Currency in EUR
Last close As at 02/06/2023
EUR24.05
▲ −0.30 (−1.23%)
Market capitalisation
EUR157m
Research: TMT
CLIQ Digital’s half year report shows progress quarter-on-quarter, although gross revenues were 8% down on prior year. Margins are starting to improve after earlier cost cutting, and customer base value (CLIQ’s measure of expected future revenues) has edged ahead from the end FY18 level. Consumer appetite for digital entertainment remains very strong across product groups and the company needs to ensure that its content portfolio remains sufficiently attractive to bring in (and retain existing) subscribers. The market valuation is at a persistent discount to peers.
CLIQ Digital |
Improving profitability
Media |
Scale research report - Update
11 October 2019 |
Share price graph Share details
Business description
Bull
Bear
Analysts
|
CLIQ Digital’s half year report shows progress quarter-on-quarter, although gross revenues were 8% down on prior year. Margins are starting to improve after earlier cost cutting, and customer base value (CLIQ’s measure of expected future revenues) has edged ahead from the end FY18 level. Consumer appetite for digital entertainment remains very strong across product groups and the company needs to ensure that its content portfolio remains sufficiently attractive to bring in (and retain existing) subscribers. The market valuation is at a persistent discount to peers.
Quarter-on-quarter progress
While gross and net revenues were both down against H118 (by 8% and 4% respectively), Q219 was 5% up on both measures over Q119, that quarter having shown 2% and 4% improvements over Q418. The CLIQ-Factor (the ratio of revenue from a customer compared to the cost of customer acquisition) also moved ahead over these three consecutive quarters, from 1.32x to 1.34x to 1.46x in Q219. Marketing spend has been relatively stable, implying that it has been more effectively focused through better use of data. Lower personnel costs following earlier headcount reductions helped lift the operational EBITDA margin to 8.3% in the half (6.5% after redundancy costs) compared to 6.6% in H118. A swing from net finance income of €0.6m in H118 to an expense of €0.4m is down to fair value movements on financial instruments taken through the P&L. The earnings impact was mostly offset by tax gains on prior year adjustments and reversals of temporary differences.
Digital entertainment core activity
Of H119 revenues, 90% came from digital entertainment services; the balance from digital marketing services. FY18 revenues were generated 80% in Europe (a half year revenue split is not given). H119 accounts show a large increase in minority interests, at €1.0m of the €1.5m net income. Subsidiaries include Red27 Mobile in the UK, 51% owned, and Hype Ventures in The Netherlands, 80% owned.
Valuation: Discount to peers
CLIQ trades at a discount of around 40% to a broad peer set of user acquisition groups, on an average of FY1 and FY2 EV/sales, EV/EBIT and P/E multiples. The range of multiples, however, is wide, reflecting different growth dynamics within the peer group. This discount in part reflects CLIQ’s smaller size. Delivery on improving revenue and profit margins could lead to its narrowing.
Consensus estimates
Source: Refinitiv |
Edison Investment Research provides qualitative research coverage on companies in the Deutsche Börse Scale segment in accordance with section 36 subsection 3 of the General Terms and Conditions of Deutsche Börse AG for the Regulated Unofficial Market (Freiverkehr) on Frankfurter Wertpapierbörse (as of 1 March 2017). Two to three research reports will be produced per year. Research reports do not contain Edison analyst financial forecasts.
Review of H119 results
Exhibit 1 below details CLIQ’s operational performance during H119 and the trends from H117 on. The key difference between the reported and the adjusted figures is the €0.5m of redundancy costs included in operating expenses within the reported figures.
Exhibit 1: P&L highlights
H117 |
H217 |
2017 |
H118 |
H218 |
2018 |
H119 |
|
Revenue (€m) |
34.9 |
35.6 |
70.5 |
30.6 |
27.7 |
58.2 |
28.2 |
Growth y-o-y % |
-13 |
-22 |
-17 |
-8 |
|||
Gross profit (€m) |
17.9 |
8.4 |
7.7 |
16.1 |
7.9 |
||
Growth y-o-y % |
-10 |
-6 |
|||||
Opex (€m) |
12 |
6.7 |
5.3 |
12 |
5.6 |
||
Growth y-o-y % |
-2 |
-16 |
|||||
EBITDA (€m) |
2.5 |
3.0 |
5.5 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
3.9 |
1.8 |
Adj EBITDA (€m) |
1.7 |
2.4 |
|||||
EBIT (€m) |
2.4 |
2.8 |
5.2 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
3.0 |
1.4 |
Adj EBIT (€m) |
1.2 |
1.9 |
|||||
Growth y-o-y % |
-38 |
-46 |
-42 |
-8 |
|||
PBT (€m) |
2.04 |
2.46 |
4.5 |
2.05 |
1.35 |
3.4 |
0.95 |
Attributable profit (€m) |
1.47 |
1.904 |
3.3 |
1.41 |
0.79 |
2.2 |
0.48 |
EPS diluted (€) |
0.23 |
0.29 |
0.52 |
0.22 |
0.12 |
0.34 |
0.08 |
Growth y-o-y % |
-4 |
-59 |
-35 |
-64 |
|||
Gross profit margin |
25.4% |
27.5% |
27.8% |
27.7% |
28.0% |
||
EBITDA margin |
7.2% |
8.4% |
7.8% |
6.6% |
6.9% |
6.7% |
6.5% |
Adj ABITDA margin |
5.6% |
8.3% |
|||||
EBIT margin |
6.9% |
7.9% |
7.4% |
4.9% |
5.4% |
5.2% |
4.9% |
Adj EBIT margin |
3.6% |
6.7% |
|||||
Attributable profit margin |
4.2% |
5.4% |
4.7% |
4.6% |
2.9% |
3.8% |
1.7% |
Source: CLIQ Digital accounts, Edison Investment Research
Underlying revenue declines easing
FY18 was a difficult year for CLIQ as it transitioned from affiliate marketing to direct media buying. Delays in new product launches meant that marketing spend was curtailed in Q417, affecting the sales of subscription services in the new calendar year. H218 continued to struggle, in part attributed to the warm summer. The improvements logged on a quarter-by-quarter basis from Q418 on are therefore welcome, albeit that the cumulative H119 revenue and gross profit figures are still below those achieved in the prior year. H219 figures will be against easier comparatives.
Profitability helped by personnel cost savings
Personnel expenses of €4.1m were 9% lower than the comparative period, with this figure including €0.5m of redundancy costs (FTE down by 20 people). Excluding this sum, H119 EBITDA margin would have increased from 5.6% to 8.3%, underpinning consensus forecasts that are looking for a 7.0% margin figure for the full year and the assumption of 8.0% for FY20e. The absence of any impairment charges in H119 resulted in a broadly flat EBIT margin on prior year of 5.2%.
Marketing spend stable over the half
Exhibit 2 below highlights how the KPIs have driven the P&L performance from FY17 to date.
Exhibit 2: Development of KPIs
H117 |
H217 |
2017 |
H118 |
H218 |
2018 |
H119 |
|
Revenue (€m) |
34.9 |
35.6 |
70.5 |
30.6 |
27.7 |
58.2 |
28.2 |
Growth y-o-y % |
12 |
4 |
8 |
-13 |
-22 |
-17 |
-8 |
CLIQ factor (ARPA/CPA) |
1.48 |
1.47 |
1.38 |
1.33 |
1.36 |
1.40 |
|
Growth y-o-y % |
2 |
4 |
-7 |
-7 |
+1 |
||
Customer base value (€m) |
27 |
26 |
25 |
24 |
24 |
24.5 |
|
Growth y-o-y % |
40 |
24 |
-7 |
-8 |
-2 |
||
Marketing spend (€m) |
9.6 |
18.6 |
9.9 |
8.9 |
18.8 |
9.8 |
|
Growth y-o-y % |
-6 |
-14 |
10 |
1 |
-1 |
Source: CLIQ Digital accounts, Edison Investment Research
Marketing spend held just below €10m for the half year, but the emphasis has shifted from the scale of the investment to its efficacy, by reducing media spend on less profitable segments. This should improve the quality of the business as well as lifting the CLIQ-Factor (ARPU divided by CPA), ARPU being average net revenue per user over the first six months and CPA being the cost of acquiring that user.
The pick-up in the CLIQ-Factor should also presage an improvement in profitability and margin.
Cash flow
In H119, the company saw an operating cash outflow of €0.1m from an inflow of €1.2m in H118, mostly down to swings in working capital. The overhead reduction and improving efficiency of marketing spend should lead to a reversal in the second half.
During the reporting period, CLIQ renegotiated its financing facilities, extending them by €0.5m to €13.5m with a maturity in March 2022 and adding Postbank AG to Commerzbank AG as providers.
There were no new acquisitions in the period and contingent acquisition consideration at the half year was €0.6m, all in current liabilities.
Forecasts and valuation
Consensus estimates were reviewed following the Q119 figures published in May, when a more cautious view was taken by investors on the potential for short-term revenue growth. Revenue expectations were adjusted to a 5% year-on-year decline for FY19 and flat EBIT, implying an improvement in margin.
For the following year, FY20, market expectations are for modest top-line growth of 3%.
Exhibit 3 below summarises the earlier FY19 KPIs provided by the company and progress towards them to date.
Exhibit 3: FY19 original KPI targets
FY19 target |
H119 progress |
|
Revenue |
Steady organic growth |
Revenues down 8% y-o-y, but customer base value up on 31 December, revenues picking up quarter-on-quarter and easier comparatives for H2 |
Gross margin |
Increase |
Increase of 2% y-o-y, due to shift in billing method |
ARPU/CPA (CLIQ factor) |
Stable |
Increase from 1.38 in H118, 1.33 in H218 to 1.40 in H119 |
Marketing spend (€m) |
Increase |
Broadly flat y-o-y at €9.8m |
Operational EBITDA* (€m) |
Increase |
40% increase y-o-y from €1.7m to €2.4m |
Operational net income* (€m) |
Sustainable increase |
Operational net income up 70% to €1.4m (prior year adjustments, fair value movements and redundancy costs result in a 17% decrease in net profit) |
Source: CLIQ Digital accounts, Edison Investment Research. Note: *Operational EBITDA and net income as defined by the company.
The share price started the year at €1.91 then had a strong run up to €3.31 in early February. From early April, the price drifted off, trading in a range of €1.90 to €2.50 from early May to date as earlier expectations of improved FY19 financial performance moderated.
The shares still trade at a substantial discount to the wider peer group across all metrics. Of particular note are FY1e EV/sales (CLIQ: 0.4x vs peers average 1.1x) and the P/E (CLIQ: 8.8x vs peers average 15.8x) multiples. Some of this discount reflects CLIQ’s smaller size. Delivery on improving revenue and margins could lead to its narrowing.
Exhibit 4: Peer comparison
Name |
Market cap (m) |
Sales growth (%) |
EV/sales (x) |
EV/EBIT (x) |
P/E |
Hist div yield (%) |
||||
FY1 |
FY2 |
FY1 |
FY2 |
FY1 |
FY2 |
FY1 |
FY2 |
Last |
||
IMImobile |
£243 |
13 |
18 |
1.6 |
1.3 |
16.0 |
13.8 |
20.6 |
18.2 |
0.0 |
XLMedia |
£111 |
(32) |
(2) |
1.2 |
1.2 |
3.9 |
3.5 |
7.3 |
6.1 |
5.5 |
Tremor Video |
£166 |
44 |
13 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
2.6 |
2.0 |
3.9 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
Claranova |
€268 |
62 |
55 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
17.3 |
8.8 |
31.6 |
13.9 |
0.0 |
Kape Technologies |
£117 |
37 |
17 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
9.3 |
6.6 |
15.4 |
10.9 |
0.0 |
Average |
24.8 |
20.2 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
9.8 |
6.9 |
15.8 |
10.5 |
1.1 |
|
CLIQ Digital |
€14 |
(5.0) |
3.0 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
7.3 |
5.8 |
8.8 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
Discount |
64% |
55% |
26% |
16% |
44% |
40% |
Source: Refinitiv. Note: Prices as at 1 October 2019. Claranova is a research client of Edison Investment Research.
|
|
Research: Healthcare
The last several weeks have been volatile for Immunicum and illustrate how complicated immunotherapy efficacy trials can be. On 29 August 2019, the company released top-line results from the Phase II MERECA study with ilixadencel plus the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The co-primary survival endpoint at 18-months lacked positive signals, which led to a negative reaction in the share price. The full analysis released on 25 September 2019 added much more detail, demonstrating that ilixadencel may have a more profound and durable effect (statistical analysis not available), while the survival data may be premature. The next date to watch is January 2020, when Immunicum will report updated survival results at 24 months and median OS if reached. Until then we keep our valuation at SEK2.0bn or SEK21.6/sh.
Get access to the very latest content matched to your personal investment style.