-free loan from 1 January 2020.
Balance sheet protected ahead of unheard-of times
Despite a positive share price reaction following the announcement of the Navitas farm-in deal, this has been reversed since early March due to the negative global macroeconomic outlook. Nevertheless, the company announced that it has made good progress in finalising the deal, with all parties committed to proceeding. Rockhopper has employed different initiatives since the beginning of the year to protect its balance sheet, leaving it in a stable financial position, with no debt and limited exposure to future development costs (excluding licence fees, taxes, costs incurred prior to 1 January 2020 and project wind-down costs) at Sea Lion.
Current market headwinds
2020 is proving to be a challenging year for the oil and gas industry. In January, geopolitical events around Iran resulted in market instability, followed later by the coronavirus outbreak and the Russia/Saudi Arabia oil price war. As a consequence, management initiated a cost reduction process to scale back headcount and activity at Sea Lion pending an improvement in the macro environment.
Valuation: RENAV at 24.4p/share
Our valuation suggests that the equity market is now applying a c 25% chance of success (CoS) for Sea Lion Phase 1. Our updated risked valuation accounts for FY19 results and the current market situation, with our long-term Brent assumptions also revised. Our analysis includes three scenarios with the 2020 Brent price inflated at 2.5%, at $40/bbl, $50/bbl (mid case) and $60/bbl. Our risked valuation now stands at 24.4p/share for our mid-case based on a Sea Lion Phase 1 CoS of 55%. We believe the project is more likely to proceed than not. However, recent global events will most likely affect the timing of a final investment decision.
Valuation
We value Rockhopper’s asset base using a conventional risked net asset value (NAV) approach, based on a risked valuation for proven reserves, and contingent and prospective resources. Key assumptions in our valuation include estimates of production profiles, asset development costs and operational costs, in addition to realised commodity prices and costs of capital. We use publicly available sources for key assumptions, including company guidance.
We have updated our forecasts and NAV to reflect Rockhopper’s FY19 results, together with the impact of the coronavirus and Russia/Saudi Arabia oil price war, in our pricing assumptions. Our risked valuation has decreased to 24.4p/share. The main change in our modelling includes our long-term Brent assumption. We have revised down our long-term oil price expectation of $70/bbl Brent from 2022 to reflect current oil price volatility. We present three scenarios with Brent in 2020 at $40/bbl in our low case scenario, $50/bbl in our mid-case scenario and $60/bbl in our high case scenario, inflated at 2.5% per year, resulting in 2022 prices of $42.0/bbl, $52.5/bbl and $63.0/bbl respectively. Given the current oil price volatility, we will continue to monitor market conditions closely and may revisit these assumptions in due course. The NAV table below, in Exhibit 1, provides a breakdown of our valuation by asset.
Exhibit 1: Edison breakdown of Rockhopper NAV
Recoverable reserves |
Low case |
Mid case |
High case |
|||||||
Asset |
Country |
WI |
CoS |
Gross |
Net |
NPV/boe |
Net risked value |
Net risked |
||
% |
% |
mmboe |
mmboe |
$/boe |
$m |
p/share |
p/share |
p/share |
||
Net cash at 31 December 2019 |
17 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
||||||
SG&A (NPV12.5 of 5 years) |
(20) |
(3.4) |
(3.4) |
(3.4) |
||||||
Proceeds from Abu Sennan disposal |
12 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
||||||
Production |
||||||||||
Civita |
Italy |
100% |
100% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(36.4) |
(1) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Guendalina |
Italy |
20% |
100% |
0.4 |
0.1 |
18.5 |
2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
Development |
||||||||||
Sea Lion Phase 1 |
Falkland Islands |
30% |
55% |
249 |
75 |
1.8 |
76 |
6.4 |
12.9 |
23.7 |
Sea Lion Phase 2 in PL32 |
Falkland Islands |
30% |
20% |
87 |
26 |
2.1 |
11 |
0.4 |
1.8 |
3.3 |
Sea Lion Phase 2 in PL04 |
Falkland Islands |
30% |
20% |
214 |
64 |
2.1 |
26 |
0.9 |
4.5 |
8.1 |
Ombrina Mare - under arbitration* |
Italy |
20 |
3.4 |
3.4 |
3.4 |
|||||
Core NAV |
551 |
165 |
|
143 |
12.9 |
24.4 |
40.2 |
|||
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: Number of shares: 458m; FX = US$1.28/£. *Based on 50% chance of recovering acquisition costs rather than risked recovery of loss of profit.
Rockhopper currently trades at 7.4p/share relative to our risked valuation of 24.4p/share. Although an increase in the share price was observed following the deal announcement, it has been completely erased by the impact of the coronavirus on energy markets in combination with the Russia/ Saudi Arabia price war in early March 2020. The current share price suggests an implied chance of success of between 20% and 30% for Phase 1 at $50/bbl or c 50% at $40/bbl. We believe the project is more likely to proceed than not, now reinforced by the Navitas deal, hence our 55% commercial chance of success for Phase 1. However, recent global events will most likely affect timings, especially around closing funding and financing agreements for the Sea Lion joint venture, and consequently a final investment decision.
|
Exhibit 2: Core assets and Sea Lion Phase 1 sensitivity |
Exhibit 3: Rockhopper NAV waterfall |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source: Edison Investment Research |
Source: Edison Investment Research |
|
Exhibit 2: Core assets and Sea Lion Phase 1 sensitivity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source: Edison Investment Research |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exhibit 3: Rockhopper NAV waterfall |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source: Edison Investment Research |
If the current oil price environment persists, we also expect to see significant cost deflation which will improve the project economics and valuation of Sea Lion Phase 1 development. In the table below we provide a sensitivity to the impact of capex on Sea Lion Phase 1.
Exhibit 4: Core assets and Sea Lion Phase 1 sensitivity to lower capex
Discount to capex/ Edison scenario |
Low case ($40/bbl) |
Mid case ($50/bbl) |
High case ($60/bbl) |
0% |
8.1 |
14.6 |
25.5 |
10% |
8.2 |
14.7 |
27.6 |
20% |
8.3 |
15.2 |
29.7 |
30% |
8.4 |
17.1 |
32.1 |
Source: Edison Investment Research
Financials
Rockhopper ended FY19 with c $17m of cash on the balance sheet and no debt, in line with our estimates, and announced unaudited cash resources of $21.9m as at 1 April 2020. With the disposal of Abu Sennan, our forecast Italian asset capex and SG&A are covered for the coming years at $5m in 2020 and $4m in 2021. This represents a c 30% cost reduction versus 2019, in line with company guidance as a response to the coronavirus pandemic and market developments. As a consequence of the Navitas farm-in, Rockhopper is fully funded through to Sea Lion Phase 1 project completion given the newly agreed interest-free loan from Navitas and Premier (excluding licence fees, taxes, costs incurred prior to 1 January 2020 and project wind down costs at Sea Lion). We are accounting for this partnership loan in the company’s balance sheet. However, we do not believe Rockhopper will need to access any additional funding for Sea Lion Phase 1 development. Project funding for the joint venture is expected to be split into vendor financing, export credit/bank finance and upstream partner equity.
Exhibit 5: Financial summary
Accounts: IFRS, year-end: 31 December, US$000s |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020e |
2021e |
|
PROFIT & LOSS |
||||||
Total revenues |
10,401 |
10,580 |
10,328 |
2,167 |
1,666 |
|
Cost of sales |
(9,573) |
(8,531) |
(10,385) |
(1,051) |
(764) |
|
Gross profit |
828 |
2,049 |
(57) |
1,116 |
901 |
|
SG&A (expenses) |
(5,282) |
(5,386) |
(5,942) |
(5,000) |
(4,000) |
|
Other income/(expense) |
(3,422) |
(5,014) |
(1,974) |
0 |
0 |
|
Exceptionals and adjustments |
(1,830) |
673 |
(12,991) |
(1,307) |
(1,307) |
|
Reported EBIT |
(9,706) |
(7,678) |
(20,964) |
(5,191) |
(4,406) |
|
Finance income/(expense) |
783 |
825 |
624 |
710 |
323 |
|
Other income/(expense) |
(39) |
(253) |
(291) |
0 |
0 |
|
Exceptionals and adjustments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Reported PBT |
(8,962) |
(7,106) |
(20,631) |
(4,481) |
(4,083) |
|
Income tax expense (includes exceptionals) |
2,823 |
(25) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Reported net income |
(6,139) |
(7,131) |
(20,631) |
(4,481) |
(4,083) |
|
Basic average number of shares, m |
457 |
457 |
455 |
458 |
458 |
|
Basic EPS |
(1.3) |
(1.6) |
(4.5) |
(9.8) |
(8.9) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
(2,403) |
(4,383) |
(2,235) |
(3,277) |
(2,644) |
|
Adjusted EBIT |
(13,349) |
(12,319) |
(13,711) |
(4,491) |
(3,554) |
|
Adjusted PBT |
(12,605) |
(11,747) |
(13,378) |
(3,781) |
(3,231) |
|
Adjusted EPS (c) |
(5) |
(1) |
(44) |
(7) |
(6) |
|
Adjusted diluted EPS (c) |
(5) |
(1) |
(44) |
(7) |
(6) |
|
BALANCE SHEET |
||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
11,585 |
11,836 |
1,814 |
911 |
456 |
|
Goodwill |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Intangible assets |
432,147 |
447,035 |
465,820 |
465,517 |
465,517 |
|
Other non-current assets |
10,789 |
10,308 |
1,883 |
1,883 |
1,883 |
|
Total non-current assets |
454,521 |
469,179 |
469,517 |
468,310 |
467,856 |
|
Cash and equivalents |
50,729 |
40,426 |
17,223 |
10,224 |
5,346 |
|
Inventories |
1,621 |
1,779 |
1,463 |
1,463 |
1,463 |
|
Trade and other receivables |
16,840 |
9,510 |
3,501 |
3,501 |
3,501 |
|
Other current assets |
4,354 |
568 |
18,538 |
18,538 |
18,538 |
|
Total current assets |
73,544 |
52,283 |
40,725 |
33,726 |
28,848 |
|
Non-current loans and borrowings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
85,245 |
90,971 |
93,759 |
93,759 |
93,759 |
|
Total non-current liabilities |
85,245 |
90,971 |
93,759 |
93,759 |
93,759 |
|
Trade and other payables |
12,772 |
15,148 |
17,943 |
12,911 |
10,354 |
|
Current loans and borrowings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Other current liabilities |
9,450 |
0 |
2,426 |
2,426 |
2,426 |
|
Total current liabilities |
22,222 |
15,148 |
20,369 |
15,337 |
12,780 |
|
Equity attributable to company |
420,598 |
415,343 |
396,114 |
392,940 |
390,164 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
CASH FLOW STATEMENT |
||||||
Profit for the year |
(8,962) |
(7,106) |
(20,631) |
(4,481) |
(4,083) |
|
Taxation expenses |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Net finance expenses |
(743) |
(572) |
(333) |
(710) |
(323) |
|
Depreciation and amortisation |
5,687 |
4,111 |
4,544 |
607 |
455 |
|
Share based payments |
864 |
1,478 |
1,307 |
1,307 |
1,307 |
|
Other adjustments (impairments) |
5,652 |
1,628 |
13,228 |
0 |
0 |
|
Movements in working capital |
(868) |
5,891 |
1,661 |
(5,032) |
(2,557) |
|
Interest paid / received |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Income taxes paid |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Cash from operations (CFO) |
1,630 |
5,430 |
(224) |
(8,309) |
(5,201) |
|
Capex * |
(26,817) |
(15,784) |
(23,895) |
(10,900) |
0 |
|
Acquisitions & disposals net |
(6,266) |
(658) |
0 |
11,500 |
0 |
|
Other investing activities |
521 |
722 |
31,121 |
710 |
323 |
|
Cash used in investing activities (CFIA) |
(32,562) |
(15,720) |
7,226 |
1,310 |
323 |
|
Net proceeds from issue of shares |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Movements in debt |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Other financing activities (includes rig settlement) |
(13) |
18 |
(247) |
0 |
0 |
|
Cash from financing activities (CFF) |
(13) |
18 |
(247) |
0 |
0 |
|
Increase/(decrease) in cash |
(30,945) |
(10,272) |
6,755 |
(6,999) |
(4,878) |
|
Currency translation differences and other |
655 |
(31) |
42 |
0 |
0 |
|
Cash at end of period |
20,729 |
10,426 |
17,223 |
10,224 |
5,346 |
|
Net (debt) cash including term deposits |
50,729 |
40,426 |
17,223 |
10,224 |
5,346 |
Source: Rockhopper Exploration, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Assumes capex ahead of Sea Lion Phase 1 first oil funded by
Premier and Navitas interest-free loan from 1 January 2020.
|
|
Research: Consumer
In a continuation of previous trends, Gamesys has reported a 19% increase in Q120 pro-forma revenues to £155.3m. The business has no retail or sport exposure and the first few weeks of Q220 have been strong. Geographically, Asian markets are driving growth and the UK has been solid. During the COVID-19 lockdown period, Gamesys is proactively instigating responsible gaming measures, which include ceasing all TV advertising, and the company is donating £200,000 to Women’s Aid. The stock trades at 6.2x P/E and 6.7x EV/EBITDA with an estimated 13.1% free cash flow yield for FY21.