Premier Oil’s (PMO) half-year results included several indications of the operator’s intent to progress the development of Sea Lion. This included: 1) sanction by Premier’s board of the Tolmount gas project, a key project that precedes Sea Lion in Premier’s development hopper (Falkland’s accounted for c 44% of Premier’s December 2017 net 2P reserves); 2) PMO’s expectation of remaining FCF positive at $65/bbl including Sea Lion capex; 3) the appointment of a pathfinder bank to assist with the senior financing structure of Sea Lion; and 4) signature of letters of intent (LOIs) with selected contractors for the provision of services and vendor financing. LOIs have been signed with the Sea Lion FPSO provider, drilling contractor, subsea equipment provider, well services, subsea installation contractor and for helicopter services. While Premier did not provide guidance on the timing of final investment decision (FID) for Sea Lion, we assume the project will be sanctioned in mid-2019 with the potential for first oil four years later in 2023. Our latest Rockhopper RENAV of 73.6p/share assumes a 55% commercial chance of success for Sea Lion Phase 1 based on a long-term Brent crude price of $70/bbl.
Written by
Rockhopper Exploration |
Phase 1, a step closer to FID |
Sea Lion progress |
Oil & gas |
24 August 2018 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analysts
Rockhopper Exploration is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premier Oil’s (PMO) half-year results included several indications of the operator’s intent to progress the development of Sea Lion. This included: 1) sanction by Premier’s board of the Tolmount gas project, a key project that precedes Sea Lion in Premier’s development hopper (Falkland’s accounted for c 44% of Premier’s December 2017 net 2P reserves); 2) PMO’s expectation of remaining FCF positive at $65/bbl including Sea Lion capex; 3) the appointment of a pathfinder bank to assist with the senior financing structure of Sea Lion; and 4) signature of letters of intent (LOIs) with selected contractors for the provision of services and vendor financing. LOIs have been signed with the Sea Lion FPSO provider, drilling contractor, subsea equipment provider, well services, subsea installation contractor and for helicopter services. While Premier did not provide guidance on the timing of final investment decision (FID) for Sea Lion, we assume the project will be sanctioned in mid-2019 with the potential for first oil four years later in 2023. Our latest Rockhopper RENAV of 73.6p/share assumes a 55% commercial chance of success for Sea Lion Phase 1 based on a long-term Brent crude price of $70/bbl.
Year end |
Revenue |
PBT |
Cash from operations ($m) |
Net (debt)/ |
Capex |
12/16 |
7.4 |
98.0 |
(21.2) |
81.0 |
(40.2) |
12/17 |
10.4 |
(9.0) |
1.6 |
50.7 |
(26.8) |
12/18e |
10.7 |
(11.6) |
2.6 |
35.0 |
(18.5) |
12/19e |
8.9 |
(18.1) |
0.1 |
33.0 |
(2.2) |
Note: Figures as reported
Funding next step for Sea Lion
Key next steps in the advancement of Sea Lion include the finalisation of the pathfinder bank’s due diligence work for the project’s senior lending syndicate. Pathfinder due diligence work is likely to include inputs from numerous independent sources including the project reserves auditor and environmental consultant. The development of Sea Lion Phase 1 remains contingent on securing senior debt and vendor funding, Premier Oil/Rockhopper internal project sanction processes and Falkland Islands Government (FIG) approval. Based on progress made to date, we believe there is a greater likelihood that the project will proceed than not, hence we increase our commercial chance of success from 40% to 55%. Uncertainty remains around the timing of project FID and hence first oil. In its results commentary, Premier mentioned that lender due diligence processes could take three to six months.
Valuation: Sea Lion funding and FID remain key
Based on an assumed 55% commercial chance of success for Sea Lion Phase 1, our RENAV stands at 73.6p/share, up from our last published 62.9p/share. We continue to base our asset valuations on a long-term oil price of Brent at $70/bbl (2022) and mark to market for recent movement in $/£ FX rates. Rockhopper reported an end-December 2017 unaudited $51m in cash and no debt, providing visibility of funding of overheads. We expect this to fall to c $35m by year-end FY18.
Valuation: Phase 1, a step closer to FID
The commercial chance of success for Sea Lion Phase 1 used in our valuation is subjective and a key driver of our risked group valuation. Given progress made to date, operator optimism and with Brent crude trading above $70/bbl, we believe there is more chance of the project progressing than not, hence we increase our chance of success from to 55%. Subsurface risks are low for Sea Lion Phase 1 based on extensive historic appraisal of the resource base. We provide a sensitivity to this risk factor in Exhibit 1 below. The market appears to be using either a lower chance of success or lower oil price assumption (or combination of the two) than our base case.
|
Exhibit 1: Sea Lion Phase 1 de-risking |
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research |
A full breakdown of our risked asset valuation is provided below, with sensitivity to the weighted average cost of capital used in our asset NPVs. Based on a 12.5% WACC, our risked valuation stands at 73.6p/share. This is an increase from our last published valuation of 62.9p/share, and is predominantly driven by a higher chance of success for Sea Lion Phase 1. Minor changes include FX rates and the impact of slightly higher oil prices for FY18 and FY19 that influence the valuation of producing assets in Egypt and Italy, which make up 4% of our group valuation.
Exhibit 2: Rockhopper risked valuation
Shares: 457m |
|
|
|
Recoverable reserves |
Net risked value |
|||||||
|
WI |
CoS |
Gross |
Net |
NPV 12.5% |
Sensitivity to WACCs |
||||||
Asset |
Country |
First oil |
(%) |
(%) |
(mmboe) |
(mmboe) |
($/boe) |
($m) |
p/share |
10% |
15% |
20% |
Net (debt)/cash - Dec 2017 |
51 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
|||||||
G&A (NPV12.5 of five years) |
(21) |
(3.3) |
(3.3) |
(3.3) |
(3.3) |
|||||||
Cash to buyer of Civita assets |
(2) |
(0.3) |
(0.3) |
(0.3) |
(0.3) |
|||||||
Production |
||||||||||||
Guendalina |
Italy |
20% |
100% |
1.2 |
0.2 |
16.6 |
4 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
|
Abu Sennan |
Egypt |
22% |
100% |
10 |
2.2 |
7.5 |
17 |
2.6 |
2.9 |
2.4 |
2.0 |
|
Development |
||||||||||||
Sea Lion Phase 1 |
Falkland Islands |
2023 |
40% |
55% |
221 |
88 |
5.7 |
277 |
44.0 |
57.9 |
33.3 |
19.0 |
Sea Lion Phase 2 in PL32 |
Falkland Islands |
2028 |
40% |
20% |
87 |
35 |
4.0 |
28 |
4.4 |
6.7 |
2.9 |
1.2 |
Sea Lion Phase 2 in PL04 |
Falkland Islands |
2028 |
64% |
20% |
214 |
137 |
3.4 |
93 |
14.9 |
23.8 |
9.1 |
3.0 |
Ombrina Mare - under arbitration |
Italy |
16 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
||||||
Core NAV |
|
|
|
|
533 |
262 |
|
462 |
73.6 |
99.0 |
55.4 |
32.8 |
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: FX = US$/£0.73.
|
Exhibit 3: Rockhopper base case valuation waterfall |
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research |
Rockhopper reported end FY17 cash of $51m and no debt. We expect this to fall to c $35m by year-end FY18 (assuming a c $5m receivable unwind) as the company funds pre-sanction activity for Sea Lion, including corporate G&A as well as $3m for Abu Sennan and the Raya-1X well in Egypt.
Current cash is clearly not enough to fund the development of Sea Lion, but existing farm-out agreements with PMO will enable RKH to progress to Sea Lion first oil, based on the partner group’s estimated $1.5bn gross capex bill. Existing agreements call for a $337m development carry on Phase 1, with a similar-sized carry on further phases. Given the debt-biased financing structure outlined by PMO, the carry net to Rockhopper of the $375m equity finance for Phase 1 pre-first oil would only be $150m. We would therefore not be surprised to see an evolution of the existing farm-out agreement.
Risks and sensitivities
The economics of Sea Lion remain sensitive to our underlying oil price assumption and cost of capital, as shown in Exhibit 4. A $5/bbl reduction in our long-term oil price assumption (from $70/bbl Brent to $65/bbl) has a 17% negative impact on our Rockhopper RENAV. PMO estimates that the company’s net economics are break-even at c $45/bbl.
Exhibit 4: Rockhopper valuation sensitivity to long-term oil price and WACC*
WACC |
7.5% |
10.0% |
12.5% |
15.0% |
17.5% |
Oil price $/bbl |
|||||
50 |
50 |
35 |
24 |
17 |
12 |
60 |
93 |
68 |
49 |
37 |
27 |
70 |
135 |
99 |
74 |
55 |
42 |
80 |
178 |
131 |
99 |
75 |
58 |
90 |
219 |
163 |
123 |
94 |
73 |
Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: *Base case long-term $70/bbl Brent in 2022 and 12.5% WACC.
Funding risk: key risks are around Sea Lion’s partner group’s ability to secure vendor, senior debt and equity financing for the Phase 1 development.
Oil price risk: the bulk of Rockhopper’s value is dependent on long-term prices, although near-term cash flows are reliant on near-term realisations in Italy and Egypt.
Fiscal regime change: the FIG is unlikely to increase the fiscal take in the foreseeable future, especially given the current outlook for oil prices. Indeed, given the delays in getting project sanction, it is in everyone’s interest to incentivise first oil as soon as possible. A renegotiation of terms is therefore possible, but we are not including it in our assumptions.
Reservoir risk: Sea Lion has been extensively appraised, so reservoir distribution here is understood and the waxy nature of the Sea Lion crude known. Similar appraisal and analysis will be required at the Isobel-Elaine complex.
Argentina: relations between Argentina and the UK have thawed in recent years. In September 2016, the UK and Argentinian governments agreed to work together to remove “restrictive measures around the oil and gas industry, shipping and fishing affecting the Falkland Islands”. A second commercial flight to the Falklands is expected later this year, which requires UK and Argentinian support. We hope that a path to normalising diplomatic relations continues.
Payment and repatriation risk from Egypt: Egyptian production can be paid in a combination of Egyptian pounds and US dollars, and we believe that it is materially easier to be paid in Egyptian pounds (although to date Rockhopper has only accepted US dollars, paid directly into its UK bank accounts).
Exhibit 5: Financial summary
Accounts: IFRS, Year-end: December, US$000s |
|
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018e |
2019e |
2020e |
|
INCOME STATEMENT |
|||||||||
Total revenues |
|
|
1,910 |
3,966 |
7,417 |
10,401 |
10,683 |
8,894 |
7,703 |
Cost of sales |
|
|
(3,970) |
(11,049) |
(7,667) |
(9,573) |
(8,871) |
(10,317) |
(11,843) |
Gross profit |
|
|
(2,060) |
(7,083) |
(250) |
828 |
1,812 |
(1,423) |
(4,140) |
SG&A (expenses) |
|
|
(10,033) |
(10,895) |
(9,970) |
(5,282) |
(5,600) |
(5,740) |
(5,884) |
Other income/(expense) |
|
|
(1,782) |
(22,934) |
(8,237) |
(3,422) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Exceptional and adjustments |
|
5,844 |
(10) |
116,527 |
(1,830) |
(1,066) |
(2,966) |
(3,016) |
|
Depreciation and amortisation |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Reported EBIT |
|
|
(8,031) |
(40,922) |
98,070 |
(9,706) |
(4,854) |
(10,129) |
(13,039) |
Finance income/(expense) |
|
|
657 |
975 |
307 |
783 |
176 |
45 |
22 |
Other income/(expense) |
|
|
(209) |
(4,750) |
(333) |
(39) |
(6,968) |
(8,013) |
(9,215) |
Exceptional and adjustments |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Reported PBT |
|
|
(7,583) |
(44,697) |
98,044 |
(8,962) |
(11,646) |
(18,097) |
(22,232) |
Income tax expense (includes exceptional) |
|
|
(5) |
55,395 |
0 |
2,823 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Reported net income |
|
|
(7,588) |
10,698 |
98,044 |
(6,139) |
(11,646) |
(18,097) |
(22,232) |
Basic average number of shares, m |
|
|
289 |
293 |
446 |
457 |
457 |
457 |
457 |
Basic EPS ($) |
|
|
(2.6) |
3.7 |
22.0 |
(1.3) |
(25.5) |
(39.6) |
(48.6) |
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
(13,875) |
(32,814) |
(15,163) |
(2,403) |
2,722 |
1,069 |
1 |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
|
(13,875) |
(40,912) |
(18,457) |
(7,876) |
(3,788) |
(7,163) |
(10,023) |
Adjusted PBT |
|
|
(13,427) |
(44,687) |
(18,483) |
(7,132) |
(10,580) |
(15,131) |
(19,216) |
Adjusted EPS (c) |
|
|
(18.6) |
120.2 |
(13.4) |
(4.5) |
(25.3) |
(35.3) |
(44.2) |
Adjusted diluted EPS (c) |
|
|
(18.6) |
120.2 |
(13.4) |
(4.5) |
(25.3) |
(35.3) |
(44.2) |
BALANCE SHEET |
|
|
|||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
12,146 |
12,637 |
18,025 |
11,585 |
16,210 |
17,860 |
15,030 |
Goodwill |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Intangible assets |
|
|
204,164 |
256,658 |
426,419 |
432,147 |
439,476 |
431,758 |
426,728 |
Other non-current assets |
|
|
11,506 |
9,803 |
9,439 |
10,789 |
10,789 |
10,789 |
10,789 |
Total non-current assets |
|
|
227,816 |
279,098 |
453,883 |
454,521 |
466,475 |
460,407 |
452,546 |
Cash and equivalents |
|
|
199,726 |
110,434 |
81,019 |
50,729 |
35,036 |
33,021 |
30,000 |
Inventories |
|
|
2,188 |
1,670 |
1,608 |
1,621 |
1,621 |
1,621 |
1,621 |
Trade and other receivables |
|
|
4,681 |
6,199 |
17,184 |
16,840 |
16,000 |
16,000 |
16,000 |
Other current assets |
|
|
1,384 |
2,192 |
495 |
4,354 |
4,354 |
4,354 |
4,354 |
Total current assets |
|
|
207,979 |
120,495 |
100,306 |
73,544 |
57,011 |
54,996 |
51,975 |
Non-current loans and borrowings |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
86 |
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
60,960 |
106,893 |
93,174 |
85,245 |
92,213 |
100,226 |
109,440 |
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
60,960 |
106,893 |
93,174 |
85,245 |
92,213 |
100,226 |
109,526 |
Trade and other payables |
|
|
19,358 |
30,457 |
34,012 |
12,772 |
12,772 |
12,772 |
12,772 |
Current loans and borrowings |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
100,439 |
9 |
9 |
9,450 |
9,450 |
9,450 |
9,450 |
Total current liabilities |
|
|
119,797 |
30,466 |
34,021 |
22,222 |
22,222 |
22,222 |
22,222 |
Equity attributable to company |
|
|
255,038 |
262,234 |
426,994 |
420,598 |
409,052 |
392,955 |
372,773 |
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
CASH FLOW STATEMENT |
|
|
|||||||
Profit for the year |
|
|
(7,583) |
(44,697) |
98,044 |
(8,962) |
(11,646) |
(18,097) |
(22,232) |
Taxation expenses |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Net finance expenses |
|
|
(470) |
3,942 |
16 |
(743) |
6,792 |
7,968 |
9,192 |
Depreciation and amortisation |
|
|
2,186 |
2,744 |
4,725 |
5,687 |
6,546 |
8,268 |
10,060 |
Share based payments |
|
|
672 |
1,937 |
994 |
864 |
100 |
2,000 |
2,050 |
Other adjustments (impairments) |
|
|
(4,415) |
26,075 |
(115,546) |
5,652 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Movements in working capital |
|
|
(1,627) |
3,143 |
(9,433) |
(868) |
840 |
0 |
0 |
Interest paid / received |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Income taxes paid |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Cash from operations (CFO) |
|
|
(11,237) |
(6,856) |
(21,200) |
1,630 |
2,632 |
139 |
(929) |
Capex |
|
|
(11,261) |
(80,919) |
(40,203) |
(26,817) |
(18,500) |
(2,200) |
(2,200) |
Acquisitions & disposals net |
|
|
(24,037) |
0 |
(13,527) |
(6,266) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Other investing activities |
|
|
84,720 |
39,791 |
77,755 |
521 |
176 |
45 |
22 |
Cash used in investing activities (CFIA) |
|
|
49,422 |
(41,128) |
24,025 |
(32,562) |
(18,324) |
(2,155) |
(2,178) |
Net proceeds from issue of shares |
|
|
(225) |
(2,733) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Movements in debt |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
9,518 |
0 |
0 |
86 |
Other financing activities (includes rig settlement) |
|
|
439 |
2,219 |
(2) |
(13) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Cash from financing activities (CFF) |
|
|
214 |
(514) |
(2) |
(13) |
0 |
0 |
86 |
Increase/(decrease) in cash |
|
|
38,399 |
(48,498) |
2,823 |
(30,945) |
(15,693) |
(2,015) |
(3,021) |
Currency translation differences and other |
|
|
(1,155) |
(794) |
(2,238) |
655 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Cash at end of period |
|
|
99,726 |
50,434 |
51,019 |
20,729 |
5,036 |
3,021 |
0 |
Net (debt) cash |
|
|
199,726 |
110,434 |
81,019 |
50,729 |
35,036 |
33,021 |
29,914 |
Source: Company accounts, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Sea Lion capex covered by existing cost carry arrangements post sanction.
|
|
Research: TMT
EQS’s interims show good progress in its evolution into a leading technology provider to corporate entities. With its revamped cloud-based COCKPIT platform scheduled for launch in Q418 and an ever-tightening regulatory environment, the elements are in place to underpin medium- term growth. The additional costs are weighing on current-year profitability and FY18 EBITDA guidance has been reduced, but our view is that this is an investment in making the group a credible and scalable partner in investor relations and compliance, with an attractive monthly recurring revenue base.