MP Evans Group
Written by
MP Evans Group |
Expansion strategy on course |
Company profile |
Consumer |
23 November 2016 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analyst
Edison Investment Research Limited is a connected adviser to MPE for the purposes of the UK Takeover Code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MP Evans is an AIM-listed palm oil producer with operations in Indonesia. Despite a short-term climate-driven trading setback, the strategy of expansion and development of its core business is on course, with a strong balance sheet further reinforced by recent non-core disposals. Management, with support of 41% of shareholders, has rejected a 740p hostile approach by KLK, a Malaysian plantation company, on the grounds that it very substantially undervalues the shares.
Historic results
Year |
Revenue (US$m) |
PBT* |
EPS |
DPS |
P/E |
Yield |
12/12 |
83.2 |
12.2 |
27.7 |
8.00 |
30.4 |
0.9 |
12/13 |
82.2 |
6.5 |
26.3 |
8.25 |
32.1 |
1.0 |
12/14 |
90.0 |
24.1 |
45.4 |
8.75 |
18.6 |
1.0 |
12/15 |
72.5 |
6.8 |
43.4 |
8.75 |
19.4 |
1.0 |
Source: Company reports. Note: *group-controlled.
Focused on the palm oil strategy
MP Evans (MPE) is a UK AIM-listed agri-business group producing palm oil in Indonesia. Its operations extend over majority-owned oil-palm plantations, smallholder co-operative plantations and minority interests in further plantation estates. Its strategy is focused on continuing to expand its oil-palm operations in a sustainable and cost-effective manner, and improving standards and productivity.
Interims: Temporary trading weakness, strategic sale
Interim profit after tax rose 17% to US$18.0m, but this includes a $7.4m profit on the strategic sale of an Australian cattle business. Continuing post-tax profit fell 4% to $6.3m on several factors, but underlying trading was weak on exceptionally dry El Niño conditions and a weak palm oil price, both of which appear temporary.
Final* offer rejected by board
On 25 October 2016 MPE received a hostile 640p cash offer from KLK, a quoted Malaysian plantations company. This was increased to 740p in a revised, final* offer. Both offers were rejected by the board, on the grounds that they very substantially undervalued the company. The rejection of the final* offer was supported by 40.9% of shareholders confirming their intention not to accept it.
Valuation: Earnings, cash, and property
As MPE is in a bid situation we are not permitted to discuss forecasts or earnings multiples. However, we note that since the half year, MPE has received A$107m (US$80m) proceeds from the Australian disposal. It also has substantial Malaysian property interests. MPE has indicated a targeted 2023e owned crop 77% higher than 2015, which indicates the company’s scale potential. We have not estimated the cost of such expansion, the future value of which would need to be discounted.
* There were two caveats to the offer being final: (i) a public announcement of the existence of a new offeror or potential offeror, whether publicly identified or not; or (ii) the recommendation of such an increased offer by KLK or its subsidiary KLKI by MPE’s board.
Company overview: Focus on palm oil
Main activities: Oil-palm plantation owner and operator
The company controls 26,600 hectares of majority-owned oil-palm plantations. It also has 8,100 hectares of smallholder co-operative oil-palm plantations where it develops and manages plantation land on behalf of local co-operative members, purchasing their production at a government-regulated price. Separately and in addition it has JV and minority interests equivalent to a further 8,100 planted hectares. The group’s palms are on average a young 7.9 years old, giving many years of production ahead given the plants’ productive life of 25-30 years.
Strategy: To drive growth through planting and expanding
MPE has a strategy focused on plantation operations as the key driver of revenue and profit growth. Previous cattle farming operations in Australia have recently been disposed of, and development land in Malaysia is being sold on an individual basis, with an objective of ultimate exit.
The strategy on the company’s ongoing oil-palm operations, centred in Indonesia, is:
■
To invest further in a fast-growing, low-cost food commodity;
■
To expand the group’s oil-palm areas in Indonesia in an environmentally-sustainable manner; and
■
Continually to maintain and, where possible, improve agronomic standards and productivity.
The strategy is working effectively as indicated by compound average annual growth in production of 30% between 2011 and 2015.
History and management
The company has had continuous involvement in Far Eastern plantation operations since being founded around 1870. The management team has a track record of successfully developing and adding value to agricultural assets. The board has a mix of industry and independent experience, and the five non-executive directors include the former chief executive, and the current chairman of R.E.A. Holdings, another palm oil operator.
The palm oil market
Palm oil is used mainly as a cooking oil, but also in margarine, baked products, soap, cosmetics, lubricants and increasingly in bio-diesel. Global production has increased by a compound 6.6% over the last five years, and demand is projected to rise by around 5% in 2016/17, according to the World Bank, with prices firming over the next decade. In 2015, 56% of total world production of 59m tonnes was from Indonesia, with a further 20% from Malaysia.
Over the last three years the crude palm oil (CPO cif Rotterdam) price has varied between US$992 per tonne in early 2014 and US$500 in mid-2015. Starting 2016 at US$580, it strengthened during the first half as a result of demand ahead of Chinese New Year, reduced stocks, increasing biodiesel production and concern over dry weather in South-East Asia. The price is currently around US$735 per tonne.
Interim results
Total profit after tax increased 17% to US$18.0m. However, this includes the $7.4m profit on the sale of the Australian cattle business NAPCo, which, together with its trading results, was included in discontinued operations.
Continuing operations’ post-tax profit declined 4% to $6.3m as a result of several opposing factors:
■
Weak plantation result on exceptionally dry weather, with revenue down 20%. This is expected to be temporary.
■
Extraction rates were firm at 25.1% weighted across the plantations.
■
The average CPO price was similar year-on-year at US$668 per tonne; however, this was affected by a new export levy of US$50 per tonne, which has an impact at prices of less than US$750 (the tax regime at prices above US$750 per tonne is effectively unchanged).
■
Direct costs were higher as a result of a fixed cost element within cost of sales representing activities such as weeding, pruning and fertilizing. As a result, gross margin was down from 23.3% in the first half of 2015 to 16.9%.
■
Group-controlled operating profit was up 8% to US$5.1m; however, this included a US$5.3m favourable movement on foreign exchange gains and losses.
Not apparent in the headline numbers was the considerable progress made on planting, with 1,980 hectares planted in the group’s owned and operated areas, in addition to preparations for planting in a further 5,100 hectares.
The balance sheet is strong with net borrowings of US$6.6m, gearing of only 2%. This was before the A$107m (US$80m) proceeds from the sale of its Australian cattle business NAPCo, which completed in July 2016, after which the group should be in a significant net cash positive position.
Offer for the company
On 25 October Kuala Lumpur Kepong Berhad (KLK), through its wholly-owned subsidiary, KL-Kepong International Ltd (KLKI), announced a hostile offer for the company at 640p per share in cash. KLK is a Malaysian plantations company capitalised at RM23.5bn (c £4.5bn). The offer was formally rejected by the MPE board on the grounds that it very substantially undervalued the company. The rejection was supported by a majority 54.7% of the company’s shareholders who confirmed their intention not to accept the offer.
On 15 November KLK announced a revised and final offer of 740p per share. There were two caveats to its being final:
(i) a public announcement of the existence of a new offeror or potential offeror, whether publicly identified or not; or
(ii) the recommendation of such an increased offer by KLK or KLKI by the board of MP Evans.
This was also rejected by the MPE board on the grounds that it, too, very substantially undervalued the company. The rejection was supported by 40.9% of the company’s shareholders, who confirmed their intention not to accept the revised offer.
In both cases, the company’s rejection announcement included comment to the effect that:
The othe company’s rejection announcement included comment to the effect that:
■
The offer did not reflect the value of the estates, JVs, smallholder co-operatives and property assets.
■
It did not take into account the company’s operational quality, with high-yielding palm oil estates and industry-leading mill extraction rates.
■
Plantings are on average, young, suggesting that production will increase substantially in coming years.
■
The strategic plan includes a significant increase in planted hectarage and further palm oil mills.
■
The balance sheet is strong, providing a platform for further growth through acquisition of additional planted areas and the development of unplanted land.
■
Global demand for vegetable oils continues to rise and palm oil has grown as a proportion of that demand, indicating strong long-term prospects for the company’s output.
KLK posted its offer document to shareholders on 18 November 2016. MPE is to publish a circular to shareholders within 14 days of the offer document.
Valuation
As the company is in a bid situation we are not permitted to discuss forecasts or earnings multiples. However, we make the following limited comments:
■
Since the half year the company has received A$107m (US$80m) from the sale of its Australian cattle business NAPCo, which completed in July 2016.
■
In addition the group has substantial property interests in Malaysia. It owns Bertam Estate with 70 hectares of land in Peninsula Malaysia, which it intends to sell when market conditions are deemed suitable. It also has a 40% interest in Bertam Properties Sdn. Berhad (Bertam Properties), which has a land bank of 330 hectares near Penang Island, Malaysia.
■
The company indicated in its 2016 interim presentation that it saw its 2023 crop totalling some 1m tonnes, of which majority group interests would contribute some 750,000 tonnes and co-operatives some 260,000 tonnes. These represent a 77% and 158% increase, respectively, on the actual crop in 2015. That gives some indication of the company’s scale potential and management’s aspirations to grow its operations and consequently revenues and earnings. Clearly those earnings are in the future and a discount would be appropriate against any resulting future valuation.
■
The company’s expansion plans include acquisition of land as well as further development of existing land. We have not attempted to estimate the cost of such investment and to what extent it can be financed out of operating cash flows as well as the NAPCo proceeds mentioned above.
|
|