Last close As at 06/08/2026
—
— 0.00 (0.00%)
Market capitalisation
—
Research: Investment Companies
The Brunner Investment Trust (BUT) has welcomed another experienced manager into its team. Julian Bishop joined Allianz Global Investors (AllianzGI) on 1 November 2022, following the departure of Matthew Tillett. He is working alongside BUT’s lead portfolio manager, Christian Schneider, and deputy portfolio managers Marcus Morris-Eyton and Simon Gergel. Schneider says that the trust has a key focus on quality, with the team aiming to outperform BUT’s global/UK composite benchmark in all market environments. The trust is on track for its 51st consecutive year of higher annual dividends and currently offers a 2.1% yield.
The Brunner Investment Trust |
An ‘all-weather’ fund for global investors |
Investment trusts |
30 November 2022 |
Analyst
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Brunner Investment Trust (BUT) has welcomed another experienced manager into its team. Julian Bishop joined Allianz Global Investors (AllianzGI) on 1 November 2022, following the departure of Matthew Tillett. He is working alongside BUT’s lead portfolio manager, Christian Schneider, and deputy portfolio managers Marcus Morris-Eyton and Simon Gergel. Schneider says that the trust has a key focus on quality, with the team aiming to outperform BUT’s global/UK composite benchmark in all market environments. The trust is on track for its 51st consecutive year of higher annual dividends and currently offers a 2.1% yield.
|
NAV outperformance versus the benchmark over the last three years |
|
|
Source: Refinitiv, Edison Investment Research. Note: Total returns in sterling. |
The analyst’s view
BUT’s managers have a very disciplined approach to bottom-up stock selection based on the three pillars of quality, growth and valuation. The resulting portfolio of 60 to 80 high-quality businesses is diversified by geography, sector and market cap and has exposure to structural growth trends such as digitisation and the switch to renewable energy. This should help the managers navigate what is undoubtably a tough macroeconomic backdrop as rising costs are negatively affecting consumer spending and corporate profitability. In addition, many market participants and corporate leaders have never experienced an environment of persistently higher inflation and rising interest rates, so above-average levels of stock market volatility look set to continue.
Scope for a higher valuation
BUT’s 11.7% share price discount to cum-income NAV is not dissimilar to the 10.5% to 12.0% range of average discounts over the last one, three, five and 10 years. However, the trust has some appealing attributes which offer scope for a higher valuation. In a volatile market environment, BUT’s focus on high-quality businesses and its measured approach to generating both long-term capital and income growth could find favour with investors.
The trust’s NAV total return currently ranks first out of 15 funds in the AIC Global sector over the last 12 months, while it is comfortably above average over the last three and five years. BUT’s NAV has also outperformed its benchmark over the last three, five and 10 years.
Recent developments
4 October 2022 – an announcement that Julian Bishop would join the AllianzGI team managing BUT, effective from 1 November 2022, as a senior portfolio manager with a view to becoming co-lead manager with Christian Schneider in due course. Bishop has 25 years’ investment experience as a global equity analyst and portfolio manager, most recently as a senior global equity portfolio manager with Tesco Pension Investment and before that with Sarasin & Partners.
26 July 2022 – BUT’s board announced that lead manager Matthew Tillett had stepped down and would be replaced by Christian Schneider, one of the trust’s deputy managers, for a minimum of six months. He works closely with BUT’s other deputy managers, Marcus Morris-Eyton and Simon Gergel, AllianzGI’s CIO of UK equities. The board and AllianzGI would continue to review the structure of the team, including the appointment of a permanent lead portfolio manager.
The fund managers: Christian Schneider, Julian Bishop, Marcus Morris-Eyton and Simon Gergel
The managers’ view: Three pillars of quality, growth and value
While there is a team-based approach in managing BUT’s portfolio, lead manager Schneider has ultimate responsibility, although it is envisaged that in due course, he and Bishop will be co-lead managers. Schneider highlights how BUT’s quality-oriented, balanced portfolio helps to insulate the trust’s performance from style biases in the stock market. The manager is keen to continue generating both long-term capital and income growth supporting BUT’s progressive dividend policy; the annual distribution has increased for the last 50 consecutive years.
Morris-Eyton explains that BUT has a clear investment philosophy where portfolio stocks must fulfil the team’s three broad criteria of quality, growth and value. In terms of quality, investee companies have long-term records of sustainable competitive advantages such as a brand (LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, LVMH) or product (Microsoft). They have strong balance sheets and proven management teams that do not overpromise and underdeliver. These businesses generate high and sustainable returns and have creditable approaches towards ESG issues. BUT’s portfolio companies have secular growth opportunities with potential to grow throughout an economic cycle, while valuation is an important consideration; the managers seek firms that are trading below their estimated intrinsic values. Morris-Eyton notes that on a forward P/E multiple basis, BUT’s portfolio has a modestly higher valuation compared with the global market but it has around twice the estimated year-one earnings growth.
Gergel highlights the very broad resources at AllianzGI that the BUT team is able to draw on, including Grassroots, which he describes as a unique market research platform. The trust has an investment universe of more than 6k stocks and its portfolio is made up of 60–80 holdings selected following diligent stock selection. Gergel says that BUT is a well-diversified actively managed fund; positions are sold if they are reaching or have met full value, a better idea has been identified or if there is a change in the investment case or operating environment – the managers are willing to sell a holding at a loss if that is deemed appropriate.
There are a series of themes represented within BUT’s portfolio. Schneider focuses on digitisation where the fund is invested across the value chain. The trust has infrastructure assets including Microsoft, Visa, Microchip Technology, Amphenol Corporation and Atlas Copco. BUT has a holding in business-to-business company Intuit, which has recurring revenue and growth opportunities from its number-one global position providing online tax-filing services and accounting software for small businesses. The trust also has a holding in business-to-consumer company Charles Schwab Corporation, a dominant online provider of banking, investing and wealth-management services.
Morris-Eyton highlights structural demand growth in the healthcare sector. The projected old-age dependency ratio, which is the number of old-age dependents (persons aged 65 years or over) per 100 persons of working age (aged 20 to 64 years), is increasing significantly, led by Europe, Australia and New Zealand and North America. Over the long term, rising incomes mean there is more wealth available to spend on healthcare systems. According to the manager, BUT has numerous touchpoints with the healthcare sector such as: insurance (UnitedHealth); diagnostics (Agilent and Roche); treatment (Intuitive Surgical, the global leader in robotic surgery, and Cooper Companies, which has an IVF franchise and a contact lens recurring revenue business); outpatient (Ecolab provides infection protection across a range of industries); and aftercare (Novo Nordisk, which has the leading global diabetes franchise and a growing business tackling obesity, and GSK (formerly GlaxoSmithKline)).
Gergel focuses on cheaper, decentralized electricity generation that is fuelling energy demand. He says that climate change is leading to increased efficiency and a shift away from fossil fuels towards renewable energy, with electricity demand expected to double by 2050. The manager says there are powerful growth themes within the energy and related sectors that are represented in BUT’s portfolio, such as Rio Tinto, which he says is fundamental for energy transmission and industrial automation and instrumentation. Gergel comments that there are renewable energy generation projects at well-established energy companies including Shell, TotalEnergies and Iberdrola, while the trust has exposure to grid and infrastructure assets such as National Grid and Schneider Electric.
Turning his attention to one of BUT’s holdings, the manager says that Unilever fits in well with the trust’s quality, growth and valuation criteria. The company has a portfolio of global brands and has a long history of good growth, high returns and pricing power, and is seen as a pioneer in sustainability issues. Unilever has a strong position in emerging markets, which offers the potential for above-average long-term growth. The firm’s valuation was depressed, which provided the managers with an attractive entry point as investors were disappointed with Unilever’s bid for GSK’s consumer assets, some poor operational performance, and less exposure than its peers to the United States, which has performed relatively well this year.
Morris-Eyton highlights BUT’s position in LVMH, which has 85 brands with the most important, Louis Vuitton, generating c 80% of the company’s EBIT. The manager considers LVMH to be an amazingly successful company that grew through the pandemic and continues to take market share. The firm is diversifying its brand portfolio and the company is 60% larger now than before COVID-19, and its leather goods business is 80% larger. While investors have to pay a premium for this superior-quality company, the manager considers its valuation is compelling as LVMH has derated in 2022 along with other growth stocks.
Current portfolio positioning
At end-October 2022, BUT’s top 10 holdings made up 32.2% of the fund, which was a modestly higher concentration compared with 31.1% a year before; five positions were common to both periods. There is a notably higher exposure to UnitedHealth, which has now claimed the top spot in the trust’s portfolio.
Exhibit 1: Top 10 holdings (as at 31 October 2022)
Company |
Country |
Sector |
Portfolio weight % |
|
31 Oct 2022 |
31 Oct 2021* |
|||
UnitedHealth |
US |
Healthcare providers |
5.5 |
4.3 |
Microsoft |
US |
Software & computer services |
4.7 |
5.4 |
Visa |
US |
Industrial support services |
4.0 |
N/A |
Munich Re |
Germany |
Non-life insurance |
3.5 |
2.7 |
Roche |
Switzerland |
Pharmaceuticals & biotechnology |
2.8 |
2.9 |
Shell |
UK |
Oil, gas & coal |
2.6 |
N/A |
TotalEnergies |
France |
Oil, gas & coal |
2.3 |
N/A |
AMETEK |
US |
Electronic & electrical equipment |
2.3 |
N/A |
Microchip Technology |
US |
Technology hardware & equipment |
2.2 |
N/A |
Schneider Electric |
France |
Energy management & automation |
2.2 |
2.3 |
Top 10 (% of portfolio) |
32.2 |
31.1 |
||
Source: BUT, Edison Investment Research. Note: *N/A where not in end-October 2021 top 10.
Exhibit 2 shows that BUT’s portfolio is diversified by both geography and sector. The geographic data is somewhat confusing as the chart is based on where companies are listed. Data from BUT show that looking where investee businesses generate their revenue, the fund’s broad geographic exposure is c 40% North America, around one-third Europe, c 20% Asia-Pacific (including Japan) and c 5% rest of the world.
|
Exhibit 2: Portfolio geographic (left) and sector (right) exposure at 31 October 2022 |
|
|
|
|
Source: BUT, Edison Investment Research |
|
|
Exhibit 2: Portfolio geographic (left) and sector (right) exposure at 31 October 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: BUT, Edison Investment Research |
Performance and peer group comparison
Exhibit 3: Five-year discrete performance data
12 months ending |
Share price |
NAV* |
Benchmark |
CBOE UK All Companies (%) |
MSCI All World exUK (%) |
31/10/18 |
(1.9) |
(0.2) |
2.6 |
(1.6) |
4.2 |
31/10/19 |
14.6 |
10.6 |
10.7 |
6.9 |
12.1 |
31/10/20 |
(3.6) |
(2.0) |
(1.7) |
(20.2) |
6.9 |
31/10/21 |
36.5 |
38.8 |
31.9 |
36.0 |
29.8 |
31/10/22 |
(2.6) |
(4.3) |
(3.3) |
(1.6) |
(4.6) |
Source: Refinitiv. Note: All % on a total return basis in pounds sterling. *NAV with debt at market value.
Looking at BUT’s relative returns in Exhibit 5, its NAV has outpaced the performance of its benchmark over the last three, five and 10 years, while lagging over the shorter periods shown. It is worth noting the trust’s significant outperformance of the broad UK market over the last three, five and 10 years, illustrating the potential benefits of investing overseas.
Over the last year, BUT’s healthcare stocks, including UnitedHealth, AbbVie and Novo Nordisk, have been important positive contributors to the trust’s relative performance. On the negative side, the largest detractors have been more diverse including Adidas (sportswear manufacturer), Tyman (building products) and Partners Group (private equity).
|
Exhibit 4: Investment trust performance to 31 October 2022 |
|
Price, NAV and benchmark total return performance, one-year rebased |
Price, NAV and benchmark total return performance (%) |
|
|
|
Source: Refinitiv, Edison Investment Research. Note: Three-, five- and 10-year performance figures annualised. |
|
Exhibit 5: Share price and NAV total return performance, relative to indices (%)
|
One month |
Three months |
Six months |
One year |
Three years |
Five years |
10 years |
Price relative to benchmark |
1.1 |
0.0 |
(1.7) |
0.7 |
2.2 |
1.2 |
13.1 |
NAV relative to benchmark |
(0.5) |
(1.8) |
(0.5) |
(1.0) |
3.8 |
0.9 |
8.0 |
Price relative to CBOE UK All Companies |
0.8 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
(1.0) |
20.0 |
28.3 |
65.3 |
NAV relative to CBOE UK All Companies |
(0.8) |
(0.2) |
2.8 |
(2.8) |
21.9 |
27.9 |
57.8 |
Price relative to MSCI All World ex-UK |
1.3 |
(0.5) |
(2.8) |
2.1 |
(3.3) |
(6.9) |
(7.8) |
NAV relative to MSCI All World ex-UK |
(0.3) |
(2.4) |
(1.7) |
0.3 |
(1.8) |
(7.2) |
(11.9) |
Source: Refinitiv, Edison Investment Research. Note: Data to end-October 2022. Geometric calculation.
The AIC Global sector is made up of 15 funds following a variety of investment mandates. Having outperformed over a multi-year period, companies with a growth bias such as Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust and Monks Investment Trust are having a tougher time this year as investor preferences have changed in an environment of sustained higher inflation and rising interest rates. With its balanced approach of seeking both long-term capital and income growth from a portfolio of listed high-quality companies BUT can be considered as more of a ‘core’ or ‘all-weather’ fund.
Exhibit 6: AIC Global sector at 29 November 2022*
% unless stated |
Market |
NAV TR |
NAV TR |
NAV TR |
NAV TR |
Discount |
Ongoing charge |
Perf. |
Net gearing |
Dividend yield |
Brunner Investment Trust |
431.2 |
(1.7) |
26.5 |
43.0 |
173.2 |
(11.9) |
0.6 |
No |
106 |
2.1 |
Alliance Trust |
2,840.1 |
(6.8) |
19.3 |
36.8 |
174.8 |
(4.7) |
0.6 |
No |
105 |
2.5 |
AVI Global Trust |
960.4 |
(7.1) |
33.1 |
42.9 |
153.5 |
(8.6) |
0.9 |
No |
105 |
1.7 |
Bankers Investment Trust |
1,307.8 |
(8.1) |
19.2 |
36.5 |
189.3 |
(7.5) |
0.5 |
No |
107 |
2.2 |
Blue Planet Investment Trust |
4.7 |
(64.4) |
(72.0) |
(73.9) |
(51.6) |
(15.3) |
5.2 |
No |
151 |
5.5 |
F&C Investment Trust |
4,759.0 |
(6.9) |
25.5 |
45.8 |
206.9 |
(2.2) |
0.5 |
No |
106 |
1.5 |
JPMorgan Elect Managed Growth |
257.8 |
(7.4) |
18.4 |
34.7 |
181.4 |
(3.1) |
0.5 |
No |
100 |
1.8 |
Keystone Positive Change Inv |
132.1 |
(27.4) |
(33.2) |
(29.1) |
19.7 |
(11.5) |
0.5 |
No |
109 |
5.2 |
Lindsell Train Investment Trust |
208.5 |
(8.7) |
9.3 |
66.4 |
412.6 |
2.5 |
0.8 |
Yes |
100 |
5.1 |
Manchester & London Inv Trust |
140.1 |
(37.2) |
(16.0) |
1.4 |
61.0 |
(18.6) |
0.7 |
Yes |
100 |
4.0 |
Martin Currie Global Portfolio |
240.6 |
(23.6) |
7.4 |
35.7 |
168.8 |
(2.6) |
0.7 |
No |
109 |
1.4 |
Mid Wynd International Inv Trust |
468.2 |
(12.9) |
24.9 |
52.5 |
245.8 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
No |
100 |
1.0 |
Monks Investment Trust |
2,310.5 |
(26.6) |
15.8 |
37.3 |
203.9 |
(8.3) |
0.4 |
No |
108 |
0.2 |
Scottish Mortgage Inv Trust |
10,792.1 |
(44.7) |
46.8 |
77.5 |
438.7 |
(7.5) |
0.3 |
No |
117 |
0.5 |
Witan Investment Trust |
1,515.3 |
(11.1) |
7.5 |
17.8 |
156.6 |
(6.5) |
0.7 |
Yes |
112 |
2.5 |
Average (15 funds) |
1,757.9 |
(19.6) |
8.8 |
28.3 |
182.3 |
(7.0) |
0.9 |
109 |
2.5 |
|
BUT rank in sector |
9 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
9 |
13 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
Source: Morningstar, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Performance to 28 November 2022 based on ex-par NAV. TR = total return. Net gearing is total assets less cash and equivalents as a percentage of net assets.
Its NAV total returns are comfortably ahead of the peer group averages over the last one, three and five years, ranking first, third and fifth respectively. BUT ranks ninth out of 15 funds over the last decade. Given its above-average returns and balanced investment approach, it is somewhat surprising that the trust’s discount is one of the widest in the peer group. BUT has a competitive ongoing charge and a below-average level of gearing, while its dividend yield is modestly below the peer-group mean.
|
|
Investment Companies
Investment Companies
Research: Consumer
Britvic reported strong double-digit revenue growth across all business units in FY22, reflecting brand resilience despite significant headwinds. Trading benefited from a full year with no COVID-19-related restrictions and hot weather during the summer. Performance was boosted by balanced growth in volume and price, as management mitigated the significant cost inflation in the year through price rises and efficiency initiatives. As such, adjusted EBIT was up 17% while adjusted EPS grew 29.3%. The dividend per share increased 19.8% to 29p. Despite the more challenging macroeconomic environment, management notes no slowdown in consumer demand, with current trading in line with expectations. Although current headwinds on costs and consumer spend are expected to persist into FY23, management believes it is well positioned to navigate these challenges successfully.