Ceres Power Holdings — Update 24 February 2016

Ceres Power Holdings — Update 24 February 2016

Ceres Power Holdings

Analyst avatar placeholder

Written by

Ceres Power Holdings

Strengthening customer engagement

Interim results

Alternative energy

25 February 2016

Price

5.54p

Market cap

£43m

Net cash (£m) at end December 2015 (including short-term investments)

12.8

Shares in issue

772.5m

Free float

51.5%

Code

CWR

Primary exchange

AIM

Secondary exchange

N/A

Share price performance

%

1m

3m

12m

Abs

(10.7)

(9.6)

(34.5)

Rel (local)

(10.3)

(3.6)

(24.0)

52-week high/low

9.7p

4.3p

Business description

Ceres Power is a developer of low-cost, next-generation fuel cell technology for use in decentralised energy products that reduce operating costs, lower CO2 emissions, increase efficiency and improve energy security.

Next event

Prelims

October 2016

Analysts

Anne Margaret Crow

+44 (0)20 3077 5700

Roger Johnston

+44 (0)20 3077 5722

Ceres Power Holdings is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited

During H116 Ceres Power continued to make good progress towards commercialising its Steel Cell technology, which offers a route to economically viable fuel cell-based systems for mass deployment. Noting the intensification of engagement with existing and new partners discussed in the interims, which underpins our revenue growth assumptions, we leave our FY16 and FY17 estimates unchanged.

Year end

Revenue (£m)

EBITDA
(£m)

PBT*
(£m)

EPS*
(p)

DPS
(p)

P/E
(x)

06/14

1.2

(6.7)

(7.7)

(1.2)

0.0

N/A

06/15

0.3

(9.7)

(10.5)

(1.2)

0.0

N/A

06/16e

1.0

(11.2)

(12.4)

(1.4)

0.0

N/A

06/17e

2.0

(10.8)

(12.0)

(1.4)

0.0

N/A

Note: *PBT and EPS are normalised, excluding amortisation of acquired intangibles, exceptional items and share-based payments.

Customer engagement intensifying

Ceres’s business model is to focus on developing highly efficient, robust and cost-effective fuel cell stacks that will be deployed by partners in power generation systems. Earlier this year, Ceres announced two significant customer agreements: one a follow-on agreement with Honda to jointly develop fuel cell stacks for power equipment suitable for deployment in a range of potential applications, and one with a global OEM to evaluate the Steel Cell technology for use in higher power electricity generation systems suitable for commercial applications.

Engagement underpinned by technology advances

Adoption of fuel cells generally remains limited because although the basic technology is proven, it is not yet cost competitive. Ceres’s patented Steel Cell technology is an innovative solution to this cost problem, predicated on using non-exotic materials that can be processed in volumes using conventional manufacturing equipment and techniques. In December Ceres announced that its V3 technology had delivered the electrical efficiencies required to be viable for commercial and light industrial scale applications as well as residential applications. Ceres’s high-speed print line has achieved a tenfold reduction in processing times, a key step in realising low-cost, high-volume production capability.

Valuation: Long-term value from royalties

The long-term value for Ceres lies in potential royalty streams created when energy generation systems incorporating Steel Cell technology are commercialised. We estimate that, if commercialisation is successful, a 40% share of the Japanese CHP market and deployment in 20% of all boilers sold in Korea could generate annual royalty revenues of c £135m. We estimate that deployment in 10% of Honda’s gensets and power appliances could add c £65m in royalty revenues annually. Cash consumption during H116 totalled £5.4m, leaving £12.8m at end December 2015. Management intends to raise further funding by the calendar year end to finance the growing opportunity for higher power applications.

Progress on execution of strategy

Ceres’s investment proposition is based on achieving its aim of developing solid oxide fuel cell technology that is competitive with other types of electrical generation. This means the technology must be efficient at converting chemical energy into electrical energy, can be manufactured using materials and processes that make the technology cost-competitive and is sufficiently robust to give an adequate payback period for consumers installing products based on the technology. In addition, since Ceres has decided to focus on developing fuel cell technology rather than complete power generation systems, it needs to secure long-term relationships with partners capable of taking complete systems to market in different geographies. At this stage of evolution, progress towards achieving these goals is more significant that the financial results themselves.

Technology developments

The latest release of the V3 Steel Cell technology platform, announced in December, has improved efficiency and power density to the point at which Ceres is able to address power only applications for the commercial scale market, as well as significantly improving the economic case for the residential market. V4 is on track for release to customers in the summer of 2016. This will incorporate manufacturing advances that reduce the cost of production together with further efficiency improvements.

Residential market

Following the adoption of a new business model in 2013, Ceres has focused on developing the fuel cells and stacks for partners to integrate into their own power generation systems. However, to demonstrate what is possible to potential customers, Ceres has developed a complete prototype system, the Steel Gen, which has been made available to OEM partners. The system has achieved Ceres’s stated target of 50% net electrical efficiency. This will allow partners to create fuel cell power systems for residential use that are more efficient than the best centralised generating plant when operated in power only mode, are at least equivalent to the best systems currently available commercially in Japan and achieve overall efficiency of up to 90% when operated in CHP (combined heat and power) mode. High electrical efficiency is particularly important in the Japanese micro-CHP sector, because the “spark-gap” between gas and electricity prices in the country is small. In addition, the design is one of the most compact residential fuel cell systems available, which is key for penetrating the market for installations in high-rise apartments in Asia where space is at a premium. The system runs on natural gas, so does not depend on ready availability of pure hydrogen to be usable and is fully compliant with all emission standards.

Higher power output

Higher electrical efficiencies are also important for entering the commercial and light industrial business sectors where fuel cells are beginning to be used for power-only and back-up power applications. During H116 Ceres has developed its first modular stack concept based on the V3 Steel Cell technology. In its initial testing, this achieved 55% net electrical efficiency, significantly exceeding the 50% level at which the technology becomes viable for commercial and light industrial scale applications. This has enabled Ceres to address new market applications and attract new potential partners (see below).

Manufacturing

Significant progress was made on production scale-up projects intended to provide demonstration and validation of a production process suitable for high-volume fuel cell manufacture at market cost points. The key innovation is based on changing the way in which the thin ceramic layers forming the electrolyte layer inside individual cells are laid down. Originally this was done by spraying. Ceres has recently commissioned its high-speed print line, which is used to deposit the thin ceramic layers. The new print line has reduced print cycle time from 30 seconds to three, as management predicted, thus substantially improving throughput. The technique also gives a better-quality deposition layer.

Developing routes to market

Japan

Following a year-long evaluation of the Steel Cell technology, which concentrated on performance, robustness and ability to handle repeated power cycles, in October 2014 Ceres Power signed a JDA with Honda to jointly develop a fuel cell stack using the Steel Cell technology. Stacks have been built in the UK and tested in Japan with the intent to ultimately deploy in 1-5kW systems. The results from this phase met the performance targets, leading to the signature of a follow-on JDA in January 2016. The relationship is clearly strengthening, as this was the first time that the client had given permission to be named. Moreover, this new phase also includes a third party, which is being lined up with the intention that it may ultimately manufacture fuel cells in volume using Ceres’s proprietary process. Management notes that this agreement is the first of several key commercial partnerships that it expects to sign during calendar 2016, in line with the target initially stated at the AGM in December 2015 of securing five leading OEMs within the next two years.

Korea

All the testing undertaken in KD Navien’s facility under the Technology Assessment Agreement completed successfully, including aggressive accelerated testing for cycleability and steady-state running. At the partner’s request, Ceres provided KD Navien with an additional system on which it has carried out extended validation. All of the performance requirements have been met to date, including the extended validation. Management opened a sales office in South Korea during H116 since the current pipeline of opportunities in Japan is attributable in part to having a sales office in the country. This local presence in Korea, together with the appointment of an experienced chief commercial officer (see below) is expected to help advance the commercial relationship with KD Navien further during calendar 2016 as well as supporting the development of additional customer relationships in the country.

North America

The US remains an important key market for Ceres because of business and householder concerns about continuity of electricity supply. The newly appointed chief commercial officer, who has been recruited from Ballard Power Systems, is based in North America, though he is also working with potential customers in Asia and Europe.

Other

As a result of the advances in system efficiency, which position the technology for deployment in higher power applications, in early February Ceres announced that it has signed an evaluation agreement with a new potential customer who is a leading global OEM. Ceres has commissioned a complete Steel Cell system for a period of rigorous testing at the customer’s site. Under the terms of an additional Memorandum of Understanding, if this testing proves successful, the two parties intend to enter into a joint development of a multi kilowatt system later in calendar 2016.

Valuation

Ceres has yet to generate commercial revenues, so its value resides in the potential royalty streams generated once distributed power systems incorporating Steel Cell technology are eventually commercialised. In Exhibit 1 we present our scenario analysis which explores potential royalty revenues and profit generated in each of the key markets as commercial partners take significant share in their respective markets. Noting that Honda is active in the genset market, we include an analysis of potential revenues and incremental profits attributable to this partner. Our analysis excludes any potential royalties arising from the agreement with the leading global OEM, which we will add as more information about the potential applications becomes available.

Exhibit 1: Scenario analysis showing potential profits attributable to key markets

Japan

Total number of fuel cell-based CHP systems sold pa 2020-30: 400,000 (government target)

Average selling price per unit with Steel Cell technology: ¥621,000 (government target)

Market share for products with Steel Cell technology

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Royalty revenues

£11.7m

£23.4m

£35.1m

£46.8m

£58.5m

Annual profit after tax

£3.1m

£8.4m

£13.7m

£19.0m

£24.3m

Korea

Total number of domestic boilers sold pa: 1,500,000

Average selling price per unit with Steel Cell technology: $5,500 (as per Japan)

Market share for products with Steel Cell technology

4%

8%

12%

16%

20%

Royalty revenues

£17.6m

£35.1m

£52.7m

£70.2m

£87.8m

Annual profit after tax

£7.4m

£15.4m

£23.3m

£31.3m

£39.3m

US

Total number of domestic boilers sold pa: 7,000,000

Average selling price per unit with Steel Cell technology: $4,500 (target price required to be competitive with conventional technology)

Market share for products with Steel Cell technology

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Royalty revenues

£16.8m

£33.5m

£50.3m

£67.0m

£83.8m

Incremental PAT pa

£12.4m

£23.5m

£34.5m

£45.6m

£56.6m

EU

Total number of domestic boiler sold pa: 5,000,000

Average selling price per unit with Steel Cell technology: €4,100 (target price required to be competitive with conventional technology)

Market share for products with Steel Cell technology

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Royalty revenues

£12.0m

£23.9m

£35.9m

£47.9m

£59.8m

Annual profit after tax

£8.9m

£16.8m

£24.7m

£32.6m

£40.5m

Global genset replacement market

Total number of gensets and power appliances sold per year by partner: 6,000,000

Average selling price per unit: $2,000

Percentage products shipped incorporating Steel Cell Technology

3%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Royalty revenues

£19.1m

£31.9m

£63.8m

£95.7m

£127.7m

Annual profit after tax

£14.2m

£22.6m

£43.7m

£64.7m

£85.8m

Source: Edison Investment Research. Note: $1.4/£; ¥113.0/$; €0.91/$.

Although it is likely that Ceres will adopt a business model in which some of the potential royalties related to single customer engagement are paid upfront as a one-off licence fee, with the payment offset against lower royalty rates, for simplicity our analysis assumes a royalty rate of 7.5% of customer sales, but no upfront licence fees. For the earnings calculation we apply cost of sales as 7.5% of licence revenue, 20% tax and model a base level of operating costs at FY17e levels (£14.0m) split equally between activities in Japan and Korea. The analysis is the same as that presented in our January note, but with current currency conversion rates, thus giving higher values when converted to sterling. Since it is not possible at this stage to determine the potential dilutive impact of any financing activity, we are not attempting to derive an indicative share price from this analysis.

Financials: Progressing to commercialisation

Earnings

H116 revenues and other operating income were at similar levels to H115 at £0.5m. It is encouraging to note that revenue primarily generated from customer evaluation and joint development agreements increased from £0.1m in H115 to £0.2m. Operating costs were 17% (£1.0m) higher than during H115, reflecting the increased number of employees engaged in R&D and initiatives to improve the company’s test and manufacturing capability. Reported operating losses increased by £0.9m to £6.2m.

Exhibit 2: H116 in context

H115

FY15

H116

FY16e

FY17e

Revenues (£k)

133

324

235

1,000

2,000

Operating costs (£k)

(5,605)

(12,476)

(6,565)

(14,000)

(14,300)

Other operating income e.g. grants (£k)

294

621

218

300

309

Reported operating loss (£k)

(5,314)

(11,722)

(6,235)

(13,248)

(12,791)

Source: Edison Investment Research

We leave our FY16 and FY17 estimates unchanged. Our model assumes that engagement with existing partners will intensify during FY16 and that discussions with potential partners will mature into evaluations and development programmes, as discussed in our initiation note, resulting in a strong ramp-up in revenues through the forecast period. We estimate that annual revenues from technology evaluations could be £100-200k per partner, scaling up to £500-1,000k for a joint development agreement. The recent announcements regarding Honda (who has signed a JDA) and the global OEM (who has signed an MoU advising of the intention to proceed to a JDA if the ongoing test programme is successful), support our assumptions regarding revenue development. Clearly any delays in progressing individual customer engagements will have a significant impact. At this early stage, we exclude any potential licence and royalty fees from our financial model, giving scope for substantial upside. We estimate that a single licence fee could be worth tens of millions of pounds.

Cash flow and balance sheet

H116 cash consumption totalled £5.4m (compared to £4.5m H115, excluding funds raised from issue of shares). This included £1.0m invested in the new print line and additional test equipment. We do not capitalise any of this R&D expenditure. Net cash (including short-term investments) reduced from £18.2m at end June 2015 to £12.8m at end December 2015. Management expects the July 2014 placing, which raised £19.6m (net) and was oversubscribed, to provide funding well into calendar 2016. However, the company intends to raise further funding by the calendar year end to finance the growing opportunity for higher power applications. In the absence of any one-off licence payments, which we treat as upside, our estimates show c £4m funding gap in FY17, which we model as satisfied through debt.

Exhibit 3: Financial summary

£000

2014

2015

2016e

2017e

Year end 30 Junel

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

IFRS

PROFIT & LOSS

Revenue

 

 

1,224

324

1,000

2,000

EBITDA

 

 

(6,663)

(9,716)

(11,248)

(10,791)

Operating Profit (pre amort. of acq intangibles & SBP)

 

(7,732)

(10,642)

(12,448)

(11,991)

Amortisation of acquired intangibles

0

0

0

0

Share-based payments

(856)

(1,080)

(800)

(800)

Exceptionals

0

0

0

0

Operating Profit

(8,588)

(11,722)

(13,248)

(12,791)

Net Interest

73

110

70

0

Profit Before Tax (norm)

 

 

(7,659)

(10,532)

(12,378)

(11,991)

Profit Before Tax (FRS 3)

 

 

(8,515)

(11,612)

(13,178)

(12,791)

Tax

1,122

1,571

1,571

1,571

Profit After Tax (norm)

(6,537)

(8,961)

(10,807)

(10,420)

Profit After Tax (FRS 3)

(7,393)

(10,041)

(11,607)

(11,220)

Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m)

536.8

753.2

772.5

772.5

EPS - normalised (p)

 

 

(1.22)

(1.19)

(1.40)

(1.35)

EPS - normalised fully diluted (p)

 

 

(1.22)

(1.19)

(1.40)

(1.35)

EPS - FRS 3 (p)

 

 

(1.38)

(1.33)

(1.50)

(1.45)

Dividend per share (p)

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

EBITDA Margin (%)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Operating Margin (before GW and except.) (%)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

BALANCE SHEET

Fixed Assets

 

 

1,715

2,080

2,380

2,680

Intangible Assets

0

0

0

0

Tangible Assets

1,715

2,080

2,380

2,680

Current Assets

 

 

10,084

20,685

9,000

3,062

Stocks

0

0

0

0

Debtors

2,385

2,501

2,423

2,615

Cash

7,699

18,184

6,577

448

Current Liabilities

 

 

(1,385)

(2,013)

(1,435)

(1,717)

Creditors including tax, social security and provisions

(1,385)

(2,013)

(1,435)

(1,717)

Short term borrowings

0

0

0

0

Long Term Liabilities

 

 

(2,341)

(2,071)

(2,071)

(6,571)

Long term borrowings

0

0

0

(4,500)

Other long term liabilities

(2,341)

(2,071)

(2,071)

(2,071)

Net Assets

 

 

8,073

18,681

7,874

(2,546)

CASH FLOW

Operating Cash Flow

 

 

(8,252)

(9,182)

(11,748)

(10,700)

Net Interest

75

110

70

0

Tax

1,000

1,218

1,571

1,571

Capital expenditure

(520)

(1,243)

(1,500)

(1,500)

Capitalised product development

0

0

0

0

Acquisitions/disposals

0

0

0

0

Financing

(41)

19,569

0

0

Dividends

0

0

0

0

Net Cash Flow

(7,738)

10,472

(11,607)

(10,629)

Opening net debt/(cash)

 

 

(15,437)

(7,699)

(18,184)

(6,577)

HP finance leases initiated

0

0

0

0

Other

0

13

0

0

Closing net debt/(cash)

 

 

(7,699)

(18,184)

(6,577)

4,052

Source: Edison Investment Research, Ceres Power Holdings accounts

Edison, the investment intelligence firm, is the future of investor interaction with corporates. Our team of over 100 analysts and investment professionals work with leading companies, fund managers and investment banks worldwide to support their capital markets activity. We provide services to more than 400 retained corporate and investor clients from our offices in London, New York, Frankfurt, Sydney and Wellington. Edison is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (www.fsa.gov.uk/register/firmBasicDetails.do?sid=181584). Edison Investment Research (NZ) Limited (Edison NZ) is the New Zealand subsidiary of Edison. Edison NZ is registered on the New Zealand Financial Service Providers Register (FSP number 247505) and is registered to provide wholesale and/or generic financial adviser services only. Edison Investment Research Inc (Edison US) is the US subsidiary of Edison and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison Investment Research Limited (Edison Aus) [46085869] is the Australian subsidiary of Edison and is not regulated by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission. Edison Germany is a branch entity of Edison Investment Research Limited [4794244]. www.edisongroup.com

DISCLAIMER
Copyright 2016 Edison Investment Research Limited. All rights reserved. This report has been commissioned by Ceres Power Holdings and prepared and issued by Edison for publication globally. All information used in the publication of this report has been compiled from publicly available sources that are believed to be reliable, however we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this report. Opinions contained in this report represent those of the research department of Edison at the time of publication. The securities described in the Investment Research may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. This research is issued in Australia by Edison Aus and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act. The Investment Research is distributed in the United States by Edison US to major US institutional investors only. Edison US is registered as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Edison US relies upon the "publishers' exclusion" from the definition of investment adviser under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws. As such, Edison does not offer or provide personalised advice. We publish information about companies in which we believe our readers may be interested and this information reflects our sincere opinions. The information that we provide or that is derived from our website is not intended to be, and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as, personalised advice. Also, our website and the information provided by us should not be construed by any subscriber or prospective subscriber as Edison’s solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect, any transaction in a security. The research in this document is intended for New Zealand resident professional financial advisers or brokers (for use in their roles as financial advisers or brokers) and habitual investors who are “wholesale clients” for the purpose of the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (FAA) (as described in sections 5(c) (1)(a), (b) and (c) of the FAA). This is not a solicitation or inducement to buy, sell, subscribe, or underwrite any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. This document is provided for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation for investment in any securities mentioned or in the topic of this document. A marketing communication under FCA Rules, this document has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
Edison has a restrictive policy relating to personal dealing. Edison Group does not conduct any investment business and, accordingly, does not itself hold any positions in the securities mentioned in this report. However, the respective directors, officers, employees and contractors of Edison may have a position in any or related securities mentioned in this report. Edison or its affiliates may perform services or solicit business from any of the companies mentioned in this report. The value of securities mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise and are subject to large and sudden swings. In addition it may be difficult or not possible to buy, sell or obtain accurate information about the value of securities mentioned in this report. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Forward-looking information or statements in this report contain information that is based on assumptions, forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable, and therefore involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of their subject matter to be materially different from current expectations. For the purpose of the FAA, the content of this report is of a general nature, is intended as a source of general information only and is not intended to constitute a recommendation or opinion in relation to acquiring or disposing (including refraining from acquiring or disposing) of securities. The distribution of this document is not a “personalised service” and, to the extent that it contains any financial advice, is intended only as a “class service” provided by Edison within the meaning of the FAA (ie without taking into account the particular financial situation or goals of any person). As such, it should not be relied upon in making an investment decision. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Edison, its affiliates and contractors, and their respective directors, officers and employees will not be liable for any loss or damage arising as a result of reliance being placed on any of the information contained in this report and do not guarantee the returns on investments in the products discussed in this publication. FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”) © FTSE 2016. “FTSE®” is a trade mark of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and is used by FTSE International Limited under license. All rights in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings vest in FTSE and/or its licensors. Neither FTSE nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings or underlying data. No further distribution of FTSE Data is permitted without FTSE’s express written consent.

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor

10167, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 9258 1161

Level 25, Aurora Place

88 Phillip St, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Wellington +64 (0)48 948 555

Level 15, 171 Featherston St

Wellington 6011

New Zealand

Frankfurt +49 (0)69 78 8076 960

Schumannstrasse 34b

60325 Frankfurt

Germany

London +44 (0)20 3077 5700

280 High Holborn

London, WC1V 7EE

United Kingdom

New York +1 646 653 7026

245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor

10167, New York

US

Sydney +61 (0)2 9258 1161

Level 25, Aurora Place

88 Phillip St, Sydney

NSW 2000, Australia

Wellington +64 (0)48 948 555

Level 15, 171 Featherston St

Wellington 6011

New Zealand

Research: Financials

Tungsten Corporation — Update 23 February 2016

Tungsten Corporation

Continue Reading

Subscribe to Edison

Get access to the very latest content matched to your personal investment style.

Sign up for free