STV Group
Written by
STV Group |
A Scottish family affair |
Introduction of |
Media |
21 December 2015 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analysts
STV Group is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We expect a return to revenue growth in FY16. Investment in Production should start to deliver and in Consumer STV is finding an increasing number of ways to leverage its strong brand. The target of 10% CAGR in EPS to FY17 looks achievable and forecasts may benefit from changes in regulation. On a c 40% P/E discount to peers, the shares look good value.
Year end |
Revenue (£m) |
EBITDA (£m) |
PBT* |
EPS* |
DPS |
P/E |
Yield |
12/14 |
120.4 |
21.5 |
17.3 |
37.6 |
8.0 |
11.6 |
1.8% |
12/15e |
120.3 |
23.1 |
19.1 |
39.1 |
10.0 |
11.2 |
2.3% |
12/16e |
130.9 |
24.5 |
20.8 |
42.3 |
12.0 |
10.4 |
2.7% |
12/17e |
138.7 |
26.2 |
22.8 |
46.3 |
14.0 |
9.5 |
3.2% |
Note: *PBT and EPS are normalised, excluding intangible amortisation, exceptional items and share-based payments.
Creating a family of Scottish media services
STV has developed a family of services that enable it to operate at a national, regional and city level; STV Player has a reach and engagement similar to that of the core TV channel and, together with the city-based initiatives, supports STV’s strategy of broadening its addressable market and earnings base – today’s announcement regarding the planned launch of an enhanced digital news service in February 2016 is a further step in this direction.
10% CAGR in EPS is a realistic target
While the lower-margin Production division is behind plan, and we trim EPS estimates in FY15 and FY16 by 2% and 3% respectively to reflect this, the STV channel should benefit from the stronger programming slate in H2 and management today confirmed that earnings for the year will be in line with its expectations. We believe that its target of 10% CAGR in EPS to FY17 remains realistic and initiate an FY17 forecast EPS of 46.3p.
Favourable regulatory wind of change
2016 is likely to be a year of significant regulatory change for the UK television sector. Significantly, the review by the Department for Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS) could open up the possibility of retransmission fees for public service broadcasters (PSBs). This review, alongside the BBC Charter Review and some other STV-specific initiatives that could help it improve the prominence of its city channels and STV Player, should all be supportive to forecasts.
Valuation: UK TV assets in focus
The group is delivering to strategy and on a 30% P/E discount to ITV and c 40% to the sector average, the shares look good value ahead of what should be a return to top-line and earnings growth next year and a high profile year for TV groups given the regulatory reviews underway. The progressive dividend adds support and the recent acquisition by ITV of UTV’s TV assets serves as a reminder of the synergies available in consolidating the ITV network.
Investment summary
Company description: Scotland’s leading media brand
STV is Scotland’s leading TV broadcaster, producer and media brand. It is the Channel 3 licence holder for Scotland (STV), reaching a fairly stable 3.6 million viewers each month, making it the largest commercial TV channel in Scotland by a considerable margin. This accounts for around 86% of EBIT and provides a fairly steady, highly cash-generative earnings stream. With TV viewing becoming increasingly non-linear, management is working towards leveraging its strong brand and content assets to increase its share of non-broadcast earnings and drive growth. It has made good progress in the last couple of years in developing a portfolio of media assets, at relatively little expense. ‘Off-network’ initiatives in its Consumer division are focused on its digital channels through its STV Player and stv.tv and, more recently, on developing targeting capabilities via its local City TV channels and by leveraging its large and growing bank of first-party customer data. It is also investing in expanding its Production division, which we expect to start to deliver in 2016, and has announced plans to launch an enhanced digital news service in February 2016.
Forecasts: Delivering on targets, FY16 should return to growth
Management has provided a transparent road map of KPIs and is making good progress delivering on these targets. STV peak-time audiences remain ahead of the ITV Network and the ‘off-network’ initiatives continue to gain traction; the STV player added a further 100k users around the Rugby World Cup, and it is now experimenting with commercialising the first-party data it holds on one-third of the adult population in Scotland. The Production division has been slower to develop than hoped, acting as a drag on group revenues. However, we expect overall revenue growth again next year: the investment made in drama and factual over the last 18 months should start to deliver, we see scope for margin improvement from the faster-growing digital initiatives, the city channels are moving towards break-even and earnings will also benefit from the falling debt position.
Valuation: Strong support and discount to peers
Using our more conservative basis for calculating EV (adjusted for the pension deficit funding) at 9.9x FY16e EV/EBITDA, the shares are in line with the broader sector, although at a 20% discount to the closest peer, ITV. On an 10.4x FY16e P/E, its discount to peers is very marked against both ITV (14.9x) and the sector average of 17.9x; the market does not yet seem to be reflecting the earnings leverage that STV is deriving from its falling financial gearing. The business is strongly cash generative and historic issues regarding high debt levels are firmly in the past. This is reflected in management’s reinstatement of a progressive dividend policy; 10p per share for the full year (+25% on 2014) and 12p per share planned for 2016, despite a higher pension funding requirement. Year to date the shares are up 20%, although they have been weak since the interims on 27 August. This pause for breath is a good time to look at STV again ahead of a forecast return to top-line growth next year and potential enhancements to earnings from favourable changes to the UK’s TV regulatory regime.
Sensitivities: Regulatory or cyclical changes
Both Ofcom and the DCMS, recognising the challenges that PSB broadcasters may face in the coming years as viewing becomes increasingly on demand, have launched a review into a number of initiatives that could result in changes in the obligations and the monetisation possibilities for PSBs. The outcome is unclear and we have not attempted to capture it in forecasts. In parallel, the BBC Charter Review could alter the competitive landscape for commercial TV companies. We expect the outcome of these reviews to be broadly favourable to STV, although there is limited visibility and this cannot be guaranteed. With the majority of revenues from advertising, results may also be affected by the strength of the economy and advertising trends.
Company description: Scotland’s leading media brand
STV reports across two divisions: STV Consumer, which houses its family of advertising-funded broadcast channels and digital services and STV Productions. Founded in 1957 (as Scottish Television), STV is headquartered in Glasgow, with additional studios and offices in Edinburgh, Aberdeen, Inverness, Dundee and London. It has approximately 400 employees, plus about 600 freelancers per year for its production business.
In 2015, we forecast Consumer will generate 93% of revenues and 98% of EBIT. The UK accounts for 99% of STV’s sales, with any overseas sales generated by its productions.
|
Exhibit 1: STV revenues by division (2015e) |
Exhibit 2: STV EBIT by division (2015e) |
|
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research |
Source: Edison Investment Research |
|
Exhibit 1: STV revenues by division (2015e) |
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research |
|
Exhibit 2: STV EBIT by division (2015e) |
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research |
STV Consumer’s largest component (81% FY15e revenues) is STV, Scotland’s largest commercial TV service. Consumer also includes STV’s digital initiatives; STV Player, its on demand catch-up service; its growing portfolio of City TV channels (currently in Glasgow and Edinburgh with three more Scottish cities due to launch in 2016); City Apps (for Scotland’s four largest cities); and the STV website, www.stv.tv.
STV Productions is Scotland’s largest commercial television production business, producing c 100 hours of programming a year. It creates and produces programmes for broadcasters in the UK and overseas, including the BBC, ITV and Channel 5. Popular recurring series include the Antiques Road Trip and Catchphrase. It also works in partnership with Red Arrow Entertainment and GroupM, to license and develop new formats.
Strategy: Leveraging its strong position in Scotland
Since March 2012 STV has been an affiliate of the Channel 3 network, which also comprises ITV in England and UTV in Northern Ireland (recently bought by ITV plc). As a network affiliate, STV makes its own regional programmes and sells its regional airtime, while ITV plc is responsible for network programming and national airtime sales.
The Channel 3 franchise provides a fairly stable stream of cash of around £20m a year (after network programming and transmission costs), growing at 2-3%, which management is using to pay down debt and underpin its progressive dividend policy. Given national airtime sales account for a large chunk of revenues (71% FY15e revenues) and network programming accounts for c 40% of its cost base, management has limited control over the performance of its Channel 3 franchise. Management aims to exceed network audience share through its regional programming and news (which it does consistently).
With 34% of audience share, it also generates mass TV audiences far in excess of any other media in Scotland, providing a strong platform to launch, cross-promote and fund its off-network initiatives to exploit its strong brand in Scotland.
These off-network initiatives underpin management’s target to grow its non-broadcast share of earnings to one-third of its earnings base by 2015 and to deliver a 10% CAGR in adjusted EPS over the period 2014-17. To measure its progress it has set 11 clear KPI financial and operational targets (summarised in Exhibit 3). So far in 2015, it is tracking ahead for most of its KPIs bar production revenues, and with the recent strength in the TV advertising market, broadcast EBIT will remain higher than one-third of total EBIT this year (a nice problem to have).
Exhibit 3: Key financial and operational targets
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015e |
2016e |
|
Financial targets |
||||||
Group % of EBIT from non-broadcast activities |
11% |
11% |
19% |
21% |
33% |
N/A |
Consumer division margin |
15.5% |
18.3% |
17.8% |
17.8% |
17.5% |
18.0% |
Digital revenues |
|
£3.5m |
£4.3m |
£5.3m |
£7.7m |
£10.0m |
Digital margin |
23% |
30% |
32% |
45% |
50% |
|
Production revenues |
£8.4m |
£10.2m |
£13.4m |
£13.3m |
£20.0m |
£23.0m |
Production margin |
6% |
2% |
3% |
3% |
6% |
7% |
Consumer operational targets |
||||||
Audience to outperform ITV Network |
+0.85pts |
+1.3pts |
+1.5pts |
+0.3pts |
||
Consumer reach (monthly average) |
Target user numbers for TV, STV Player, City TV, City Apps, Website |
|||||
Consumer engagement (mins/day/user) |
Target user times spent on TV, STV Player, City TV, City Apps, Website |
|||||
Long form video streams in year (m) |
3.9 |
5.0 |
11.0 |
14.0 |
18.0 |
21.0 |
Consumer insights records (m) |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
1.6 |
2.4 |
Source: STV Group
STV Consumer – a widening family of channels and services
STV is creating a strong brand of family services that enable it to operate at a national (Channel 3 franchise), regional (four micro regions in Scotland) and city level (City TV and City Apps). Its integrated offering, combined with a growing bank of customer data, enables it to offer advertisers unique access to both mass and targeted TV and digital audiences. Its strategy seems to be gaining traction as it finds an increasing number of ways to use its strong brand and IP. 92% of Scots use its products each month and 75% use two or more.
|
Exhibit 4: STV family of services – national regional and city level |
|
|
Source: STV, Edison Investment Research |
Channel 3 – Scotland’s largest commercial channel
STV holds the two Channel 3 licences for Scotland (northern and central), which were renewed by Ofcom in January 2014 (at a nominal cost) and run for 10 years, to December 2024. STV reaches 92% of Scottish viewers, generating an average monthly audience of 3.6 million and an average peak-time audience approximately three times larger than Channel 4, four times larger than Channel 5 and 20 times larger than Sky 1.
Affiliate business model – locks in margin
As a public service broadcaster (PSB), STV’s licences, which guarantee it spectrum and prominence on the electronic programming guide (EPG), require it to deliver a minimum of four hours a week of news (including separate regional bulletins) and 78 hours of regulated, non-content news a year, including 29 hours of current affairs. In practice, it always exceeds this.
Under the network affiliate arrangement (NAA), ITV plc is responsible for acquiring programme rights and devising the network schedule. STV pays a set fee for the network schedule, which it combines with its own original Scottish programming. This means it broadcasts a channel with a network programme budget of more than £750m (significantly more than that of its commercial rivals) at a cost to itself of only c £40m. While the NAA means that STV has limited control over network programming decisions, it materially de-risks the group by linking the fee to national airtime sales, effectively locking in margin and smoothing cash flows (the fee is paid on a monthly basis). Management targets ‘outperforming’ the network (which it has consistently done) through its regional input.
ITV plc currently handles the sale of STV’s national airtime. Given ITV’s dominant position in airtime sales, Ofcom (the UK media regulator) has loosely pegged the price of advertising to audience share via a formula known as the Contract Rights Renewal. STV’s sales contract with ITV plc expires at the end of 2016. As the current terms were agreed more than 10 years ago, STV is evaluating other options, which could include self-representation or an alliance with another sales house (eg Channel 4 or Sky). STV has a legal entitlement to at least similar terms as the ones it receives currently, so there is no downside to exploring its options. We estimate that STV is paying c 10% of its national airtime revenues which, given the low marginal cost of provision to ITV, may leave scope for improvement.
|
Exhibit 5: ITV share of UK TV net advertising revenue |
Exhibit 6: Trends in UK media advertising revenues |
|
|
|
Source: Barb, Ofcom |
Source: Warc/Advertising Association |
|
Exhibit 5: ITV share of UK TV net advertising revenue |
|
|
Source: Barb, Ofcom |
|
Exhibit 6: Trends in UK media advertising revenues |
|
|
Source: Warc/Advertising Association |
Fairly stable audience share in recent years
Contrasting with the ongoing declines in newspaper circulations, TV advertising has been relatively unscathed in the move to online and, over the last few years, ITV’s audience and advertising has also been fairly stable (Exhibits 5 and 6). However, the way consumers access TV is evolving rapidly. According to Ofcom, 60% of adults in Scotland have a smartphone and 50% a tablet. Half of Scots now use catch-up services and 21% use standalone OTT services (up 12 percentage points on the year before). For younger demographics, the change in viewing habits is even more marked, with only half of TV viewing done live via broadcast.
Off-network initiatives: Leveraging its brand, creating a family
STV’s off-network initiatives are geared towards these evolving TV viewing habits. Its strategy is to provide its content free to viewers anywhere, at any time. Along with its home-grown content, it has full digital rights to all the Channel 3 content in Scotland and delivers this, plus its own content, to online, mobile and connected devices. Against management targets for use and engagement, its initiatives to leverage its brand are performing strongly, with viewing and engagement steadily increasing towards management’s 2016 targets (Exhibits 7 and 8).
|
Exhibit 7: Reach, millions of viewers per month |
Exhibit 8: Engagement, minutes per day |
|
|
|
Source: STV Group |
Source: STV Group |
|
Exhibit 7: Reach, millions of viewers per month |
|
|
Source: STV Group |
|
Exhibit 8: Engagement, minutes per day |
|
|
Source: STV Group |
STV digital – reaching audiences on demand and on the move
STV Player offers 30 days VOD which, as the programme costs are sunk, is very high margin. It is available on all the main OTT and mobile platforms. Approximately 1.2m videos are streamed by 0.6m users each month, with a very high average engagement of 50 minutes, ahead of both target and the TV channel. For technical reasons, the player is currently not yet available on satellite or cable – any change to this could also provide a boost to viewing.
The website (stv.tv) is Scotland’s largest online commercial destination with 4.8 million unique users in H115. While registered users are numerous, usage is fairly low (three minutes a day) and STV is experimenting with ways to drive engagement. It has had some success with its social media strategy, which increased traffic to stv.tv news by 44% in H1 this year. Management also recently announced that in February 2016 it plans to launch a potentially disruptive new service, dubbed project Metropolis, which would merge its regulatory news service with its city franchises to provide a service including sport, news, weather and entertainment, much akin to the online news services provided by the BBC and other newspaper groups.
City services – engaging with local communities
Localisation is a key part of STV’s strategy to engage the consumer and compete with other media. STV has been awarded five 12-year licences to launch City TV channels in Scotland. Glasgow TV was launched in July 2014, Edinburgh TV in January 2015 and STV plans to launch Aberdeen, Ayr and Dundee in 2016. Together these channels cover 80% of Scotland’s population. The channels are produced in association with local universities, which gives a unique flavour and reach into the local community. STV has developed a low-cost TV package for local advertisers where the cost of producing an advert is bundled into the advertising sales agreement. In doing so, it is enabling many local SMEs to advertise on TV for the first time. The channels are also feeding the wider STV network with talent, content and cross-marketing opportunities; for instance, after the launch of STV Glasgow, use of its City App increased by 80%.
Looking ahead to 2016, along with the launch of the remaining three City TV channels, management is in discussions with Ofcom to try to secure PSB prominence of the City TV channels. The city channels currently occupy slot 23 on the Freeview EPG. With the probability of BBC Three moving off air, slot 8 opens up and as the only other PSB channel in Scotland, there is a good chance of City TV getting it, which should provide a boost to viewing. Further out, management is exploring ways in which the five city services could be linked more closely to drive viewing.
Data insights: Know your customer, improve ROI
STV’s digital platforms allow for much greater data mining. Customers have to register to use STV Player and City TV Apps and STV now holds data (typically four data points including name, post code, gender, age) on 1.6m Scots (approximately one-third of the Scottish adult population) and targets 2.4 million by 2016. This information, enriched with data from Experian, provides high-quality, first-party data, which enables STV to provide a more tailored experience to the consumer and a more targeted audience for advertisers.
It is early days in STV’s data strategy, but initial results are promising. One of its first projects was in partnership with the Scottish Rugby Union (SRU) for a targeted email campaign to drive registration on STV Player around the Rugby World Cup – this was broadcast on Channel 3 this September and saw registrations increase by c 100k. It is also working with around 20 local advertisers in the north-east of Scotland who are trialling location-based VOD advertising. It is early days, but targeting is a nice complement for TV brand advertisers that might otherwise look elsewhere for more targeted campaigns.
STV Productions: Investment should yield returns next year
STV Productions is Scotland’s largest TV production business, producing 138 hours of content in 2014. Its largest customer is ITV, although it also produces content for the BBC (One, Two and Three), Sky and TV3 in Ireland.
STV Productions has a strong franchise in factual and entertainment content, with recurring commissions Catchphrase (ITV, ITV2 - evening), Antiques Road Trip and Celebrity Antiques Road Trip (BBC One and BBC Two - evening), The Link (BBC One - daytime), The Lie (TV3 Ireland, S4C and STV - evening) and a promising new game show format Safeword (ITV2 - evening). It is also developing a good reputation in serious documentaries. However, to drive margins and growth towards targeted levels, STV needs to have greater success with higher-margin recurring drama and formats that have greater library and international potential.
It has a number of drama initiatives underway, but has not yet found a ‘breaking’ format, and production revenues and EBIT margins are running behind the group’s targets. After a disappointing 2015, there are a number of reasons why 2016 and beyond should be significantly stronger:
Drama: in 2014, STV recruited a new head of drama, Sarah Brown (ex-BBC Drama). The lead time between development and commercialisation of a project is 18-24 months, and we understand there are a number of promising projects that could contribute in 2016, notably a three-part drama based on the high-profile novels by Elizabeth Gilbert and a separate eight-part, high-end drama series. High-end drama can sell for more than £750k an episode; consequently, if either one of these projects is commissioned, there would be a significant uplift to production revenues.
Entertainment and factual: during 2015 STV appointed Dan Korn (ex-Discovery) as creative director for factual entertainment. The lead time to commercialisation of factual tends to be shorter than drama. Also, there are 12 hours of new programmes in development. The recommissioning of Catchphrase in 2016 will also be supportive to overall growth (for timing reasons, two seasons fell into 2014, and none into 2015).
New partnerships: during 2015, STV announced a strategic relationship with GroupM entertainment, the world’s largest media investment group, which deepens and formalises the group’s existing collaboration.
Independent status: management plans to relaunch its campaign to be classified as an independent producer in the UK, which would enable it to benefit from the quotas that require UK broadcasters to commission content from the independent sector and far improved terms of trade.
While STV’s target of £23m of production revenues by 2016 is looking rather ambitious, we believe the momentum is building, and 2016 should be a considerably stronger year than 2015.
Regulatory environment: Winds of change
Public service broadcast channels hold a privileged place in the TV landscape. PSBs are ‘gifted’ dedicated terrestrial spectrum and guaranteed prominence on the EPG (electronic programming guide), in return for fulfilling certain commitments that are deemed to be in the public interest, but which might not make commercial sense if left to the free market. However, many of these obligations were constructed in an analogue environment of little competition. In the digital era, PSBs face considerable competition and in its December 2014 review of PSBs, Ofcom recognised the challenges PSBs may face in the coming years as the market internationalises and consolidates, and as viewing becomes increasingly on demand.
The DCMS and Ofcom have launched a review into a number of initiatives that could result in changes to the obligations and the monetisation possibilities for PSBs. The review is far reaching, and there seems to be an overall thrust for a more lenient environment for PSBs. The most significant proposal relates to the notion of retransmission fees and the must offer/must carry obligations.
■
There is a web of archaic legislation that centres around section 73 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, which in effect means that PSBs, unlike other channels, have to make themselves available to cable platforms, but cannot (unlike commercial channels) charge those platforms for the right to carry their content (known as retransmission fees). This ruling was introduced to support the roll-out of analogue cable in the 1980s and 1990s, but the case for having a different arrangement for cable has now passed.
■
PSBs are also subject to must offer/must carry provisions designed to ensure universal access to PSB channels, which means that for other platforms (satellite, IPTV), their bargaining power for any fee is all but zero. This is despite the fact that PSBs may see less commercial benefit from some platforms (where consumers can skip through the ads, or where they are not guaranteed EPG prominence due to genre grouping or due to varying EPG presentations).
The government is proposing to repeal section 73 and is reviewing the need for must offer/must carry on pay platforms, given that 98% of UK homes can now access digital Freeview or Freesat (both of which would carry the PSB channels). The outcome of this review should on the whole be positive for PSBs. To put it into context, most pay TV platforms pay their other premium channels (such as Disney) on a subscriber basis, whereas ITV is currently paying cable and satellite companies for the technical cost of transmission and playout. If these provisions are updated, PSBs would have more negotiating power with respect to the pay platforms (Sky, Virgin etc) and could be in a position to demand compensation for ad skipping in the form of a retransmission fee. In the US these fees account for c $1.2bn in revenues for channels annually.
Given the public service aspect of the channels, determining the value of any change is not simple and we are wary of placing too much weight on straight comparisons with other markets and channels. Ofcom has warned that “with this extra revenue would come additional responsibilities in terms of investing in public service content…it is concerned how a new system would ensure that the resulting funds would be invested in public service content rather than simply passed on to shareholders”. We would hope that at the very least, retransmission fees cover the additional direct costs the PSBs carry for making their content available on the pay TV platforms (this would equate to £1m annually for STV). In a purely free market environment, it could be significantly more; if we assume 50p per subscriber per month for instance, this would equate to £86m for Channel 3, of which c 7% would flow to STV (£6m). On the whole, we expect positive change when the DCMS reaches a conclusion expected in H116.
Highly experienced management team
STV has an extremely experienced management team (see biographies on page 16 and at www.stvplc.tv). Before joining STV in 2007, CEO Rob Woodward was commercial director of Channel 4 television and on the main board. CFO George Watt joined the company as financial controller in 1998 and was appointed to the board in 2001. Chairman is Margaret Ford (Baroness Ford of Cunninghame) has more than 20 years’ experience as a non-executive director of companies and was a member of the Olympic board between 2009 and 2012.
The director of channels, Bobby Hain, is responsible for STV’s consumer services on all platforms, having previously been responsible for STV’s two Channel 3 licences between 2003 and 2010. Peter Reilly is responsible for advertising and STV Creative, having formerly worked for ITV, while Alan Clements is the director of content at STV Productions.
Forecasts
We believe that management’s target of 10% CAGR in adjusted EPS over the 2014-17 period seems achievable. Although there is still work to be done to scale the production business, this is a small part of group earnings, and its higher-margin digital and city initiatives are performing well, providing a boost to a stable base of earnings from its Channel 3 franchise and a falling interest charge as debt continues to reduce. Furthermore, there is a favourable regulatory tailwind that may provide a booster to revenues in a number of areas, none of which is explicitly forecast.
Earnings forecasts: 10% CAGR in EPS a realistic target
We are reducing our estimate for STV Productions this year, but maintain our strong forecast growth rate for production into FY16. This results in a slight reduction to EPS (2% in FY15 and 3% next year). We also introduce FY17 estimates. Overall, we are forecasting 10% CAGR in EPS to FY17, in line with management’s targets.1
Using FY14 EPS adjusted for exceptional tax of 34.6p.
Key assumptions underlying our forecasts include:
■
Consumer (ex-digital): in FY14, Channel 3 grew at 7.5%, faster than the overall UK TV advertising market, benefiting from a strong sports line-up, which included the FIFA World Cup. As one of the more mature TV channels, we would ordinarily expect Channel 3 to grow at a slower rate than the market overall2 and for FY15-17, we forecast growth of 2-3% annually (national airtime sales increased by 3% in the H115). The NAA means that network programme costs should move in line with advertising, but there may be some margin pressure as STV invests in its portfolio of City TV channels and as premium rate telephony revenues continue to fall. We forecast Glasgow to be break-even by the end of this year, Edinburgh by the end of FY16 and break-even across the entire portfolio of five channels in FY17.
Warc forecasts UK TV advertising growth to slow to 4% next year from 6.4% this year.
■
Digital: with the jump in STV Player registrations around the Rugby World Cup in October, we remain optimistic that management can deliver its targeted 1.5m streams a month by the end of FY16 and forecast revenues to growth at 25% over the period to FY17 (H115 revenues increased by 30%). As the programming costs are sunk for STV Player, margins in this division are very high (35% FY15e) and even with ongoing investment in Metropolis and other online activities, there remains scope for margin improvement as revenues grow alongside viewing; we forecast margins expanding to 45% in FY17.
■
Production: in the current year we now expect revenues of c £9m (previously £13.7m). Management’s £23m target for FY16 is looking ambitious (although it is important to remember that it would only take one hit drama to move the dial, and it could still be reached if both the drama projects get commissioned). Our forecast for £15m revenues next year is based on a mid-case assumption that recurring series are recommissioned again, along with another Catchphrase. In addition, we assume an incremental 10 hours of factual and that the three-part drama in development will be commissioned.
Exhibit 9: Summary forecasts
2014 |
2015e |
2016e |
2017e |
||
National airtime |
77.8 |
80.1 |
82.5 |
84.6 |
|
Regional airtime |
12.6 |
12.7 |
13.0 |
13.3 |
|
City TV |
0.6 |
1.5 |
2.5 |
3.0 |
|
Digital |
5.3 |
7.2 |
9.0 |
11.3 |
|
Sponsorship |
5.3 |
5.4 |
5.4 |
5.4 |
|
Other |
|
5.5 |
4.3 |
3.4 |
3.1 |
Consumer |
107.1 |
111.3 |
115.9 |
120.7 |
|
Productions |
13.3 |
9.0 |
15.0 |
18.0 |
|
Revenue |
120.4 |
120.3 |
130.9 |
138.7 |
|
Revenue growth |
7% |
0% |
9% |
6% |
|
EBIT: Digital |
1.7 |
2.5 |
3.6 |
5.1 |
|
EBIT: Other consumer |
17.4 |
18.0 |
17.5 |
17.4 |
|
EBIT: Productions |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
|
Pre-exceptional EBIT (£m) |
19.5 |
20.5 |
22.0 |
23.7 |
|
EBIT margin - digital |
32% |
35% |
40% |
45% |
|
EBIT margin - other consumer |
17% |
17% |
16% |
16% |
|
EBIT margin – production |
3% |
0% |
6% |
7% |
|
Total EBIT margin (%) |
16% |
17% |
17% |
17% |
|
Total finance costs |
-2.2 |
-1.4 |
-1.2 |
-0.9 |
|
PBT (£m) |
17.3 |
19.1 |
20.8 |
22.8 |
|
EPS (diluted normalised, p) |
37.6 |
39.1 |
42.3 |
46.3 |
|
Source: STV (historic), Edison Investment Research (forecasts)
Pension obligations: Triennial valuation in Q116
STV operates two defined benefit pension schemes. A full actuarial valuation of the scheme was carried out as at 1 January 2012, resulting in an actuarial deficit of £83m as of March 2014. This is significantly more than the balance sheet value of the deficit (£6m at H115) as the actuarial valuation uses a discount rate based on gilts rather than the corporate bond-based discount rate of 3.7% used for the IAS 19 balance sheet valuation. A recovery plan was agreed over 11 years with funding of £7-7.8m pa for the period 2015-25. The actuarial valuation is refreshed every three years, and the outcome of the valuation as at January 2015 is expected to be completed in Q116. There are many inputs to the valuation, but one of the key determinants is interest rates and, with gilt rates currently broadly similar to those used in the last triennial valuation, we are assuming the annual funding requirement does not change.
Strong cash flow, progressive dividend policy
The business is strongly cash generative and excessive net debt, historically an issue for the group, is firmly in the past. This is reflected in management’s reinstatement of a progressive dividend policy: 10p per share for the full year (+25% on FY14) and 12p per share planned for 2016, despite the higher pension funding requirement. In 2014, STV refreshed its facilities and equipment, following the licence renewals and we expect capex to now return to a maintenance level of approximately £2.5m a year. Overall, we forecast FY15 net debt to reduce by £5m this year to £24.3m (debt/EBITDA ratio of c 1.0x), falling to £16.2m by the end of 2017.
|
Exhibit 10: Declining net debt |
|
|
Source: STV accounts, Edison Investment Research |
Valuation
Key investment considerations
■
STV’s Channel 3 franchise provides a fairly stable, highly cash-generative income stream of c £20m a year (net of programming and transmission costs), although STV is not directly in control of its performance.
■
Management is finding new and innovative ways to leverage its strong brand identity in Scotland, providing growth opportunities beyond its traditional broadcast franchise.
■
2016 should see the investment in production start to deliver and continued growth from its off-network initiatives. This should ensure a return to overall top-line growth for the group.
■
Regulatory change is likely in 2016, which we believe on the whole should be favourable to STV. Change is not reflected in consensus estimates.
■
The shares trade at an EV/EBITDA and P/E discount to its closest peer, ITV, a potential consolidator in the longer term.
■
Management is pursuing a progressive dividend policy; once the triennial valuation of the pension deficit has been addressed (Q116), special dividends may be on the agenda.
UK TV consolidation – supportive to valuation
STV’s closest peer in the UK is ITV plc, and UTV in Ireland – both Channel 3 franchise owners. UTV recently announced the sale of its TV assets to ITV. Adjusting for our estimated NPV of the IAS 19 deficit, the deal was completed on 3x 2014 revenues and 20x 2014 EBIT, with the premium reflecting the significant synergies that will be generated in absorbing UTV into ITV plc. STV is now the only remaining Channel 3 licence holder that has not been consolidated into the ITV plc group. While we do not think its acquisition is currently on the agenda, the synergies from consolidation would be significant and the logic of a deal is inescapable. Along with the progressive dividend policy, this should provide a solid support to the shares and should be considered as part of the longer-term investment case. UK commercial TV assets are also sought after internationally; Liberty Global recently increased its stake in ITV to 9.9% and in 2014 Viacom acquired Channel 5 for £450m (Channel 5 generates advertising revenues roughly 2.5x those of STV).
Peer comparisons – discount to peers
The UK commercial TV companies all have fairly substantial pension deficits. When looking at EV multiples, we adjust net debt to include our estimated NPV of the actuarial pension funding requirements (£45m for STV and £156m for ITV) to treat the companies consistently. As part of our peer comparison, we also make reference to other European commercial broadcasters.
Year to date, the shares are up 20%, although they have been weak since the interims on 27 August. Using our more conservative basis for calculating EV on an FY16e EV/EBITDA, the shares on 9.9x are in line with the broader sector, although at a 20% discount to the closest peer, ITV. On a 10.4x FY16e P/E its discount to peers is very marked against both ITV (14.9x) and the sector average of 17.9x; the market does not yet seem to be reflecting the earnings leverage that STV is deriving from its falling financial gearing.
Using a WACC of 11%, our DCF, which assumes our forecast to 2017 followed by 3% revenue growth to 2025 and a 2% perpetuity growth rate, returns a value of 492p.
Exhibit 11: Peer comparison
Company |
Currency |
Market |
Net debt/ |
EV |
Revenue |
EBITDA |
EPS |
Div |
EV/Sales |
EV/EBITDA |
P/E |
||||||
This |
Next |
This |
Next |
This |
Next |
This |
This |
Next |
This |
Next |
This |
Next |
|||||
STV* |
GBP |
174 |
25 |
199 |
0% |
9% |
19% |
19% |
4% |
8% |
2% |
1.7 |
1.5 |
8.6 |
8.1 |
11.3 |
10.5 |
STV* adjusted net debt |
174 |
69 |
243 |
0% |
9% |
19% |
19% |
4% |
8% |
2% |
2.0 |
1.9 |
10.5 |
9.9 |
11.3 |
10.5 |
|
ITV plc |
GBP |
10,591 |
(41) |
10,550 |
13% |
7% |
30% |
31% |
38% |
10% |
3% |
3.6 |
3.4 |
12.0 |
10.9 |
16.4 |
14.9 |
ITV - using IAS 19 pension deficit value |
10,591 |
1,447 |
12,038 |
13% |
7% |
30% |
31% |
38% |
10% |
3% |
4.1 |
3.8 |
13.7 |
12.5 |
16.4 |
14.9 |
|
TF1 |
EUR |
2,188 |
(516) |
1,673 |
-3% |
3% |
10% |
11% |
-76% |
13% |
4% |
0.8 |
0.8 |
8.5 |
7.6 |
21.9 |
19.3 |
M6 |
EUR |
2,011 |
(278) |
1,732 |
0% |
3% |
23% |
23% |
-3% |
2% |
5% |
1.4 |
1.3 |
5.9 |
5.9 |
16.7 |
16.3 |
ProSiebenSat.1 |
EUR |
10,195 |
1591 |
11,786 |
12% |
11% |
28% |
28% |
38% |
14% |
4% |
3.7 |
3.3 |
12.9 |
11.8 |
20.8 |
18.3 |
Mediaset |
EUR |
4,512 |
790 |
5,302 |
5% |
8% |
37% |
40% |
100% |
205% |
1% |
1.5 |
1.4 |
4.1 |
3.5 |
95.5 |
31.3 |
Mediaset Espana |
EUR |
3,768 |
(277) |
3,491 |
6% |
6% |
23% |
25% |
221% |
25% |
4% |
3.6 |
3.4 |
15.8 |
13.3 |
21.4 |
17.1 |
Averages |
5% |
5% |
22% |
24% |
32% |
48% |
3% |
2.2 |
2.1 |
10.8 |
9.3 |
29.6 |
17.9 |
||||
Source: Bloomberg, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Edison estimates. Prices as at 15 December 2015.
Sensitivities
■
Dependence on advertising: more than 85% of STV’s revenues are derived from advertising, which is affected by both the general economy and by competition from other advertising media and marketing channels. Television’s share has been fairly stable in recent years, and we expect it to remain so in the coming years given the mass audiences terrestrial television can deliver but, with viewing habits evolving rapidly, for instance to streaming platforms, this could be eroded.
■
Reliance on ITV: as an affiliate, STV depends on ITV for its network programmes and national airtime sales. The interests of both companies are aligned and the relationship is now good (following the settlement of a long-running legal case in 2011) and the 2012 network programming arrangement has de-risked STV by locking in margin and smoothing cash flows. However, this relationship means that STV has devolved a significant part of its control to ITV plc and is not directly in control of its programme schedule.
■
Regulatory environment: the BBC is governed by a Royal Charter and the current charter is due to expire at the end of 2016. The charter covers far-reaching issues such as the purpose of the BBC, the scope of its services, as well as how it should be funded, governed and regulated. As the largest UK broadcaster, which benefits from a stable licence fee, even small changes in the requirements placed on it could have repercussions across the whole industry.
■
DCMS review: the DCMS review is likely to result in material changes for PSBs. Given the lack of visibility, we have not reflected any potential change in our forecasts and believe that any change would represent upside to our estimates. However, this cannot be guaranteed.
■
Interest rates: the value of the deficit of the two defined benefit pension schemes is sensitive to a number of variables, in particular interest rates. A rise or fall in real interest rates could reduce or increase the deficit respectively.
Exhibit 12: Financial summary
£m |
2013 |
2014 |
2015e |
2016e |
2017e |
||
Dec |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
||
PROFIT & LOSS |
|||||||
Revenue |
|
|
112.1 |
120.4 |
120.3 |
130.9 |
138.7 |
EBITDA |
|
|
20.1 |
21.5 |
23.1 |
24.5 |
26.2 |
Operating Profit (before amort. and except.) |
18.0 |
19.5 |
20.5 |
22.0 |
23.7 |
||
Intangible Amortisation |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Exceptionals |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Pension finance credit/cost |
(0.9) |
0.0 |
(0.2) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Operating Profit |
17.1 |
19.5 |
20.3 |
22.0 |
23.7 |
||
Net Interest |
(2.8) |
(2.2) |
(1.4) |
(1.2) |
(0.9) |
||
Profit Before Tax (norm) |
|
|
15.2 |
17.3 |
19.1 |
20.8 |
22.8 |
Profit Before Tax (FRS 3) |
|
|
14.3 |
17.3 |
18.9 |
20.8 |
22.8 |
Tax |
(2.1) |
(2.6) |
(3.8) |
(4.2) |
(4.6) |
||
Profit After Tax (norm) |
13.0 |
14.7 |
15.3 |
16.6 |
18.3 |
||
Profit After Tax (FRS 3) |
12.2 |
14.7 |
15.1 |
16.6 |
18.3 |
||
Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m) |
39.1 |
39.1 |
39.1 |
39.3 |
39.5 |
||
EPS - normalised fully diluted (p) |
|
33.2 |
37.6 |
39.1 |
42.3 |
46.3 |
|
EPS - (IFRS) (p) |
|
|
31.6 |
38.7 |
39.7 |
43.5 |
47.6 |
Dividend per share (p) |
2.0 |
8.0 |
10.0 |
12.0 |
14.0 |
||
EBITDA Margin (%) |
17.9 |
17.9 |
19.2 |
18.7 |
18.9 |
||
Operating Margin (before GW and except.) (%) |
16.1 |
16.2 |
17.0 |
16.8 |
17.1 |
||
BALANCE SHEET |
|||||||
Non-Current Assets |
|
|
22.6 |
26.9 |
27.3 |
27.4 |
27.6 |
Intangible Assets |
8.6 |
9.5 |
9.4 |
9.3 |
9.2 |
||
Tangible Assets |
6.7 |
8.8 |
9.3 |
9.5 |
9.8 |
||
Other including deferred tax |
7.3 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
||
Current Assets |
|
|
47.8 |
61.2 |
52.9 |
53.9 |
54.9 |
Stocks |
17.6 |
18.3 |
18.3 |
18.3 |
18.3 |
||
Debtors |
21.4 |
23.1 |
24.6 |
25.6 |
26.6 |
||
Cash |
8.8 |
19.8 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
||
Other |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
(62.0) |
(19.7) |
(19.7) |
(19.7) |
(19.7) |
Creditors |
(17.5) |
(19.7) |
(19.7) |
(19.7) |
(19.7) |
||
Short term borrowings |
(44.5) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Long Term Liabilities |
|
|
(0.8) |
(64.9) |
(49.8) |
(47.7) |
(41.7) |
Long term borrowings |
0.0 |
(49.2) |
(34.3) |
(32.2) |
(26.2) |
||
Retirement benefit obligation |
0.0 |
(14.9) |
(14.7) |
(14.7) |
(14.7) |
||
Other long term liabilities |
(0.8) |
(0.8) |
(0.8) |
(0.8) |
(0.8) |
||
Net Assets |
|
|
7.6 |
3.5 |
10.7 |
13.9 |
21.1 |
CASH FLOW |
|||||||
Operating Cash Flow |
|
|
18.3 |
20.9 |
21.6 |
20.5 |
25.2 |
Net Interest |
(2.5) |
(1.8) |
(1.4) |
(1.2) |
(0.9) |
||
Tax |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(2.6) |
(3.0) |
||
Capex |
(1.4) |
(5.0) |
(3.0) |
(2.6) |
(2.7) |
||
Acquisitions/disposals |
(0.3) |
(0.3) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Financing |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(0.9) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Dividends |
0.0 |
(1.6) |
(3.4) |
(4.2) |
(4.8) |
||
Pension deficit funding |
(4.2) |
(5.5) |
(7.8) |
(7.8) |
(7.8) |
||
Net Cash Flow |
9.9 |
6.7 |
5.1 |
2.1 |
6.0 |
||
Opening net debt/(cash) |
|
|
45.3 |
35.7 |
29.4 |
24.3 |
22.2 |
HP finance leases initiated |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Other |
(0.3) |
(0.4) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(0.0) |
||
Closing net debt/(cash) |
|
|
35.7 |
29.4 |
24.3 |
22.2 |
16.2 |
Source: STV (historics), Edison Investment research (forecasts)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|