Immunovia is preparing to market its IMMray PanCan-d for self-pay patients at high risk of pancreatic cancer (PC) in Q418, after preparatory activities were pushed back slightly from mid-2017 to 2018. To achieve reimbursement, a prospective trial in this population is being run and if positive, the test could be reimbursed in 2020. Immunovia is pursuing other groups ie patients with new-onset T2 diabetes aged 50+ and those with early gastric symptoms. Our revised valuation is SEK3.6bn as we now include early gastric symptoms. Autoimmune diseases represent upside.
Written by
Immunovia |
IMMray PanCan-d approaches the market |
Outlook |
Healthcare equipment & services |
22 March 2018 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analysts
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Immunovia is preparing to market its IMMray PanCan-d for self-pay patients at high risk of pancreatic cancer (PC) in Q418, after preparatory activities were pushed back slightly from mid-2017 to 2018. To achieve reimbursement, a prospective trial in this population is being run and if positive, the test could be reimbursed in 2020. Immunovia is pursuing other groups ie patients with new-onset T2 diabetes aged 50+ and those with early gastric symptoms. Our revised valuation is SEK3.6bn as we now include early gastric symptoms. Autoimmune diseases represent upside.
Year end |
Revenue |
PBT* |
EPS* |
DPS |
P/E |
Yield |
12/16 |
24.5 |
(14.7) |
(0.98) |
0.0 |
N/A |
N/A |
12/17 |
24.2 |
(45.2) |
(2.67) |
0.0 |
N/A |
N/A |
12/18e |
27.2 |
(61.8) |
(3.65) |
0.0 |
N/A |
N/A |
12/19e |
38.1 |
(73.4) |
(4.34) |
0.0 |
N/A |
N/A |
Note: *Normalised, excluding amortisation of acquired intangibles and exceptionals.
First self-pay sales in sight in high-risk patients
Immunovia plans to market its lead indication the IMMray PanCan-d test in late 2018 in the private self-pay market following a slight delay to its pre-marketing activities from mid-2017 to this year. The company is also running the PANFAM-1 study, a three-year prospective clinical trial in 1,000 high-risk patients to achieve reimbursement. At SEK5,000/test and two tests per year, we estimate the total market opportunity is c SEK2bn in the EU/US, based on c 200k potential patients.
PC in diabetes is a much larger opportunity
In December 2017, Immunovia started the prospective PANDIA-1 study in new-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients aged 50+ as part of a consortium. It is also continuing with the retrospective study using the biobank of Lund University Diabetes Centre (LUDC) which comprises samples from over 17,000 patients. Applied to the c 3.4m patients diagnosed with diabetes every year in the EU and the US, the opportunity is worth SEK34bn/year based two tests per year for three years at SEK5,000/test.
Trial in patients with early gastric symptoms starts
The prospective PANSYM-1 study started with a pilot study collecting samples from 360 patients with early gastric symptoms. The results of this study are expected this year and the trial will be expanded if they are positive. The company’s own primary research estimates a potential market of 1m tests in the US/EU, which is a SEK5bn opportunity at SEK5,000/test. Separately, the company’s platform has shown it can differentiate Lupus from other autoimmune diseases with 96% accuracy, representing future upside.
Valuation: updated to SEK3.6bn or SEK208/share
Our updated valuation is SEK208/share vs SEK155.2/share previously. The main change is the addition of the early symptoms population with 5% penetration and SEK250m peak sales. We add end-2017 net cash of SEK192.4m and roll the model forward in time. Due to increased costs and pushed out revenues we now have a funding gap of SEK150m in 2019. Peak sales are SEK2.7bn in the EU/US.
Investment summary
Company description: A versatile diagnostics platform
Immunovia AB is a technology platform and product development company headquartered in Lund’s Medicon Village in Sweden. The company was founded in 2007 based on research from Lund University and the Centre for Translational Cancer Research (CREATE Health) in Lund. Its proprietary technology platform IMMray utilises antibody microarrays to detect biomarkers of early disease to allow rapid treatment. The system is complemented with proprietary antibody libraries, antibody production and purification as well as software and clinical algorithms. The IMMray system has the potential to allow for monitoring of cancer treatment, predicting disease progression and assessing response to therapy. The company’s main product is IMMray PanCan-d, a blood-based test for early detection of pancreatic cancer. Immunovia floated on First North market in 2015. During 2017 the company submitted an application to list on Nasdaq Stockholm’s main market with a decision expected in Q118.
Valuation: rNPV of SEK3.6bn or SEK208/share
Our updated valuation is SEK3.6bn or SEK208/share vs SEK2.6bn or SEK155.2/share previously, based on a risk-adjusted NPV analysis using a 12.5% discount rate. The main change to our valuation is the addition of the early gastric symptoms group. We assume a price of SEK5,000 per test, in line with the pricing of other indications and peak sales of c SEK2.7bn in the EU and US. As previously, we project a 35% penetration rate in the c 200,000 population of high-risk patients, 5% in the 3.4 million newly diagnosed diabetic patients and 5% in patients with early gastric symptoms.
Financials: FY17 results released
Immunovia reported FY17 financial results on 15 February 2018. While R&D remains the main cost driver, Immunovia has also ramped up its marketing activities. Total operating expenses (including depreciation and amortisation) increased to SEK69.7m in FY17 from SEK39.4m in FY16, above our estimate of SEK46m. This increase was mainly driven by marketing activities and a new laboratory in the US. The number of full time employees increased to 34 at the end of 2017 vs 21 at end 2016. From 2017 to 2020 we expect Immunovia to fund the prospective PANFAM-1 clinical trial in individuals at high risk of pancreatic cancer at an estimated cost of SEK40m over three years; the PANDIA-1 study in newly diagnosed T2D patients over 50 years of age at an estimated cost of SEK90m for three years; and the PANSYM-1 study in patients with early vague gastric symptoms which we estimate will cost c SEK30m over three years. Due to the increased clinical trial activity and marketing expenses associated with the launch of IMMray PanCan-d, we are raising our total expense forecasts to SEK87.6m in 2018 and SEK101.5m in 2019 vs the previous SEK68.3m and SEK75.3m, respectively). Immunovia’s end of 2017 cash position was SEK192.4m. We project a cash shortfall in FY19e that we cover with SEK150m debt for illustrative purposes.
Sensitivities: Commercial execution is key
The key sensitivity is commercialisation. Immunovia plans to start the first self-pay sales in the high-risk population later this year. It needs to complete a number of activities to achieve this, including obtaining the CE mark in Europe, Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) accreditation in the US, ISO certifications and manufacturing scale up. Any delay in meeting these milestones would push back first revenues. Successful commercialisation will require reimbursement and managing price sensitive healthcare authorities in each country. For example, although FDA approval is not needed for reimbursement in the US, the strategy of marketing the product as a laboratory developed test (LDT) validated by a CLIA-accredited laboratory may limit its ability to distribute its test beyond the CLIA-certified lab and may mean a slow ramp-up in revenues and a lower probability of reimbursement. FDA approval, which requires additional resources, would increase the chances of getting reimbursement. As an example, Exact Sciences’s Cologuard was only reimbursed after FDA approval. True acceptance will likely only come after full reimbursement and inclusion in various cancer screening guidelines.
IMMray technology for the early diagnosis of cancer
Immunovia’s proprietary IMMray technology platform is based on the analysis of antibody microarrays. Through its in-house antibody production and purification facility the company generates a slide of 14 antibody arrays. Using the company’s bioinformatics platform the tests are processed and provide a snapshot of the patient’s disease status. This information can be used to assess the patient’s responsiveness to therapy, diagnostics, disease follow up and monitoring.
The company’s first product is IMMray PanCan-d, a blood-based test for the early detection of pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer is classified according to progression, with stages I and II being localised and amenable to surgical resection, while stages III and IV have spread to lymph nodes and other internal organs.
Exhibit 1: Pancreatic cancer is split into stages
Stages |
Comments |
Stage 0 |
Also called carcinoma in situ. Abnormal cells are found in the pancreas and may become cancer. |
Stage I |
Cancer has formed and is only in the pancreas. Stage IA: tumour is 2cm or smaller. Stage IB: tumour is larger than 2cm. |
Stage II |
Cancer may have spread to nearby tissue and organs, and may have spread to lymph nodes near the pancreas. Stage IIA: it has spread to nearby tissue and organs but has not spread to lymph nodes. Stage IIB: it has spread to nearby lymph nodes and may have spread to nearby tissue and organs. |
Stage III |
The tumour has spread to the major blood vessels near the pancreas and may have spread to nearby lymph nodes. |
Stage IV |
Cancer has spread to distant organs such as the liver, lung and the peritoneal cavity. |
Stages |
Stage 0 |
Stage I |
Stage II |
Stage III |
Stage IV |
Comments |
Also called carcinoma in situ. Abnormal cells are found in the pancreas and may become cancer. |
Cancer has formed and is only in the pancreas. Stage IA: tumour is 2cm or smaller. Stage IB: tumour is larger than 2cm. |
Cancer may have spread to nearby tissue and organs, and may have spread to lymph nodes near the pancreas. Stage IIA: it has spread to nearby tissue and organs but has not spread to lymph nodes. Stage IIB: it has spread to nearby lymph nodes and may have spread to nearby tissue and organs. |
The tumour has spread to the major blood vessels near the pancreas and may have spread to nearby lymph nodes. |
Cancer has spread to distant organs such as the liver, lung and the peritoneal cavity. |
Source: Edison Investment Research
Typically, symptoms do not appear until the disease has spread and it is too late for full resection. As a result, less than 5% of patients are alive five years after diagnosis. Early detection at stage I or II, when the tumour can be removed with surgery, could improve five-year survival rates to c 50%. Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal cancers with 53,000 new cases in the US in 2016 and an estimated 41,780 deaths, according to SEER. In the EU-27, there were 78,654 new cases and 77,958 deaths in 2012 according to EUCAN.
In addition to patients at high risk of pancreatic cancer, the company is targeting new-onset diabetic patients over 50 years of age. This population group has up to eight times higher risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Between 1% and 2% of patients with T2D develop pancreatic cancer. The test could be a first filter to diagnose early-stage PC that would be confirmed later.
Immunovia is also targeting patients with early gastric symptoms. Primary research conducted by the company’s academic collaborator, the University College of London (UCL) suggests that patients with early gastric symptoms undergo up to 18 visits to the doctor and a six- to nine-month delay until pancreatic cancer is diagnosed.
The company also has ongoing projects in other indications such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), prostate and breast cancer. To support clinical development and commercialisation, Immunovia works with key opinion leaders and top cancer research centres and consortia.
First sales on sight this year in the high-risk setting
Immunovia expects first sales of IMMray PanCan-d in the hereditary and familial risk patient group in late 2018. The company’s initial plan is to target the private sector, mainly individuals through patient organisations and pancreatologists at healthcare institutions that will pay for the tests from their own budget. In order to achieve this goal, Immunovia is working on several fronts:
■
Obtain ISO 13485 and ISO 17025 certifications
■
Obtain the CE mark following the 98/97/EC directive of In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices in Europe
■
Receive the CLIA/CPA accreditation in the US
■
Scale up manufacturing and ensure the reproducibility of laboratory processes
These preparatory activities were initially expected to be completed in mid-2017, but will now be conducted during 2018 and are critical to start commercialisation later in the year.
PANFAM-1 prospective trial to pave the way for reimbursement
Although sales are possible without reimbursement, we believe that securing reimbursement is central to the investment case, to maximise the potential of the test and achieve our peak sales forecast. Therefore, Immunovia is running a prospective clinical trial (PANFAM-1) in high-risk individuals (those with a family history of pancreatic cancer, hereditary pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis or rare genetic diseases such as Peutz-Jeghers syndrome or Lynch Syndrome) that started in December 2016. The study will run for three years and recruit 1,000 patients. This trial intends to show the clinical utility of the test by discriminating between people who have pancreatic cancer and those who do not, even at early stages. There will be a readout after an undisclosed number of events with final results expected in 2019, although these timelines depend on the enrolment of patients and centres that join the study. The study is being conducted in top research centres in the US and Europe.
Immunovia aims to have PanCan-d included in surveillance programmes in familial pancreatic cancer and we estimate that US and EU sales could represent a total SEK2bn opportunity. The company will market the test to pancreatologists with its own salesforce.
An extensive dataset of retrospective studies
Immunovia has conducted a number of retrospective trials where the main end point was the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUROCC or AUC, see Exhibit 3). This is an accuracy measure that relates to the ability of the test to discriminate among alternative states of health; in this case among pancreatic cancer and healthy individuals, other conditions of the pancreas or PC stages. On the back of these data the company has developed a signature of 35 biomarkers that discriminates pancreatic cancer from healthy samples and other pancreatic diseases.
The company’s largest study to date has been the Scandinavian study (n=1,355); IMMray PanCan-d was able to differentiate between stage I and II pancreatic cancer and healthy subjects at a rate of 96%, with 98% for stages I to IV and healthy subjects. The rate was 96% in the US validation study (see Exhibit 2). Rates are lower when discriminating between pancreatic cancer and other pancreatic diseases: 85% in one study, 70% in another (Exhibit 2).
Exhibit 2: Retrospective studies
Study |
Number of samples |
Data |
44 |
AUC=1 PC vs healthy individuals |
|
103 |
AUC=0.95 PC vs healthy individuals |
|
AUC=0.86 PC vs pancreatitis |
||
AUC=0.99 PC vs autoimmune pancreatitis |
||
AUC=0.85 PC vs combined healthy, pancreatitis and immune pancreatitis |
||
113 |
AUC=1 acute pancreatitis vs healthy controls |
|
AUC=0.96 chronic pancreatitis vs healthy controls |
||
AUC=0.98 autoimmune pancreatitis vs healthy controls |
||
338 |
PC vs healthy controls: average AUC 0.98, sensitivity 99%, specificity 80%. Average PPV of 96% and NPV of 95% |
|
PC vs other pancreatic disease: average AUC 0.7, 62% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 73% PPV, 71% NPV |
||
213 |
AUC value of 0.80 for early stage disease (stage I/II) and 0.96 for late stage disease (stage three/four) vs normal controls, respectively |
|
1,355 |
AUC value of 0.96 for stage I and II PC vs normal controls |
|
AUC value of 0.98 for all PC vs normal controls |
||
429 |
AUC=0.96 for PC stage I and II vs normal controls |
Source: Edison Investment Research, Immunovia. Note: PC = pancreatic cancer. AUC = area under the ROC Curve. PPV = positive predictive value. NPV = negative predictive value.
Sensitivity, specificity and the clinical value of a diagnostic test
It is important to reduce false positives as much as possible for a critical condition like pancreatic cancer. A good diagnostic test for pancreatic cancer needs to show that a positive result is actually a positive. Therefore, a high specificity and high positive predictive value (PPV) will ultimately determine the value of the test for this condition and influence reimbursement decisions. Ideally, the test needs to demonstrate a high specificity (true negatives) with high PPV (true positives according to the prevalence of the disease in a given population). In other words, the test needs to properly detect those patients with the disease and keep the false negatives to a minimum to reduce the need for expensive secondary testing with ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computerised tomography (CT) scan.
Exhibit 3: Measures of diagnostic accuracy
Concept |
Definition |
Sensitivity |
The ability of a test to correctly classify an individual with the disease |
Specificity |
The ability of a test to correctly classify an individual without the disease |
Positive predictive value (PPV) |
The probability that the disease is present when the test is positive eg a PPV of 15% means that among those who had a positive screening test, the probability of disease is 15% |
Negative predictive value (NPV) |
The probability that the disease is not present when the test is negative eg a NPV of 15% means that among those who had a negative screening test, the probability of being disease-free is 15% |
Area under the ROC curve (AUC) |
Estimate the discriminative power of a test. The closer to 1, the better the accuracy |
Concept |
Sensitivity |
Specificity |
Positive predictive value (PPV) |
Negative predictive value (NPV) |
Area under the ROC curve (AUC) |
Definition |
The ability of a test to correctly classify an individual with the disease |
The ability of a test to correctly classify an individual without the disease |
The probability that the disease is present when the test is positive eg a PPV of 15% means that among those who had a positive screening test, the probability of disease is 15% |
The probability that the disease is not present when the test is negative eg a NPV of 15% means that among those who had a negative screening test, the probability of being disease-free is 15% |
Estimate the discriminative power of a test. The closer to 1, the better the accuracy |
Source: Edison Investment Research
Since the incidence of pancreatic cancer is low (c 13 cases per 100,000 people), screening in the general population is not feasible. A test with 99% specificity and 99% sensitivity in a population with low incidence of a disease (like the 0.013% of pancreatic cancer) used to screen 100,000 individuals would detect nearly all patients with the disease, but would classify 1,000 healthy individuals as having the disease. This would result in a PPV of just 1.3%, which is too low to justify screening the general population. That is why it is important to focus on particular subgroups with increased incidence of pancreatic cancer. In the high-risk population, it is estimated that the incidence is around 2.2%, which is a PPV of c 60%, assuming the test has 99% sensitivity and specificity rates.
Exhibit 4: Competitors and current tests for PC
Company |
Product |
Status |
Description |
Data |
Cost per test ($) |
Interpace |
PancraGen TM |
Market |
Assesses the risk of cancer in precursor lesions. No direct competitor. Retrospective data. Reimbursed, but small sales due to invasiveness and inconclusive data |
Sensitivity: 47%-83% Specificity: 81%-100% PPV: 55%-100% NPV: 50%-97% |
Not disclosed |
Myriad |
Panexia |
Market |
Identifies patients with higher risk of developing cancer. Not competitive, but complementary to Immunovia |
Sensitivity: 99% Specificity: 99% |
3,025 |
Natimab |
EZR/ENOA Abs |
Clinical development |
Blood-based two marker test for prognosis and detection of pancreas cancer |
Sensitivity: 100% Specificity: 92.3% AUC: 0.96 |
NA |
VolitionRx |
NuQ |
Clinical development |
Blood test based on the NuQ nucleosome technology |
Sensitivity: 84% Specificity: 92% |
40-80 |
Trovagene |
Trovera KRAS ctDNA |
Pre-clinical |
Liquid biopsy. Measures ctDNA KRAS mutations |
Sensitivity: 30%-50% Specificity: 90% |
NA |
Current tests |
|||||
Various |
EUS |
Market |
Endoscopy ultrasound |
Sensitivity: 89% Specificity: 96% |
500 |
Various |
CA-19-9 |
Market |
Blood marker for follow up |
Sensitivity: 79% Specificity: 82% |
20-40 |
Source: Edison Investment Research, Immunovia
PANDIA-1 trial: diabetes is the next big market
In December 2017 Immunovia joined a consortium formed of the Lund and Uppsala Universities, Lund University Diabetes Centre, Region Skåne, Region Uppsala and more recently, the Danish Centre for Strategic Research into Type 2 Diabetes. The consortium will give Immunovia access to 9,500 new T2D patients over 50 years of age and run the prospective PANDIA-1 trial. The consortium has received a grant of SEK7.6m from SWElife, the Swedish government’s strategic innovation programme. According to Immunovia first data will be available in 2020 and full results in 2021.
In parallel Immunovia is conducting a retrospective study to compare samples from diabetes patients that developed pancreatic cancer with those who did not using the biobank of Lund University Diabetes Centre (LUDC). The LUDC has samples from all newly diagnosed patients in the Skåne region of Sweden, which is approximately over 17,000 patients.
Furthermore, Immunovia has signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the US National Cancer Institute to validate biomarkers to improve early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in patients over 50 years old with new onset diabetes. These patients have eight times more risk to develop pancreatic cancer.
While there is a link between pancreatic cancer and diabetes, it is unclear whether diabetes is a symptom or a cause of pancreatic cancer. Around 50% of patients with pancreatic cancer have T2D and they are often diagnosed shortly after of before their pancreatic cancer diagnosis. On the other hand, diabetes involves changes in cell metabolism, inflammation and other changes that may have cancer-promoting effects, which could increase the risk of cancer in certain cases. The prevalence of pancreatic cancer in T2D patients is around 1% to 2.2%, according to different studies. The Rochester study conducted in 2,127 diabetic subjects shows 1% of those over 50 years old being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer three years after diagnosis. A meta-analysis of 88 studies demonstrates a strong association between pancreatic cancer and recently diagnosed diabetes and highlights the risk of pancreatic cancer even long after the diagnosis of diabetes, suggesting that selective screening of patients recently diagnosed with diabetes for pancreatic cancer should be considered. Furthermore, since 2015 the UK’s NICE recommends a CT scan or ultrasound to assess for pancreatic cancer in people aged 60 and over with weight loss and new-onset diabetes. IMMray PanCan-d could be a first filter to diagnose early-stage pancreatic cancer that would be later confirmed.
With c 3.4 millon new patients per year and two tests per patient per year for three years, at a price of SEK5,000/test, this represents an annual opportunity of SEK34bn.
Evaluate IMMray’s potential in early gastric symptoms
Immunovia’s collaborator Professor Stephen Pereira and his team at the Institute for Liver and Digestive Health of the University College London (UCL) have started collecting samples from patients with early vague gastric symptoms. Up to 360 blood samples from this patient population will be used in a study that aims to assess the utility of IMMray PanCan-d in this population. This study will present interim data in 2018 and now forms the initial part of the prospective PANSYM-1 study.
An American study published in 2015 found that c 31% of pancreatic cancer patients are initially misdiagnosed. The most common misdiagnosis was gallbladder disease, followed by gastroesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcer disease. Importantly, there was an average three-month time difference from the first visit to a physician to the actual cancer diagnosis in patients who were initially misdiagnosed with respect to those that were correctly diagnosed. Patients who were initially misdiagnosed had a 1.4-fold greater risk of having stage III or IV disease at the time of the pancreatic cancer diagnosis. There was a trend toward shorter survival among those who were initially misdiagnosed (median overall survival of 9.6 vs 10.3 months).
The UCL’s primary research suggests that patients that present to their doctor with early symptoms such as abdominal pain (in 39% of cases), jaundice (36%), change in bowel habit (30%), or dyspepsia (21%) undergo up to 18 visits and six- to nine-months until pancreatic cancer is diagnosed. Hence, identifying patients with pancreatic cancer and initial vague symptoms could lead to improved diagnosis and earlier treatment.
The fact that there are not noticeable symptoms or that they are vague (weight loss, abdominal pain, jaundice) make pancreatic cancer difficult to detect at early stages and therefore difficult to treat and deadly.
We now include this indication in our valuation and estimate a potential opportunity of SEK5bn based on the company’s estimate of 1m tests per year at SEK5,000/test. We forecast that the company achieves 5% of this market in 2028.
IMMray in autoimmune diseases provides upside
Immunovia has generated data from its IMMray biomarker microarray in autoimmune diseases. In particular, data from a retrospective trial in 315 blood samples designed to assess IMMray SLE biomarker signature showed that IMMray can differentiate samples with SLE from other diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), vasculitis and Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) with 96% accuracy. The data are relevant as up to half of SLE cases are usually misdiagnosed, according to Immunovia.
Further data show the potential of the IMMray signatures in the differential diagnosis of autoimmune diseases. IMMray differentiated rheumatoid arthritis from a mix of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjögren syndrome and systemic vasculitis (SV), with 89% accuracy. It differentiated RA from SS, and SV, with accuracies of 83% and 95%, respectively.
The company is collaborating with Linköping University to discover biomarkers to explore IMMray’s potential in autoimmune diseases. Immunovia plans to do additional tests in SLE and RA.
Sensitivities
As previously discussed, the key sensitivity is market penetration. To secure payers’ acceptance the test needs to demonstrate high specificity with high PPV. This would avoid expensive secondary testing. Initial self-pay sales may gain some traction in the US where this market is more developed, but more widespread acceptance will come after positive data from the prospective study, regulatory approval and full reimbursement is granted. The company plans to obtain the CE mark in Europe and market its product as an LDT under the CLIA waiver programme in the US among other activities needed to start commercialisation. The timeline for this is 2018 (vs the previous target of mid-2017); if these activities are completed as planned, launch could be possible in late 2018. We believe that true acceptance will come after a full reimbursement and inclusion in various cancer screening guidelines. This may involve the need for FDA approval which may require additional trials to be conducted that are not currently included in our forecasts.
Expansion to other population groups such as autoimmune diseases and other cancer indications could provide upside.
Financials
We now project first sales in late 2018, hence we have adjusted our forecast to SEK2.7m from SEK9.4m to reflect the late launch of IMMray PanCan-d. Additionally, we forecast similar levels of revenues in the form of capitalised R&D work in FY18 (c SEK24.5m) that will decrease from 2019 onwards as clinical trials begin to complete. We forecast increased sales from 2020 onwards as the company obtains approval and reimbursement for IMMray PanCan-d in the high-risk indication and from 2021 in the other two indications. We model increasing total operating costs of SEK87.6m in FY18e (vs SEK68.3m before) as a result of a further SEK10m rise in R&D for the new PANSYM-1 study and marketing activities. We project the PANFAM-1 study in the at-risk population to consume SEK40m in 2017-19, the PANDIA-1 study in the T2D population to cost SEK90m and run from 2018 to 2020 and the PANSYM-1 study to consume SEK30m from 2018 to 2020.
Exhibit 6: Forecast adjustment
Concept (SEKm) |
2017e |
2017 actual |
2018e previous |
2018e new |
Total revenues |
27.8 |
24.2 |
43.6 |
27.2 |
Opex (incl. depreciation & amortisation) |
46 |
69.7 |
68.3 |
87.5 |
Operating profit/(loss) |
(18.2) |
(45.5) |
(31.3) |
(62.3) |
Net profit/(loss) |
(17.5) |
(45.2) |
(30.8) |
(61.8) |
Cash flow from operations |
(19.7) |
(46.5) |
(33.7) |
(62.3) |
Source: Company accounts. Edison Investment Research
Immunovia’s end of 2017 cash position was SEK192.4m, which we estimate should be sufficient to fund operations for the next 18 months. We expect Immunovia to end 2018 with a cash balance of SEK100m. Due to increased clinical activity and commercial activities we project a cash shortfall in 2019 that we cover with SEK150m debt for illustrative purposes. We expect Immunovia to achieve positive operating cash flow in 2021.
Exhibit 7: Financial summary
SEK '000s |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018e |
2019e |
||
Year end 31 December |
GAAP |
GAAP |
GAAP |
GAAP |
GAAP |
||
PROFIT & LOSS |
|||||||
Revenue |
|
|
17,007 |
24,503 |
24,249 |
27,222 |
38,123 |
Cost of Sales |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(1,889) |
(10,142) |
||
Gross Profit |
17,007 |
24,503 |
24,249 |
25,333 |
27,981 |
||
Operating expenses |
(17,377) |
(24,115) |
(39,113) |
(53,333) |
(53,333) |
||
Personnel |
(6,749) |
(14,815) |
(29,138) |
(32,052) |
(45,000) |
||
EBITDA |
|
|
(7,136) |
(14,429) |
(44,256) |
(60,052) |
(70,354) |
Operating Profit (before amort. and except.) |
(7,424) |
(14,978) |
(45,520) |
(62,252) |
(73,670) |
||
Intangible Amortisation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
||
Exceptionals/Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Operating Profit |
(7,424) |
(14,978) |
(45,520) |
(62,252) |
(73,669) |
||
Net Interest |
40 |
255 |
288 |
481 |
264 |
||
Exceptionals/Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Profit Before Tax (norm) |
|
|
(7,384) |
(14,723) |
(45,232) |
(61,771) |
(73,406) |
Profit Before Tax (IFRS) |
|
|
(7,384) |
(14,723) |
(45,232) |
(61,771) |
(73,405) |
Tax |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Discontinued operations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Profit After Tax (norm) |
(7,384) |
(14,723) |
(45,232) |
(61,771) |
(73,406) |
||
Profit After Tax (IFRS) |
(7,384) |
(14,723) |
(45,232) |
(61,771) |
(73,405) |
||
Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m) |
11.42 |
14.99 |
16.93 |
16.93 |
16.93 |
||
EPS - normalised (ore) |
|
|
(65) |
(98) |
(267) |
(365) |
(434) |
EPS - normalised (ore) |
|
|
(65) |
(98) |
(267) |
(365) |
(434) |
Dividend per share (ore) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
||
Gross Margin (%) |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
||
EBITDA Margin (%) |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
||
Operating Margin (before GW and except.) (%) |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
||
BALANCE SHEET |
|||||||
Fixed Assets |
|
|
14,556 |
22,485 |
46,761 |
66,326 |
83,339 |
Intangible Assets |
13,885 |
19,483 |
36,791 |
59,115 |
76,128 |
||
Tangible Assets |
671 |
3,002 |
7,211 |
7,211 |
7,211 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
2,759 |
0 |
0 |
||
Current Assets |
|
|
76,959 |
260,925 |
204,009 |
106,506 |
167,549 |
Stocks |
0 |
0 |
0 |
378 |
1,521 |
||
Debtors |
814 |
1,830 |
11,584 |
540 |
3,559 |
||
Cash |
75,767 |
259,095 |
192,425 |
105,589 |
162,469 |
||
Other |
378 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
(7,713) |
(6,778) |
(13,975) |
(567) |
(2,028) |
Creditors |
(1,252) |
0 |
0 |
(567) |
(2,028) |
||
Short term borrowings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Deferred revenues |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other short term liabilities |
(6,461) |
(6,778) |
(13,975) |
0 |
0 |
||
Long Term Liabilities |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(150,000) |
Long term borrowings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(150,000) |
||
Deferred revenues |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other long term liabilities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Net Assets |
|
|
83,802 |
276,632 |
236,795 |
172,265 |
98,860 |
CASH FLOW |
|||||||
Operating Cash Flow |
|
|
-2,844 |
(11,868) |
(46,525) |
(62,313) |
(72,789) |
Net Interest |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Tax |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Capex |
-8,636 |
(30,809) |
(31,187) |
(24,524) |
(20,330) |
||
Acquisitions/disposals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Financing |
55,441 |
207,233 |
4,923 |
0 |
0 |
||
Dividends |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
18,772 |
8,880 |
0 |
0 |
||
Net Cash Flow |
43,961 |
183,328 |
(63,909) |
(86,836) |
(93,119) |
||
Opening net debt/(cash) |
|
|
(31,804) |
(75,767) |
(259,095) |
(192,425) |
(105,589) |
HP finance leases initiated |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Exchange rate movements |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
1 |
0 |
(2,761) |
0 |
0 |
||
Closing net debt/(cash) |
|
|
(75,767) |
(259,095) |
(192,425) |
(105,589) |
(12,469) |
Source: Company accounts, Edison Investment research
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The year 2017 was marked by steady progress in Intec’s development program of AP-CDLD for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). The drug is a co-formulation of widely used carbidopa and levodopa using the company’s proprietary accordion pill (AP) technology. The program is in Phase III with more than 300 (of 420) patients enrolled to date with full enrolment expected in H218.