Valuation
Our valuation continues to be based on an rNPV analysis, which includes A$25.4m in
pro forma net cash at end-December 2025. We apply a discount rate of 12.5% and include
Xanamem in the two lead indications. Given the positive interim XanaMIA results, which
surpassed predefined futility thresholds and excluded any severe safety concerns,
we believe it is appropriate to raise our PoS estimate for the AD indication to 12.5%
(from 10.0% previously), which continues to reflect the very high hurdle rate for
therapeutic drug candidates to generate clinical efficacy in this indication. We continue
to use a PoS of 12.5% in the MDD indication. In addition to the new PoS factor in
AD, we have rolled forward our estimates, mildly pushed back the AD launch timeline
to CY30 (as stated above) and adjusted for forex (we now assume a rate of
US$0.70/A$ vs
US$0.66/A$ previously). Given these changes and a 12.7% increase in shares outstanding assuming
full completion of the A$17m offering and SPP, we obtain a total equity valuation
of A$778.3m (vs A$720.2m previously) or A$0.22 per share (down from A$0.23 previously
given the increased shares outstanding).
| Exhibit 7: Actinogen rNPV valuation |
 |
| Source: Edison Investment Research |
We highlight that the appreciation of the Australian dollar (against the US dollar)
had a measurable effect on our valuation. Had the exchange rate remained at
US$0.66/A$, our valuation would have been A$828.7m or A$0.23/share.
The top-line efficacy readout, slated for November 2026, will be the most defining
catalyst for the company in at least the past seven years. The initial XanADu Phase
II AD study readout in May 2019 is the closest comparable situation, although we would
argue that the XanaMIA readout is more impactful given the pivotal nature of the study
and the refinement of this study’s entry criteria (by focusing on patients with biomarker-positive
AD). A positive XanaMIA efficacy outcome could result in a sharp upward revision in
our PoS estimate to over 40%. Below we provide a sensitivity analysis of how our valuation
would be affected by different PoS estimates as well as different gross US annual
treatment price projections (our
US$7,500 yearly price estimate may be conservative given the pricing for disease-modifying
anti-amyloid drugs like Leqembi and Kisunla). We highlight that an increase in PoS
to 45% would raise the rNPV per share valuation to A$0.68.
| Exhibit 8: rNPV per share (A$) sensitivity to probability of success and gross US annual treatment
price (US$) |
 |
| Source: Edison Investment Research |
We recognise, of course, that XanaMIA has the potential for broad adoption given its
convenient once-daily dosage form, its excellent safety record to date (notably a
lack of associated risk of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema/effusion,
as seen in anti-amyloid therapies) and the possibility for it to be used in combination
with other AD drugs.
As stated above, we forecast A$225m in additional financing will be required before
FY29 to fund Actinogen’s activities and the development of both the MDD and AD programmes,
after which, provided it receives regulatory approval, Actinogen should be able to
generate sufficient operating revenues to reach recurring profitability. Our model
assumes all financing will be raised through illustrative debt, as per the usual Edison
methodology. If our projected funding need of A$225m is raised through equity issuances
at the prevailing market price of c A$0.042, our effective valuation would decrease
to c A$0.11 per share.
The amount of fund-raising estimated to be needed for Actinogen to independently bring
Xanamem to commercialisation in these indications remains larger than the company’s
current market capitalisation. However, we note that the funding intervals may be
staggered over several years, which may alleviate potential challenges associated
with raising such funds. We believe Actinogen will seek non-dilutive funding arrangements
and/or partnership arrangements, which may reduce the overall funding need, but such
scenarios are not included in our forecasts. While our base-case scenario assumes
internal Xanamem development for the AD and MDD programmes, if the company is successful
in securing a licensing deal (or deals) for Xanamem with an established biopharma
company (or companies), our R&D expenditure requirements for Actinogen and, consequently,
our overall funding need projections would likely be substantially reduced. In addition,
should the company exclusively prioritise the AD programme and avoid additional R&D
spending on the MDD indication, our projected funding requirement would be reduced
by over A$65m.
| Exhibit 9: Financial summary |
 |
| Source: Actinogen accounts, Edison Investment Research |