Last close As at 16/01/2025
GBP0.68
▲ 3.80 (5.90%)
Market capitalisation
GBP196m
Research: Real Estate
Foxtons is at an inflexion point, in terms of both its underlying markets, which are recovering, and the next stage of its development. Revenues have fallen every year since 2016 but grew c 50% in Q1 and are now forecast to grow at a CAGR of 15% pa for the next three years, as sales are strong, lettings are picking up as the London market begins to normalise and Foxtons has been active with M&A. These positives are likely to be boosted by further M&A in lettings, as well as growth in ‘Build to Rent’ (BTR) and regional expansion. While our base case estimates imply a valuation below the current price, we value the shares at up to 129p based on our bull case scenario.
Foxtons Group |
Clear growth plans drive upside potential |
Initiation of coverage |
Financial services |
29 June 2021 |
Share price performance
Business description
Next events
Analyst
Foxtons Group is a research client of Edison Investment Research Limited |
Foxtons is at an inflexion point, in terms of both its underlying markets, which are recovering, and the next stage of its development. Revenues have fallen every year since 2016 but grew c 50% in Q1 and are now forecast to grow at a CAGR of 15% pa for the next three years, as sales are strong, lettings are picking up as the London market begins to normalise and Foxtons has been active with M&A. These positives are likely to be boosted by further M&A in lettings, as well as growth in ‘Build to Rent’ (BTR) and regional expansion. While our base case estimates imply a valuation below the current price, we value the shares at up to 129p based on our bull case scenario.
Year end |
Revenue (£m) |
PBT* |
EPS* |
DPS |
P/E |
Yield |
12/19 |
106.9 |
(1.9) |
(0.3) |
0.0 |
N/A |
N/A |
12/20 |
93.6 |
1.6 |
(0.1) |
0.0 |
N/A |
N/A |
12/21e |
130.1 |
9.5 |
2.5 |
0.5 |
22.5 |
0.9 |
12/22e |
137.7 |
12.5 |
3.3 |
0.8 |
17.2 |
1.5 |
Note: *PBT and EPS are normalised, excluding amortisation of acquired intangibles, exceptional items and share-based payments.
Multiple sales growth channels highlight potential
London, Foxtons’ core market, is beginning to show early signs of recovery with sales volumes and prices increasing, and rental rates being less depressed since February/March 2021. Furthermore, Foxtons is targeting other revenue streams that could add materially to the group from the acquisition of lettings books, increased exposure to the rapidly growing BTR market (Foxtons has a 22% market share) and geographical growth outside London. Foxtons has executed four deals since March 2020, including Douglas and Gordon, adding c £19m to revenue.
Highly leveraged to lettings consolidation
Foxtons’ depressed earnings are highly leveraged to consolidation in the lettings market. To highlight the gearing, we estimate that acquisitions of lettings books totalling £10m could add £5.6m to revenue and c £3.6m to operating profit. These events would add c 0.9p to earnings in a full year, boosting our 2022e base case EPS of 2.4p by nearly 40%. Foxtons’ gearing to incremental revenue, which averages c 75%, leaves it well placed to benefit as its markets recover and it increases its exposure to higher-quality stable and recurring lettings revenue.
Valuation: Bull case suggests value of 129p/share
Our base case shows 2022e EPS of 2.4p, which gives a valuation below the current share price when we apply the average 2014/15 P/E of 17.5x. If we roll over our forecasts to 2023e, our EPS of 2.9p implies a valuation of 50.8p, much closer to the current price. However, we would argue that future growth may not be fully reflected in the share price or our estimates as we do not forecast acquisitions. Our bull case highlights the potential upside in forecasts, where Foxtons is particularly geared to further acquisitions of lettings books as well as growth from BTR, regional expansion and underlying markets. Our bull case scenario suggests potential 2022e EPS of 7.4p, which implies a valuation of 129p when the 17.5x P/E is applied.
Investment summary
Company description: London’s leading estate agency
Foxtons is London’s leading and most widely recognised estate agency, with an 8% market share of available lettings and a c 7% share of the sales commission pool. This is similar in size to the market share of the entire online estate agency market combined. The next largest agent has a c 5% share of the lettings market. Foxtons operates from a network of 57 inter-connected branches, offering a range of residential related services, which breakdown into three separate revenue streams: sales, lettings and mortgage broking. Its network covers 85% of the Greater London area.
Foxtons achieves a 4% higher selling price and an 8% higher rental income on lettings than peers, according to Foxtons’ internal research and supported by consumer consultancy TwentyCi. These attractive outcomes for clients arguably justify Foxtons’ premium commission rates. The best-in-class IT suite also gives Foxtons a competitive advantage.
Valuation: Bull case suggests a valuation of 129p/share
Our base case scenario, our 2022 estimates, shows basic reported EPS for the year of 2.4p and at the current price this implies a P/E of 23.6x. This rating is at the top end of Foxtons’ historical range of 9–27x (average 17.5x) achieved in the 2014–15 period. However, we would argue that future growth may not be fully reflected in the current share price and our estimates. To highlight the leverage of potential earnings outcomes, we estimate that acquisitions of lettings books for £10m could add £5.6m to revenue and c £3.6m to operating profit. These events would add c 0.9p to earnings in a full year, boosting our 2022e base case EPS by c 40%. Our bull case scenario highlights the potential upside in forecasts, where Foxtons is particularly geared to further acquisitions of lettings books as well as growth from BTR, regional expansion and underlying markets. Our bull case scenario suggests potential EPS of 7.4p, which implies a valuation of 129p when a 17.5x P/E is applied.
Financials: Forecasts could prove very conservative
Our 2021 and 2022 forecasts are ahead of consensus, highlighting the attractive position in which Foxtons now finds itself, with material risks, we believe, to the upside. After several years of declining revenues and three years of losses, there is now considerable light at the end of the tunnel. Furthermore, the quality of its revenue has materially improved as lettings revenue has become the dominant income stream, of which c 75% can be considered recurring. We forecast free cash flow (FCF) to more than double from £4.5m in 2020 to c £10.5m in 2022, thus funding investment in the business, M&A, dividends and, potentially, cash returns to shareholders. We expect a year-end net cash position of £22.8m.
Sensitivities: Unavoidable market risk, but upturn expected
Given that Foxtons’ key market is London, the UK’s financial centre, it is sensitive to changes in the financial services sector’s performance and employment rate, in the UK and globally, both positive and negative. Given its operational gearing, this can have a material effect both on the upside and on the downside. Currently, we believe that the market outlook is experiencing an upturn. There are, of course, a range of other sensitivities that can have an impact on the revenue and profitability of the group. Typical sensitivities for Foxtons include:
■
Macro issues: cyclical downturn or upturn, interest rate fluctuations, mortgage availability, changes to taxation (eg, corporation tax, Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) holidays and tax rate changes).
■
Regulatory issues: increased regulation on agents and landlords such as limits on tax deductibility of debt cost, changes to expense deductibility and changes to dividend tax rules, which might be a cost in the short term, but may also attract more business in the long term as the burdens on private and corporate landlords increase.
■
Company specific issues: such as over-paying for acquisitions of lettings books, or poorly executing the home counties and regional expansion.
■
Market issues: working practices have had to change over the last year with people often being forced to work from home. As COVID-19 dies away, there could be material changes to demand that may increase or decrease the number of sales or people’s propensity to rent.
Company description: Foxtons is at an inflexion point
As the leading estate agency in London, and with one of the most iconic brands in the sector, Foxtons has an opportunity to leverage its operations, people and IT platforms as London and the rest of the UK emerge from the COVID-19 crisis. It also has an ungeared balance sheet and cash-generative characteristics that should allow it to expand its services and revenues in both London and other chosen regions of the UK. We forecast year-end net cash of £22.8m and expect a net cash position to be maintained except in exceptional circumstances (eg an attractive, large M&A opportunity at the right price).
Foxtons is the leading London estate agency
Foxtons is London’s leading estate agency with a c 7–8% share of lettings and sales. It operates from a network of 57 inter-connected branches offering a range of residential related services, which breakdown into three separate revenue streams: sales, lettings and mortgage broking. Its network covers 85% of the Greater London area.
Foxtons prides itself on having the best information technology in the market available to employees and clients, which results in Foxtons achieving a 4% higher selling price than peers and an 8% higher rental income on lettings. The IT gives Foxtons a competitive advantage and, arguably, justifies its premium commission rates, although holding rates at a time of market weakness did lead to a loss of market share. Competitors appear now to be rebuilding commission rates, which has led to the reversal of the market share decline.
Foxtons has a single ‘tech stack’ called BOS, which includes a database with over 250 datapoints that model every household in London. This allows clients to manage their property through MyFoxtons, and allows Foxtons to predict customer behaviour and provide value-add consulting services for BTR and New Homes customers. Furthermore, it also reduced the cost per acquisition (CPA) of customers by 23% in 2020 and management asserts that it allows Foxtons to better cross-sell services.
Strategic expansion of services inside and outside London
Foxtons will continue to focus on the higher-density, higher-value London market. That said, it is now planning to break out of London as it sees a low-risk opportunity to expand geographically. It plans to develop a low capital-intensity estate agency in selected markets in the South East outside London, as well as 15 hand-picked urban areas in other parts of the UK that have some similar characteristics to London, for example premium-priced property and markets with an appetite for lettings services.
Historically, the group aimed to achieve an even balance of revenue between the more stable lettings income and the more cyclical sales income. However, in the short term, the former is the subject of greater focus as the lettings market is becoming more complex due to regulations around safety issues for example and lettings books are becoming available to buy from incumbents as in many cases there are succession issues as business owners age. Recent deals have been agreed on c 1.5x historical revenue.
Furthermore, Foxtons has developed and intends to grow its revenue stream from the rapidly expanding institutional BTR sector.
Experienced management team
Foxtons has a strong and experienced management team. The non-executive chairman of Foxtons is Ian Barlow, who is a retired senior partner of KPMG in London. He is also a non-executive director of the Goodwood Estate Company. He has previously served as a senior independent director of Urban and Civic, and Smith and Nephew, as well as being chairman of the board at HM Revenue and Customs for four years until 2016.
Nic Budden is the chief executive officer of Foxtons. He joined the company as COO in 2005 and has been in his current position since 2014. Before joining Foxtons, he held a wide range of international positions at BT Group, Cable and Wireless and Severn Trent Group. The chief financial officer is Richard Harris, who joined Foxtons in 2019 from Laird Plc, where he was group financial controller. He also spent 11 years at Marks and Spencer in numerous senior finance roles.
Foxtons’ chief operating officer is Patrick Franco, who joined the group in 2015. Before coming to Foxtons, he held a number of differing positions in London and New York with Credit Suisse Asset Management. Below the senior management there is a raft of experienced professionals. For example, the average director in the company has a tenure of over 17 years, branch managers 10 years and senior negotiators five years.
Foxtons is well positioned for growth
London, Foxtons’ core market, is beginning to see early signs of recovery with sales volumes and prices increasing (Q1 sales revenue up 50% ex Douglas and Gordon (D&G)), and rental rates being less depressed since February/March (Exhibit 1). Furthermore, Foxtons is targeting other revenue streams that could add materially to group revenue from, for example, the acquisition of lettings books (we assume each £10m investment could add c £5.6m to revenue and c £3.6m to operating profit), increased exposure to the rapidly growing BTR market (currently 5% of lettings revenue, but potentially set to triple in magnitude) and geographical growth outside London, a market opportunity of similar size to its existing London market. We estimate that Foxtons could grow its revenue by c £49m or c 50% over the next three years, even before further acquisitions. The operational gearing impact of this growth is very high and is discussed in the next section.
The London market is at an inflexion point
Foxtons is almost entirely focused on the London market, a market that was heavily disrupted by the effects of Brexit (referendum, negotiations, actual departure) and multiple general elections, and is currently depressed by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. During this extended five-year period, average house price growth has been limited to c 3% pa, but sales volumes fell 43% and 60% in Greater London and Central London respectively, according to the Land Registry.
However, we believe that both the lettings and sales markets are recovering (see charts below) as London, and rest of the UK, head towards a ‘new normal’ as the population returns to work and the rest of the economy opens back up for business. Foxtons’ Greater London region contains 13% of the UK population, and by value accounts for 33% of sales and 38% of UK lettings.
Exhibit 1: Letting demand/supply ratio and rental value change year-on-year |
Exhibit 2: Annual price growth in Prime Central London |
Source: Knight Frank |
Source: Knight Frank |
Exhibit 1: Letting demand/supply ratio and rental value change year-on-year |
Source: Knight Frank |
Exhibit 2: Annual price growth in Prime Central London |
Source: Knight Frank |
Long-term market growth characteristics
London is the UK’s only truly ‘global’ city and Savills forecasts suggest that it will benefit from the effect of a population increase of c 300,000 over the next five years. On the assumption that the average UK household comprises 2.4 people, it implies demand for c 130,000 new dwellings over the period, which is likely to stimulate sales and lettings activity.
Given that London and the rest of the UK have been undersupplied with housing for many years, JLL expects sales prices to rise c 20% over the next five years despite affordability issues. Furthermore, London is the most unaffordable city (average first-time buyer mortgage cost is c 57% of average earnings) in the country, which often implies that renting is a popular alternative to ownership. Rental tenure is expected to increase 11%, and rental rates (prices) are also expected to rise by 17% according to Foxtons’ own published figures. Clearly, the increased sales activity will benefit Foxtons, but the shift to rental will also improve the quality of Foxtons’ income stream, given that c 75% of lettings income is either recurring or semi-recurring (see section titled ‘75% of lettings revenue is considered recurring’).
Exhibit 3: Growth rates in next five years |
Source: Foxtons, Savills, JLL, Edison Investment Research |
Acquisitions of lettings books set to continue
There has been a long history of corporate activity in the estate agency market and this looks set to continue. The most recent high-profile deal was the acquisition at the end of 2020 of the 651-branch network of Countrywide by Connells, which itself had a network of 581 branches at the time of the deal. Both groups included numerous local brands that had been largely pulled together through acquisition. Connells is owned by the Skipton Building Society.
Foxtons itself has agreed four acquisitions in the last year (see Exhibit 4 below), all of which were to secure lettings portfolios that are viewed as having attractive, recurring revenue streams. In total, Foxtons has invested £18.9m and added c 4,500 properties to its own book of tenancies, increasing it by c 25%. It is also worth noting that Foxtons’ landlords tend to stay with the new owner after acquisition. In the case of London Stone, Foxtons acquired 687 tenancies; it sold 15 of the properties through its own network, gained a net seven tenancies and ended the first year with 679 in total. This compares favourably with Foxtons’ repeat business, which ran at 86% in 2019 and 2020.
We believe the trend to consolidate will continue as the market professionalises in response to increased regulatory and compliance requirements for both landlords and agents, and also the entry of institutional landlords, particularly in the BTR sector.
Exhibit 4: Foxtons’ acquisitions since 1 January 2020
Target |
Date |
Cost (£m) |
Revenue (£m) |
PBT (£m) |
EBITDA (£m) |
Location |
Revenue multiple (x) |
Tenancies acquired |
Comment |
|
London Stone |
1 Mar '20 |
2.2 |
1.5 |
0.7 |
- |
Woolwich |
1.5 |
687 |
Lettings and property management |
|
Pillars Estates |
Oct '20 |
0.2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
224 |
Companies House micro company accounts |
|
Aston Rowe |
23 Nov '20 |
2.2 |
1.1 |
0.5 |
- |
Acton and Brook Green |
2.0 |
689 |
Branches and sales activities retained by Aston Rowe |
|
2020 total |
4.6 |
2.6 |
1,600 |
|||||||
Douglas and Gordon |
1 Mar '21 |
14.3 |
16.5 |
- |
0.6 |
Central, South and West |
0.9 |
2,900 |
Includes branch network. Tenancies account for 65% of revenue |
|
Total since 1 Jan 2020 |
18.9 |
19.1 |
4,500 |
Source: Foxtons, Edison Investment Research
Foxtons can drive considerable value from adding lettings portfolios to its existing business because its IT platform has considerable capacity to accommodate greater volumes. In fact, Foxtons claims that it could handle the entire London lettings volumes from its existing infrastructure. This allows Foxtons to achieve attractive synergies (see Exhibit 9).
In Exhibit 4 above, there is a range of revenue multiples that have been agreed to date. The range from 0.9x to 2.0x reflects the fact that in the case of D&G, Foxtons acquired the branch network as well as the lettings book, and in the case of Aston Rowe, the vendors kept the branches and only sold the lettings book. Therefore c 1.5x revenue would be a reasonable benchmark for pure lettings book acquisitions.
Leading share in the rapidly growing ‘Build to Rent’ market
As investment yields have continued to fall in recent years, the attractiveness of investing in the relatively low-yield BTR sector has increased. Institutional investment in the sector was almost non-existent before 2015, but it had steadily grown to an estimated £4bn in 2020 (Knight Frank/RCA). In total, it is estimated that c £41bn had been committed to the sector by the end of 2020, with a further £19bn ready to be deployed in schemes with planning consent.
Foxtons has developed a leading market share in the London BTR markets and now works with some of the largest BTR developers and operators including Grainger, Essential Living, Harrow Council and British Land. BTR differs from traditional lettings because the former focuses on a single development that is mainly/completely rented out, whereas a traditional portfolio of lettings properties could include a ‘pepper pot’ distribution of individual properties.
Furthermore, the predictability of rent collection of such schemes has become more appreciated, adding to its attractions. Last year, in the period between March and August, 95.2% of rents were collected from institutional BTR schemes.
Exhibit 5: Total investment in UK institutional private rented sector (£bn) (PRS) |
Exhibit 6: London BTR sector projected units to 2025 |
Source: Knight Frank, Edison Investment Research |
Source: Knight Frank, Edison Investment Research |
Exhibit 5: Total investment in UK institutional private rented sector (£bn) (PRS) |
Source: Knight Frank, Edison Investment Research |
Exhibit 6: London BTR sector projected units to 2025 |
Source: Knight Frank, Edison Investment Research |
In London, the BTR sector (schemes with 75 units or more) amounted to c 17,000 units. Roughly half of this number was externally managed, of which Foxtons has built a 22% market share, due to data systems, its track record, brand awareness and existing relationships. This implies that c 1,850 of its 21,800 portfolio at the end of December 2020 were BTR units, 8% of the total. On the assumption that Foxtons maintained its market share of the 12,000 units under construction and the 23,000 in planning, BTR could account for c 5,500 units in Foxtons’ portfolio by 2025. On current forecasts, BTR would then account for c 20% of the lettings portfolio at that point, although the fees are lower at c 8%, compared to c 11% on ‘traditional’ lettings.
Exhibit 7: Market share of agents in London BTR sector |
Source: Say Property Consulting, Foxtons |
South East (ex London) and 15 regional markets to attack
Foxtons’ brand awareness in London is very high at 84% (YouGov). Outside of London, it is still a respectable 36%. By harnessing Foxtons’ brand recognition with its sector expertise and strong technology, it is developing a new sales channel outside the capital. Initially, it set up a sales office within the Chiswick Park head office to cover Berkshire and it currently has more than 50 properties on the market for sale.
Foxtons hopes, of course, that this asset-light ‘virtual’ sales office model will be a success and it will then be rolled out into the home counties, targeted areas of South East England and ultimately to 15 targeted urban areas such as Manchester, Leeds and Edinburgh.
This expansion represents a departure from Foxtons’ ‘home turf’ but the scale of the opportunity is similar in size to its London market, which accounts for 33% of UK sales and 38% of lettings by value. The targeted areas account for c 31% of the UK’s sales and 35% of lettings by value. Therefore, in theory, this initiative could double the size of the business over the long term assuming a similar market share to London (c 7–8%), although it could take many years to achieve this. As yet, Foxtons has not publicly set any revenue or margin targets, nor announced any capital investment plans, and expansion is not reflected in our forecasts.
Other diversified sales channels
Foxtons has a China and Hong Kong sales desk, which is partnered with a number of estate agents in China. This operation accounts for c 1% of sales currently and is split c 70%/30% between lettings and sales.
In other moves designed to diversify sales channels, Foxtons is beginning to develop a network of contacts addressing high-yield (versus alternative investments) new home developments across the UK, targeted at London property investors. Typically, Foxtons arranges the purchase of properties off-plan on behalf of investors with a view to adding the lettings to its own portfolio. This is still an embryonic operation, but one that could perhaps grow more rapidly as Foxtons’ regional presence becomes more established.
Operational gearing to drive earnings recovery
In the period since 2015, Foxtons’ revenue has been continually depressed by external factors including the Brexit hiatus, tax changes, the tenancy fee ban and of course COVID-19. Due to the operational gearing of the model, underlying operating profit turned into losses in 2018 and 2019. We believe that this gearing, which averages c 75% across the group, can once again be a positive for the group as the market recovers and Foxtons increases its exposure to the stable income generated by lettings activity. We estimate that revenue could grow by c £44m between 2020 and 2022, which implies operating profit of £11.5m in our base case. However, our bull case suggests higher revenue from expansion and M&A, and material profit if operational gearing assumptions hold.
65% to 85% revenue drop-through to operating profit
Foxtons’ business model is highly operationally geared, which was clearly evidenced between 2016 and 2018 when revenue fell £38.3m to £111.5m, and adjusted operating profit collapsed from £40.9m to a loss of £1.8m. This period excluded the introduction of the tenancy fee ban (from 1 June 2019), which cost Foxtons a further 7% of revenue. This operational gearing exists because a large part of Foxtons’ costs are fixed in the short run and Foxtons has a centralised operating model with a single technology platform. This, in turn, is supported by a branch network populated with skilled, highly incentivised employees. Foxtons should also feel the benefit of c £5m of cost savings that have been taken out of the business since 2019, largely offsetting the tenancy fee ban.
We estimate that the largest revenue stream, Lettings, has a drop-through rate of c 75% on incremental organic revenue growth and a drop-through rate of around 65% on M&A revenue. The latter is demonstrated in Exhibit 9, which illustrates how the £2.6m of annualised revenue generated by the three lettings books purchased in 2020 generated an operating profit of £0.6m. However, once integrated into the Foxtons infrastructure, synergies of £1.1m were realised, implying an underlying operating profit of £1.7m, a 65% drop-through from revenue. After amortisation, the adjusted operating profit contribution totals £1.1m.
Exhibit 8: Revenue drop-through to operating profit |
Exhibit 9: Lettings acquisitions’ profit contribution |
Source: Foxtons, Edison Investment Research |
Source: Foxtons, Edison Investment Research |
Exhibit 8: Revenue drop-through to operating profit |
Source: Foxtons, Edison Investment Research |
Exhibit 9: Lettings acquisitions’ profit contribution |
Source: Foxtons, Edison Investment Research |
75% of lettings revenue is considered recurring
Exhibit 10 below demonstrates the attractive recurring revenue characteristics of Foxtons’ lettings division. 34% of tenancies also include property management activity, often on behalf of absent or overseas landlords. Property management and tenancy renewals are considered recurring revenues, which are collected monthly through the tenancy agreement. Furthermore, over 80% of landlords re-let property through Foxtons after a tenant vacates. Collectively, 75% of lettings revenue is considered recurring and therefore a high-quality predictable income. The remaining 25% typically comes from new property lettings, which replace tenancies that are lost.
Exhibit 10: Recurring revenue characteristics |
Source: Foxtons, Edison Investment Research |
Lettings revenue: Historically stable, reliable and now growing
Between 2012 and 2019, the number of tenancies in the Foxtons portfolio was relatively stable, at around 20,000, and these tenancies generated revenue of between £63m and £69m over the period. The average revenue per tenancy was also relatively consistent, fluctuating between £3,225 in 2014 and £3,560 in 2015, when the lettings market was particularly buoyant. These stable figures lend support to the notion of resilient revenue described above.
Exhibit 11: Lettings revenue stable, reliable and now growing |
Source: Foxtons, Edison Investment Research |
2020 was an interesting year for several reasons; firstly, the COVID-19 pandemic prompted around 10% of Foxtons tenants to ask for rent reductions. This activity led to a c 12% decline in the average annual rent in London and had an impact on most, if not all, landlords and letting agents. Secondly, the last part of the tenant fee ban was felt across the sector, which cost Foxtons another £1.5m in 2020. Finally, and more positively, Foxtons made the decision to begin to buy tenant portfolios thus resulting in the first meaningful increase in the absolute volume of tenancies on the books. This was further boosted in 2021 with the purchase of D&G on 1 March, which added nearly 3,000 tenancies, which typically generated a higher revenue/unit than the existing portfolio.
Capital allocation and dividends
Foxtons’ new growth strategy, introduced at a time when the market was rapidly improving, is likely to result in better revenue and profits, and we estimate that, with a c 90% cash conversion rate, it should give it more flexibility in the future to consider capital allocation. Its main priorities are to invest in the business and its people, but it will now consider further M&A in the lettings market, and only after that will it consider returning cash to shareholders. That said, we believe Foxtons is minded to invest in the business, execute M&A and pay dividends. Further share buybacks will probably have to wait.
Prioritising free cash flow from operations
Historically, Foxtons was a cash-generative business, paying away 80–90% of its earnings as dividends in 2014 and 2015, and executing an £11m share buyback in 2016. However, with the decline in revenue and profits since then, dividends were initially reduced and have not been declared at all since 2018. This looks likely to change as revenue and margins are rebuilt. The management team’s ranking of capital priorities are as follows:
■
ensure sufficient liquidity to manage the business through the cycle;
■
continue investment in people and technology;
■
acquire high-quality lettings businesses;
■
maintain a strong balance sheet (with net cash of c £10–12m at all times); and
■
return excess cash to shareholders.
Dividends to return in respect of 2021, further share buybacks
The last priority in the list above is to return excess cash to shareholders. The company completed a £3m share buyback programme in April 2021 at a weighted average price of 58p, partially returning some of the £22m of capital that was raised in the placing in April 2020 at 40p/share. The placing was designed to protect the business from uncertainty in the early weeks of the pandemic and to allow management to make decisions for the long term. It also allowed Foxtons to repay its revolving credit facility and ensure that the company could exit the pandemic in a sound financial position.
From here, however, cash returns are likely to be carried out in the form of an ordinary dividend representing 35–40% of profit after tax. In the current year, this is likely to be a very modest amount given the improving but low profitability. However, the positive outlook and operating leverage give us optimism that higher and more meaningful payouts are probable further out.
Exhibit 12: Foxtons’ EPS and DPS 2013–23e |
Source: Foxtons, Edison Investment Research |
The buyback suggests that management is alert to the notion of returning surplus cash to shareholders. However, any future share buybacks will depend on the level of M&A activity, which is expected to take precedence over returning cash to shareholders. Considering that the lettings market is very fragmented (Foxtons enjoys the highest market share of new lettings deals at c 8%) and is consolidating rapidly, we believe further share buybacks are unlikely over our forecast period.
Financials
Our forecasts are ahead of consensus estimates, highlighting the exciting position in which Foxtons now finds itself. After several years of declining revenues and three years of losses, there is now considerable light at the end of the tunnel. Furthermore, the quality of the revenue has materially improved as the largely recurring Lettings revenue has become the dominant income stream. FCF should grow, thus funding investment in the business, M&A, dividends and, potentially, cash returns to shareholders.
Revenue set to grow for the first time in six years
2021 should mark the turnaround in the fortunes of Foxtons after five tough years of declining revenues as the impact of several unhelpful events fade away.
In 2021, we expect a much-improved sales market as pent-up demand is satisfied, and Foxtons will also reap the benefit from a full-year contribution of the three acquisitions made in 2020, and 10 months’ contribution from the D&G acquisition. In total, we expect revenue to increase from £93.6m in 2020 to £130.1m in 2021, an increase of 39%.
In addition to the revenue growth and M&A benefits, Foxtons should feel the benefit of c £3m of cost savings that have been taken out of the business since 2019, offsetting the tenancy fee ban.
The other notable change is the shift in the revenue mix from Sales to better-quality Lettings income. In 2015, the split was 48%/46% in favour of Sales. In 2021 it is expected to be 58%/34% in favour of Lettings. We believe lettings is likely to remain the dominant revenue stream, assuming Foxtons continues to be acquisitive in this space. Each £10m of spend could result in c £5.6m of revenue.
At the year end we anticipate that Foxtons will generate a profit after three years of post-tax losses and declare a small dividend.
The table below shows a bridge of revenue, cost and profit from 2019 to 2021e and 2022e. This in effect looks through the ‘noise’ created by the pandemic and clearly highlights the various elements that have an impact on our forecasts.
Exhibit 16: Revenue, cost and profit bridge, 2019 to 2022e (£m)
Revenue |
Cost |
Adj. profit |
Comment |
||
2019 |
106.9 |
(107.6) |
(0.7) |
Base starting point |
|
Organic lettings growth |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
Revenue flat ex tenant fee ban (vols up 10.9%, rates down 14.6%) |
|
Organic Sales growth |
6.2 |
(1.2) |
4.9 |
Volume up 9.1%, rate up 5%. 80% drop through |
|
Organic mortgage broking growth |
1.1 |
(0.7) |
0.5 |
c 40% drop through |
|
2020 lettings M&A |
2.6 |
(1.5) |
1.1 |
In line with guidance |
|
D&G |
14.7 |
(13.7) |
1.0 |
10 months from 1 March, plus c 7% growth y-o-y. 7% margin. Post £1m amortisation |
|
Tenant fee ban (inc offset) |
(1.5) |
0.0 |
(1.5) |
||
Cost reductions |
- |
3.0 |
3.0 |
Network and head office restructuring |
|
|
|||||
2021e |
130.1 |
(121.7) |
8.4 |
||
Organic lettings growth |
2.7 |
(0.8) |
1.9 |
4% growth, 70% drop through |
|
Organic Sales growth |
1.2 |
(0.2) |
1.0 |
3% growth, 85% drop through |
|
Organic mortgage broking growth |
0.4 |
(0.2) |
0.2 |
4% growth, 40% drop through |
|
D&G |
3.3 |
(2.0) |
1.3 |
FY effect, 70% drop through |
|
Organic cost inflation |
- |
(1.2) |
(1.2) |
Underlying cost assumption |
|
2022e |
137.7 |
(126.1) |
11.5 |
Source: Foxtons, Edison Investment Research
Cash flow positive, balance sheet ungeared
We expect Foxtons to generate headline FCF of c £20m in 2021, rising to £22.5m next year, before the impact of lease repayments of £14m and £12m, respectively, implying underlying FCF of £6m and £10.5m in the periods. However, net cash is expected to fall from £37m at the end of December 2020 to £22.8m at the end of this year due to the acquisition of D&G for £14.25m, and a small amount of deferred consideration on another deal.
Foxtons has also invested c £3.1m in IT platform Boomin. Net cash is expected to rise again next year, but with the company in an acquisitive mood, we are not ruling out further deals, which would clearly have an impact on the year-end net debt figure, but are not included in our forecasts.
Exhibit 17: Income statement assumptions
|
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021e |
2022e |
2023e |
|
Tenancy portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenancy portfolio at period start (number) |
19,367 |
19,832 |
19,806 |
19,621 |
19,800 |
21,800 |
25,135 |
25,638 |
|
Organic growth/growth |
465 |
-26 |
-185 |
179 |
400 |
436 |
503 |
513 |
|
Tenancy portfolio at period end, ex M&A |
- |
- |
- |
- |
20,200 |
22,236 |
25,638 |
26,151 |
|
M&A (D&G, 2021) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1,600 |
2,899 |
0 |
0 |
|
Tenancy portfolio at period end (number) |
19,832 |
19,806 |
19,621 |
19,800 |
21,800 |
25,135 |
25,638 |
26,151 |
|
Organic growth |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
2.0% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
M&A |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8.1% |
13.3% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Growth in tenancy portfolio |
|
2.4% |
-0.1% |
-0.9% |
0.9% |
10.3% |
15.6% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
Lettings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lettings units - organic, ex D&G |
19,832 |
19,806 |
19,621 |
19,844 |
18,595 |
23,616 |
24,088 |
24,570 |
|
Revenue per unit (£) |
3,444 |
3,348 |
3,415 |
3,313 |
3,081 |
2,835 |
2,891 |
2,949 |
|
Letting revenue - Organic (£m) |
68.300 |
66.314 |
67.009 |
65.741 |
57.291 |
66.939 |
69.643 |
72.457 |
|
Volume change - Organic |
|
2.4% |
-0.1% |
-0.9% |
1.1% |
-6.3% |
27.0% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
Rental rate change - Organic |
-3.3% |
-2.8% |
2.0% |
-3.0% |
-7.0% |
-8.0% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
|
Growth in Letting revenue - Organic |
|
-0.9% |
-2.9% |
1.0% |
-1.9% |
-12.9% |
16.8% |
4.0% |
4.0% |
Lettings units - D&G only |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2,435 |
2,964 |
2,993 |
|
Revenue per unit (£) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3,756 |
3,756 |
3,794 |
|
Letting revenue - D&G (£m) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
9.149 |
11.133 |
11.357 |
|
Volume change - D&G |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
12.0% |
1.0% |
1.0% |
Rental rate change - D&G |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.0% |
1.0% |
|
Growth in Letting revenue - D&G |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
16.0% |
1.0% |
2.0% |
Letting revenue (£m) |
|
68.300 |
66.314 |
67.009 |
65.741 |
57.291 |
76.088 |
80.776 |
83.813 |
Lettings revenue growth (%) |
- |
-2.9% |
1.0% |
-1.9% |
-12.9% |
32.8% |
6.2% |
3.8% |
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales units - Organic, Ex D&G |
4,026 |
2,962 |
2,529 |
2,423 |
2,034 |
2,746 |
2,801 |
2,857 |
|
Revenue per unit (£) |
13,785 |
14,376 |
14,324 |
13,463 |
13,854 |
14,132 |
14,273 |
14,416 |
|
Sales revenue - Organic (£m) |
55.500 |
42.583 |
36.225 |
32.621 |
28.180 |
38.804 |
39.976 |
41.183 |
|
Volume change - Organic |
|
-27.6% |
-26.4% |
-14.6% |
-4.2% |
-16.1% |
35.0% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
Revenue per unit change - Organic |
5.7% |
4.3% |
-0.4% |
-6.0% |
2.9% |
2.0% |
1.0% |
1.0% |
|
Growth in sales revenue - Organic |
|
-23.4% |
-23.3% |
-14.9% |
-9.9% |
-13.6% |
37.7% |
3.0% |
3.0% |
Sales units - D&G only |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
335 |
408 |
412 |
|
Revenue per unit (£) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
16,667 |
16,834 |
17,002 |
|
Sales revenue - D&G (£m) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5.583 |
6.862 |
7.000 |
|
Volume change - D&G |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.0% |
1.0% |
1.0% |
Sales rate change - D&G |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2.0% |
1.0% |
1.0% |
|
Growth in Sales revenue - D&G |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2.0% |
2.0% |
Sales revenue (£m) |
|
55.500 |
42.583 |
36.225 |
32.621 |
28.180 |
44.387 |
46.837 |
48.183 |
Sales revenue growth (%) |
- |
-23.3% |
-14.9% |
-9.9% |
-13.6% |
57.5% |
5.5% |
2.9% |
|
Mortgage Broking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage broking units - Organic |
4,221 |
4,243 |
4,318 |
4,442 |
4,361 |
5,015 |
5,216 |
5,424 |
|
Revenue per unit |
2,109 |
2,062 |
1,915 |
1,921 |
1,853 |
1,927 |
1,927 |
1,927 |
|
Mortgage revenue - Organic (£m) |
8.900 |
8.751 |
8.269 |
8.532 |
8.079 |
9.662 |
10.049 |
10.451 |
|
Volume change - Organic |
|
11.0% |
0.5% |
1.8% |
2.9% |
-1.8% |
15.0% |
4.0% |
4.0% |
Revenue per unit change - Organic |
-3.4% |
-2.2% |
-7.1% |
0.3% |
-3.6% |
4.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Growth in Mortgage revenue - Organic |
|
7.2% |
-1.7% |
-5.5% |
3.2% |
-5.3% |
19.6% |
4.0% |
4.0% |
Mortgage revenue (£m) |
|
8.900 |
8.751 |
8.269 |
8.532 |
8.079 |
9.662 |
10.049 |
10.451 |
Mortgage revenue growth (%) |
- |
-1.7% |
-5.5% |
3.2% |
-5.3% |
19.6% |
4.0% |
4.0% |
Source: Foxtons, Edison Investment Research. Note: D&G= Douglas and Gordon.
Exhibit 18: Revenue and profit detail from income statement (£m)
|
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021e |
2022e |
2023e |
|
Revenue |
|||||||||
Lettings |
68.300 |
66.314 |
67.009 |
65.741 |
57.291 |
76.088 |
80.776 |
83.813 |
|
Sales |
55.500 |
42.583 |
36.227 |
32.621 |
28.180 |
44.387 |
46.837 |
48.183 |
|
Mortgage Broking |
8.900 |
8.751 |
8.269 |
8.532 |
8.079 |
9.662 |
10.049 |
10.451 |
|
Other |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total Revenue |
132.700 |
117.648 |
111.505 |
106.894 |
93.550 |
130.137 |
137.663 |
142.447 |
|
Revenue growth (%) |
-11.4% |
-11.3% |
-5.2% |
-4.1% |
-12.5% |
39.1% |
5.8% |
3.5% |
|
Total costs |
(113.889) |
(108.778) |
(113.337) |
(107.577) |
(91.646) |
(121.704) |
(126.181) |
(128.862) |
|
Adjusted operating profit |
|||||||||
Lettings |
- |
- |
- |
4.213 |
6.335 |
6.993 |
8.681 |
9.896 |
|
Sales |
- |
- |
- |
(6.262) |
(5.849) |
(0.501) |
0.725 |
1.464 |
|
Mortgage broking |
- |
- |
- |
1.366 |
1.418 |
1.941 |
2.076 |
2.225 |
|
Total adjusted operating profit |
18.811 |
8.870 |
(1.832) |
(0.683) |
1.904 |
8.433 |
11.481 |
13.585 |
|
Growth in Adjusted operating profit (%) |
-54.0% |
-52.8% |
-120.7% |
-62.7% |
-378.8% |
342.9% |
36.1% |
18.3% |
|
Adjusted operating profit margin (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lettings |
- |
- |
- |
6.4% |
11.1% |
9.2% |
10.7% |
11.8% |
|
Sales |
- |
- |
- |
-19.2% |
-20.8% |
-1.1% |
1.5% |
3.0% |
|
Mortgage broking |
- |
- |
- |
16.0% |
17.6% |
20.1% |
20.7% |
21.3% |
|
Total adjusted operating margin (%) |
|
14.2% |
7.5% |
-1.6% |
-0.6% |
2.0% |
6.5% |
8.3% |
9.5% |
Drop-through rate; Revenue increase to operating profit (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lettings (Growth - 70%, M&A - 65%) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-25.1% |
3.5% |
36.0% |
40.0% |
|
Sales (Growth - 85%, M&A 75%) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-9.3% |
33.0% |
50.0% |
55.0% |
|
Mortgage broking (Growth - 40%) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-11.5% |
33.0% |
35.0% |
37.0% |
|
Group |
|
129.4% |
66.0% |
174.2% |
-24.9% |
-19.4% |
17.8% |
40.5% |
44.0% |
Source: Foxtons, Edison Investment Research
Exhibit 19: Financial summary
Year end 31 December, IFRS |
£m |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021e |
2022e |
2023e |
|
INCOME STATEMENT |
||||||||
Revenue |
|
|
111.5 |
106.9 |
93.6 |
130.1 |
137.7 |
142.4 |
Normalised operating profit |
|
|
(0.3) |
0.6 |
3.8 |
11.4 |
14.5 |
16.5 |
Amortisation of acquired intangibles |
(0.2) |
(0.6) |
(0.8) |
(1.2) |
(1.0) |
(1.0) |
||
Exceptionals |
(15.7) |
(5.7) |
(1.1) |
(0.5) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Share-based payments |
(1.3) |
(0.7) |
(1.0) |
(1.8) |
(2.0) |
(1.9) |
||
Other |
(0.0) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Reported operating profit |
(17.6) |
(6.3) |
0.8 |
7.9 |
11.5 |
13.6 |
||
Net Interest |
0.0 |
(2.4) |
(2.2) |
(1.9) |
(1.9) |
(1.9) |
||
Exceptionals |
0.3 |
(0.1) |
(0.0) |
(0.1) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Profit Before Tax (norm) |
|
|
(0.0) |
(1.9) |
1.6 |
9.5 |
12.5 |
14.6 |
Profit Before Tax (reported) |
|
|
(17.2) |
(8.8) |
(1.4) |
6.0 |
9.5 |
11.7 |
Reported tax |
0.0 |
1.0 |
(1.8) |
(1.1) |
(1.8) |
(2.2) |
||
Net income (normalised) |
(1.5) |
(2.1) |
(2.1) |
5.3 |
7.7 |
9.5 |
||
Net income (reported) |
(17.2) |
(7.8) |
(3.2) |
4.8 |
7.7 |
9.5 |
||
Basic average number of shares outstanding (m) |
275 |
275 |
314 |
327 |
325 |
326 |
||
EPS - basic normalised (p) |
|
|
(0.01) |
(0.32) |
(0.08) |
2.55 |
3.30 |
3.80 |
EPS - diluted normalised (p) |
|
|
(0.01) |
(0.32) |
(0.08) |
2.53 |
3.28 |
3.77 |
EPS - basic reported (p) |
|
|
(6.25) |
(2.83) |
(1.02) |
1.48 |
2.38 |
2.91 |
Dividend (p) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.52 |
0.83 |
1.02 |
||
Revenue growth (%) |
-5.2 |
-4.1 |
-12.5 |
39.1 |
5.8 |
3.5 |
||
Normalised Operating Margin (%) |
-0.3 |
0.5 |
4.1 |
8.8 |
10.5 |
11.6 |
||
BALANCE SHEET |
||||||||
Fixed Assets |
|
|
130.9 |
178.7 |
173.4 |
180.3 |
170.7 |
162.2 |
Intangible Assets |
101.5 |
101.0 |
103.5 |
107.6 |
108.7 |
109.8 |
||
Goodwill |
9.3 |
9.3 |
11.4 |
11.4 |
11.4 |
11.4 |
||
Tangible Assets |
17.2 |
13.0 |
10.5 |
22.4 |
19.8 |
17.2 |
||
Right of use assets |
0.0 |
51.4 |
44.4 |
35.4 |
27.4 |
20.4 |
||
Contract assets |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
||
Investments & other |
2.6 |
3.3 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
||
Current Assets |
|
|
32.4 |
30.2 |
52.6 |
40.0 |
45.6 |
50.2 |
Contract assets |
0.5 |
1.0 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
||
Debtors |
13.7 |
13.4 |
13.9 |
18.7 |
19.8 |
20.5 |
||
Cash & cash equivalents |
17.9 |
15.5 |
37.0 |
20.7 |
27.0 |
33.1 |
||
Other |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
(1.1) |
(2.9) |
(5.1) |
||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
(22.0) |
(27.9) |
(29.2) |
(31.1) |
(29.9) |
(28.4) |
Creditors |
(13.7) |
(10.5) |
(10.3) |
(14.3) |
(15.1) |
(15.7) |
||
Lease liabilities |
0.0 |
(9.7) |
(10.8) |
(10.8) |
(10.8) |
(10.8) |
||
Contract liabilities |
(2.5) |
(6.3) |
(7.7) |
(7.7) |
(7.7) |
(7.7) |
||
Other |
(5.7) |
(1.4) |
(0.4) |
1.7 |
3.7 |
5.8 |
||
Long Term Liabilities |
|
|
(17.9) |
(65.2) |
(62.4) |
(49.3) |
(37.5) |
(25.4) |
Lease liabilities |
0.0 |
(46.2) |
(40.7) |
(28.8) |
(18.8) |
(8.9) |
||
Contract liabilities |
(1.1) |
(1.3) |
(1.1) |
(1.1) |
(1.1) |
(1.1) |
||
Other long-term liabilities |
(16.8) |
(17.8) |
(20.6) |
(19.5) |
(17.6) |
(15.4) |
||
Net Assets |
|
|
123.3 |
115.8 |
134.5 |
139.9 |
148.9 |
158.6 |
Shareholders' equity |
|
|
123.3 |
115.8 |
134.5 |
139.9 |
148.9 |
158.6 |
CASH FLOW |
||||||||
Op Cash Flow before WC and tax |
(13.2) |
(2.6) |
4.3 |
12.1 |
15.5 |
17.6 |
||
Depreciation - Right of use assets |
0.0 |
9.8 |
9.4 |
9.0 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
||
Impairment of goodwill |
9.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Branch asset impairment |
2.7 |
4.3 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Gain on disposal of PPE etc |
0.1 |
(0.4) |
(0.5) |
(0.5) |
(0.5) |
(0.5) |
||
Working capital |
1.3 |
(2.6) |
(0.6) |
(0.9) |
(0.3) |
(0.2) |
||
Exceptional & other |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Decrease in provisions |
1.2 |
0.8 |
(0.8) |
(1.0) |
(1.0) |
(1.0) |
||
Share based payment charges |
1.3 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
||
Cash settlement of share incentive plan |
0.0 |
(0.4) |
0.0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
||
Tax |
(1.5) |
0.2 |
0.2 |
(1.1) |
(1.8) |
(2.2) |
||
Net operating cash flow |
|
|
1.8 |
9.8 |
14.7 |
19.9 |
22.4 |
23.1 |
Capex |
0.2 |
(0.3) |
(0.4) |
(0.4) |
(0.4) |
(0.4) |
||
Acquisitions/disposals |
(2.0) |
(0.2) |
(3.9) |
(17.6) |
(0.1) |
(0.1) |
||
Net interest |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
||
Dividends |
(0.7) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(1.7) |
(2.7) |
||
Repayment of lease liabilities |
0.0 |
(12.0) |
(10.0) |
(14.0) |
(12.0) |
(12.0) |
||
Purchase of own shares |
0.0 |
(0.1) |
(0.3) |
(2.7) |
(0.3) |
(0.3) |
||
Net proceeds from issue of ord. Shares |
0.0 |
0.0 |
21.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Other |
0.0 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
||
Net Cash Flow |
(0.7) |
(2.4) |
21.5 |
(14.2) |
8.4 |
8.1 |
||
Opening net debt/(cash) |
|
|
(18.6) |
(17.9) |
(15.5) |
(37.0) |
(22.8) |
(31.1) |
Closing net debt/(cash) (ex lease liabilities |
|
(17.9) |
(15.5) |
(37.0) |
(22.8) |
(31.1) |
(33.9) |
|
Closing net debt/(cash) (inc. lease liabilities) |
(17.9) |
40.4 |
14.6 |
16.9 |
(1.5) |
(19.5) |
Source: Company accounts, Edison Investment Research
|
|
|