Last close As at 17/08/2026
EUR1.35
▲ 0.01 (0.97%)
Market capitalisation
EUR271m
Research: TMT
MGI – Media and Games Invest (MGI) continues to steadily gain market share in a difficult trading environment. It is the leading mobile open web supply-side platform on both Android and iOS in North America, and second on Android and fifth on iOS in EMEA. Q323 organic net revenue was 1% up on Q322, with early benefits from the €10m annualised cost savings plan helping to lift the adjusted EBITDA margin to 29% (Q322: 26%). The fundamentals for MGI are positive, with its vertical integration giving an efficient market proposition and earlier acquisitions providing a sound basis for its connected TV offering. The withdrawal of personal identifiers on Google should give further impetus, which we feel is not yet reflected in the rating.
MGI – Media and Games Invest |
Building a major global adtech player |
Q323 results |
Software |
8 December 2023 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analysts
MGI – Media and Games Invest is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MGI – Media and Games Invest (MGI) continues to steadily gain market share in a difficult trading environment. It is the leading mobile open web supply-side platform on both Android and iOS in North America, and second on Android and fifth on iOS in EMEA. Q323 organic net revenue was 1% up on Q322, with early benefits from the €10m annualised cost savings plan helping to lift the adjusted EBITDA margin to 29% (Q322: 26%). The fundamentals for MGI are positive, with its vertical integration giving an efficient market proposition and earlier acquisitions providing a sound basis for its connected TV offering. The withdrawal of personal identifiers on Google should give further impetus, which we feel is not yet reflected in the rating.
Year end |
Revenue |
Adjusted EBITDA* |
PBT* |
EPS* |
EV/EBITDA* (x) |
P/E |
12/21 |
252.2 |
71.2 |
26.9 |
19.8 |
6.8 |
4.3 |
12/22 |
324.4 |
93.2 |
30.3 |
13.5 |
4.8 |
6.3 |
12/23e |
303.0 |
93.2 |
20.8 |
9.5 |
4.8 |
9.0 |
12/24e |
325.5 |
102.5 |
32.9 |
15.4 |
4.3 |
5.5 |
Note: *PBT and EPS are normalised, excluding amortisation of acquired intangibles, exceptional items and share-based payments.
Q3 results show revenues returning to growth
Net revenues were down 11%, which, adjusting for disposals and forex, turns to a small increase of 1%. Reported EBITDA was boosted by the release of earn-out liability for the AxesinMotion (which remains a sound acquisition but had missed targets in a tough macro environment), partially offset by restructuring-related sums, with a net gain of €40.6m. The improvement in adjusted EBITDA margin to 29% underpins our full-year assumptions, with potential upside given the trailing 12-month (TTM) figure of €95m, ahead of the flat like-for-like €93.2m guided at the interims. Good cash conversion in the quarter is likely to follow through in Q4, which should bring leverage below 3.0x (2.9x on our modelling). Our figures are unchanged on these results.
Fundamental market changes give large opportunity
The programmatic adtech market is highly inefficient, with many layers of complexity each scraping a slice of cost. MGI, through its Verve brand, has built a vertically integrated solution that is gaining traction and growing share. We believe that many advertisers, publishers and intermediaries are ill-prepared for the upcoming withdrawal of Google cookies and that this presents Verve with a major opportunity to accelerate its presence with its established AI-driven solutions.
Valuation: Well below peers
Adtech shares have had mixed performances in 2023, with scale a clear benefit. MGI is now trading at a considerable discount to peers across pure adtech and relevant content categories. Parity of rating on EV/revenue and EV/EBITDA across FY23–24e would see the price climb to €3.45 (from €3.57 in June).
Investment summary
Company description: One-stop shop for programmatic advertising
MGI operates an ad-software platform that matches global advertiser demand with publisher ad inventory, with the added benefit of the first-party data from its own games portfolio and from the installed software development kit (SDK) base of 20k apps, allowing it to optimise transactions. This owned and operated inventory also allows MGI to roll out changes to the SDKs for testing MGI before going live with external publishers. MGI is best known for its capabilities in the mobile space but it also covers the full range of digital devices served by programmatic advertising, including connected TV. MGI has grown through acquisition and organically, with the pieces now in place to build further scale. Currently, revenues are 90% weighted to the supply (publisher) side, with ambitions to gain further penetration on the demand (advertiser) side. The group is already using AI and machine learning in its ad-targeting capabilities and is well placed to take advantage of industry changes around privacy. MGI is headquartered in Sweden, but the bulk of its revenues are generated in North America.
Valuation: Well below peers and DCF
Trading across the adtech sector has been very mixed this year, with weak underlying demand and substantial shifts in the landscape undermining confidence. The largest players in the space have continued to build share and this has been reflected in stronger share price performances. We have looked at MGI in the context of pure adtech players, adtech companies that combine with elements of content and gaming stocks. MGI’s rating is at a notable discount to all three groups. Were MGI’s shares to trade at parity across EV/revenue and EV/EBITDA averaged across FY23–24, the shares would be trading at €3.45, down from €3.57 when we last did this exercise in June. We have also sense checked this with a discounted cash flow (DCF) at varying weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and terminal growth rates. Using a WACC of 10% and terminal growth of 2%, we derive a value of €3.31.
Financials: Set for a better H223
Full year guidance was unchanged on the Q3 figures, although our view is that the risk for adjusted EBITDA is now on the upside. This is despite continued adverse trading conditions restricting revenue growth. With increased efficiency – partly from a €10m cost-savings initiative, partly from ongoing operational efficiencies such as platform integrations – we model adjusted EBITDA margins trending up across FY23–25. We model leverage returning to management’s targeted range of 2.0–3.0x by the year-end, having topped out at 3.7x, and at 3.2x TTM at end Q323. Debt is primarily in the form of listed bonds, 90% of which reach maturity in FY26/27, at which point refinancing options may be more advantageous. Roughly 65% of the bonds are hedged.
Sensitivities: Centred on market
Management characterises the reductions in market pricing for advertising inventory at 20–30% down on the prior year. In this context, maintaining revenues at prior year levels (adjusted for currency and disposals) is a considerable achievement. Management indicated on the Q3 call at the end of November that there have been some early signs of improvement, and a stronger economic and consumer outlook should be quickly reflected in improving yields. The adtech ecosystem is highly complex and arguably does not act in the best interests of its end users, with multitudinous players and a lack of transparency. MGI has a goal of ‘making advertising better’, which should align it more closely with both demand- and sell-sides.
MGI’s financial performance depends additionally on the interest rate environment, given the extent of debt on the balance sheet. As this burden eases (as modelled), M&A opportunities should resume a stronger role in the group’s development.
Company description: Global adtech solutions
MGI is emerging as a significant player in the adtech space, building on its leading position in mobile to offer a cross-platform, vertically integrated solution to both advertisers and publishers. It retains its exposure to games as a valuable source of high-quality, first-party data, but this is no longer separated out as a revenue stream or source of profit. MGI’s operating subsidiaries provide technical solutions for app publishers to monetise and advertise their apps and generate revenues. This is achieved by matching the ad publishers’ ad inventory with demand from advertising companies, targeting specific types of app users in particular geographies.
MGI’s origins lie in the games segment, where gamigo was founded in 2000. It was purchased by CEO Remco Westermann out of Axel Springer in 2012 to form the core on which the gaming operation has been built. It was restructured over the next couple of years into a format that was better aligned to grow through M&A and achieve the critical mass needed to attract users and, crucially, the data that comes with them. A good variety of high-quality content is an essential element of driving user acquisition at a cost that will enable attractive returns.
Through delivering content attractive to users, MGI has built an extensive pool of first-party data. The value and utility of this resource has risen markedly as concerns over privacy have climbed the agenda both of regulators and of the public over the last few years. With the changes made to Apple’s tracking to an opt-in basis and the forthcoming withdrawal by Google of third-party cookie usage (now set for 2024), the traditional model of monetisation through advertising has been fundamentally compromised.
Why maintain the games exposure?
MGI has over 5k casual and mobile games and an audience of over 1bn registered players accumulated over the years. It has assembled its own software development kits (SDKs), bringing together a group of tools that enable the programming of mobile applications, now being used within more than 20k direct publisher integrations. This has the following advantages:
■
this degree of global scale is very attractive to publishers and to advertisers;
■
it allows the company access to very large volumes of permissioned data; and
■
Verve is able to test and improve its offering on a very fast turnround basis, considerably cheaper than having to use external resources.
Over recent periods, the group has withdrawn from massive multiplayer online games and sold its 7% stake in Enad Global 7 in Q422 (funds received in H123).
Major global adtech in mobile and connected TV
With its data lake built on predominantly casual gamers, and fewer legacy providers, the mobile adtech in-app space has provided fertile ground for MGI to build its presence. This has been achieved through a combination of organic growth and acquisition.
Exhibit 1 shows the graphic the company has compiled to illustrate how the various elements and key individuals have joined over time. It also shows how MGI has effectively moved beyond the acquisition phase, with vertical integration now the overriding objective.
Verve is now the key go-to-market brand (www.verve.com) for both the mobile and the connected TV (CTV) programmatic offerings. It describes itself as providing ‘advertising innovation at scale by combining complementary technologies and a suite of products for both demand and supply. We empower marketers and publishers within the open internet by optimising the entire value chain across the omnichannel customer journey.’ In this context, the open internet is used to describe the web outside of what are termed the walled gardens – these being the likes of Facebook, X etc – where data is garnered and retained within the site rather than made available for independent use.
|
Exhibit 1: Company ‘genealogy’ from 2000 |
|
|
Source: MGI. Note: Founders are Remco Westermann, CEO, and Jens Knauber, COO; Paul is Paul Echt, CFO; Sameer is Sameer Sondhi, chief revenue officer and in charge of Verve; Rami is Rami Alanka, general manager A&I and Prassana is Prasanna Prasad, chief technology officer of Verve. |
What does Verve do?
The language around adtech is notorious for its use of obtuse terminology, which we attempt to demystify further in the section of this report describing the industry below.
At its core, Verve provides a platform on which publishers can sell the ‘space’ within their digital content that is suitable for advertisements – otherwise known as ad inventory. This is done faster than the eye can detect, on a programmatic (automated) basis that allows advertisers to bid for the most suitable spaces and for the successful bidder to populate it with their content.
Its supply-side (ie from the publishers’ end) platform is now integrated into over 20k apps through in-house written SDKs. Combined with the inventory available from MGI’s own games within gamigo, this gives a significant resource of inventory to the market, all on a privacy-first basis, ie with no personal identifiers used as part of the process. This is extremely important, given the rapid shifts happening currently in the digital advertising market.
From the opposite end, ie the advertisers and their agencies, Verve is working with more than 85 third-party demand-side platforms (DSPs) as well as its own internal DSPs. Verve operates a selfserve, cloud-based platform, enabling advertisers to create, manage and optimise data-driven digital advertising campaigns across all relevant formats and devices. Clients are primarily Fortune 500 companies or the major holding company agencies. As indicated on the Q3 results call, Verve is now building direct relationships with agencies and advertisers, as well as via the DSPs.
Strategy to build on strengths in shifting market
MGI’s development is illustrated in Exhibit 2, which shows how it has transitioned from the original games company to a vertically integrated adtech software platform. With this process complete, the group’s strategy is currently focused on building on the position within the market now established. Management cites reports showing that it is the leading SSP on both Google Play and the Apple App Store in North America; in Europe it is second-placed on Google and third on Apple; in Asia Pacific it is second on both platforms; and in Latin America is it second on Google and sixth on the Apple App Store.
The ambition to build on this position is based on the following strategies.
Targeting further gains in market share for in-app advertising
Gaining further ground is going to require a greater degree of sophistication, including upgrading the capabilities in video, increasing rendering capacity to keep pace or outpace the shift in the market. Enhancements to ATOM, the group’s advertising targeting solution based on anonymised behavioural and contextual data, should help drive further penetration of the existing client base and support winning new business. This includes greater sophistication in the segmentation and adding additional signals, but also involves improving and standardising the integration into the wider ecosystem.
Verve has also been working on machine-learning optimisation to reduce cloud-computing and associated costs, ensuring that the suite is working well with the latest versions of the Apple adnetwork, SKAN 4.0 and facilitating developments within the Google privacy sandbox.
Driving further AI-driven data optimisation
|
Exhibit 2: Elements of data optimisation programme |
|
|
Source: MGI – Media and Games Invest |
MGI has been utilising machine learning and artificial intelligence for some years in developing its tech stack and the algorithms used. It has a distinct advantage in being able to train its Moments.AI on its own first-party data generated within the games operations and iterate quickly and efficiently. With the impending withdrawal of cookies within Google, being able to define and target audiences in real time is a strong commercial attribute. In a study carried out by an independent third party for Verve, a comparative was conducted to test targeting sports-related content in Germany against the leading market alternatives, looking at how content can be contextually targeted on the open web on the same day that it is published. This capability allows advertisers to showcase their ads alongside highly relevant new content, capitalising on its significant audience. The test, across a 24-hour period, showed 96% of impressions appearing on the same day, against 50% and 36% from the alternative providers. For highly relevant sportsrelated URLs/websites, the differential was far greater, at 86% compared with 5% and 4%.
Moments.AI covers all the over 700 standard IAB interest segments and the 11 brand safety segments established by the World Federation of Advertisers, known as GARM (the Global Alliance for Responsible Media).
Building a strong position in CTV
CTV has emerged rapidly as a key channel, particularly in the US, with considerable momentum as advertisers start to recognise its potential for immediate sales conversion. The nature of the medium means that the opportunities for meaningful targeting are abundant. Statista cites that 74% of TV households in the US have a smart TV in 2023, up from 58% in 2020. Management highlights research showing ad spend in the medium increasing at a CAGR of 25% over FY20–25 and 17% across FY22–25. Verve Group has been involved in this segment for some time, having acquired video-monetisation specialist Nexstar (founded in 2014 and formerly known as LKQD) in 2021.This is a fully integrated part of the Verve privacy-first omnichannel offering.
CTV already accounts for 14% of MGI’s media volume (H123). The Q323 presentation highlighted that the group already reaches 60% of US households, adding value from the cross-platform approach, which includes cross-platform targeting. Inventory is supplied by partners such as Sling, Discovery+, LG, Rakuten TV, Paramount, Vizio, Friendly.TV, Hearst Television and Xumo, while, on the demand side, partners include the likes of McDonalds, Amazon, Samsung and Wells Fargo and clients of Magnite. The breakdown of media volume in group revenue is not disclosed but, if the market research is correct, a growth rate in CTV ad spend of 17% is well ahead of that projected for digital advertising spend of 7%, so we would anticipate CTV becoming a more meaningful element in MGI’s mix.
The existing plans for expanding Verve’s reach include new targeting types, such as language and livestream, and additional features, plus migration of the offering onto the Verve platform (itself a substantial undertaking). In the mid-term, Verve plans to add support for real-time bidding for ad pods in additional to individual ad slots (in CTV, the ads served are grouped together in ‘pods’; preroll, midroll and endroll). Real-time bidding, therefore, has an additional layer of complexity to juggle. Verve is also reworking its inventory management tools to increase efficiency, updating for changes to placement guidelines and putting together new deals on programmatic CTV.
Focus on further growing the demand-side
MGI boosted its presence on the demand-side/DSP with the purchase (by Verve) of Dataseat in July 2022 (price undisclosed but in the high-single digits of sterling millions initial consideration with an earn-out element based on performance to FY25). Dataseat gave the group a substantive step up in privacy-safe mobile capability, but the balance within MGI is still heavily weighted to the supply side, which generated 90% of group revenues in H123. The ambition is to improve this balance. Verve also has the DSP elements within the CTV referred to above and other smaller previous acquisitions.
The DSP landscape is ripe for consolidation, with the major customers pushing to deal with fewer counterparties.
Improve vertical integration across the tech stack
Any group put together through acquisition will inevitably have a number of legacy systems that are not always capable of integration. MGI has worked to prioritise those elements and stacks, which needed technical underpinning. Some stacks, such as those at Dataseat, are still under earn-out, limiting the degree of change that can be undertaken.
The acquisition of Smaato in July 2022 added a substantial mobile-first but multi-channel and brand-focused SSP. It still operates as a separate team to PubNative, an earlier mobile ad tech purchase, but the teams are working much more closely together so the degree of duplication is reducing.
A full integration of the currently configured Verve Group would probably take three to five years, but the benefits should start to accrue along the way.
As well as the integration, there remains work to be done on optimisation. In particular, management is evaluating further investments in insight and measurement, as well as adding capabilities in audio. There are also gains to be made from moving to a hybrid delivery capability, from a purely cloud-based model.
Overview of progress
At the CMD in August, we filmed the following interview with CEO Remco Westermann, where he summarised the group’s positioning and outlook.
|
Exhibit 3: ETV interview with CEO, Remco Westermann |
|
|
Source: Edison Investment Research |
Shifting sands of adtech
The programmatic advertising industry has developed in a manner that has baked in large-scale inefficiencies and lacks transparency, meaning that advertisers derive a relatively small proportion of value from their spend. Media specialist Ebiquity estimates that around 20% of digital adspend is wasted through inefficiency and fraud. In the context of a global digital adspend market estimated by Dentsu at $424.3bn for the current year, it is a considerable sum of money spent with no potential for earning a return.
The LUMA Partners consultancy provides useful graphics, known as LUMAscapes, which clearly show the complexity of the market. While the one produced covering the mobile advertising market may not be quite so crowded as that for display, the sheer numbers of participants imply a considerable degree of inefficiency.
Consolidation inevitable
Given the complexity and the crowded landscape, the market is obviously not operating to the best interests of its users, who would prefer to deal efficiently, with fewer counterparties.
With pressure being brought to bear by the demand side and the supply side, consolidation at some point is inevitable. While a core group of four or five would probably be optimal to avoid too much concentration, it is unlikely that even twice that level will be reached due to the amount of private-equity funding that has been invested. While this money has backed genuine innovation and technological creativity, many are not scalable and will eventually either fade away or become part of larger platforms at some stage. Verve has been doing exactly this – seeking out innovation that does more than add scale for its own sake.
Breaching the walled gardens
The ‘walled gardens’, such as Facebook, Amazon and Google account for around one-third of time spent on the internet but around two-thirds of the advertising spend. The patience of US regulators has been stretched (see the summary judgement of the US Department of Justice on abusive market practices at Google) and the EU has also been flexing its muscles.
In retail media, one of the fastest growing areas of ad spend, Amazon is leveraging its huge quantities of first-party data, which it uses to determine its most advantageous sales categories. However, the status quo is unlikely to shift straight away.
Increasing recognition of the limitations for competition of the walled gardens has been pushing more participants to see what can be done on the open web. As businesses on the open web scale, there is always the danger that they become their own walled gardens protecting and harnessing their own data. Organisations such as Disney and Walmart have enormous troves of first-party data that is only currently being used to a limited extent. The development of the CTV market is building similar large data lakes for the likes of Roku and Netflix.
With such a shifting landscape, being an efficient and transparent partner of scale is an attractive concept and it is this territory that Verve/MGI is seeking to occupy. It is also important to continue to innovate and be flexible to meet the needs of a demanding client base, which may include further acquisitions. However, any M&A strategy has to be discriminating, both in terms of the technology and in the prices paid. For MGI, activity is likely to pick up as debt falls back into the targeted range, or if the payback on a deal is such that leverage will move back in that range in the short-term.
Management well-versed in games sector and M&A
The senior management team is headed up by Remco Westermann, who has been CEO and chairman since 2018. He has extensive experience in the mobile and online entertainment industry. He founded Bob Mobile (which later became CLIQ Digital, a client of Edison Investment Research) and helped build the mobile media company Sonera Zed, managing its German subsidiary as CEO. Previously, Remco was a manager at leading companies such as Balance Point and a consultant at Rost & Co. In the dynamic, highly competitive and fast-growing games market, Remco has built up a leading and fast-growing online games company through a successful M&A strategy, following the acquisition and repositioning of gamigo in 2012. In 2018, MGI came about via a reverse merger when Westermann acquired a majority stake in the publicly listed Solidare Real Estate Holding and Remco was appointed CEO and executive director of the board. gamigo was acquired and integrated and all real estate assets were subsequently sold, with the business model changing to ‘buy, integrate, build and improve’ in the gaming and media sectors. He has an indirect holding in 26.9% of the equity and an option for 15 million shares running through to FY30 at €2.60 per share, so obviously well out of the money. This option was granted to enable an ESOP phantom share programme for employees of the MGI group. It is contractually secured that these 15 million options can only be used for such ESOP programmes at a strike price of €1.30. Bodhivas shall, in the case of profits, transfer such profits to the capital of MGI without retaining any profits for Bodhivas.
Paul Echt has been group CFO since 2018, prior to which he gained more than 10 years’ experience in the tech and finance industry as a finance manager. He previously held positions at UniCredit Bank in Berlin, Munich and New York and Shopgate in San Francisco. Paul holds 45,320 shares in the company.
COO Jens Knauber joined in 2012 with more than 10 years’ experience as a manager in the gaming industry, with over 300 published games. He held a series of leadership positions at Hamburg publisher dtp entertainment and has a strong background in games publishing with a wide global network in the gaming industry. He is responsible for gamigo.
Sensitivities
There are a number of factors that investors should bear in mind when investing in MGI:
■
Macro influences on demand and pricing: Advertising volumes revenues are closely tied to the underlying economies and, in particular, the health of consumer markets. In periods of weak demand, the prices achieved for ad inventory will be under pressure and higher volumes will be needed to maintain revenues. This has been the case for MGI over recent reporting periods.
■
FY2 expectations of recovery: Current FY2 expectations for both MGI and the wider industry are factoring in an element of recovery in underlying markets, which could be further delayed by geopolitical concerns impacting consumer confidence.
■
Changes to the market: The advertising ecosystem is complex and dominated by a handful of very large players, such as Alphabet and Meta. MGI may be disadvantaged by moves made by these large players or by changes in the regulatory environment (albeit that these latter currently look to be playing in MGI’s favour).
■
Ad fraud: Bad actors are prevalent across the sector and MGI’s operations are unlikely to be immune, with possible repercussions in terms of customer acquisition and volumes. Increasing vertical integration across the tech stack should mean fewer possible entry points.
■
Leverage: Management has set guidance for net leverage at 2.0–3.0x. At the end of September this was 3.2x TTM, down from 3.6x TTM at end Q322. Management is guiding to the ratio dropping back into the target zone by the year end (which allies with our modelling), but the scope for acquisitive expansion is obviously curtailed currently.
■
Interest rates and stock market rating: The elevated prevailing interest rates is self-evidently unfavourable for a group such as MGI, with bonds that carry a coupon at a margin over Euribor. The higher interest rate environment obviously increases the cost of capital but does have the advantage of reducing the amount of competition for attractive assets. However, the reduction in the group’s stock market rating over recent periods reduces the utility of equity in negotiating earnings’ enhancing transactions.
■
Key person exposure: We believe that MGI’s share price and potentially its operations could be affected by the loss of key management, particularly CEO Remco Westermann.
■
Corporate structure: Remco Westermann (currently a board member and CEO) is the largest shareholder in MGI through his indirect holding in Bodhivas, which holds 27.1% of group equity and €1.2m of bonds. He also holds an option for 15 million shares running through to FY30 at €2.60, solely for the purpose of meeting the requirements of the group’s ESOP.
Valuation
We have looked at MGI’s valuation firstly in comparison with a wide peer set (there being no one directly comparable immediate group) and then sense checked this approach with a DCF.
Valuation compared with various peer sets
We evaluate MGI compared to three sets of peers: (relatively) pure adtech, ad software combined with content (games or other) and (relatively) pure gaming. Although this leads to a cumbersome peer table, it allows us to see the slightly different dynamics. With a slight improvement in sentiment in the adtech sector after difficult trading in FY22, current year EV/EBITDA ratings here have edged ahead of the ad software companies. The gaming companies are now the lowest ranking of the three subsectors.
Exhibit 4: Peer group performance and ratings
|
Price |
ytd perf |
Market cap |
Net debt |
EV/sales (x) |
EV/EBITDA (x) |
P/E (x) |
||||||||
Company |
(local ccy) |
(%) |
(€m) |
(€m) |
FY0 |
FY1e |
FY2e |
FY0 |
FY1e |
FY2e |
FY0 |
FY1e |
FY2e |
||
Ad-tech |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
The Trade Desk |
70.5 |
57 |
31,735 |
(1,352) |
20.6 |
17.2 |
14.3 |
49.9 |
43.6 |
36.4 |
67.0 |
55.5 |
49.9 |
||
Pubmatic |
16.7 |
30 |
779 |
(162) |
2.5 |
2.6 |
2.3 |
6.7 |
9.2 |
7.9 |
30.0 |
766.2 |
|
||
Viant Technology |
6.3 |
57 |
364 |
(193) |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
- |
6.7 |
5.6 |
- |
- |
- |
||
Magnite |
8.1 |
(24) |
1,023 |
374 |
2.9 |
2.8 |
2.6 |
8.3 |
9.1 |
8.2 |
10.9 |
15.3 |
11.4 |
||
AcuityAds Holdings |
1.5 |
(29) |
52 |
(52) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
DoubleVerify Holdings |
33.2 |
51 |
5,184 |
(248) |
11.5 |
9.4 |
7.6 |
37.7 |
29.6 |
24.6 |
129.6 |
95.5 |
73.3 |
||
Integral Ad Science Hold |
14.6 |
66 |
2,116 |
127 |
5.9 |
5.1 |
4.4 |
19.5 |
15.2 |
13.1 |
380.6 |
430.5 |
51.1 |
||
LiveRamp Holdings |
33.2 |
41 |
1,996 |
(459) |
3.2 |
2.8 |
2.6 |
36.0 |
24.6 |
16.3 |
65.8 |
45.4 |
25.3 |
||
Digital Turbine |
4.7 |
(69) |
433 |
309 |
0.6 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
4.0 |
4.9 |
7.6 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
7.6 |
||
Tremor |
143.5 |
(46) |
242 |
(84) |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
1.2 |
2.1 |
1.8 |
3.0 |
8.4 |
4.5 |
||
Criteo |
24.9 |
(4) |
1,292 |
(349) |
1.1 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
4.0 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
9.6 |
9.4 |
9.4 |
||
YOC |
12.1 |
(9) |
42 |
(1) |
1.7 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
11.5 |
10.1 |
7.8 |
17.7 |
16.7 |
12.1 |
||
Median |
|
13 |
|
2.5 |
2.6 |
2.3 |
9.9 |
9.2 |
7.9 |
23.9 |
31.1 |
12.1 |
|||
Ad-software and content |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AppLovin |
37.5 |
256 |
11,561 |
2,094 |
5.2 |
4.6 |
3.9 |
13.8 |
10.2 |
8.2 |
- |
43.0 |
23.0 |
||
IronSource |
29.5 |
3 |
10,302 |
1,047 |
8.8 |
5.8 |
5.2 |
- |
32.5 |
19.9 |
- |
- |
- |
||
Azerion |
2.2 |
(60) |
263 |
178 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
8.0 |
6.6 |
5.7 |
- |
18.0 |
13.2 |
||
Future |
851 |
(33) |
1,162 |
560 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
5.1 |
5.3 |
5.2 |
5.4 |
6.1 |
6.1 |
||
Median |
(15) |
|
3.5 |
3.2 |
2.9 |
8.0 |
8.4 |
6.9 |
5.4 |
18.0 |
13.2 |
||||
Gaming |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Embracer Group |
23.0 |
(51) |
2,600 |
1,518 |
2.7 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
6.4 |
5.2 |
4.4 |
- |
5.8 |
6.0 |
||
Stillfront Group |
11.7 |
(33) |
536 |
345 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
3.8 |
4.5 |
5.7 |
4.7 |
||
Paradox Interactive |
210.0 |
(1) |
1,966 |
(54) |
10.8 |
9.1 |
8.0 |
15.8 |
14.2 |
11.4 |
30.9 |
39.5 |
27.1 |
||
Modern Times Group |
84.7 |
(5) |
936 |
(356) |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
5.1 |
4.7 |
4.5 |
14.8 |
13.9 |
12.7 |
||
Rovio Entertainment |
9.2 |
52 |
708 |
(106) |
1.9 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
11.1 |
10.4 |
9.5 |
21.2 |
- |
18.1 |
||
Team17 |
165.0 |
(63) |
281 |
(54) |
1.5 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
4.3 |
5.0 |
4.0 |
6.8 |
8.7 |
7.0 |
||
Median |
|
(17) |
|
|
1.7 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
5.8 |
5.1 |
4.5 |
14.8 |
8.7 |
9.9 |
||
Total average |
(6) |
2.6 |
2.4 |
2.2 |
7.9 |
7.6 |
6.4 |
14.7 |
19.2 |
11.7 |
|||||
MGI - Media & Games Invest |
0.9 |
(48) |
142 |
199 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
5.3 |
3.7 |
4.6 |
6.2 |
8.7 |
5.4 |
||
Premium/(discount) to ad-tech |
(61) |
|
|
(45%) |
(42%) |
(41%) |
(47%) |
(60%) |
(42%) |
(74%) |
(72%) |
(55%) |
|||
Premium/(discount) to ad-software and content |
(34) |
|
|
(61%) |
(54%) |
(52%) |
(34%) |
(56%) |
(33%) |
14% |
(51%) |
(59%) |
|||
Premium/(discount) to gaming |
(32) |
|
|
(18%) |
6% |
2% |
(8%) |
(28%) |
4% |
(58%) |
1% |
(45%) |
|||
Premium/(discount) to total |
|
(42) |
|
|
(46%) |
(38%) |
(37%) |
(33%) |
(52%) |
(28%) |
(58%) |
(55%) |
(54%) |
||
Source: Refinitiv, Edison Investment Research. Note: Prices as at 1 December 2023.
MGI’s shares are trading at a discount across EV/sales, EV/EBITDA and P/E for FY22, FY23e and FY24e. With P/E more variable (due to tax regimes, etc), were the shares to trade at EV/sales and EV/EBITDA parity to the averages of these peers across FY23 and FY24, MGI’s share price would be €3.45. When this exercise was last carried out in June, the resultant parity level was €3.50. Overall, the performance of the ‘pure’ adtech businesses has improved over Q323. The Trade Desk, far and away the largest player in the adtech sector, has particularly benefitted from both its scale and its exposure to the faster growing segments of CTV and retail media.
Stocks which combine adtech and content have seen weaker share price performances year-to-date, except for Applovin, where the benefits of scale and early adoption of AI have boosted financial performance. Of the three groups, the gaming stocks are the lowest rated by the markets.
DCF points to higher valuation
We have also looked at a DCF calculated on varying WACC and terminal growth rates. We previously chose an illustrative WACC of 9% and have now revised this to 10%, given the underlying interest rate and macro environment. This now more closely reflects MGI’s actual forecast cost of debt at 10.7%. At a 2% terminal growth rate, the valuation indicated is €3.31. The reduction from the figure of €3.91 that we cited in June reflects the lower forecasts and this higher WACC.
Exhibit 5: DCF (€/share) at varying WACC and terminal growth rates
Terminal growth rate |
||||||
WACC |
0.00% |
1.00% |
2.00% |
3.00% |
4.00% |
|
12.5% |
1.67 |
1.79 |
1.95 |
2.14 |
2.37 |
|
12.00% |
1.84 |
1.99 |
2.16 |
2.38 |
2.65 |
|
11.50% |
2.03 |
2.20 |
2.40 |
2.65 |
2.97 |
|
11.00% |
2.24 |
2.43 |
2.67 |
2.96 |
3.34 |
|
10.50% |
2.47 |
2.69 |
2.97 |
3.32 |
3.77 |
|
10.00% |
2.73 |
2.99 |
3.31 |
3.72 |
4.28 |
|
9.50% |
3.01 |
3.31 |
3.70 |
4.20 |
4.88 |
|
9.00% |
3.33 |
3.69 |
4.14 |
4.75 |
5.60 |
|
8.50% |
3.69 |
4.11 |
4.66 |
5.41 |
6.48 |
|
8.00% |
4.10 |
4.60 |
5.26 |
6.20 |
7.60 |
|
Source: Edison Investment Research
Financials
Following the interim results, we adjusted our modelling to reflect management’s revised guidance. This is that FY23 revenue will come in around the same level as prior year (when adjusted for disposals and currency), an 11% reduction on the previously published number, while adjusted EBITDA was guided to come in at the same published level as FY22, implying an improvement in underlying adjusted EBITDA margin.
Ad impressions starting to rebuild
Looking at the quarterly figures in greater detail, the early signs of rebuild in ad impressions are encouraging. The industry pattern is generally sequential quarterly growth across the year, with a greater weighting to Q4, which benefits from Thanksgiving, Black Friday and Christmas, all of which attract higher levels of ad spend.
Exhibit 6: Key quarterly statistics
€m |
Q122 |
Q222 |
Q322 |
Q422 |
Q123 |
Q223 |
Q323 |
Ad impressions (bn) |
156 |
161 |
172 |
181 |
166 |
181 |
186 |
Software clients >€100k revenue |
479 |
513 |
546 |
551 |
557 |
559 |
559 |
Revenue |
65.9 |
78.1 |
87.6 |
92.9 |
68.8 |
76.2 |
78.3 |
y-o-y revenue growth (%) |
27% |
37% |
39% |
16% |
4% |
-2% |
-11% |
q-o-q revenue growth (%) |
-18% |
19% |
12% |
6% |
-26% |
11% |
3% |
EBITDA |
16.9 |
20.0 |
21.4 |
26.5 |
17.4 |
20.04 |
63.7 |
Adjusted EBITDA |
17.6 |
21.1 |
23.0 |
31.5 |
19.1 |
21.3 |
23.1 |
Adjusted EBITDA margin (%) |
27% |
27% |
26% |
34% |
28% |
28% |
29% |
Source: Company
With Q1–3 FY23 revenues of €223.3m already booked, a full-year estimate of €303m clearly looks achievable, given the inherent weighting of advertising budgets to the final quarter of the calendar year. This is despite continuing softness in industry pricing, which demands that higher volumes must be achieved to generate the same revenues. TTM adjusted EBITDA of €95m indicates that the current forecast for the full year of €93.2m ought to be more readily achievable given the operational gearing effect of higher H2 seasonal volumes.
Exhibit 7: Summary historical and forecast financials
€m |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023e |
2024e |
Revenue |
140.2 |
252.2 |
324.4 |
303.0 |
325.5 |
Operating expenses (excluding D&A, share-based payments and one-off costs) |
(104.5) |
(187.1) |
(239.7) |
(180.2) |
(228.1) |
Adj. EBITDA |
35.8 |
71.2 |
93.2 |
93.2 |
102.5 |
EBITDA |
35.8 |
65.0 |
84.8 |
122.8 |
97.4 |
D&A |
(7.4) |
(16.3) |
(43.3) |
(15.5) |
(15.8) |
Normalised operating profit |
28.4 |
48.8 |
41.5 |
107.3 |
81.6 |
Amortisation from acquired intangibles |
(8.1) |
(12.0) |
(14.9) |
(13.4) |
(13.4) |
Exceptional items |
(7.0) |
(4.7) |
(27.1) |
(6.5) |
(3.5) |
Share-based payments |
(2.2) |
(1.5) |
(1.6) |
(1.6) |
(1.6) |
Reported operating profit |
11.0 |
30.6 |
(2.1) |
85.8 |
63.1 |
Pre-tax profit |
3.9 |
14.9 |
(11.4) |
(0.7) |
14.4 |
Net income |
3.1 |
16.1 |
(20.3) |
0.3 |
10.7 |
Free cash flow |
6.1 |
25.0 |
88.2 |
40.4 |
52.1 |
Net debt/(cash) |
57.7 |
198.6 |
273.9 |
267.5 |
247.6 |
Net debt to adjusted EBITDA |
1.6 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
2.4 |
Revenue growth (%) |
67.1 |
79.8 |
28.7 |
-6.6 |
7.4 |
Adj. EBITDA margin (%) |
25.5 |
28.2 |
28.7 |
30.8 |
31.5 |
Normalised operating margin (%) |
20.2 |
19.3 |
12.8 |
35.4 |
25.1 |
Reported operating margin (%) |
7.9 |
12.1 |
(0.6) |
28.3 |
19.4 |
PBT margin |
2.8 |
5.9 |
(3.5) |
(0.2) |
4.4 |
Net income margin |
2.2 |
6.4 |
(6.3) |
0.1 |
3.3 |
Source: Company accounts, Edison Investment Research
With the increasing degree of automation, greater proportion of CTV revenues in the mix and larger volumes put through the platform, the trend in margin should be positive. Along with the programme to remove €10m of operating costs through efficiency gains such as de-duplication, and progress in platform integrations, we are comfortable modelling forward margins in excess of 30%.
|
Exhibit 8: Long-term revenue and margin trend |
|
|
Source: Company accounts, Edison Investment Research |
Cash flow supports investments
The interim numbers showed an absorption of working capital of €11.3m related to higher levels of receivables due to larger payments from publishers following strong Q123 trading – primarily a timing issue. This is expected to flatten out over H2, with less lumpy trading patterns, and our modelling for the full year shows the working capital absorption settling at €3.2m. The more substantive pressure on operating cashflow is the increase in interest cost, which totalled €23.2m in H123, up from €14.4m in H122.
The short-term focus is on improving the free cash flow and reducing the leverage and the indicated €10m cost-saving programme will contribute here, as will the lower levels of capital expenditure.
The longer-term record on cash generation clearly shows the emphasis on building the business through capex, both internal/maintenance capex and through acquisition (see Exhibit 10 below).
|
Exhibit 9: Long-term cash generation and capex |
|
|
Source: Company accounts, Edison Investment Research |
It is also informative to look at the cumulative picture over FY19 through FY22 (see Exhibit 11), as this splits out the maintenance and the acquisitional spend as MGI has put the various elements of its tech stack into place as the company has transitioned away from its earlier gaming-focused proposition.
|
Exhibit 10: Cumulative cash flow across FY19–FY22 |
|
|
Source: Company accounts, Edison Investment Research |
Balance sheet supported by bond issuance
■
MGI’s debt is primarily in the form of quoted bonds, rather than bank debt. In November 2020, MGI issued a €80m senior secured floating-rate callable bond, followed by a €40m tap issue in March 2021. The group subsequently placed a €150m bond issue under its existing senior secured floating-rate callable bond in June 2021, priced at 102% of par. As part of this, existing bondholders agreed to increase the bond framework to €350m. MGI placed another subsequent bond issue of €80m in September 2021, priced at 103% of par.
■
The interest rate consists of a nominal interest rate of 5.75% pa plus three months Euribor, with quarterly payments. The bond runs to November 2024, with early repayment options in November 2023 and May 2024.
■
In April 2022, MGI completed the book building of a directed share issue of 9,569,378 new ordinary A shares, at a price of SEK31.35, which was oversubscribed. The investors comprised a number of Swedish and international institutional investors, including Oaktree Capital Management, the company’s largest institutional shareholder. This raised SEK300m and rebalanced the balance sheet following the acquisition of AxesInMotion.
■
In June 2022, MGI placed €175m of new senior secured bonds at 98.00% of par, with a floating rate coupon of Euribor plus 6.25% and repurchased €115m of existing senior secured bonds. This offering generated strong demand from primarily institutional investors based in the Nordics, continental Europe, North America and Asia, ultimately allowing the bonds to be priced at 98.00% of par. The bond has a maximum term to June 2026, with early repayment opportunities in December 2024, June 2025 and December 2025. These bonds currently trade at a mid-price of €0.9725.
■
In March 2023, €176.2m of the bonds maturing in 2024 were bought back, leaving €34m of the 2024 remaining in the market. These currently trade at a mid-price of €0.9988.
■
Also in March 2023, MGI placed €225m of a maximum €300m of senior secured floating-rate callable bonds due March 2027. The coupon is three months Euribor plus 7.25% and the bonds were placed at par and are currently trading at €0.9700.
Across the portfolio, 90% of the bonds now mature in 2026 and 2027, giving plenty of room for manoeuvre on refinancing options in what may be a more favourable interest rate environment. Approximately 65% of the group’s bond interest rates are hedged.
Reduced earn-out liabilities
Alongside the Q323 results, MGI released €62.8m of the earnout of the AxesInMotion acquisition, bought in April 2022, €9.4m as a ‘normal’ adjustment and a further €53.3m as a fair-value adjustment. This is the result of AxesInMotion not reaching the EBITDA targets set at the time of purchase. This should not necessarily be interpreted that the acquisition has not been successful, more that the short-term performance has been held back by weak markets. There remains another €14.9m of earnout liability for it remaining on the MGI balance sheet dependent on EBITDA performance in FY24.
Debt back inside leverage target range
As at end-September, MGI was carrying €305.4m of net interest-bearing debt, being cash and cash equivalents of €110.4m and debt of €415.8m. Our modelling indicates a year-end net debt figure of €267.5m (predicated on an improving working capital performance in Q4). This is 2.9x our adjusted EBITDA estimate for the year, so would achieve a retraction back into the target range of 2.0–3.0x, which management has guided to be the case.
Our modelling points to a further fall to €247.6m of net debt for end FY24, being 2.4x our adjusted EBITDA forecast.
Exhibit 11: Financial summary
€000s |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023e |
2024e |
||
Year end 31 December |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
IFRS |
||
INCOME STATEMENT |
|||||||
Revenue |
|
|
140,220 |
252,166 |
324,444 |
303,000 |
325,515 |
Operating costs excl. D&A |
(104,469) |
(187,124) |
(239,691) |
(180,206) |
(228,098) |
||
Adj. EBITDA |
|
|
35,751 |
71,216 |
93,153 |
93,180 |
102,529 |
EBITDA |
|
|
35,751 |
65,042 |
84,753 |
122,794 |
97,417 |
Operating profit (before amort. and excepts.) |
|
|
28,380 |
48,768 |
68,288 |
69,566 |
81,578 |
Amortisation of acquired intangibles |
(8,137) |
(11,964) |
(14,853) |
(13,368) |
(13,368) |
||
Exceptionals |
(6,993) |
(4,708) |
(27,100) |
(6,500) |
(3,500) |
||
Share-based payments |
(2,209) |
(1,466) |
(1,613) |
(1,613) |
(1,613) |
||
Reported operating profit |
20,243 |
36,804 |
26,618 |
48,086 |
63,098 |
||
Net Interest |
(7,140) |
(21,919) |
(37,983) |
(48,793) |
(48,684) |
||
Joint ventures & associates (post tax) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Exceptionals |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Profit Before Tax (norm) |
|
|
21,240 |
26,850 |
30,304 |
20,773 |
32,895 |
Profit Before Tax (reported) |
|
|
13,104 |
14,887 |
(11,365) |
(707) |
14,414 |
Reported tax |
(1,194) |
1,169 |
(9,064) |
0 |
(4,882) |
||
Profit After Tax (norm) |
15,281 |
28,018 |
21,194 |
14,114 |
23,393 |
||
Profit After Tax (reported) |
2,707 |
16,055 |
(20,429) |
(707) |
9,533 |
||
Minority interests |
(352) |
(7) |
(88) |
(1,000) |
(1,200) |
||
Discontinued operations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Net income (normalised) |
15,633 |
28,019 |
21,056 |
15,114 |
24,593 |
||
Net income (reported) |
3,058 |
16,061 |
(20,341) |
293 |
10,733 |
||
Average Number of Shares Outstanding (m) |
85.5 |
141.7 |
156.2 |
159.2 |
159.2 |
||
EPS - basic normalised (c) |
|
|
18.29 |
19.77 |
13.48 |
9.49 |
15.44 |
EPS - normalised fully diluted (c) |
|
|
16.35 |
19.77 |
12.07 |
8.52 |
13.86 |
EPS - basic reported (c) |
|
|
3.58 |
11.33 |
(13.02) |
0.18 |
6.74 |
Dividend (c) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
||
Revenue growth (%) |
167.1 |
179.8 |
28.7 |
(6.6) |
7.4 |
||
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%) |
25.5 |
28.2 |
28.7 |
30.8 |
31.5 |
||
Normalised Operating Margin (%) |
20.2 |
19.3 |
21.0 |
23.0 |
25.1 |
||
BALANCE SHEET |
|||||||
Fixed Assets |
|
|
293,466 |
650,495 |
823,637 |
831,854 |
845,426 |
Intangible Assets |
272,829 |
605,746 |
791,284 |
798,641 |
811,353 |
||
Tangible Assets |
1,742 |
4,681 |
5,522 |
6,382 |
7,242 |
||
Investments & other |
18,895 |
40,068 |
26,831 |
26,831 |
26,831 |
||
Current Assets |
|
|
92,376 |
283,598 |
221,022 |
215,223 |
239,226 |
Stocks |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Debtors |
37,009 |
97,497 |
65,085 |
54,789 |
58,860 |
||
Cash & cash equivalents |
46,254 |
180,156 |
149,992 |
154,489 |
174,421 |
||
Other |
9,113 |
5,945 |
5,945 |
5,945 |
5,945 |
||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
78,205 |
243,433 |
219,471 |
212,433 |
215,251 |
Creditors |
30,037 |
53,754 |
68,711 |
55,226 |
58,044 |
||
Short term borrowings |
6,089 |
32,020 |
31,903 |
39,644 |
39,644 |
||
Other financial liabilities |
30,155 |
137,611 |
97,515 |
97,515 |
97,515 |
||
Other non-financial liabilities |
11,924 |
20,048 |
21,342 |
20,048 |
20,048 |
||
Long Term Liabilities |
|
|
130,792 |
383,168 |
503,443 |
436,794 |
436,794 |
Long term borrowings |
97,855 |
343,925 |
389,386 |
382,386 |
382,386 |
||
Other long term liabilities |
32,937 |
39,243 |
114,057 |
54,408 |
54,408 |
||
Net Assets |
|
|
176,846 |
307,493 |
321,745 |
397,849 |
432,607 |
Minority interests |
(60) |
(59) |
1,211 |
1,211 |
1,211 |
||
Shareholders' equity |
|
|
176,786 |
307,434 |
322,956 |
399,060 |
433,818 |
CASH FLOW |
|||||||
Operating Cash Flow |
2,707 |
16,055 |
(20,429) |
(707) |
9,533 |
||
Depreciation & amortisation |
15,508 |
28,238 |
58,135 |
28,904 |
29,206 |
||
Working capital |
(4,543) |
(5,714) |
55,284 |
(3,189) |
(1,253) |
||
Exceptional & other |
4,072 |
1,167 |
(2,755) |
1,613 |
1,613 |
||
Tax |
112 |
1,514 |
6,002 |
0 |
0 |
||
Net finance cost |
7,347 |
23,583 |
37,983 |
48,793 |
48,684 |
||
Net operating cash flow |
|
|
25,203 |
64,843 |
134,220 |
75,414 |
87,782 |
Capex |
(19,098) |
(39,844) |
(46,007) |
(34,992) |
(35,649) |
||
Acquisitions/disposals |
(18,609) |
(255,790) |
(138,000) |
(1,641) |
(5,000) |
||
Equity financing |
26,876 |
109,338 |
27,900 |
0 |
0 |
||
Dividends |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
(31,304) |
(24,920) |
(53,413) |
(32,422) |
(26,861) |
||
Net Cash Flow |
(16,932) |
(146,373) |
(75,300) |
6,359 |
20,272 |
||
Opening net debt/(cash) |
|
|
36,976 |
57,690 |
198,600 |
273,900 |
267,541 |
FX |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other non-cash movements |
(3,782) |
5,463 |
0 |
0 |
(340) |
||
Closing net debt/(cash) |
|
|
57,690 |
198,600 |
273,900 |
267,541 |
247,609 |
Source: Company accounts, Edison Investment Research
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Research: Healthcare
Shield Therapeutics’ US commercialisation efforts continue to gather steam, with prescription volumes gearing up in Q323 (27,750 prescriptions, a 76% sequential growth over Q2 and higher than the combined H123 figure of 26,284) and net selling price making a strong recovery after dipping in H123 (+24% to $148/prescription). US revenues grew to $4.1m, higher than the combined H1 figure of $3.7m. First-time prescribers grew 27% q-o-q and new prescriptions were up by 87%. More encouragingly, the clinical utility of Accrufer continues to be considered favourably by prescribers, reflected in the 77% repeat writers from Q223. Management has guided for FY23 total prescriptions to be between 100k and 130k, requiring a sequential growth of 65.6% at the lower end, which we see as undemanding given the Q3 run rate and growing momentum (as the expanded salesforce gets more entrenched). We maintain our full-year estimates and continue to value the company at £390.4m.