Currency in GBP
Last close As at 25/03/2023
GBP1.48
▲ 1.40 (0.95%)
Market capitalisation
GBP1,703m
Research: Investment Companies
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEMIT) is by far the largest fund in the AIC Global Emerging Markets sector. Its two managers Chetan Sehgal (lead manager) and Andrew Ness seek companies with robust business models, sustainable earnings growth potential and which are trading at a discount to their estimated intrinsic values. The managers’ considerable experience, coupled with the deep resources of a broad investment team, enables them to identify interesting opportunities that may be overlooked by other investors. While TEMIT’s performance has been disappointing over the last 12 months, partly due to a tighter Chinese regulatory environment, the trust has outpaced the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index over the last three and five years.
Templeton Emerging Markets IT |
Broad opportunities in public and private markets |
Investment trusts |
13 January 2022 |
Analysts
|
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEMIT) is by far the largest fund in the AIC Global Emerging Markets sector. Its two managers Chetan Sehgal (lead manager) and Andrew Ness seek companies with robust business models, sustainable earnings growth potential and which are trading at a discount to their estimated intrinsic values. The managers’ considerable experience, coupled with the deep resources of a broad investment team, enables them to identify interesting opportunities that may be overlooked by other investors. While TEMIT’s performance has been disappointing over the last 12 months, partly due to a tighter Chinese regulatory environment, the trust has outpaced the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index over the last three and five years.
TEMIT’s NAV outperformance vs the benchmark (five years to end-Dec 2021) |
Source: Refinitiv, Edison Investment Research |
The analyst’s view
TEMIT’s managers now have a broader opportunity set as since July 2021 up to 10% of the fund can be invested in private companies (currently 0%). These will not be high risk, early stage investments but in businesses where there is a clear path to the company being listed. Investors with a higher risk tolerance are attracted to emerging markets for their above-average economic growth potential, helped by a rising middle class and urbanisation, along with relatively attractive valuations compared with developed markets. TEMIT offers a broad exposure to emerging regions via a fund that is diversified by sector, geography and market cap (as at the end of November 2021 around 25% of the fund was invested in companies below $10bn). All stocks are selected on a bottom-up basis, but in aggregate the managers have meaningful overweight exposures versus the benchmark in technology and South Korea.
Discount within the range of historical averages
In July 2021 there was a 5:1 share split with the objective of facilitating smaller investments and the reinvestment of dividends. TEMIT is currently trading at a 9.4% discount to cum-income NAV, which is within the range of 8.9% to 11.2% average discounts over the last one, three, five and 10 years. Dividends are paid semi-annually in January and July and the trust’s current yield is 2.1%. TEMIT is subject to a five-year continuation vote; the next is due in July 2024.
The manager’s view: ‘Cautiously optimistic’
Ness considers that TEMIT has a competitive advantage as he and Sehgal can draw on the broad resources of Franklin Templeton’s emerging markets team, which has more than 60 investment professionals located in 14 countries across the globe who are able to provide regional insights. The manager highlights the research process, which he says is transparent with a long-term focus, seeking companies on a bottom-up basis that have sustainable long-term earnings growth and are trading at a discount to their estimated intrinsic value.
A consideration of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors is integrated into investment decisions and risk management mitigates unintended risks from top-down factors. Ness comments that TEMIT’s portfolio is distinctive, diversified and high conviction, with the potential to outperform the benchmark in a range of stock market environments. He suggests that there is now a wider range of investment opportunities available helped by a broadening China ‘A’ share market and a booming initial public offering environment.
Discussing his outlook for 2022, Ness is ‘cautiously optimistic’ based on the growth prospects and relatively attractive valuations available in emerging markets. He says that the Chinese economic slowdown has been due to a range of factors including regulatory crackdowns, problematic high levels of leverage in the property sector and energy curtailment policies with the aim of improving China’s environmental performance. TEMIT’s Chinese exposure has been increased following share price weakness, but the trust remains underweight versus the benchmark.
The manager comments that the global move to full COVID-19 vaccination is ongoing and will take time and while the level of mortalities has declined, there is an increasing acceptance that the virus is endemic. Ness believes that the omicron variant will negatively affect economic activity and he suggests that full normalisation in the travel sector is unlikely before summer 2022. The global chip shortage and securing semiconductor supplies has meant significant price increases as well as higher capex in those sectors. TEMIT is overweight the semiconductor stocks that have sustainable cost and technology advantages, and which are in favourable competitive positions. Higher energy costs, freight rates and raw material costs have led to inflationary pressures on company margins. The managers’ preference is to remain focused on low-cost firms that are operating in areas of secular growth.
Portfolio construction
At 30 November 2021 there were 75 holdings in the portfolio, with the top 10 making up 54.4% of the fund compared with 56.6% a year ago; six positions were common to both periods. In terms of market cap, 45.8% of the portfolio was invested in companies above $50bn, 30.4% between $10bn and $50bn and 23.8% below $10bn.
The manager explains that the characteristics of TEMIT’s portfolio reflect the investment approach of focusing on companies with sound business models and sustainable earnings power that are trading at a discount to their intrinsic worth. The fund has clear quality characteristics with higher returns and margins and lower leverage compared with the benchmark, along with a lower forward P/E valuation. Ness comments that he and Sehgal have been exposed to crises in the past, so they try to be ‘masters of their own destiny’. He says that they are ‘doing something different’ versus the competition, as within the stock market there has been ‘a lot of herding into long-term quality growth names at any price’.
Considering TEMIT’s high-conviction top 10 active weights, Ness says that there is a diversity of businesses across a range of industries, with a mix of well known large-caps such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and Samsung Electronics, and lesser-known names such as NAVER, which owns the leading search engine in South Korea, along with a selection of other online businesses such as entertainment, payments and logistics. The manager comments that TEMIT’s top 10 overweight companies are typically leaders in their industries, with competitive moats and attractive growth profiles; he is ‘happy to own these in size’.
Exhibit 1: Top 10 holdings (as at 30 November 2021)
Company |
Country |
Sector |
Portfolio weight % |
|
30 Nov 2021 |
30 Nov 2020* |
|||
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing |
Taiwan |
Information technology |
13.1 |
10.8 |
Samsung Electronics |
South Korea |
Information technology |
10.7 |
10.7 |
Alibaba |
China |
Consumer discretionary |
5.6 |
9.5 |
Tencent |
China |
Communication services |
5.2 |
8.5 |
ICICI Bank |
India |
Financials |
4.8 |
3.1 |
NAVER |
South Korea |
Communication services |
4.0 |
4.1 |
MediaTek |
Taiwan |
Information technology |
3.7 |
N/A |
China Merchants Bank |
China |
Financials |
2.5 |
N/A |
LUKOIL |
Russia |
Energy |
2.5 |
N/A |
Sberbank of Russia |
Russia |
Financials |
2.4 |
N/A |
Top 10 (% of portfolio) |
54.4 |
56.6 |
Source: TEMIT, Edison Investment Research. Note: *N/A where not in November 2020 top 10.
TEMIT’s sector exposure, which is a product of bottom-up stock selection, is shown in Exhibit 2. Over the 12 months to end-November 2021 there is a higher technology weighting (+6.3pp) and this remains the largest active weight versus the benchmark by quite some margin (+13.3pp). The trust is overweight semiconductor and internet stocks and has a range of software companies; these are businesses that are benefiting from the rollout of the digital economy and increasing e-commerce volumes. Within the financials sector the trust is overweight emerging market banks, which are benefiting from increased demand from an expanding middle class in developing economies. Low levels of credit penetration will likely increase, and banks are well capitalised, ‘more so than 20 years ago’ reports Ness. Higher inflation should lead to higher interest rates, which is positive for bank net interest margins.
Exhibit 2: Portfolio sector exposure versus benchmark (% unless stated)
Portfolio end-Nov 2021 |
Portfolio end-Nov 2020 |
Change |
Index |
Active weight |
Trust weight/ |
|
Information technology |
35.1 |
28.8 |
6.3 |
21.8 |
13.3 |
1.6 |
Financials |
22.0 |
18.7 |
3.3 |
19.5 |
2.5 |
1.1 |
Communication services |
13.9 |
18.7 |
(4.8) |
10.8 |
3.1 |
1.3 |
Consumer discretionary |
12.4 |
19.3 |
(6.9) |
14.6 |
(2.1) |
0.9 |
Materials |
7.9 |
3.7 |
4.2 |
8.4 |
(0.5) |
0.9 |
Consumer staples |
3.9 |
4.6 |
(0.7) |
5.7 |
(1.8) |
0.7 |
Energy |
2.9 |
3.2 |
(0.4) |
5.6 |
(2.7) |
0.5 |
Industrials |
2.2 |
2.3 |
(0.1) |
4.8 |
(2.7) |
0.4 |
Healthcare |
1.2 |
0.9 |
0.3 |
4.6 |
(3.4) |
0.3 |
Real estate |
1.2 |
0.0 |
1.2 |
2.0 |
(0.8) |
0.6 |
Utilities |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.3 |
(2.3) |
0.0 |
Other net assets |
(2.6) |
(0.2) |
(2.4) |
0.0 |
(2.6) |
N/A |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Source: TEMIT, Edison Investment Research. Note: Numbers subject to rounding.
Over 12 months to end-November 2021, TEMIT’s largest changes in geographic exposure are higher weightings in Taiwan (+3.7pp) and India (+2.7pp) with lower weightings in China (-2.6pp) and South Africa (-2.4pp). Compared with the benchmark, the trust’s largest active weights are an overweight in South Korea (+10.0pp) and underweight in China (-5.2pp); this is despite the manager adding to TEMIT’s Chinese exposure in recent months, taking advantage of market weakness. Also, of note, the trust has no exposure to Saudi Arabia, which made up 3.3% of the benchmark at end-November 2021.
Exhibit 3: Portfolio geographic exposure versus benchmark (% unless stated)
Portfolio end-Nov 2021 |
Portfolio end-Nov 2020 |
Change |
Index |
Active weight |
Trust weight/ |
|
China |
28.9 |
31.5 |
(2.6) |
34.0 |
(5.2) |
0.8 |
South Korea |
22.2 |
20.2 |
2.0 |
12.2 |
10.0 |
1.8 |
Taiwan |
18.6 |
14.9 |
3.7 |
15.6 |
2.9 |
1.2 |
Brazil |
6.0 |
6.3 |
(0.3) |
4.1 |
1.9 |
1.5 |
Russia |
7.7 |
6.6 |
1.1 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
2.0 |
India |
8.5 |
5.8 |
2.7 |
12.1 |
(3.6) |
0.7 |
South Africa |
1.2 |
3.5 |
(2.4) |
3.1 |
(2.0) |
0.4 |
Mexico |
1.7 |
1.4 |
0.3 |
1.8 |
(0.2) |
0.9 |
UK |
1.4 |
2.4 |
(1.0) |
0.0 |
1.4 |
N/A |
Thailand |
1.6 |
1.8 |
(0.2) |
1.6 |
(0.1) |
1.0 |
United States |
1.7 |
2.0 |
(0.3) |
0.0 |
1.7 |
N/A |
Rest of the world |
3.3 |
3.8 |
(0.5) |
11.7 |
(8.3) |
0.3 |
Other net assets |
(2.6) |
(0.2) |
(2.4) |
0.0 |
(2.6) |
N/A |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Source: TEMIT, Edison Investment Research. Note: Numbers subject to rounding.
Performance: Mid-term outperformance
Exhibit 4: Five-year discrete performance data
12 months ending |
Share price |
NAV |
MSCI Emerging |
MSCI World |
CBOE UK All Companies (%) |
31/12/17 |
32.5 |
30.8 |
25.8 |
12.4 |
14.0 |
31/12/18 |
(10.7) |
(11.6) |
(8.9) |
(2.5) |
(9.8) |
31/12/19 |
27.1 |
24.1 |
14.3 |
23.4 |
19.3 |
31/12/20 |
17.1 |
15.7 |
15.0 |
12.9 |
(10.9) |
31/12/21 |
(4.7) |
(3.9) |
(1.3) |
23.5 |
18.4 |
Source: Refinitiv. Note: All % on a total return basis in pounds sterling.
Looking at TEMIT’s five-year discrete performance data in Exhibit 4, the trust has outperformed its MSCI Emerging Markets Index benchmark in three of the last five years in both NAV and share price terms.
Exhibit 5: Investment trust performance to 31 December 2021 |
|
Price, NAV and benchmark total return performance, one-year rebased |
Price, NAV and benchmark total return performance (%) |
Source: Refinitiv, Edison Investment Research. Note: Three-, five- and 10-year performance figures annualised. |
TEMIT’s relative returns are shown in Exhibit 6. Its NAV and share price total returns are ahead of those of the benchmark over the last three and five years, while lagging over one and 10 years. Ness notes that the trust’s performance over the last year has been ‘challenging’, although he says that it is more important to focus on the mid to long term; the managers aim to outperform the benchmark over a rolling five-year period. It should be noted that TEMIT’s underperformance versus the MSCI World Index over the last decade is largely due to the very strong performance of the mature US stock market in recent years.
Exhibit 6: Share price and NAV total return performance, relative to indices (%)
|
One month |
Three months |
Six months |
One year |
Three years |
Five years |
10 years |
Price relative to MSCI Emerging Markets |
2.3 |
0.9 |
(3.9) |
(3.4) |
9.3 |
12.9 |
(4.0) |
NAV relative to MSCI Emerging Markets |
0.9 |
0.4 |
(3.2) |
(2.6) |
6.4 |
7.4 |
(2.0) |
Price relative to MSCI World |
(0.1) |
(7.6) |
(19.1) |
(22.8) |
(17.6) |
(11.0) |
(51.4) |
NAV relative to MSCI World |
(1.4) |
(8.1) |
(18.5) |
(22.2) |
(19.8) |
(15.4) |
(50.4) |
Price relative to CBOE UK All Companies |
(2.8) |
(4.5) |
(16.1) |
(19.5) |
12.7 |
29.7 |
(6.9) |
NAV relative to CBOE UK All Companies |
(4.2) |
(5.0) |
(15.6) |
(18.8) |
9.7 |
23.4 |
(5.0) |
Source: Refinitiv, Edison Investment Research. Note: Data to end-December 2021. Geometric calculation.
Ness gives some colour on TEMIT’s performance over the last 12 months. Holdings that have made a positive contribution include ICICI Bank, which has benefited from higher economic activity and lending following COVID-19 lockdowns. The manager says that the bank has one of the strongest retail brands in India; its margins are supported by a low-cost deposit base and is trading at a discount to its private-sector peers. Within the electric vehicle (EV) supply chain, Chinese firm Guangzhou Tinci Technology Company is well positioned to benefit from increased demand for EVs and energy storage, and TEMIT has a large active weight in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, one of the largest global semiconductor suppliers, which has delivered strong earnings growth and has a robust operational outlook. Longshine Technology Group is a Chinese software and IT services provider to the power and electricity industries and is a relatively recent addition to the trust’s portfolio. Its businesses include online payment and EV charging payment services.
Moving on to the negative contributors to TEMIT’s performance, Ness reports that there has been significant share-price weakness in some of its Chinese names. Brilliance China, which has a joint venture with BMW, has seen its shares suspended since March 2021 following a delay in reporting its 2020 corporate results. Hence, the managers have imposed a fair value discount on the holding and are monitoring the situation very closely. Brilliance China’s operating earnings have exceeded consensus expectations as there is strong demand in China for European brands such as BMW.
There have been regulatory investigations into a range of leading businesses in China. Alibaba is the country’s largest e-commerce platform and has had some well documented challenges, including having to halt the planned listing of its fintech arm, and there has been an antitrust probe into online merchant pricing. Ness comments that the Chinese internet industry has seen heightened scrutiny in the past, and the strongest companies have proved to be resilient. He cites Alibaba’s distinct competitive advantages, which should support the firm’s long-term earnings growth in areas such as e-commerce and cloud computing.
Another of TEMIT’s holdings, Tencent, has been under pressure due to tightening online gaming regulation. Once again, the manager believes that Tencent’s businesses will thrive over the long term; the company is well diversified with a robust balance sheet. Ness believes that Tencent has a selection of attractive investments and long-term growth drivers. He suggests that within China we are ‘closer to the end of the regulatory process than the beginning’.
Peer group comparison
TEMIT is the largest of the 12 funds in the AIC Global Emerging Markets sector. Its NAV total returns are above average over three and five years, ranking sixth out of 12 funds and third out of nine funds respectively, while lagging over the last one and 10 years. As at 12 January 2022, TEMIT’s discount was modestly wider than the sector average, where just one fund was trading at a premium. It has the second-lowest ongoing charge, an average level of gearing and a dividend yield that is modestly below the mean.
Exhibit 7: Global emerging markets peer group as at 12 January 2022*
% unless stated |
Market cap (£m) |
NAV TR |
NAV TR |
NAV TR |
NAV TR |
Discount (cum fair) |
Ongoing charge |
Perf. |
Net gearing |
Dividend yield |
Templeton Emerging Mkts Inv Trust |
2,111.7 |
(7.6) |
35.6 |
54.1 |
90.3 |
(10.5) |
1.0 |
No |
102 |
2.1 |
Barings Emerging EMEA Opps |
94.2 |
12.1 |
25.5 |
35.0 |
74.1 |
(13.9) |
1.7 |
No |
100 |
3.3 |
BlackRock Frontiers |
245.2 |
16.4 |
20.1 |
29.2 |
163.2 |
(7.5) |
1.3 |
Yes |
106 |
4.0 |
Fidelity Emerging Markets |
740.6 |
(7.9) |
29.0 |
39.4 |
93.6 |
(11.1) |
1.0 |
No |
100 |
1.6 |
Fundsmith Emerging Equities Trust |
352.3 |
(2.8) |
22.1 |
40.6 |
|
(9.6) |
1.3 |
No |
101 |
0.1 |
Gulf Investment Fund |
59.1 |
28.2 |
60.0 |
50.2 |
166.8 |
(9.7) |
1.9 |
No |
100 |
2.8 |
JPMorgan Emerging Markets |
1,477.8 |
(3.0) |
45.8 |
78.4 |
157.8 |
(7.9) |
0.9 |
No |
100 |
1.1 |
JPMorgan Global Emerging Mkts |
435.5 |
3.2 |
40.8 |
55.9 |
126.0 |
(9.1) |
1.0 |
No |
107 |
3.5 |
Jupiter Emerging & Frontier Income |
60.4 |
8.2 |
36.7 |
|
|
(10.9) |
1.4 |
No |
109 |
4.4 |
Mobius Investment Trust |
160.3 |
23.9 |
48.1 |
|
|
1.2 |
1.5 |
No |
100 |
0.0 |
ScotGems |
39.3 |
5.8 |
(1.7) |
|
|
(22.2) |
1.5 |
No |
100 |
0.0 |
Utilico Emerging Markets |
457.5 |
8.2 |
6.6 |
22.5 |
95.3 |
(12.1) |
1.1 |
No |
104 |
3.8 |
Average (12 funds) |
519.5 |
7.1 |
30.7 |
45.0 |
120.9 |
(10.3) |
1.3 |
102 |
2.2 |
|
TEM rank in peer group |
1 |
11 |
6 |
3 |
7 |
7 |
2 |
5 |
7 |
Source: Morningstar, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Performance as at 12 January 2022 based on ex-par NAVs. TR = total return. Net gearing is total assets less cash and equivalents as a percentage of net assets.
.
|
|
Investment Companies
Investment Companies
Research: Investment Companies
Martin Currie Global Portfolio Trust (MNP) is managed by Zehrid Osmani, who aims to generate above-market returns over a rolling five-year period. He says that there are exciting new growth opportunities available, but he cautions the need to stay disciplined given stock markets ‘have travelled far and valuations are generally high’. The manager is positive on the global economic outlook, which is supported by robust levels of infrastructure spending. He believes that while rising US interest rates could lead to higher levels of stock market volatility, it is part of a ‘normalisation’ rather than a tightening of US monetary policy, so he remains positive on the equity outlook. Osmani is continuing to focus on companies with the potential to generate consistent earnings growth and pricing power to protect their margins in an environment of rising costs.
Get access to the very latest content matched to your personal investment style.