Currency in GBP
Last close As at 09/06/2023
GBP0.94
▲ 0.80 (0.86%)
Market capitalisation
GBP412m
Research: Real Estate
Custodian REIT’s (CREI’s) Q123 report showed continuing strong performance, with like-for-like rental and capital value growth supporting a three-month total return of 3.2%. Capital growth has been strong in the past year, but it is CREI’s income-driven approach that has driven its consistent record of attractive returns. It is optimistic that this will continue, while any weakness in capital values may present opportunities for further income and dividend accretive growth.
Custodian REIT |
Good momentum through Q123 |
Q123 update and outlook |
Real estate |
30 August 2022 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analyst
Custodian REIT is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
Custodian REIT’s (CREI’s) Q123 report showed continuing strong performance, with like-for-like rental and capital value growth supporting a three-month total return of 3.2%. Capital growth has been strong in the past year, but it is CREI’s income-driven approach that has driven its consistent record of attractive returns. It is optimistic that this will continue, while any weakness in capital values may present opportunities for further income and dividend accretive growth.
Year end |
Net rental income (£m) |
EPRA earnings* (£m) |
EPRA |
NAV/** |
DPS |
P/NAV** |
Yield |
03/21 |
33.1 |
23.7 |
5.6 |
97.6 |
5.00 |
1.09 |
4.7 |
03/22 |
35.6 |
25.3 |
5.9 |
119.7 |
5.25 |
0.89 |
5.0 |
03/23e |
38.8 |
26.4 |
6.0 |
124.7 |
5.63 |
0.85 |
5.3 |
03/24e |
40.0 |
27.0 |
6.1 |
124.9 |
6.00 |
0.85 |
5.7 |
Note: *Excludes revaluation gains/losses and other exceptional items. **Defined as EPRA net tangible assets (EPRA NTA) per share.
Forecast income growth maintained but costs higher
A strong performance continued through Q123, despite growing market headwinds. NAV grew 2.1% to 122.2p, driven by a 1.7% like-for-like increase in portfolio valuations. ERV increased by 1.4% like-for-like and net capital deployment added 1.5% to annualised rent roll (to £41.1m). The Q123 DPS of 1.375p is in line with Q422 as well as the FY23 target of at least 5.5p. It was fully covered despite EPRA earnings of 1.4p (Q422: 1.6p) being negatively affected by the timing of capital deployment and a reduction in occupancy (88.7% vs 89.9% at end-FY22), with the positive impact of letting offset by the timing of refurbishment and sales. CREI remains positive about the strength of the regional occupier market and its ability to grow income further, while debt is now 74% fixed for an average of around eight years. We nevertheless expect higher interest and administrative costs than previously and have reduced forecast EPRA earnings and DPS by c 7%.
Consistently positive returns built off income growth
CREI’s prime strategy for delivering returns is its focus on generating attractive and stable dividend returns, from an actively managed, well-diversified portfolio of UK regional commercial real estate. It is differentiated by a focus on smaller lot-size properties, which typically provide a yield premium over larger assets. This is partly the result of a broader range of potential occupiers, while attracting less competition from larger institutional investors. Combined with moderate gearing and a relatively low-cost base, this yield premium has contributed to consistent and attractive total returns since the 2014 initial public offering (IPO), delivered by dividends paid.
Valuation: Consistent, income-focused returns
The minimum 5.5p per share DPS targeted by CREI for FY23 represents an attractive yield of 5.2%, while our forecast for FY23 DPS growth exceeds CREI’s minimum target. The c 13% discount to the unaudited end-Q123 NAV per share compares with an average c 3% premium since IPO.
Investment summary
In addition to recent financial performance, this report covers CREI’s long-term performance and strategy. The strength of the FY22 result may be seen as exceptional, benefiting as it did from a bounce-back in property valuations as pandemic restrictions were progressively eased. However, recurring earnings and dividends also showed good growth, with rent collection back to pre-pandemic levels. A strong performance continued through Q123. Despite growing headwinds from rising inflation, only partly explained by the war in Ukraine, CREI remains positive about the strength of the regional occupier market and its ability to grow income further. It recognises the risk of property valuations being negatively affected on a broad scale by weakening volumes and sentiment in the investment market, thus far restricted to a minority of sub-sectors such as ‘big-box’ logistics. However, given the company’s focus on income driven returns, any falls in the valuation of those assets that CREI targets for acquisition would support reinvestment at higher yields, supporting earnings and enhancing dividend capacity.
The underpinning for CREI’s optimism is covered throughout this report, but in summary includes:
■
CREI provides diversified exposure to UK commercial real estate, enabling it to spread risks, adapt its portfolio to changing market and economic conditions and seek investment opportunities across a wide pool of assets.
■
A focus on properties with smaller individual values differentiates it from most of its peers. Properties of this size typically provide a yield premium over larger assets, in part the result of a broader range of potential occupiers, while attracting less competition from larger institutional investors.
■
The company has successfully managed the complexities of a smaller lot-size portfolio through asset and tenant selection, active asset management and well-controlled costs, generating a well-established track record of income-focused returns.
■
A significant 69% weighting to industrial logistics and retail warehouse assets, where the investment manager identifies continuing positive fundamentals for rental growth, has been highly beneficial to recent performance.
■
Recent acquisitions are yet to fully contribute to earnings and there is significant upside potential from void reduction.
■
Gearing is low and 74% of all debt is long term and fixed rate, providing protection against increasing interest rates.
■
Commercial real estate has traditionally provided a medium-term hedge against inflation as, at least in part, this is reflected in rental growth and valuations over time. Increasing building costs have a tendency to restrict new construction.
AGM proposals
CREI will hold its annual general meeting (AGM) on 31 August 2022. Within the ‘ordinary’ business of the AGM we think it worth highlighting three proposals:
■
Since 2016 the upper target-lot-size has been £10m at the point of investment, but to reflect significant inflation since then, shareholders will be asked to approve an increase to £15m. This level will continue to be below the general level of institutional demand and CREI does not expect a material difference in the yield premium versus larger assets or in the implementation of its investment strategy.
■
Historically, CREI has restricted its investment to completed assets, occasional forward funded development1 and refurbishment. Shareholders will be asked to approve a broadening of the definition of refurbishment to include the redevelopment of properties already owned to a limit of 10% of gross assets. To be clear, CREI will not acquire land assets or properties with the intention of development or redevelopment. The purpose is to provide additional flexibility to enhance asset quality, including environmental performance, to better meet the demands of tenants and drive income growth.
In our view a very low risk activity. CREI typically acquires the land upfront, with planning consent in place, and funds the development of the pre-let asset. During the development phase, it receives a finance coupon equivalent to the net initial yield of the finished asset and at completion acquires the asset at a pre-agreed price.
■
To better reflect CREI’s focus on income, the board is proposing a change in the company’s name from Custodian REIT to Custodian Property Income REIT. This may be especially useful within the retail investment platform space by making the shares more visible to those investors seeking a combination of income and growth.
Consistently positive income-driven returns2
Although the sharp pandemic-related fall in capital values generated a negative total return in Q121 (4.2%), the subsequent quarters each generated positive returns, and total return for the FY21 year was positive.
Although UK commercial property market returns have historically shown significant cyclicality, the income component has been much less volatile than capital values. CREI’s income-focused strategy has consistently generated positive annual total returns. From listing in March 2014 to June 2022 (Q123), it generated an EPRA NAV total return (without assuming reinvestment of dividends paid) of 73.3%, or a compound annual average return of 6.9% pa. Income return has represented the majority of the total return and has been relatively consistent. In the period from IPO to end-FY21, income contributed 100% of total returns, but the strong growth in property values and NAV in FY22 and Q123 has reduced the contribution to c 70%.
Exhibit 1: NAV total return history*
Annual |
Quarterly |
Since IPO |
|||||||||||||||||
Mar-15 |
Mar-16 |
Mar-17 |
Mar-18 |
Mar-19 |
Mar-20 |
Mar-21 |
Mar-22 |
Jun-22 |
March-14 to Jun-22 |
||||||||||
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
Q123 |
|||||||||||
Opening EPRA NAV per share (p) |
98.2 |
101.3 |
101.5 |
103.8 |
107.3 |
107.1 |
101.6 |
97.6 |
119.7 |
98.2 |
|||||||||
Closing EPRA NAV per share (p) |
101.3 |
101.5 |
103.8 |
107.3 |
107.1 |
101.6 |
97.6 |
119.7 |
122.2 |
122.2 |
|||||||||
Dividends paid per share (p) |
3.750 |
6.350 |
6.350 |
6.425 |
6.525 |
6.625 |
4.913 |
5.625 |
1.375 |
47.9 |
|||||||||
EPRA NAV total return |
7.0% |
6.4% |
8.5% |
9.6% |
5.9% |
1.0% |
0.9% |
28.4% |
3.2% |
73.3% |
|||||||||
o/w income returns |
3.8% |
6.3% |
6.3% |
6.2% |
6.1% |
6.2% |
4.8% |
5.8% |
1.1% |
48.8% |
|||||||||
o/w capital return |
3.2% |
0.2% |
2.2% |
3.4% |
-0.2% |
-5.2% |
-4.0% |
22.7% |
2.1% |
24.4% |
|||||||||
Compound annual total return |
6.9% |
Source: Custodian REIT, Edison Investment Research. Note: *NAV is EPRA NTA per share
The relative consistency of income returns can be seen in the following chart and as interest rates rise, with negative implications for property valuations, we expect this trend to continue.
Exhibit 2: Trend in income return and capital return |
Source: Custodian REIT historical data, Edison Investment Research forecasts |
Diversification provides income resilience
Portfolio diversification provides a mitigation to risk in uncertain times such as these and CREI’s portfolio is well spread across the main commercial property sectors and by location, tenant and lease term.
Exhibit 4: Portfolio summary
30-Jun-22 |
31-Mar-22 |
31-Mar-21 |
31-Mar-20 |
|
Q123 |
FY22 |
FY21 |
FY20 |
|
Portfolio value |
£699.8m |
£665.2m |
£551.9m |
£559.8m |
Number of assets |
161 |
160 |
159 |
161 |
Separate tenancies |
347 |
339 |
265 |
280 |
Annualised rent roll |
£41.1m |
£40.4m |
£38.7m |
£40.4m |
EPRA occupancy rate |
88.7% |
89.9% |
91.6% |
95.9% |
WAULT |
4.7 years |
4.7 years |
5.0 years |
5.3 years |
Net initial yield (NIY) |
5.5% |
5.7% |
6.6% |
6.8% |
Weighted average EPC rating |
C (60) |
C (61) |
C (63) |
C (70) |
Source: Custodian REIT
At 30 June 2022 (end-Q123) the externally appraised portfolio value of £699.8m reflected a net initial yield of 5.5%, with a rent roll of £41.1m pa. Net transaction activity since has increased the rent roll to £42.4m and the number of properties to 164 from 161. The weighted average unexpired lease term to first break at end-Q123 was 4.7 years.
Of the 347 individual tenancies at end-Q123, the top 10 tenants represented a little more than 20% of overall rent roll, with rents from the largest tenant, Menzies Distribution, spread over eight individual assets. Menzies is one of the UK's leading urban logistics businesses.
Exhibit 5: Top 10 tenants by share of income at 31 March 2022 (end-FY22)
|
|||
Menzies Distribution |
3.77% |
Sainsbury's |
1.58% |
B&M Retail |
3.07% |
Homebase |
1.56% |
B&Q |
2.46% |
Regus |
1.57% |
Wickes Building Supplies |
2.06% |
H&M |
1.53% |
First Title* |
1.59% |
Next |
1.37% |
Top 10 tenants |
20.6% |
Source: Custodian REIT. Note: *Trading as Enact Conveyancing.
Exhibits 6 and 7 show the sector and geographic spread of the portfolio. Geographically, it has minimal exposure to London, but exposure to every other region. It is split between the main property sectors, in line with the company’s objective of maintaining a suitably balanced portfolio, with relatively high exposures to the industrial, retail warehouse and alternative sectors (‘other’, including drive-through restaurants, car showrooms, trade counters, gymnasiums, restaurants, and leisure units), with relatively low exposure to offices and high street retail. Reflecting yield differences, by value, the industrial weighting is higher (48%) than the income weighting shown in Exhibit 6 and the weightings to offices (12%) and high street retail (8%) are lower. For retail warehouse and ‘other’, the differences are small.
Exhibit 6: Sector split by income at 31 March 2022 (end-FY22) |
Exhibit 7: Regional split by income at 31 March 2022 (end-FY22) |
Source: Custodian REIT |
Source: Custodian REIT |
Exhibit 6: Sector split by income at 31 March 2022 (end-FY22) |
Source: Custodian REIT |
Exhibit 7: Regional split by income at 31 March 2022 (end-FY22) |
Source: Custodian REIT |
Diversified but actively managed
Although the portfolio is diversified to manage risk, the investment strategy provides flexibility to adapt to changing market conditions. CREI seeks to position the portfolio to attract the best of occupational market demand through careful stock selection and asset management. This is reflected in active sector positioning and the high weighting currently to industrial and retail warehouse assets, together 69% of the portfolio by value (59% by income).
Asset management has been a key driver of both income and capital growth. This includes lease renewals and re-gears, rent reviews, new lettings, acquisitions and disposals, and investment in asset enhancement, including environmental improvement.
Exhibit 8: Asset management has been a key driver of capital growth
Pence per share |
FY18 |
FY19 |
FY20 |
FY21 |
FY22 |
5-year |
Asset management |
2.3 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
2.2 |
3.0 |
10.6 |
General valuation movement |
0.8 |
3.0 |
(7.7) |
(6.9) |
16.7 |
5.9 |
Source: Custodian REIT
As a long-term investor, changes to the overall portfolio positioning have been evolutionary rather than revolutionary, but we highlight the following:
■
The significant long-term exposure to industrial/logistical assets that the manager sees as a particularly good fit with CREI’s investment strategy, with typically high vacant possession values and relatively low capital expenditure requirements. Growing occupier demand has benefited from the trend towards online purchasing and supply chain disruption, while supply is constrained. The investment manager notes that smaller properties are more expensive to develop, pro-rata, so require higher rents to justify development. With inflation driving build costs higher, it expects continuing rent growth. Strong investment demand has driven yields lower, especially for the ‘big box’ distribution centres that CREI has no exposure to. More recently, investor sentiment has begun to weaken for these as interest rates increase and, despite the expectation of rent growth, the manager is conscious that this may broaden out across the sector. For CREI’s industrial and logistics portfolio, like-for-like rental growth continued in Q123, up 1.7% (FY22: 10.7%), and capital values increased too (+1.8% versus 26.4% in FY22).
■
A steadily growing exposure to the out-of-town retail warehouse sub-sector, which benefits from restricted supply, generally free parking and the convenience that is complementary to growth in online sales for both click-and-collect and customer returns. CREI’s portfolio is almost exclusively focused on DIY, homewares, discounters and food, all let at affordable rents. Capital values increased by 16.4% in FY22 and 1.5% in Q123. With the occupier profile well matched to current market demand, the investment manager expects rental growth to pick up (down 1.7% in FY22 but up 0.1% in Q123).
■
A significant exposure to ‘other’ sectors, which includes properties with a wide range of tenant exposures that would ordinarily be defensive in terms of the economic cycle, but which in some cases were challenged during the pandemic. These include car showrooms, petrol filling stations, children’s day nurseries, restaurants, gyms, hotels, healthcare units, and, more recently, ‘drive-thru’ restaurants (typically coffee and prepared food) that is in strong demand from an increasing number of tenants. Although rents were down by 2.7% in FY22, the second half of the year saw a recovery (+1.9%), which continued through Q123 (+0.6%).
■
A highly selective approach to regional offices, a sector about which the manager has been cautious regarding the potential for ownership costs (through obsolescence and the requirement for capital expenditure, as well as lease incentives) to weigh on net income to a greater extent than is typically the case in other sectors. These factors are more evident in a post-pandemic world where occupiers are focusing on higher-quality space to support business, attract employees back to the office and improve their environmental footprint. To better meet this demand, the company is seeking to reposition its portfolio through suitable acquisitions and identified refurbishment opportunities that it expects will reduce vacancy and drive rental growth. During Q123, rental growth accelerated to 3.4% from 2.7% in the whole of FY22.
■
A long-term decline in high street retail exposure, reflecting challenging structural issues that were accelerated by the pandemic. CREI has reorganised its portfolio over the past two years, exiting most of its secondary locations to focus on prime locations where it expects occupier demand to support future rental growth. For CREI’s assets, rents and capital values both continued to decline in FY22, each by c 5%, but there are increasing signs of this bottoming out in recent months with good demand for remaining vacant space.
Exhibit 9: Sector positioning (by share of portfolio value) over time |
Exhibit 10: Sector positioning (by share of portfolio income) over time |
Source: Custodian REIT data, Edison Investment Research |
Source: Custodian REIT data, Edison Investment Research |
Exhibit 9: Sector positioning (by share of portfolio value) over time |
Source: Custodian REIT data, Edison Investment Research |
Exhibit 10: Sector positioning (by share of portfolio income) over time |
Source: Custodian REIT data, Edison Investment Research |
Inflation protection in bricks and mortar
CREI’s investment manager expects medium-term rental growth across the market to broadly match inflation, although over shorter periods this relationship is influenced by the incidence of rent reviews (typically on a five-year basis) and the timing of lease maturities. At the end of FY22, 81% of CREI’s income was on an open market review basis3 and the weighted average unexpired lease term to first break across the portfolio was 4.7 years at end of Q123. While recognising the shorter-term visibility of index-linked reviews, the investment manager is cautious of the ‘bond-like’ characteristics this may create, and the potential for greater emphasis to be placed on the tenant covenant over property fundamentals. It notes that ‘at some point in a property’s lifecycle, rents will always be re-based to open market values. An over-reliance on index linked rent reviews can lead to disparity between investment values and underlying property values’. For this reason, CREI will continue to target good real estate where open market rent reviews have the capacity to deliver rental growth, aiming to ‘provide inflation protection from the bricks and mortar, not the lease contracts’. Although ‘under-renting’ across the CREI portfolio is relatively modest (c £0.4m), like-for-like ERV continued to grow through Q123.
81% open market; 8% inflation indexed; 11% fixed uplifts.
While lease maturities reflect an element of income risk, they also provide an opportunity to reset rents towards or ahead of ERV. As at end-FY22, c 38% of portfolio rental income was due to mature over the following three years (Exhibit 11), representing a reasonable balance of risk and opportunity in our view.
Exhibit 11: Income expiry profile*
31-Mar-22 |
31-Mar-21 |
|
End-FY22 |
End-FY21 |
|
0–1 year |
15% |
11% |
1–3 years |
23% |
20% |
3–5 years |
19% |
22% |
1–10 years |
31% |
34% |
10+ years |
12% |
13% |
Total |
100% |
100% |
Source: Custodian REIT. Note: *To first break or to expiry where no break clause exists.
Predominantly fixed-rate borrowing provides interest rate protection
CREI operates with moderate gearing and for most of its debt the interest rates are fixed. The end-Q123 net loan to value (LTV) ratio of 21.5% (21.7% including post-Q123 investment activity) remained below the medium-term target of 25%. A Q123 refinancing increased the proportion of agreed debt facilities that are fixed rate to 74% from 61%, providing significant protection against rising interest rates.
In June 2022 CREI arranged a £25m tranche of term debt with existing lender Aviva Real Estate Investors at a fixed 4.10%, using the proceeds to refinance a £25m variable rate revolving credit facility (RCF) with RBS. The RBS facility was acquired with DRUM REIT and was due to expire in September 2022.
Total agreed debt facilities now amount to £190m, of which £140m is fixed-rate debt with a blended cost of c 3.6% and average term to maturity of just under eight years. Including the shorter-term, flexible, floating rate RCF with Lloyds Bank, the total average cost of debt at end-Q123 was 3.2% with an average term to maturity of just over six years. Reflecting the impact of interest rate movements on CREI’s floating rate debt, we anticipate an increase to c 3.4% in the average cost of borrowing by end-FY23.
Exhibit 12: Summary of debt facilities at 30 June 2022
Lender |
Facility (£m) |
Margin |
Term to maturity (years) |
Maturity date |
Scottish Widows |
20.0 |
3.935% |
3.1 |
13/08/2025 |
Scottish Widows |
45.0 |
2.987% |
5.9 |
05/06/2028 |
Aviva tranche 1 |
35.0 |
3.020% |
9.8 |
06/04/2032 |
Aviva tranche 2 |
15.0 |
3.260% |
10.4 |
03/11/2032 |
Aviva tranche 3 |
25.0 |
4.100% |
10.4 |
03/11/2032 |
Total fixed rate |
140.0 |
3.359% |
||
Lloyds Bank revolving credit facility |
50.0 |
SONIA +1.5%-1.8% |
2.2 |
17/09/2024 |
Total debt facilities |
190.0 |
3.2% |
6.3 |
Source: Custodian REIT data, Edison Investment Research
Seeking further accretive growth
CREI has grown strongly since IPO, increasing an initial seed portfolio of c £95m to an end-Q123 portfolio valuation of c £700m, and it targets further accretive growth. For shareholders, the benefits of growth are for CREI to become a larger, more liquid and further diversified vehicle, appealing to a broad range of investors, that can benefit from scale efficiencies, spreading fixed costs over a wider income-producing asset base and ultimately reducing the marginal rate of asset management charges. With net assets now above £500m, the marginal asset management charge has reduced to 0.65% of average net assets (and the administration fee to 0.05%), and at net assets of more than £750m would fall to 0.55%/0.03%. Initial portfolio growth in the three years to end-FY19 was funded by significant equity raises. Net acquisition activity slowed noticeably in FY20, as attractive opportunities that met CREI’s investment criteria were more difficult to identify. Due to high demand for the shares, maintaining a consistent premium to NAV, net acquisitions were funded by share issuance under the company’s tap issue facility in addition to capital recycling. During the pandemic, activity slowed further but picked up in FY22, and to a lesser extent net investment, continuing into 2023.
Exhibit 13: Portfolio acquisitions and disposals |
Source: Custodian REIT data, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Includes acquisition costs written off. |
FY22 was dominated by two main transactions. DRUM REIT was acquired for £43.5m, adding a portfolio of 10 assets with a valuation of £49m. The consideration was settled by the issue of new CREI shares. Also in FY22, a portfolio of nine industrial assets, non-core to CREI over the medium term, was sold for £32.6m, 19% above the start-year valuation.
Including DRUM REIT, during FY22 CREI acquired assets with an aggregate value of £63.5m (before costs) at a blended net initial yield of 6.6%. Properties with an aggregate consideration of £54.5m were sold, £9.6m ahead of the pre-sale valuation, at a blended 6.0% yield for those occupied.
So far in FY23, CREI has acquired properties for an aggregate £41.6m (before costs) at a blended net initial yield of 6.6% and disposed of properties for an aggregate £14.8m, £4.8m ahead of the end-FY22 valuation, at a blended 6.0% yield for those occupied.
Exhibit 14: Summary of recent transactions
Purchases (£m) |
Sales (£m) |
||||||
Location |
Sector |
Consideration (£m) |
NIY* |
Location |
Sector |
Price |
NIY* |
Cromer |
Retail warehouse |
4.5 |
6.3% |
Nottingham & Cheltenham |
High street retail |
2.9 |
N/A |
Liverpool |
Industrial |
4.3 |
5.6% |
Day nursery |
Other/day nursey |
0.6 |
N/A |
Dundee |
Industrial |
1.9 |
5.9% |
Galashiels |
Retail warehouse |
4.5 |
5.7% |
Manchester |
Office |
6.3 |
6.1% |
Portfolio |
Industrial (7) |
32.6 |
5.9% |
York |
Industrial |
3.0 |
5.9% |
Stockport |
Other/car showroom |
9.0 |
6.7% |
DRUM REIT |
Portfolio |
43.5 |
6.8% |
Stafford |
Other/car showroom |
4.9 |
5.8% |
FY22 total |
63.5 |
6.6% |
54.5 |
6.0% |
|||
Grangemouth |
Industrial |
7.5 |
5.5% |
Derby |
Other/car showroom |
5.6 |
5.7% |
Winchester |
High street retail |
3.7 |
6.4% |
Weston-Super-Mare |
High street retail |
0.7 |
8.6% |
Nottingham |
Retail warehouse |
15.0 |
6.2% |
Milton Keynes |
Industrial |
8.5 |
N/A |
York |
Retail warehouse |
3.0 |
5.1% |
||||
Measham & Droitwich |
Retail warehouse (2) |
8.9 |
9.4% |
||||
Chesterfield |
Industrial |
3.5 |
6.1% |
||||
FY23 to-date total |
41.6 |
6.6% |
14.8 |
6.0% |
Source: Custodian REIT data, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Net initial yield. For purchases includes notional buyers’ costs in addition to consideration. Assets that were vacant at the point of sale are shown as N/A.
While CREI’s preference is for selective individual property acquisitions, we expect it will also consider further strategic portfolio acquisitions and corporate acquisitions, seeking to benefit from sector consolidation. The company also sees the potential to take market share from struggling open-ended funds. Strategic disposals, particularly of mature assets, may provide capital recycling opportunities, but to significantly grow scale will require additional capital. Maintaining a moderate level of gearing, larger acquisitions will require additional equity and debt capital. Equity issuance for cash, including under the tap issuance facility, is unlikely while the shares trade at a discount to NAV, but given the above-average price to net asset value at which CREI shares trade, vendor placings and equity swaps are possibilities. This was the case with DRUM REIT, which had the added advantage of broadening CREI’s shareholder base.
Investing in asset quality and environmental performance
Within its broader ESG strategy, CREI has seen a continuing improvement in the environmental performance of its portfolio. During FY22, the percentage of properties with an EPC rating of C or better increased to 73% from 59% in FY21 and the weighted average EPC score of the portfolio at end-Q123 was C (60) compared with C (61) at end FY22 and C (63) at end-FY21.
The company plans no EPC E-rated properties by 2025 and no D-rated properties by 2027 in line with MEES regulations.4 Most of the investment required to meet its these targets will form part of the existing rolling programme of asset enhancement and CREI will work with occupiers that share similar environmental performance goals. The company sees such improvements as an opportunity to benefit from improved asset quality, attractive to tenants, with enhanced rents and valuation, generating a positive return on investment. CREI’s ESG committee report in the FY22 annual report details its other targets and progress towards achieving these, and a next stage is to publish its net zero carbon pathway.
Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards.
Exhibit 15: Summary of portfolio EPC ratings by weighted average floor area
31-Mar-22 |
31-Mar-21 |
|
EPC rating |
End-FY22 |
End-FY21 |
A |
3% |
1% |
B |
21% |
15% |
C |
49% |
43% |
A-C total |
73% |
59% |
D |
20% |
30% |
E |
7% |
11% |
F |
0% |
0% |
Source: Custodian REIT
Recent financial performance: A strong FY22 has continued into Q123
FY22 results were published in June 2022, reflecting CREI’s strongest ever year of total returns. On an IFRS basis, earnings increased to £122.3m from £3.7m in FY21, driven by a £117.0m swing in realised and unrealised property gains after acquisition costs (to £97.1m from a loss of £19.9m). Excluding capital gains, EPRA earnings also showed a good level of growth, increasing 6.7% to £25.3m or 5.9p per share (FY21: 5.6p). DPS declared for the year showed a continuing recovery, up 5% to 5.25p and was 110.3% covered by EPRA earnings, while rent collection returned to pre-pandemic levels. Custodian has subsequently published its quarterly update for the three months that ended 30 June 2022 (Q123), which shows further progress with a three-month total return of 3.2%.
Exhibit 15 shows a summary of the FY22 results. We highlight the following:
■
Net rental income increased by £2.5m (7.6%) to £35.6m. The increase reflected higher annualised contracted rents and a reduction in rent receivable charges, partly offset by higher non-recoverable property operating costs.
■
Administrative expenses increased £0.9m to £5.5m. Within this, management fees increased £0.4m, reflecting the growth in NAV, and other administrative costs by £0.4m, driven by increased staff costs and additional costs relating to the development of the pathway to net zero carbon and other sustainability linked costs.
■
With interest costs flat, EPRA earnings increased £1.6m (6.7%) to £25.3m or 5.9p per share (FY21: 5.6p). DPS declared increased by 5% to 5.25p and was 110% covered.
■
Including realised and unrealised property gains net of acquisition costs, IFRS earnings were £122.3m, taking NAV per share to 119.7p (FY21: 97.6p; H122: 106.0p). Including DPS paid the total return was 28.4%.
Exhibit 16: Summary of FY22 financial performance
Year end March (£m unless stated otherwise) |
FY22 |
FY21 |
FY22/FY21 |
Edison FY22 forecast |
Gross rental income |
39.0 |
38.7 |
1.0% |
39.1 |
Non-rechargeable property costs |
(3.3) |
(2.0) |
(2.9) |
|
Receivables provision/write-off |
(0.2) |
(3.6) |
(0.2) |
|
Net rental income |
35.6 |
33.1 |
7.6% |
36.0 |
Administrative expenses |
(5.5) |
(4.6) |
20.7% |
(5.2) |
Operating Profit before revaluations |
30.1 |
28.5 |
5.5% |
30.8 |
Net interest |
(4.8) |
(4.8) |
(4.9) |
|
EPRA earnings |
25.3 |
23.7 |
6.7% |
25.9 |
Revaluation of investment properties |
94.0 |
(19.6) |
71.4 |
|
Costs of acquisitions |
(2.3) |
(0.7) |
(3.1) |
|
Profit on disposal |
5.4 |
0.4 |
5.3 |
|
IFRS earnings |
122.3 |
3.7 |
99.5 |
|
IFRS EPS (p) |
28.5 |
0.9 |
23.2 |
|
EPRA EPS (p) |
5.9 |
5.6 |
4.5% |
6.0 |
DPS (declared) (p) |
5.25 |
5.00 |
5.0% |
5.50 |
EPRA earnings/dividends paid in period (x) |
110.3 |
112.7 |
99.3% |
109.2 |
IFRS NAV & EPRA NTA per share (p) |
119.7 |
97.6 |
114.7 |
|
Investment portfolio (£000s) |
665.2 |
551.9 |
20.5% |
669.1 |
NTA total return |
28.4% |
0.9% |
23.5% |
|
Net LTV |
19.1% |
24.9% |
23.3% |
Source: Custodian REIT data, Edison Investment Research
Q123 NAV total return 3.2%
Further progress in Q123 included NAV growth of 2.1% to 122.2p, driven by a 1.7% like-for-like increase in portfolio valuations. ERV increased by 1.4% like-for-like and net capital deployment added 1.5% to annualised rent roll of £41.1m (end-FY22: £40.5m). Strong leasing activity saw 13 new leases secured, adding £1.8m of annualised rental income for an average 6.8 years. The positive impact of letting four vacant units was offset by vacancy at two industrial properties earmarked for refurbishment and another that has since been profitably divested, with EPRA occupancy reducing to 88.7% (end-FY22: 89.9%). A Q123 DPS of 1.375p, in line with Q422, is consistent with the FY23 target of at least 5.5p and was covered by EPRA earnings. Quarterly EPRA EPS of 1.4p (Q422: 1.6p) was affected by the timing of capital deployment and the change in occupancy.
Forecast update
The changes in our EPRA earnings forecasts are driven by higher administrative costs and net interest expenses.
Exhibit 17: Forecast revisions
Net rental income (£m) |
EPRA EPS (p) |
DPS (p) |
EPRA NAV/share (p) |
Net LTV |
|||||||||||
Old |
New |
Change (%) |
Old |
New |
Change (%) |
Old |
New |
Change (%) |
Old |
New |
Change (%) |
Old |
New |
Change (pp) |
|
03/23e |
39.4 |
38.8 |
-1.7 |
6.5 |
6.0 |
-7.4 |
6.00 |
5.63 |
-6.3 |
116.7 |
124.7 |
6.9 |
23.2% |
23.0% |
0.2 |
03/24e* |
40.0 |
40.0 |
0.0 |
6.6 |
6.1 |
-6.9 |
6.50 |
6.00 |
-7.7 |
118.7 |
124.9 |
5.2 |
23.3% |
24.0% |
-0.7 |
Source: Edison Investment Research. *Our last published note showed FY24e EPRA EPS of 6.7p due to an incorrect adjustment from IFRS to EPRA earnings for revaluation gains.
The increase in administrative costs is substantially related to higher management fees, reflecting the strong growth in NAV and despite the lower marginal fee reducing with growth. We also expect other administrative costs to be higher than previously, in line with FY22. The increase in our forecast interest charge reflects borrowing costs rather than the level of borrowing.
Exhibit 18: Change in EPRA earnings forecasts
£m |
New estimate |
Old estimate |
Change in estimate |
||||||
FY23e |
FY24e |
FY23e |
FY24e* |
FY23e |
FY24e |
||||
Net rental income |
38.8 |
40.0 |
39.4 |
40.0 |
(0.7) |
(0.0) |
|||
Administrative expenses |
(6.4) |
(6.6) |
(5.6) |
(5.7) |
(0.9) |
(0.9) |
|||
Net interest |
(5.9) |
(6.4) |
(5.3) |
(5.3) |
(0.6) |
(1.1) |
|||
EPRA earnings |
26.4 |
27.0 |
28.5 |
29.0 |
(2.1) |
(2.0) |
Source: Edison Investment Research. *Our last published note showed FY24e EPRA earnings of £29.6m due to an incorrect adjustment from IFRS to EPRA earnings for revaluation gains
Our gross rental income forecasts are little changed and reflect like-for-like ERV growth of c 2.8% in FY23 (Q123 c 1.4%). This may prove to be conservative given the growth currently being experienced. Similarly, our forecasts imply only a modest increase in occupancy from 88.7% at end-Q123 to c 89.0% at end-FY23 and 89.4% at end-FY24. We have assumed no acquisitions or disposals other than those already announced, although capital recycling is likely.
Following a 1.7%/£11.3m like-for-like valuation increase in Q123, we forecast c 2.6%/£18.7m for the year and flat in FY24. We estimate that a 0.5% increase in the valuation yield (Q123: 5.54%) would reduce NAV per share by c 14p.
Valuation and performance
CREI’s target DPS for FY23 of at least 5.5p represents a prospective yield of 5.2%. Based on our forecast DPS of 5.625p, the yield is slightly higher. Meanwhile, the shares trade at a c 13% discount to the Q123 NAV per share of 119.7p, below the average premium of c 3% since IPO.
Exhibit 19: P/NAV history |
Source: Refinitiv prices at 29 August 2022, Custodian REIT NAV data, Edison Investment Research |
In Exhibit 20, we show a summary performance and valuation comparison of CREI and what we consider to be its closest diversified income-oriented peers. CREI’s share price performance is above the peer group average over one and three years. For comparative purposes, the valuation data are shown on a trailing basis. CREI trades on a higher P/NAV than the average of the group, as it has done for most of the period since IPO, and its trailing yield is below average. Factors supporting CREI’s valuation include uninterrupted quarterly DPS during the pandemic (albeit at a reduced level), moderate gearing and a focus on smaller lot size properties with a yield premium that has historically supported risk-adjusted income returns.
Exhibit 20: Peer performance and valuation summary
Price |
Market cap (£m) |
P/NAV |
Trailing yield (%)** |
Share price performance |
||||
1 month |
3 months |
1 year |
3 years |
|||||
Ediston Property |
74 |
156 |
0.77 |
6.8 |
-6% |
-8% |
-4% |
-33% |
BMO Real Estate Investments |
88 |
209 |
0.66 |
4.6 |
8% |
-5% |
19% |
-10% |
BMO Commercial Property Trust |
107 |
754 |
0.72 |
4.2 |
-11% |
-9% |
6% |
-27% |
Picton |
91 |
498 |
0.74 |
3.8 |
-2% |
-8% |
-6% |
0% |
Regional REIT |
71 |
366 |
0.73 |
9.2 |
-4% |
-16% |
-20% |
-25% |
Schroder REIT |
53 |
259 |
0.67 |
5.9 |
-3% |
-3% |
2% |
-15% |
Standard Life Investment Property |
76 |
292 |
0.72 |
5.0 |
-3% |
-5% |
7% |
-19% |
UK Commercial Property REIT |
71 |
921 |
0.63 |
7.0 |
-5% |
-16% |
-10% |
-20% |
Average |
0.71 |
5.6 |
-3% |
-9% |
-1% |
-19% |
||
Custodian |
106 |
467 |
0.87 |
5.1 |
-3% |
8% |
8% |
-12% |
UK property sector index |
1,567 |
-9% |
-13% |
-20% |
-14% |
|||
UK equity market index |
4,076 |
-1% |
-3% |
-1% |
-3% |
Source: Company data, Refinitiv prices at 29 August 2022. Note: *Based on last reported EPRA NAV/NTA. **Based on trailing 12-month DPS declared.
Additional details on the company and management
Custodian REIT is an externally managed UK real estate investment trust (REIT), listed on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange. Its portfolio of commercial property assets is managed with the objective of providing long-term, secure income with an attractive target dividend and long-term NAV growth. To this end, CREI looks to maintain a diverse tenant, region and sector mix with properties, outside of London, with high residual values and a lower risk of obsolescence. It is differentiated from most peers by investing in smaller lot-size assets of between £2m and £10m at the point of acquisition, where there is less price competition.
The board
CREI’s board of directors typically comprises six members, all of whom are non-executive and responsible for the overall management of the company’s activities. The board is chaired by David Hunter, a professional strategic adviser focused principally on UK and international real estate, who sits on the boards of a number of listed and unlisted companies, as well as holding corporate advisory roles.
The independent non-executive directors are Hazel Adam, who joined the board in December 2019, bringing a range of experience including the buy-side and sell-side investment industry, strategies and markets; Elizabeth McMeikan, a former Tesco executive and experienced board member, appointed in March 2021; Chris Ireland, a former CEO of JLL UK and former chair of the Investment Property Forum, who also joined the board in March 2021; Malcolm Cooper, who has extensive board experience and a background in corporate finance, infrastructure and property, and who joined the board in June 2022, replacing Matthew Thorne, who will retire at the AGM in August 2022 after eight years’ service. Ian Mattioli, chief executive officer of Mattioli Woods and a board member of the investment manager, is also a non-executive board member but deemed not to be independent. Ed Moore, finance director of Custodian Capital, is company secretary to CREI. Full details of the board can be found at www.custodianreit.com/about-us-2/meet-the-directors/.
The investment manager
The company is externally managed by Custodian Capital (www.custodiancapital.com), a wholly owned subsidiary of Mattioli Woods (www.mattioliwoods.com). Custodian Capital was appointed investment manager at the IPO, an arrangement that is subject to regular board review. Richard Shepherd-Cross is the managing director of Custodian Capital and the fund manager of CREI. He is a former director of Jones Lang LaSalle in London, where he led the portfolio investment team before joining Mattioli Woods in 2009, with responsibility for its syndicated property initiative, the precursor to Custodian. In total, the Custodian Capital team that is dedicated to the management of CREI’s assets consists of 18 members, including six property professionals.
Management and administration fees are paid to the manager on a sliding scale that allows shareholders to benefit from growth in NAV. The fees on continued growth in NAV above £500m were reduced during the year.
■
Property management fees are charged at 0.90% pa on average net assets of up to £200m, 0.75% pa between £200m and £500m, 0.65% between £500m and £750m, and 0.55% above £750m.
■
Administrative fees are charged at 0.125% pa on average net assets up to £200m, 0.08% pa between £200 and £500m, 0.05% between £500m and £750, and 0.03% above £750m.
Sensitivities
The commercial property market is cyclical, historically exhibiting substantial swings in valuation through cycles. Income returns are significantly more stable, but still fluctuate according to tenant demand and rent terms. From a sector viewpoint, we also highlight the increased risks and uncertainties that attach to development activity, including planning consents, timing, construction risks and the long lead times to completion and eventual occupation. CREI’s development exposure is modest and limited to the improvement of existing properties. In this respect it may best be seen as an extension of its refurbishment activity, aimed at enhancing long-term income growth and returns. Forward funded development activity is likewise modest and, in our view, very low risk. More generally we note the sensitivity to:
■
Economic risk: the war in Ukraine and sharply rising inflation, to a lesser extent reflected in interest rates, are creating a high level of uncertainty regarding the global and UK economic outlook. Although the incidence and impact of the pandemic has substantially eased, there remains some uncertainty about the potential emergence of new strains.
■
Sector risk: some of the inherent cyclical risk to vacancy in commercial property can be mitigated by portfolio diversification. CREI’s portfolio is highly diversified by asset, sector, tenant and geography, with a focus on properties with higher yields and residual values.
■
Energy performance considerations: a failure to successfully meet regulatory and/or tenant expectations for energy performance enhancement would likely affect CREI’s ability to let properties on satisfactory terms and may make properties unlettable.
■
Funding risks: three-quarters of debt facilities are fixed rate and longer term, mitigating interest rate risk. Increasing long-term rates may be expected to negatively affect market-wide property valuations.
■
Management risk: as CREI is externally managed, any management risk is indirect. Custodian Capital, the external manager, operates with a relatively small team, and if a senior member of that team were to leave, they would need to be replaced.
Exhibit 21: Financial summary
Year end 31 March, £m |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023e |
2024e |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
|
PROFIT & LOSS |
|||||||
Gross rental income |
34.1 |
39.1 |
40.0 |
38.7 |
39.0 |
41.8 |
42.7 |
Non-recoverable property costs |
(0.9) |
(1.5) |
(1.5) |
(2.0) |
(3.3) |
(3.0) |
(2.7) |
Rent receivables provisions/write |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(0.3) |
(3.6) |
(0.2) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Net rental income |
33.2 |
37.6 |
38.1 |
33.1 |
35.6 |
38.8 |
40.0 |
Administrative expenses |
(4.4) |
(4.9) |
(4.8) |
(4.6) |
(5.5) |
(6.4) |
(6.6) |
Operating Profit before revaluations |
28.8 |
32.7 |
33.4 |
28.5 |
30.1 |
32.3 |
33.4 |
Revaluation of investment properties |
11.9 |
(5.5) |
(25.9) |
(19.6) |
94.0 |
18.7 |
0.0 |
Costs of acquisitions |
(6.2) |
(3.4) |
(0.6) |
(0.7) |
(2.3) |
(2.7) |
0.0 |
Profit/(loss) on disposal |
1.6 |
4.3 |
(0.1) |
0.4 |
5.4 |
4.6 |
0.0 |
Operating Profit |
36.1 |
28.0 |
6.8 |
8.6 |
127.2 |
53.0 |
33.4 |
Net Interest |
(3.7) |
(4.4) |
(4.7) |
(4.8) |
(4.8) |
(5.9) |
(6.4) |
Profit Before Tax |
32.4 |
23.6 |
2.1 |
3.7 |
122.3 |
47.1 |
27.0 |
Taxation |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Profit After Tax |
32.4 |
23.6 |
2.1 |
3.7 |
122.3 |
47.1 |
27.0 |
Net revaluation of investment property/costs of acquisition |
(5.6) |
8.9 |
26.4 |
20.3 |
(91.7) |
(16.0) |
0.0 |
Gains/(losses) on disposal |
(1.6) |
(4.3) |
0.1 |
(0.4) |
(5.4) |
(4.6) |
0.0 |
EPRA earnings |
25.2 |
28.5 |
28.7 |
23.7 |
25.3 |
26.4 |
27.0 |
Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m) |
362.4 |
391.9 |
409.7 |
420.1 |
428.7 |
440.9 |
440.9 |
IFRS EPS (p) |
8.9 |
6.0 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
28.5 |
10.7 |
6.1 |
EPRA EPS (p) |
6.9 |
7.3 |
7.0 |
5.6 |
5.9 |
6.0 |
6.1 |
Dividend per share (p) |
6.45 |
6.55 |
6.65 |
5.00 |
5.25 |
5.63 |
6.00 |
Dividend cover (x)* |
1.06 |
1.10 |
1.04 |
1.13 |
1.10 |
1.07 |
1.02 |
Ongoing charges ratio (excluding property expenses) |
1.15% |
1.12% |
1.12% |
1.12% |
1.20% |
1.19% |
1.20% |
NAV total return |
5.9% |
1.1% |
0.9% |
28.4% |
8.8% |
4.9% |
|
BALANCE SHEET |
|||||||
Fixed Assets |
528.9 |
572.7 |
559.8 |
551.9 |
665.2 |
725.1 |
735.9 |
Investment properties |
528.9 |
572.7 |
559.8 |
551.9 |
665.2 |
725.1 |
735.9 |
Other non-current assets |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Current Assets |
12.9 |
6.1 |
30.7 |
9.9 |
16.8 |
20.0 |
10.2 |
Debtors |
7.9 |
3.7 |
5.3 |
6.0 |
5.2 |
7.6 |
7.7 |
Cash |
5.1 |
2.5 |
25.4 |
3.9 |
11.6 |
12.3 |
2.5 |
Current Liabilities |
(12.8) |
(14.2) |
(14.9) |
(12.8) |
(39.9) |
(17.6) |
(17.7) |
Creditors/Deferred income |
(12.8) |
(14.2) |
(14.9) |
(12.8) |
(17.2) |
(17.6) |
(17.7) |
Short term borrowings |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(22.7) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Long Term Liabilities |
(113.9) |
(138.1) |
(148.9) |
(139.2) |
(114.5) |
(177.6) |
(178.0) |
Long term borrowings |
(113.4) |
(137.5) |
(148.3) |
(138.6) |
(113.9) |
(177.0) |
(177.4) |
Other long term liabilities |
(0.6) |
(0.6) |
(0.6) |
(0.6) |
(0.6) |
(0.6) |
(0.6) |
Net Assets |
415.2 |
426.6 |
426.8 |
409.9 |
527.6 |
550.0 |
550.5 |
NAV/share (p) |
107.3 |
107.1 |
101.6 |
97.6 |
119.7 |
124.7 |
124.9 |
EPRA NAV/share (p) |
107.3 |
107.1 |
101.6 |
97.6 |
119.7 |
124.7 |
124.9 |
NAV total return |
9.6% |
5.9% |
1.1% |
0.9% |
28.4% |
8.8% |
4.9% |
CASH FLOW |
|||||||
Operating Cash Flow |
28.4 |
36.0 |
31.0 |
23.8 |
32.6 |
29.5 |
32.7 |
Net Interest |
(3.5) |
(4.2) |
(4.4) |
(4.5) |
(4.5) |
(5.5) |
(6.1) |
Tax |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Net additions to investment property |
(105.9) |
(46.2) |
(12.2) |
(10.1) |
26.6 |
(38.5) |
(10.0) |
Ordinary dividends paid |
(23.0) |
(25.5) |
(27.0) |
(20.6) |
(24.2) |
(24.7) |
(26.5) |
Debt drawn/(repaid) |
49.4 |
24.0 |
10.5 |
(10.1) |
(25.1) |
40.0 |
0.0 |
Proceeds from shares issued (net of costs) |
53.9 |
13.3 |
25.0 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Other cash flow from financing activities |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Net Cash Flow |
(0.7) |
(2.6) |
22.9 |
(21.5) |
7.7 |
0.7 |
(9.8) |
Opening cash |
5.8 |
5.1 |
2.5 |
25.4 |
3.9 |
11.6 |
12.3 |
Closing cash |
5.1 |
2.5 |
25.4 |
3.9 |
11.6 |
12.3 |
2.5 |
Debt as per balance sheet |
(113.4) |
(137.5) |
(148.3) |
(138.6) |
(136.6) |
(177.0) |
(177.4) |
Unamortised loan arrangement fees |
(1.6) |
(1.5) |
(1.7) |
(1.4) |
(1.2) |
(0.8) |
(0.4) |
Total debt |
(115.0) |
(139.0) |
(150.0) |
(140.0) |
(137.8) |
(177.8) |
(177.8) |
Restricted cash |
(1.3) |
(1.4) |
(0.9) |
(1.2) |
(1.1) |
(1.4) |
(1.4) |
Closing net debt |
(111.3) |
(137.9) |
(125.5) |
(137.3) |
(127.3) |
(166.8) |
(176.7) |
Net LTV |
21.0% |
24.1% |
22.4% |
24.9% |
19.1% |
23.0% |
24.0% |
Source: Custodian REIT historical data, Edison Investment Research
|
|
|
Research: Healthcare
Incannex Healthcare is an Australian biotech specializing in the development of treatments for chronic conditions through a unique approach. Specifically, the company is investigating the use of cannabinoids and psychedelics, leveraging its synergistic combination intellectual property (IP). Most recently, it has achieved proof-of-concept in Australia for IHL-42X, its lead asset for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The company intends to file an investigational new drug application (IND) with the FDA (in CY Q422) following positive Phase II results from its Australian clinical trial data. Incannex is also progressing development of its (Australian) Phase II clinical asset, psilocybin in combination with psychotherapy in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). We value Incannex at US$695.7m or US$11.42 per ADR.
Get access to the very latest content matched to your personal investment style.