Marlborough Wine Estates
Written by
Marlborough Wine Estates |
Winning wines
Food and beverage |
NXT Company Spotlight
30 June 2016 |
Share details
Business description
Bull
Bear
Analysts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marlborough Wine Estates (MWE) was formed in March 2015 to acquire vineyard assets, inventory and distribution agreements comprising the Otuwhero Estate from Min (James) Jia. The purchase was satisfied by the issue of 240m shares. At the last private issue price of NZ$0.20 per share, this valued the consideration received by the founder at NZ$48m, compared with the April 2013 book value for the assets of NZ$13.1m. Products sold in FY15 (pro-forma) include bulk grapes (67.6% of revenue) and bottled wine into China (21.1%), New Zealand (NZ) (4.3%) and other markets (7.1%). MWE is undertaking a compliance listing on the NXT market, with no new capital being raised.
Producing premium white wines for export
MWE produces premium-quality white wine, mostly sauvignon blanc, sourced from its vineyards. The grapes are converted to bulk and bottled wine by a contract processor with oversight from MWE’s chief winemaker, or are sold to other winemakers as bulk grapes (68% of revenue in FY15). Bottled wine (32% of FY15 revenue) is MWE’s highest margin product. MWE sells its export wine to related party distributors at a premium of ~30% to the average industry wide average FY15 price of NZ$11.86 per litre. In FY15, 76% of MWE’s export sales were made to China and Hong Kong.
Growth from production increases
MWE plans to increase vineyard production by 5% per year until the vineyards are producing 2,000 tonnes of grapes pa from 1,401 currently. The strategy is to continue to position its O:TU brand wine at the premium end of the market, increase the sales of bottled wine through increased market penetration in China and Hong Kong and expand into new markets. Growth is also expected from acquisitions and by expanding into other NZ-sourced food and beverage products.
Valuation: Peer group trading at 3x to 4x EV/sales
The FY15 pro forma financial statements show MWE making gross profit of NZ$0.46m before other revenue and fair value adjustments. It is not possible to make meaningful earnings multiple comparisons due to the size and maturity of the peer group. The three peers (Australian Vintage, Delegat and Foley Family Wines) are trading on EV/sales multiples of 3.0x to 4.0x. Using MWE’s latest private capital raise price of NZ$0.20/share and implied market cap of NZ$58.7m (and net debt of $5.1m at end FY15), sales will need to reach ~NZ$16m to ~NZ$21m for MWE to be priced on the same EV/sales basis. MWE’s FY15 sales were NZ$2.4m.
|
Historical performance
Source: Marlborough Wine Estates. Note: *Pro forma for 12 months; revenues includes sales revenue and other revenue; **actual from 18 March 2015 to 30 June 2015; ***NPAT includes positive fair value adjustment of NZ$1.054m. |
The wine industry
According to Wine Institute, Global vineyard plantings in 2014 were 17,960 thousand acres (7,268 thousand hectares).8 NZ plantings were 88,000 acres (35,612 hectares)9 or 0.5% of global vineyard area. In 2014 the top five countries measured by vineyard area were Spain (13.0%), China (11.0%), France (10.4%), Italy (9.5%) and Turkey (9.9%). NZ was ranked No 32 on the World Vineyard Acreage table.10 USA is the largest consumer of wine (13.03% of world consumption in 2014)11 followed by France (11.29%), Italy (8.26%), Germany (8.18%) and China 6.4%.
1 acre = 0.404 hectares
www.wineinstitue.org
www.wineinstitute.org
www.wineinstitute.org
The chart below shows global vineyard plantings, wine production and consumption:
|
Exhibit 7: Global vineyard plantings, wine production and consumption |
|
|
Source: www.wineinstitute.org |
Global wine consumption per capita is forecast to grow the most in emerging wine consuming regions such as China. Euromonitor International’s forecasts for CAGR in wine consumption per capita over the five years from 2013 to 2018 are shown in Exhibit 8.
Exhibit 8: Forecast five-year CAGR in wine consumption in key growth regions and markets
CAGR 2013-2018 |
|
China |
4.5% |
Canada |
1.6% |
Spain |
0.7% |
USA |
0.6% |
New Zealand |
0.2% |
Russia |
0.7% |
France |
(0.7%) |
Germany |
(0.8%) |
Australia |
(0.8%) |
United Kingdom |
(1.4%) |
Italy |
(2.6%) |
China |
Canada |
Spain |
USA |
New Zealand |
Russia |
France |
Germany |
Australia |
United Kingdom |
Italy |
CAGR 2013-2018 |
4.5% |
1.6% |
0.7% |
0.6% |
0.2% |
0.7% |
(0.7%) |
(0.8%) |
(0.8%) |
(1.4%) |
(2.6%) |
Source: Euromonitor International, Treasury Wine Estates Annual Report 2015
The chart below contrasts the change in per capita in wine consumption in the US with the change in wine consumption in China. From 2007 to 2013 the CAGR in per capita wine consumption in the US was 3.14% compared with China where the CAGR in per capita wine consumption was 19.48%. In 2014 wine consumption in China fell from 1.28 litres per capita to 1.16 litres per capita mainly due to the economic slowdown in China.
|
Exhibit 9: US and China litres of wine consumed per capita and annual growth rates |
|
|
Source: www.wineinstitute.org |
In China the fastest-growing bottled wine categories are the cheapest and the most expensive, which supports MWE’s strategy to position its wines at the premium end of the market. This is illustrated with data on Australian bottled wine exports.
Exhibit 10: Bottled wine exports from Australia to China – 12 months ended 31 December 2015
<A$2.49 |
A$2.50-A$4.99 |
A$5.00 - A$7.50 |
A$7.50-A$9.99 |
A$10.0-A$19.9 |
A$20.0-A$49.9 |
>A$50.00 |
Total |
|
China (000s litres) |
4,585 |
30,236 |
10,277 |
3,634 |
4,816 |
1,405 |
607 |
55,558 |
World (000s litres) |
16,059 |
219,364 |
41,926 |
16,489 |
16,907 |
3,549 |
2,140 |
316,434 |
China % increase |
201% |
62% |
31% |
51% |
53% |
72% |
202% |
55% |
World % increase |
38% |
5% |
16% |
11% |
30% |
22% |
58% |
9% |
Source: www.wineaustralia.com
NZ renowned for quality sauvignon blanc wines
With plantings in 2014 of 35,859 hectares, the NZ wine industry is only 0.5% of global production. The MWE 157ha planted vineyard represents 0.4% of the total NZ vineyard plantations. NZ has established an export industry that has almost tripled in value in the 10 years since 2006.
Exhibit 11: NZ wine industry
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
|
Number of wineries |
530 |
543 |
585 |
643 |
672 |
697 |
703 |
698 |
699 |
673 |
Number of growers |
866 |
1,003 |
1,060 |
1,117 |
N/A |
791 |
824 |
833 |
N/A |
762 |
Production area (ha) |
22,676 |
25,355 |
29,310 |
31,954 |
33,200 |
34,500 |
35,537 |
35,182 |
35,510 |
35,859 |
Average yield (tonnes/ha) |
8.2 |
8.1 |
9.7 |
8.9 |
8 |
9.5 |
7.6 |
9.8 |
12.6 |
9.1 |
Average grape price (NZ$/tonne) |
2,022 |
1,981 |
2,161 |
1,629 |
1,293 |
1,239 |
1,359 |
1,688 |
1,666 |
N/A |
Tonnes crushed |
185,000 |
205,000 |
285,000 |
285,000 |
266,000 |
328,000 |
269,000 |
345,000 |
445,000 |
326,000 |
Total production (millions of litres) |
133.2 |
147.6 |
205.2 |
205.2 |
190 |
235 |
194 |
248.4 |
320.4 |
234.7 |
Domestic sales NZ wine (millions of litres) |
50 |
51 |
46.5 |
59.3 |
56.7 |
66.3 |
64.6 |
51.7 |
49.9 |
61.9 |
Consumption per capita NZ Wines (litres) |
12.1 |
12.2 |
11.1 |
13.9 |
13 |
15.2 |
14.7 |
11.6 |
11.2 |
13.7 |
Total domestic sales all wine (millions of litres) |
86 |
91.8 |
87.4 |
92.7 |
92.1 |
93.9 |
91.9 |
92.5 |
90.1 |
96.3 |
Consumption per capita (all wines) litres |
20.6 |
21.7 |
20.8 |
21.5 |
21.1 |
21.3 |
20.9 |
20.8 |
20.1 |
21.3 |
Export volumes (millions of litres) |
57.8 |
76.0 |
88.6 |
112.6 |
142.0 |
154.7 |
178.9 |
169.6 |
186.9 |
209.4 |
Export value (millions of NZ$ - FOB) |
512.4 |
698.3 |
797.8 |
991.7 |
1,041.0 |
1,094.0 |
1,177.0 |
1,210.0 |
1,328.0 |
1,424.0 |
Source: NZ Winegrowers Annual Report 2015. Note: FOB = free on board.
The Marlborough wine district of New Zealand accounts for 75% of the country’s total wine production12 and 79% of its wine exports. The region is renowned for producing sauvignon blanc wines, which account for some 86% of total wine production. The MWE FY17 forecast harvest of 1,544 tonnes (as per the FY17 KOM) is 0.5% of the last available data (2014) for total Marlborough wine production. Details of plantings are set out below:
www.wine-marlborough.co.nz
Exhibit 12: Marlborough wine district of NZ – production statistics
Growers |
Wineries |
Vineyard (ha) |
Tonnes of grapes |
Tonnes/ha |
|
2007 |
530 |
104 |
21,200 |
120,888 |
5.7 |
2008 |
524 |
109 |
22,277 |
194,639 |
8.7 |
2009 |
556 |
130 |
23,600 |
192,128 |
8.1 |
2010 |
605 |
130 |
23,920 |
183,000 |
7.7 |
2011 |
600 |
142 |
23,964 |
244,893 |
10.2 |
2012 |
600 |
142 |
23,964 |
188,649 |
7.9 |
2013 |
568 |
148 |
22,587 |
215,680 |
9.5 |
2014 |
568 |
168 |
22,903 |
329,572 |
14.4 |
Source: www.wine-malborough.co.nz
Wines produced in the Marlborough region in 2014 show the sauvignon blanc variety is dominant:
Exhibit 13: Marlborough wine district of NZ – varietal plantings in 2014
Tonnes of grapes |
(%) |
|
Sauvignon blanc |
282,608 |
85.8% |
Pinot noir |
18,940 |
5.7% |
Chardonnay |
11,530 |
3.5% |
Pinot gris |
10,670 |
3.2% |
Riesling |
3,044 |
0.9% |
Other |
2,780 |
0.8% |
Total |
329,572 |
100.0% |
Source: www.wine-marlborough.co.nz
Awatere Valley region in Marlborough district
The MWE vineyards are in the Awatere Valley, which has been categorised as the coldest and driest part of the Marlborough district. Climatic classifications of the sub regions of Marlborough are set out below:
Exhibit 14: Marlborough wine district – sub regions
Sub regions |
Temp |
Moisture |
Wairau Valley |
Cool |
Dry |
Southern Valleys |
Cooler |
Dryer |
Awatere Valley |
Coolest |
Driest |
Source www.wine-marlborough.co.nz
The Awatere Valley has a more extreme climate than the other regions with strong winds, variable soils and temperatures and a later ripening season. One of the issues is the scarceness of irrigation water, which in a drier than normal season can limit vine growth. Berry sizes tend to be smaller with a more intense flavour, which gives the Awatere Valley wines their unique character.
Key operating milestones
MWE has set four key metrics by which investors should be able to assess performance:
■
Gross harvest, or grape production from the vineyards. This measure shows the vineyard’s grape supply capacity, which in the opinion of the board is sustainable for at least 15 years. Grape production is expected to increase as the vines mature and the board’s longer-term forecasts are for a gross annual harvest of 2,000 tonnes (5% annual growth rate). At a 5% growth rate of annual production, the current production of 1,401 tonnes should reach 2,000 in 2023. The KOM forecasts are for grapes produced from the existing vineyards and do not factor in future vineyard development where the time to full production could take five years. The FY16 harvest is expected to yield 1,660 tonnes. The previous forecast for 5% growth to 1,471 tonnes has been exceeded due to favourable climatic conditions. The FY17 forecast of 1,544 tonnes assumes normal growing conditions and is therefore 5% pa growth from the FY15 production baseline. FY16 has been treated as an exceptional year.
■
Bulk grape sales have been expressed in tonnes because of the difficulty in forecasting the price, which can vary materially depending on supply/demand factors. Bulk grape production as a percentage of the total harvest is expected to increase from 68% in FY15 to 74% in FY17. The tonnage of bulk grape sales is governed by how much of the harvest is put into bottled and bulk wines. It is MWE’s intention to increase bottled wine sales because they offer higher margins than grapes sold in bulk or grapes processed into bulk wine. An increase in the sale of bottled wines will mean a reduction in the amount of wine sold as bulk wine to other NZ wine producers.
■
International bottled wine sales, which management expects to double between FY16 and FY17, are underpinned by the minimum purchase requirements that form part of the distribution arrangements with related party GEL. In FY16 GEL is contracted to undertake minimum purchases of NZ$1.4m of bottled wine out of total international sales of NZ$1.6m; this rises to a minimum of NZ$3.0m of total international sales of NZ$3.2m in 2017. The minimum purchase requirements mean it would be very unlikely for the international wine sales KOM not to be met.
■
NZ bottled wine sales are expected to be driven by the Music Bay brand, launched in 2016. NZ wine sales accounted for 13.3% of total wine sales in FY15 and are expected to account of 6% of total bottled wine sales in FY17.
Exhibit 15: Key operating milestones defined by company
FY15 (pro forma) |
FY16e |
FY17e |
|
Gross harvest (tonnes) |
1,401 |
1,660 |
1,544 |
Bulk grape sales (tonnes) |
955 |
1,190 |
1,144 |
International bottled wine sales (NZ$) |
679,806 |
1,600,000 |
3,200,000 |
NZ bottled wine sales (NZ$) |
104,407 |
137,293 |
205,940 |
Bulk grapes % of total harvest |
68% |
72% |
74% |
NZ wine sales % of total wine sales |
13.3% |
7.9% |
6.0% |
Source: MWE Listing Document, page 34, Edison Investment Research
Management
MWE has an experienced board and senior management team with knowledge and understanding of vineyard operations and Asian markets, particularly the China market.
Executive chairman Min (James) Jia is the founder holds 82.6% of the issued shares. James is an experienced property developer and has held real estate, vineyard and forestry assets in NZ and China. He is active in property development in Auckland, NZ. Min (James) Jia purchased the Otuwhero Estate and Donaldson’s Block and associated vineyard assets in April 2013 for NZ$13.1m. These assets together with the distribution agreements were sold to MWE for 240m shares, which at a value of NZ$0.20 per share valued his interests at NZ$48m. James sold 47.7m shares into the float (at NZ$0.20 per share) to assist with achieving a greater shareholder spread. He is paid NZ$120,000 pa for his role as executive chairman. James has a Bachelor’s degree in engineering and a Master’s in business administration.
Ly (Lily) Lee is married to Min (James) Jia. She is an experienced property developer both in NZ and China and in the 1990s established a large travel agency in Germany. She is the general manager of Shanghai Aufun Investment Consultancy, which helps Chinese investors invest offshore. Lily holds a bachelor’s degree in language and is paid an annual director’s fee of NZ$40,000.
Jack Zhong Yin holds a bachelor’s degree in business studies and a master’s in taxation studies. He is a member of the NZ Institute of Directors and is a registered financial services provider (FSP). Jack is the head of Asian Development for DFK Griffiths Carlton, an Auckland-based accountancy firm, and has extensive management and investment advice experience. He is an executive director and is paid an annual directors fee of NZ$50,000.
Danny Chan is an independent director and holds a bachelor’s degree in commerce and administration. He holds directorships in Academic Colleges Group, Abano Healthcare, Farmers’ Mutual Group, Flowerzone International and Auckland Tourism Events and Economic Development. He is also a member of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet’s China Project Advisory Group, the NZ/China Advisory Council and NZ Markets Disciplinary Tribunal.
Songyuan (Benny) Huang is an independent director and heads up global margin lending business KVB Kunlun NZ. He holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting, a master’s degree in international business and is a chartered financial analyst. He is also a member of the NZ Institute of Directors and is paid an annual directors fee of NZ$30,000.
Senior staff include Catherine Ma (bachelor’s degree in commerce) as group CEO, Eric Li (bachelor’s degree in commerce) as financial controller and Jan Kux, a winemaker with 20 years’ experience in Europe and NZ. Jan is a member of the GESCO Society for the Sciences and Development of Viticulture and is an active member in the German Sommelier Association.
Sensitivities
MWE is exposed to primary production risk, which includes climatic conditions and the impact of disease and pests. It is also exposed to the global supply/demand dynamics.
Distribution agreements with related parties – management advises that the terms of the agreement with related party GEL and Min (James) Jia-owned NZIT have been negotiated on an arm’s length basis. The sale of O:TU premium wines to these two distributors has been set at a premium to the average NZ white wine FY15 export price of NZ$11.86 per litre. The Listing Document (page 8) states that the premium is “dependent on MWE brand and varietal but that most of range is priced at a premium of 30% or more”. The GEL agreement can be terminated on 90 days’ written notice by either party. The loss of this agreement could place MWE at a disadvantage in the China market, however, management believes that acceptable alternative distribution agreements could be put in place with little or no impact on MWE’s market position in China.
Grape supply – all grapes are sourced from MWE’s vineyards. A reduction in the supply of high-quality grapes could limit MWE’s wine and bulk grape revenues.
Viticulture management – MWE engages experienced viticulturists and has put in place strategies to mitigate against the effects of frost, diseases, pests and birds. It has also developed dams to provide a water supply during the dry summer months.
Quality issues – it is possible that the wine harvesting and winemaking processes result in a reduction in quality of the finished product thus affecting product reputation, costs and future sales. The current dispute with the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) is an example of a dispute arising from the production process that could lead to a significant liability. See below for additional information on this dispute.
Size and market position – MWE is a relatively small boutique producer of premium NZ white wines and is in competition with much larger producers of white wine from the Marlborough region and other regions of NZ as well as producers from Australia, France, Italy, Spain, Chile and other large wine-producing countries. To provide some perspective, NZ-based listed wine company Delegat sold 2.2m cases of wine in FY15 and MWE sold 6,587 cases.
Key man risk – Min (James) Jia is the executive chairman, founder and owner of the Otuwhero Estate vineyard assets from April 2013. He is also the key to distributing bottled wines in China through related party distributors GEL and NZIT.
Premium white wine market in China – this is not as well established as the premium red wine market and there is a risk the market may not develop as quickly or extensively as MWE anticipates, which could affect sales revenues. However, in FY16 and FY17 the minimum purchase requirements under the related-party distribution agreements underpin between 87.5% and 93.8% of expected international bottled wine sales in FY16 and FY17.
Bulk grape purchase agreements – the current agreements expire after the FY17 harvest. New agreements need to be put in place and there is a risk they could be struck on less favourable terms than the existing agreements.
Processing agreement – MWE is reliant on a third-party processor for producing bulk and bottled wine. Any change to or termination of this agreement could have an adverse effect on the quantity and quality of wine available for sale.
Shanghai International Wine Exchange (SIWE) – only wine producers can make sales on the SIWE. NZIT (owned by Min (James) Jia) supplies wine to SIWE but the contract risk lies with MWE as the producer, which means MWE has provided a NZ$4.4m performance bond. MWE has an obligation to redeem wine not sold by SIWE at 102.5% of the original price. The current offering of O:TU wines on SIWE is 27,900 bottles of 2013 sauvignon blanc with a selling price of 680 yuan per bottle (NZ$143.72/US$103). Management advises that members (shareholders of MWE under the Joint Ownership scheme) receive a discount on wine purchased on SIWE and are able to purchase the wine at RMB360 per bottle. An NZ company owned by Min (James) Jia has novated the liability that MWE has to ICBC and has also provided an indemnity to MWE, which extinguishes all other liabilities that MWE may have under its contractual relationships with SIWE.
Dependence on the China market – MWE intends to develop markets outside China, in the US, Japan, South Korea, Australia and Europe. For FY15 (pro-forma) management advises that 76% of MWE’s exports were to China and Hong Kong.13
Listing document, page 31
Currency – sales to China and other international markets expose MWE to currency risks. MWE does not have a hedging policy in place.
SWOT analysis
Exhibit 16: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats
Strengths |
Weaknesses |
Vineyard not yet mature, therefore production +500 tonnes by 2023 |
Liquidity risk: free float of ~10% |
Vineyard expansion on 45ha vineyard-ready land |
Dependence on related party distributors in China |
Additional land for further vineyard development |
Reliance on China/HK market (76% of revenue in FY15) |
Wine listed on Shanghai International Wine Exchange |
Bottled wine KOM met via minimum purchase requirement from related distributor |
Wine served on China Airlines flights |
No contract for bulk grape sales beyond FY17 |
O:TU wines have won international awards |
Related party perception issues |
Marlborough sauvignon blanc wines synonymous with quality |
Small player in NZ sauvignon blanc market |
Established distribution network in China through related party distributors |
Small player in global wine market |
|
Gross margin of ~19% (FY15 PF) |
Opportunities |
Threats |
Expansion to new markets |
Ministry of Primary Industries dispute (NZ$1.2m stock impairment is possible) |
Development of new grape varieties and wine styles |
Breach of Overseas Investment Office consent ruling |
Acquisitions |
Quality issues |
Investment in other NZ sourced food and beverage products |
Exchange rate risk (76% of sales to China and HK) |
Improve gross margin by increasing bottled wine sales |
|
Strengths |
Vineyard not yet mature, therefore production +500 tonnes by 2023 |
Vineyard expansion on 45ha vineyard-ready land |
Additional land for further vineyard development |
Wine listed on Shanghai International Wine Exchange |
Wine served on China Airlines flights |
O:TU wines have won international awards |
Marlborough sauvignon blanc wines synonymous with quality |
Established distribution network in China through related party distributors |
|
Opportunities |
Expansion to new markets |
Development of new grape varieties and wine styles |
Acquisitions |
Investment in other NZ sourced food and beverage products |
Improve gross margin by increasing bottled wine sales |
Weaknesses |
Liquidity risk: free float of ~10% |
Dependence on related party distributors in China |
Reliance on China/HK market (76% of revenue in FY15) |
Bottled wine KOM met via minimum purchase requirement from related distributor |
No contract for bulk grape sales beyond FY17 |
Related party perception issues |
Small player in NZ sauvignon blanc market |
Small player in global wine market |
Gross margin of ~19% (FY15 PF) |
Threats |
Ministry of Primary Industries dispute (NZ$1.2m stock impairment is possible) |
Breach of Overseas Investment Office consent ruling |
Quality issues |
Exchange rate risk (76% of sales to China and HK) |
|
Source: Edison Investment Research
Other legal issues
There is a dispute between the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) and MWE’s former contracted wine processor. MWE is not a party to the ongoing dispute involving the origins of NZ$1.2m of bottled wine that the MPI alleges it cannot trace. If the MPI’s position is upheld, the wine will be destroyed. MWE is in discussions with its insurer, however, there is no guarantee that its insurance policy will cover this potential loss. MWE may have a claim against the processor. A worst case outcome is that MPI’s position is upheld, the wine is destroyed, there is no cover under MWE’s insurance policy and a claim cannot be made against the processor. The result would reduce bottled wine inventories by NZ$1.2m, which would see inventories as at 30 June 2015 restated at NZ$5.0m and an impairment charge against profits of NZ$1.2m. The directors have not made an impairment charge; the outcome is expected within six months.
O:TU Investments (OIL) obtained consent from the Overseas Investment Office (OIO) to acquire the Otuwhero vineyard, Donaldson’s Block and associated assets in April 2013. However, the restructure undertaken in preparation for a NXT listing inadvertently breached the consent because it increased Min (James) Jia’s interest by 3%. MWE became aware of this breach and in December 2015 lodged a retrospective consent application. The OIO remedies available are a fine (up to NZ$100,000), a penalty (up to NZ$300,000) and, in the worst case, selling down or disposing of some of the land.
Financials
MWE was incorporated on 18 March 2015 and audited financial statements are available for the period from incorporation to 30 June 2015. MWE has also prepared pro forma accounts for the 12 months ended 30 June 2015 to include the restructure as if it had taken place on 1 July 2014. These financial statements have not been audited.
Earnings
Because of a decline in the price of bulk wine, in 2015 MWE decided to hold bulk wine stocks until prices increased. This meant that sales of bulk wine that would normally have been made in FY15 were made in FY16. Management advises that at the date of the Listing Document in FY16 it had sold 770,000 litres of bulk wine. No details were provided of the price received. Under normal pricing conditions, it would be reasonable to expect that bulk wine would be sold in the year of production.
The income statement for 2015 does not include amortisation of intangibles. Future years’ profits will be reduced by an amortisation charge of NZ$515,315, which is based on the provisional useful life of the distribution rights of 10 years.
Exhibit 17: Income statements for 2015
NZ$ |
Actual FY15 |
% sales |
Pro forma FY15* |
% sales |
Pro forma FY15 ** |
Comment |
Sales |
1,840,189 |
100.0% |
2,414,175 |
100.0% |
2,800,365 |
Sales + other + int income |
Cost of goods sold |
(1,583,185) |
(1,956,231) |
||||
Gross Profit |
257,004 |
14.0% |
457,944 |
19.0% |
||
Cash operating expenses |
(298,495) |
(885,255) |
||||
Other revenue |
24,529 |
1.3% |
373,514 |
15.5% |
||
EBITDA |
(16,962) |
(53,797) |
1,013,564 |
EBIT + Depn |
||
Depreciation |
(105,918) |
(351,213) |
||||
EBIT before fair value adjustment |
(122,880) |
(405,010) |
662,351 |
Inc Fair Value Adj |
||
Fair value adjustment |
1,054,685 |
57.3% |
1,054,685 |
43.7% |
||
Net interest |
(91,499) |
(387,610) |
||||
NPBT |
840,306 |
45.7% |
262,065 |
10.9% |
||
Income tax |
(250,266) |
(92,454) |
||||
NPAT |
590,040 |
32.1% |
169,611 |
7.0% |
169,611 |
EBIT less Int paid & Tax |
Source: MWE data. The actual FY15 audited is for the period from incorporation (18 March 2015) to 30 June 2015. Pro forma FY15 (unaudited) is for the 12 months. Note: Pro forma FY15* is as per the unaudited financial statements and Pro-forma FY15** is as set out on Page 33 of the Listing Document
Fair value adjustments
NZ IFRS require certain assets to be stated at fair value rather than at historic cost. All movements in these fair values are reflected in and impact the Statement of Financial Performance. The assets affected are:
■
biological (vines); and
■
harvest provision release where inventory is valued at market value rather than costs incurred in the harvest process.
In 2015 the fair value adjustments resulted in additional gain of NZ$1.054m. According to management, this is offset by an increase in cost of goods sold of NZ$1,054m less biological asset adjustment of NZ$0.213m. According to the Listing Document (page 33), MWE has incurred an EBIT profit of NZ$0.6m or net profit after tax of NZ$0.2m for the year to 30 June 2015 (pro forma).
Balance sheet
Interest-bearing liabilities of NZ$6.1m are shown as current at 30 June 2015 because, as stated in the audited financial statements, the loan with ICBC was due to mature on 17 December 2015 and the intention was to apply for the loan to be refinanced for a two-year period. Management advises that this loan has been extended to 22 September 2016 and a new facility will be renegotiated after the NXT listing is complete.
Exhibit 18: Balance sheet as at 30 June 2015
NZ$ |
Comments |
|
Current assets |
||
Cash |
988,556 |
|
Accounts receivable |
1,195,961 |
68 days |
Inventory and WIP |
6,234,378 |
~1,050,000 litres wine |
Prepayments |
23,775 |
|
GST receivable |
441,616 |
|
Total current assets |
8,884,286 |
|
Non-current assets |
||
Property plant and equipment |
13,812,633 |
Purchased from Min (James) Jia |
Related party loan |
13,945 |
|
Investments (at cost) |
72,250 |
Loan – Blind River Irrigation |
Deferred tax |
153,276 |
|
Intangible assets |
5,153,450 |
Distribution rights – 10-year life |
Total non current assets |
19,205,554 |
|
Total assets |
28,089,840 |
|
Current liabilities |
||
Accounts payable |
232,553 |
|
Accrued expenses |
32,037 |
|
GST payable |
374,783 |
|
Income tax |
496,679 |
|
Interest bearing borrowings |
6,100,000 |
Interest only 6.79% - expires 22 September 2016 |
Shareholder loan |
70,632 |
|
Total current liabilities |
7,306,684 |
|
Net assets |
20,783,156 |
|
Equity |
||
Share capital |
15,000,226 |
85% owned by founders |
Retained earnings |
5,782,930 |
|
Total equity |
20,783,156 |
Source: MWE Audited Financial Statements 18 March 2015 to 30 June 2015
Cash flow
Cash flow from operations is negative, mainly because FY15 did not include sales of bulk wines that were deferred until FY16 due to weak market pricing.
There have been no dividends paid and the board has not yet set a dividend policy.
Exhibit 19: Cash flow – 18 March 2015 to 30 June 2015 (NZ$)
Net cash flow from operations |
(307,857) |
Fixed asset purchases |
(2,825) |
Disposal of assets |
2,900 |
Cash acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries |
888,711 |
Cash from shareholder advances |
396,524 |
Net change in cash |
977,453 |
Exchange adjustment |
11,103 |
Cash at end of period |
988,556 |
Net cash flow from operations |
Fixed asset purchases |
Disposal of assets |
Cash acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries |
Cash from shareholder advances |
Net change in cash |
Exchange adjustment |
Cash at end of period |
(307,857) |
(2,825) |
2,900 |
888,711 |
396,524 |
977,453 |
11,103 |
988,556 |
Source: MWE Audited Financial Statements as at 30 June 2015
Valuation
MWE is a young company that reported a NPAT of NZ$0.59m for the period from 18 March 2015 to 30 June 2015. The unaudited pro forma NPAT for the 12 months ended 30 June 2015 was NZ$0.170m. Management expects that as production volumes ramp up and sales of bottled wines increase from NZ$0.78m in FY15 to the company’s KOM estimate of NZ$3.4m in FY17 that profitability will increase significantly. MWE has not provided any forecast material other than the KOMs.
Sensitivity analysis
We have undertaken a sensitivity analysis using the company’s KOMs and a set of our assumptions to illustrate in Exhibit 21 the improved margin that could be achieved by selling increased quantities of higher margin bottled wine and reducing the amount of lower value bulk wine sales. For the purpose of this sensitivity, we have excluded other revenue and fair market value adjustments. This sensitivity analysis is not meant to be a forecast and has been provided to illustrate the impact of increasing production and changing product mix. Our sensitivity analysis shows cash-based gross margin could increase from 53.8% in FY15 to 58.0% in FY17 if all KOMs and our pricing and cost assumptions are met.
In our sensitivity analysis, we have assumed an increased cash cost of goods sold (per litre produced) because of increased volumes of bottled wines, which will include not only the crushing costs but the costs associated with winemaking and bottling. Details of assumptions and their sources are included in the table below.
Exhibit 20: Assumptions used to in gross profit margin (cash basis) sensitivity analysis
Assumptions |
FY15 |
FY16e |
FY17e |
Tonnes of grapes |
|||
Bulk grapes (from KOM) |
955 |
1,190 |
1,144 |
Bottled wine (tonnes grapes) (from KOM using 750 litres per tonne grapes) |
79 |
150 |
295 |
Bulk wine sales (tonnes grapes) (derived by taking KOM for grapes produced and deducting grapes sold as bulk grapes and grapes crushed to product bottled wine) |
367 |
320 |
105 |
Gross harvest |
1,401 |
1,660 |
1,544 |
Price of bulk wine per litre (NZ$) (Actual for FY15; $4 .00 per litre assumed from FY16e and 2% increase for FY17e) |
3.78 |
4.00 |
4.08 |
Bulk grape sales (per tonne) (NZ$) (Actual for FY15 and 2% increase pa for FY16e and FY17e) |
1,707 |
1,741 |
1,776 |
Total litres (inc bulk grapes conv to litres) |
|||
Bulk grapes in litres (750 litres per tonne) |
716,250 |
892,500 |
858,000 |
Bottled wine in litres (750 litres per tonne) |
59,008 |
112,811 |
221,165 |
Bulk wines in litres (750 litres per tonne) |
None sold |
23,969 |
7,884 |
Total litres |
775,258 |
1,029,280 |
1,087,048 |
Cash COGS (excluding fair value adjustment) per litre (NZ$) sold (FY15 actual, FY16e and FY17e we have increased costs to allow for additional costs associated with the increase in the volume of bottled wine) |
1.43 |
1.70 |
2.10 |
Operating cost increases assumed (to allow for increased costs associated with the increase in the volume of bottled wine sold) |
5.0% |
5.0% |
Source: MWE Audited Financial Statements as at 30 June 2015, Listing Document, June 2016, Edison Investment Research for assumptions made on prices for bulk wine and bulk grapes and for increases in COGS and operating costs.
Exhibit 21: Sensitivity analysis for gross margin (cash basis) improvement from product mix change
NZ$ |
FY15 |
FY16e |
FY17e |
Sales |
|||
Bottled wine (from KOM) |
784,213 |
1,737,293 |
3,405,940 |
Bulk grapes (from KOM and pricing assumptions in Exhibit 20) |
1,630,185 |
2,071,957 |
2,031,701 |
Bulk wine (quantity derived by taking KOM for grapes produced and deducting grapes sold as bulk grapes and grapes crushed to product bottled wine; pricing assumptions in Exhibit 20 |
- |
1,278.34 |
428.86 |
Total revenue |
2,414,175 |
3,810,528 |
5,438,070 |
Cash cost of goods sold* (excluding fair value adjustment) (FY15 actual, FY16e and FY17e we have increased costs to allow for additional costs associated with the increase in the volume of bottled wine, see Exhibit 20) |
1,114,513 |
1,749,776 |
2,282,802 |
Gross profit margin (cash basis) |
1,299,662 |
2,060,752 |
3,155,269 |
Gross margin (cash basis) % |
53.8% |
54.1% |
58.0% |
Operating costs (refer to assumptions in Exhibit 20) |
885,255 |
929,518 |
975,994 |
Cash base EBITDA (excluding "other revenues") |
414,407 |
1,131,234 |
2,179,275 |
Other revenue |
373,514 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Fair value adjustment |
1,054,685 |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Depreciation |
(351,213) |
(351,213) |
(351,213) |
Amortisation |
(515,345) |
(515,345) |
Source: MWE Audited Financial Statements as at 30 June 2015, Listing Document, June 2016, Edison Investment Research. Note: FY15 PF cash cost of goods sold excludes non-cash items totalling NZ$841,718 comprising a change in fair value of agricultural produce and inventories of biological assets as advised by management. This non-cash adjustment has reduced costs of production from NZ$1,956,231 as shown in the unaudited financial statements to NZ$1,114,513 on a cash basis.
Valuation methods
Where there is sufficient information available, fundamental valuations are undertaken using discounted cash flow analysis or other methods such as the dividend discount model or the Gordon’s growth model. To provide a valuation reference for MWE we have looked at how the market is pricing comparable companies.
There are two listed peers in the NZ/Australian market. Both companies are well established and are substantially larger than MWE and are therefore of limited relevance. Treasury Wine Estates is not considered to be a relevant peer because of its diversified product range, its global spread and its size which is 123x the market capitalisation of MWE.
Exhibit 22: Comparable company analysis
Company |
Currency |
Market cap (m) |
2016e P/E (x) |
2017e P/E (x) |
2018e P/E (x) |
2016e EV/EBIT (x) |
2017e EV/EBIT (x) |
2018e EV/EBIT (x) |
2016e yield (%) |
2017e yield (%) |
2018e yield (%) |
Australian Vintage |
A$ |
143 |
17.6 |
15.0 |
- |
13.9 |
12.2 |
2.8 |
3.2 |
||
Delegat Group |
NZ$ |
645 |
17.7 |
15.7 |
13.7 |
14.4 |
12.5 |
11.1 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
Average |
17.6 |
15.3 |
13.7 |
14.1 |
12.3 |
11.1 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
2.2 |
||
Treasury Wine Estates |
A$ |
7,160 |
32.1 |
25.4 |
22.0 |
20.3 |
15.0 |
13.3 |
2.0 |
2.7 |
3.1 |
Source: Bloomberg. Note: Price at 23 June 2016. All companies have a 30 June year end.
Due to lack of meaningful profit forecasts, we have also looked at EV/sales ratios, have included Foley Family Wines and used historic multiples as a reference point. If we assume that the Delegat and Foley Family Wines multiples (see Exhibit 23) are the most appropriate then MWE sales would need to increase from current levels of NZ$2.4m to between ~NZ$16m and ~NZ$21m (assuming EV/sales multiples of between 3.0x and 4.0x). The EV used for MWE is NZ$64m. comprising the implied market capitalisation of NZ$58.7m plus net debt of NZ$5.1m as of June 2015.
Exhibit 23: EV/sales multiples – peer group
Currency |
Market cap (m) |
2015 (x) |
2016e (x) |
2017e (x) |
|
Australian Vintage |
A$ |
143 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
Delegat Group |
NZ$ |
645 |
3.0 |
3.8 |
3.4 |
Foley Family Wines |
NZ$ |
82 |
3.3 |
N/A |
N/A |
Treasury Wine Estates |
A$ |
7,160 |
1.8 |
2.6 |
2.2 |
MWE* |
NZ$ |
58 |
26.5 |
Source: Bloomberg. Note: Priced at 23 June 2016. *MWE implied market cap based on the latest private placement of NZ$0.20 per share and 293.3m shares. Sales for FY15 are based on unaudited pro forma financial statements for FY15.